E. Jean Carroll v. Donald J. Trump and United States of America (poll added!)
Posted: Thu Jan 18, 2024 6:57 pm
How about moving him into another room with a video feed?
Falsehoods Unchallenged Only Fester and Grow
http://www.thefogbow.com/forum/
Cuffs, gag and shock collar.Slim Cognito wrote: ↑Thu Jan 18, 2024 6:57 pm How about moving him into another room with a video feed?
From skimming slightly, I got the impression Habba is trying to show Carroll isn't a prude (so?), she has income and influential friends (e.g., Vanity Fair), and she's old (80). So apparently she shouldn't get any money.SuzieC wrote: ↑Thu Jan 18, 2024 5:24 pm Thanks VERY much for the verbatim play-by-play RealityCheck. In the portion of cross you quoted in post #876 Habba was trying to establish that Ms. Carroll enjoyed and welcomed sexual assault. At least that is what I think she was trying to do. An obnoxious strategy to be sure but do she and her client realize that the line of questioning assumes that sexual assault did in fact occur? Ms. Habba made herself look like a jerk in front of the jury all day long but she probably does not care that she is a laughingstock in the legal community forever.
I read it as she trying to mitigate damages. "You got famous from your allegations and are more popular than ever, and you're gonna die soon anyway, so you don't need millions."pipistrelle wrote: ↑Thu Jan 18, 2024 7:09 pm From skimming slightly, I got the impression Habba is trying to show Carroll isn't a prude (so?), she has income and influential friends (e.g., Vanity Fair), and she's old (80). So apparently she shouldn't get any money.
Exactly.bob wrote: ↑Thu Jan 18, 2024 7:28 pmI read it as she trying to mitigate damages. "You got famous from your allegations and are more popular than ever, and you're gonna die soon anyway, so you don't need millions."pipistrelle wrote: ↑Thu Jan 18, 2024 7:09 pm From skimming slightly, I got the impression Habba is trying to show Carroll isn't a prude (so?), she has income and influential friends (e.g., Vanity Fair), and she's old (80). So apparently she shouldn't get any money.
Like that nut that ran down all those people in the Christmas parade. It was so satisfying seeing the judge boot him and then mute his audio. LOLSlim Cognito wrote: ↑Thu Jan 18, 2024 6:57 pm How about moving him into another room with a video feed?
What a dumb thing to attempt to impeach on. I don’t know what the rules are in federal court in New York, but where I practice(d) you can’t talk to your client about their testimony during breaks in their testimony. I assume that’s universally true. So of course the answer is going to be no. It makes Habba look like she’s fishing with an empty hook, which makes her look sort of desperate.Habba: Ms. Carroll, have you spoken to your counsel about your testimony since yesterday?
Carroll: No.
That is what she’s trying to do, but it never works. That’s why it’s dumb.
Good catch on the question about EJC's age. I was wondering where Habba was going with that. All in all Habba's questioning was pretty despicable.pipistrelle wrote: ↑Thu Jan 18, 2024 7:09 pm
From skimming slightly, I got the impression Habba is trying to show Carroll isn't a prude (so?), she has income and influential friends (e.g., Vanity Fair), and she's old (80). So apparently she shouldn't get any money.
You can have someone else write a letter, but you cant have someone else talk for you to move a motion in a Courtroom.
Donie Dookiepants is such a Mook.
however, if you're a Stephanie Miller fan, this is a complimentmook
noun
ˈmük
slang
: a foolish, insignificant, or contemptible person
One of the points Habba raises is that Carroll deleted emails received that contained death threats. She claims that is tampering with evidence. (was part of the crossexamination)Rolodex wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2024 2:54 pm Habba filed a motion to dismiss. And other stuff.
https://twitter.com/big_cases/status/17 ... 77361?s=20Big Cases Bot@big_cases
New filing: "Carroll v. Trump I"
Doc #271: LETTER addressed to Judge Lewis A. Kaplan from Alina Habba dated January 19, 2024 re: Letter Requesting a Declaration of a Mistrial and other Alternative Relief.…
[full entry below ]
PDF: https://courtlistener.com/docket/184182 ... modal=True
#CL18418220
8:37 PM · Jan 19, 2024
I think the relevance is that Trump talked so much trash about her that people wanted her dead. But it’s a double-edged sword. Why didn’t she save them when they could prove her case.RTH10260 wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2024 4:55 pmOne of the points Habba raises is that Carroll deleted emails received that contained death threats. She claims that is tampering with evidence. (was part of the crossexamination)Rolodex wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2024 2:54 pm Habba filed a motion to dismiss. And other stuff.
https://twitter.com/big_cases/status/17 ... 77361?s=20Big Cases Bot@big_cases
New filing: "Carroll v. Trump I"
Doc #271: LETTER addressed to Judge Lewis A. Kaplan from Alina Habba dated January 19, 2024 re: Letter Requesting a Declaration of a Mistrial and other Alternative Relief.…
[full entry below ]
PDF: https://courtlistener.com/docket/184182 ... modal=True
#CL18418220
8:37 PM · Jan 19, 2024
My question of course is, did team T formally request that evidence be preserved? And did Habba determine thatt the deletions were made after this court case started, or was Carroll refering to older emails. Anyhow, how would they be relevant, it wasn't tfg who sent them, but crazy mmaggats.
I'm sure that she has scores of recent ones that she has not deleted.