Ah, yes, Kenneth Allen. Patriotic Resistance member. Guess that letter he wrote to Arizona's AG, Terry Goddard, didn't result in the investigation of Obama that Kenny was hoping for. He fancies himself something of a legal expert, as this letter demonstrates -- although the cases he cited in this letter are inapposite* (kinda like Orly's). You gotta chuckle about his inappropriate invocation of
Miranda and the Privileges and Immunities Clause of the
Arizona Constitution:
Quote:
TO: Attorney General Terry Goddard
Office of the Attorney General
1275 West Washington Street
Phoenix, AZ 85007
602.542.5025
800.352.8431 (toll free)
Fax 602.542.4085
Request for investigation: re: Barack H Obama; aka Barry Soetoro
Dear Mr. Terry Goddard, my name is Kenneth Allen I think you might remember me in Kenneth Allen vs. Arizona State Bar and State of Arizona # Cv-0820040301, where I voluntarily dismissed the complaint because you and I came to a compromise. Then the State Bar broadcasted my address and phone number in place of an Attorney in Sonoita, Arizona [Kenneth Allen] now retired, even today I still get calls for him. I am writing you today with a special request because I believe our Constitution is worth fighting for!
I am requesting that the vetting process of Barack H Obama; aka Barry Soetoro be investigated for national security reasons and because if he isn’t a Natural Born Citizen pursuant ot Article II section I of the US Constitution he shouldn’t be in office and should be removed from that office.
According to a report in the Washington Post, the Senate unanimously declared McCain to be a “natural born” citizen, meeting the demand of Article 2 of the Constitution, which states, “no person except a natural born citizen … shall be eligible to the office of president.”*
However, even though congress received a similar request to review Barack Obamas; aka. Barry Soetoro birth place, the request was refused. So my question here would be why was McCain vetted and not Obama? More specifically, those who doubted McCain’s eligibility had an opportunity for a review but not those who doubt Obama. Even when I requested an audience with Governor Jan Brewer I received no reply, why.
That violates a liberty and right of every American and every person that lives in Arizona and each and everyone of them have been disenfranchised , because I am a members of a republic, and not a democracy I have a right to know who my president is and if he is legitimate.
“What I’m arguing is that, the Arizona Secretary of state “ at the time was Jan Brewer”, Congress and President Obama have violated my due process under the constitution of the United States of America and ignored our rights under the Ninth and tenth Amendments and the Arizona State constitution.
I have attached a letter from Rep. Eric Swafford of Tennessee, giving consent to Dr Orly Taitz to place his name as a plaintiff against Obama for no being qualified to be president, it is therefore my request that you and your office investigate the vetting process or lack thereof of Barach H Obama, aka; Barry Soetoro. To this date no one knows if he has changed his name legally. This would not disenfranchise the voters of Arizona because what he did violates the very essence of the Constitution. Barack Obama knows he isn’t a Natural Born Citizen, he knows that he became a senator under the clock of fraud, and the same with President. Although I must say he had a lot of help.
Discussion
If he [Barack Obama aka Barry Soetoro] was born in Hawaii, there are four (5) other obstacles to Senator Obama’s eligibility. However according to experts the documents he has posted on his site are a fraud, and were used for seed documents.
1. In and about 1967, Senator Obama moved to Indonesia, took the last name of his stepfather, Soetoro, and went by the name Barry Soetoro. In original legal action filed by Mr. Berg, he presented Senator Obama’s school registration, showing him registered as Barry Soetoro, Citizenship-Indonesian, Religion Islam, signed by L. Soetoro.
2. From 1945, Indonesia has not allowed dual citizenship and, therefore, Ms. Dunham-Obama-Soetoro, Senator Obama’s mother, had to relinquish her son’s U.S.citizenship in order to obtain Indonesian citizenship for him, which would make him ineligible to become a United States President.
3. Regrettably , the United States could not allow dual citizenship with Indonesia at that time, as Indonesia did not allow dual citizenship, and it was prohibited by the Hague Convention of 1930, as interfering with the internal affairs of another sovereign Country.
4. Upon return to the United States in and around 1971-1972, Senator Obama would have been required to go to the then current immigration procedures to regain his U.S. citizenship. There is no record of him ever doing that. Even if he had done so, he would be considered a naturalized citizen and not a “natural born” citizen.
5.Aassuming Senator Obama was born in what is now Kenya, at the time of Senator Obama’s birth in 1961, (now) Kenya was the British Protectorate of Zanzibar and Senator Obama was automatically accorded a form of British citizenship under Section 32(1) of the British Nationality Act of 1948, effective date January 28, 1949, based on his father’s citizenship.
Finally, in 1981, Senator Obama traveled to Pakistan, when there was a ban for U.S. citizens to travel to Pakistan. The only logical possibility for him to do so was by using one of his other passports: Indonesian, Kenyan, or British.
A sacrifice to public interest takes place when a citizen is deprived of a constitutional right or rights, See: Arnett v. Kennedy, 416 U. S. 134, 159, 40 L. Ed. 2d 15, 94 S. Ct. 1633 (1974)(quoting United States Civil Serv. Commission v. National Ass. Of Letter Carriers, 413 U. S. 548 , 579, 37 L. Ed. 2d 796, 93 S. Ct. 2880 (1973) . Obama not showing his “vault” birth certificate, that is the one sealed in Hawaii is in fact a sacrifice to public interest, that’s something we all deserve, he could avoid this by simply having his certificate released from the vault in Hawaii. States cannot diminish rights of the people; Hurtado v. California, 110 U. S. 516, where rights secured by the constitution are involved; there can be no rule making or legislation which would abrogate them, Miranda v. Arizona, supra. If the State refuses to investigate these allegations the State will be violating the rights of the people of Arizona. Article 1 section 9 clause 7 ( title of nobility) John McCain was vetted, however Obama; aka Barry Soetoro were not, so Barack Obama; aka Barry Soetoro needs to be vetted. There is a growing number of suits out there and Americans are made, especially those that were not informed. Discrimination, is the act of treating differently two persons or things under like circumstances, National Life v. United States, 277 U. S. 508, 630, McCain was not treated with the same respect as Obama, nor were the people of Arizona, that sir is discrimination. The denial of equal justice is still prohibited by the constitution, Yick Wo v. Hopkins, supra. All I’m asking for Mr. Goddard is the same respect that was shown to Barack H Obama, it is also your duty under the constitution to protect the rights of the people of Arizona. And just a reminder Mr. Goddard; pursuant to the Ninth Amendment and the Arizona constitution Article 2 § 13 of the “No law shall be enacted granting any citizen, class of citizens, or corporations other than municipal, privileges and immunities which, upon the same terms, shall not equally belong to all citizens”.
Respectfully submitted for investigation,
* "inapposite" = a term that lawyers love to throw around
adj : of an inappropriate or misapplied nature [syn: out of place]