According to the State Bar of Texas, on Aug. 22, 2001, the Supreme Court of Texas accepted the resignation, in lieu of discipline, of Charles Edward Lincoln [#00791116], 40, of New Orleans, La. The court found that on March 17, 2000, Lincoln entered into a plea agreement in Cause No. A-99-CR-275-WS, The United States of America v. Charles Edward Lincoln, wherein he pleaded guilty to falsely representing his social security number (42 USC §408(a)(7)(B)).

As a condition of the plea agreement, Lincoln agreed to resign from the practice of law in Texas in lieu of disciplinary proceedings by the State Bar of Texas.

On Aug. 22, the Supreme Court of Texas accepted the resignation, in lieu of discipline, of Charles Edward Lincoln [#00791116], 40, of New Orleans, La. The court found that on March 17, 2000, Lincoln entered into a plea agreement in Cause No. A-99-CR-275-WS, The United States of America v. Charles Edward Lincoln, wherein he pleaded guilty to falsely representing his social security number (42 USC §408(a)(7)(B)). As a condition of the plea agreement, Lincoln agreed to resign from the practice of law in Texas in lieu of disciplinary proceedings by the State Bar of Texas.

In 2000, Lincoln was convicted in Texas on a federal charge of falsely representing his Social Security number, a felony. As a result, he gave up his license to practice in the state.

Originally charged with five felonies, the case resulted from Lincoln applying for a checking account using a false Social Security number.

In a second matter, he was disbarred from U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas after a federal judge requested an investigation of Lincoln because two of his clients had a falsified receipt. The receipt purported to be from the federal court clerk and represented funds the clients had given Lincoln. The clients believed Lincoln was depositing their money in an escrow account related to their case.

Two days before a hearing by the federal court’s admissions committee, Lincoln went to his clients’ home, instructed them not to tell the judge that he gave them the receipt, which he asked them not to produce, and he gave the clients a cashier’s check for $6,000. He did not appear at the hearing.

Who is he, and what's his relevance?

Last week I was in Philadelphia for the first (and quite possibly, I would hope, the last) hearing in Berg v. Taitz, which I would rate as one of the stupidest lawsuits I’ve ever seen in my life—two unique Political radicals originally dedicated to the same worthy cause of deposing de facto President Barack Obama fighting each other inside the system they would be more likely to reform if they worked together….I was pleased and honored to be on the side of the clear winner in the case, Dr. Orly Taitz….

PROOF OF SERVICE I the undersigned Charles Edward Lincoln, being over the age of 18 and not a party to this case, so hereby declare under penalty of perjury that on this Sunday July 12, 2009, I provided facsimile copies to all of the following non-party attorneys whose names were affixed to the “STATEMENT OF INTEREST” who have appeared in this case in accordance with the local rules of the Central District of California, to wit:
THOMAS P. O’BRIEN
LEON W. WEIDMAN
ROGER E. WEST
DAVID A. DeJUTE
FACSIMILE (213) 894-7819
DONE AND EXECUTED ON THIS 12th day of July, 2009
____________________
Charles Edward Lincoln

OMG YOU ARE NOT GOING TO BELIEVE THIS POOP!! :shock:

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/blog1/


emphasis added

Hmmm is this her new buddy Lincoln? :shock:

Deo Vindice: Heroes In Gray Forever
Deo vindice (God will vindicate) was the motto of the Confederacy and it lives on. Those eternal gray heroes who sallied forth in great honor, they paid the price that makes this term so honorable and so eternally significant.

Robert Ponte

After 20 years of experience in the computer industry I went to work as the Director of Technology at a DOT.com company. After working there just 6 months they said they made some mistakes and had to lay me off. New jobs were next to none so I started a computer consulting but I needed more income and a way to get back on my feet quickly. Late in 2001 I found an education and mentors program that has completely turned around my financial and personal life. Now 8 years later my life is now more about family, community, giving back and sharing this unique education, conversations and experiences with others.

Roberts professional experience.

mailto:robert@The-Hudson-Group.net


The Hudson Group Affiliates

Tony Larson / http://www.bvisual.com

Alan Martin / http://www.thumbsdownmethod.com/

Charles Lincoln

Charles Lincoln III Blog

Your Remedy is in the Law

*

Dr. Charles E. Lincoln (J.D., PhD) - Litigation and civil practice / courtroom procedures expert


Malcolm Doney - Mortgage fraud auditor and expert witness


Rod Class - AIB Radio - Constitutional Lobbyist – Private Attorney General


Carl Weston - Private Attorney General – Constitutional Lobbyist


Roger Tanner - Private Investigator Registered FBI Informant – Credit Card Debt Elimination expert


We will announce other speakers at the beginning of the Program!

We have put this seminar together to bring you the latest and best information on how you can attack mortgages, both before a foreclosure happens, and afterward.

Although we cannot guarantee you will win, we will teach you how to take winning actions, both administratively (before going to court), and in litigation (both with pleadings, and in a courtroom). Some who follow our strategies can end up owning their homes free and clear of all debt.

We will teach victims of mortgage fraud how to spot many kinds of fraud and how to take action that can produce financial gains for themselves.

We will also show you how (figuratively) to beat up credit card debt collectors and make credit card (and other unsecured) debt disappear.

We know that attorneys have a huge edge over pro se litigants, both in specialized education and in the opinions of judges, and so we will teach you how to minimize that edge, how to prepare better than most attorneys do, and to look and do your best in court.

We will show you how to “practice” in traffic courts where you have less at stake. We will teach you how to win traffic cases.

CAUTION: If you suffer from overwhelming debt, foreclosure, traffic tickets, due process violations, or judicial corruption, you NEED this seminar. Clear your calendar, email your reservation, and mail in your payment Now.

Dr. Charles Lincoln
Principles, goals, and preparing for pro se litigation, how to draft and file a complaint, how to respond to a foreclosure lawsuit, dealing with judges and the bar, using natural contradictions in the law to improve your chance of winning, case studies in foreclosure litigation.

1. Word Version PDF Version In re: Max Bennett, Judge of the 319th Judicial District Court, Nueces County, Texas, Relator. No. 96-0598. Supreme Court of Texas. Dec. 4, 1997. — .

2. Word Version PDF Version Citizens State Bank Of Sealy, Texas, Petitioner, v. Caney Investments, et al., Respondents, No. C-6708. Supreme Court of Texas. March 16, 1988., — .

3. Word Version PDF Version Chrysler Corporation, Relator, v. The Honorable Robert Blackmon, Judge, Respondent, 841 S.W.2d 844. No. D-1637. Supreme Court of Texas. Oct. 14, 1992. — .

4. Word Version PDF Version Dombrowski v. Pfister, 380 U. S. 479 (1965) — .

5. Word Version PDF Version Harbor Perfusion, Inc. v. Floyd, 45 S.W.3d 713 — .

6. Word Version PDF Version Friedman And Associates v. Beltline Road, 861 S.W.2d 1 — .

7. Word Version PDF Version Glass v. Glass, 826 SW2d 683 — .

8. Word Version PDF Version Grizzle v. East Commerce Bank, No. 05-98-00537-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Dallas. Feb. 14, 2001. — .

9. Word Version PDF Version Henry v. Low, 132 S.W.3d 180 (Tex.App. 04/01/2004) — .

10. Word Version PDF Version Guaranty Federal Savings v. Horseshoe Operating Company, Nos. C-7559, C-7720. Supreme Court of Texas. May 9, 1990. — .

11. Word Version PDF Version Litoff v. Jackson, No. 4-87-00595-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, San Antonio. Dec. 2, 1987. — .

12. Word Version PDF Version Mitchum v. Foster, 407 U.S. 225, 92 S.Ct. 2151 (1972) — .

13. Word Version PDF Version Neely v. Commission for Lawyer Discipline, 976 S.W.2d 824 — .

14. Word Version PDF Version Nguyen v. Intertex, Inc., 93 S.W.3d 288 — .

15. Word Version PDF Version Gonzalez v. Reliant Energy, Inc., 159 S.W.3d 615 — .

16. Word Version PDF Version In re: Estate of Charles E. York, No. 13-96-649-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Corpus Christi. June 26, 1997. — .

17. Word Version PDF Version Younger v. Harris, 401 U. S. 37, 47-53 (1971) — .

Charles Lincoln was the lawyer who launched the case Atwater v. Lago Vista, which eventually made it to the U.S. Supreme Court, but not with him as the lawyer for the plaintiff. The way the courts handled that case, and retaliated against Lincoln and others for bringing it, is a tale of judicial and prosecutorial corruption that continues today, and deserves wider attention. See full details and case history here > Atwater v. City of Lago Vista

Below are just a few of the important cases Charles Lincoln has successfully brought to the courts. We need more people like him in our country.


1. Word Version Petitioner n Intervention's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, 060405 — To settle issues of law to establish basis for negotiations in Lincoln v. Williamson County.

2. Word Version Petitioner in Intervention's Answer to Jergins' Motion to Strike, 060228 — In Lincoln v. Williamson County.

3. Word Version First Amended Petition in Intervention, 060228 — Intervention by Jon Roland in Lincoln v. Williamson County.

4. Word Version Affidavit of Standing to Intervene, 060228 — Supporting intervention by Jon Roland in Lincoln v. Williamson County.

5. PDF Version Order Nunc Pro Imposing Sanctions, 06/01/30 — Illegal order in Lincoln v. Williamson County that exhibits corruption and abuse of discretion.

6. Word Version Proposed Order Denying Sanctions, 06/01/26 — Proposed order in Lincoln v. Williamson County that should have been adopted.

7. Word Version Petition in Intervention as Amicus Curiae, application for Appointment as Guardian ad litem, and Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, 05/10/18 — In custody case. Contains memorandum that provides background on case.

8. Word Version Motion for Quo Warranto Review Jury, 05/10/18 — In Lincoln v. Williamson County.

9. Word Version Motion to Modify Temporary Orders, 05/06/23 — In custody case.

10. Word Version Appelant's Reply Brief, 05/01/00 — In appeal to Fifth Circuit.

11. PDF Version Brief of Appelee Michael Jergins, 05/01/14 — In appeal to Fifth Circuit.

Rule 1-320 Financial Arrangements With Non-Lawyers

(A) Neither a member nor a law firm shall directly or indirectly share legal fees with a person who is not a lawyer, except that:

(1) An agreement between a member and a law firm, partner, or associate may provide for the payment of money after the member's death to the member's estate or to one or more specified persons over a reasonable period of time; or

(2) A member or law firm undertaking to complete unfinished legal business of a deceased member may pay to the estate of the deceased member or other person legally entitled thereto that proportion of the total compensation which fairly represents the services rendered by the deceased member; or

(3) A member or law firm may include non-member employees in a compensation, profit-sharing, or retirement plan even though the plan is based in whole or in part on a profit-sharing arrangement, if such plan does not circumvent these rules or Business and professions Code section 6000 et seq.; or

(4) A member may pay a prescribed registration, referral, or participation fee to a lawyer referral service established, sponsored, and operated in accordance with the State Bar of California's Minimum Standards for a Lawyer Referral Service in California.

Justice System Integrity Division (213-974-3888) – Felony charges against disbarred
or resigned attorneys who continue to practice, or for attorney misconduct more generally;

Consumer Protection Division (213-580-3273) – Cases involving unfair and deceptive
business practices, false advertising, and for information or assistance with civil enforcement
tools;

Major Fraud Division (213-580-3200) – Cases involving complex and large-scale
fraud offenses.

The Law Office of Dr. Orly Taitz*, Esq., has been designated as lead counsel of choice by

Tierra Limpia/Deo Vindice Real Estate Research & Consulting of Austin, Texas, and Cambridge, Massachusetts, and now (in addition to other TL/DV programs) offers you a legal representation in its litigation program aimed at obtaining quiet title to your home and other real estate.

Dr. Orly Taitz is busy filing pleadings... Her assistant will help keep her twitter page updated.
about 5 hours ago from web