OD, I would remind you that Orly and the birfers misconstrue plain English. Case in point is Butterdezillion's assertion that the Hawai'i DoH's verification actually "indirectly verifies" Obama wasn't born in Hawai'i. Even if they don't misconstrue, they just quickly flip to "Obama & Soros kidnapped the judge's puppy and threatened to give them healthcare" shtick.

Birfers don't live in the United States of America. They live in a Marxist Socialist Hellhole of their own imaginations where the Usurper routinely assassinates his enemies and even those commies in the Republican Party are in on it (yet somehow voting for Romney, at least for some matters). The courts could rule explicitly that Obama was born in Hawai'i and that fact alone qualifies him as a natural born citizen (wait a minute, I seem to recall something happening in Indiana...) and the birfers would still scream that they had no hearing on the merits and that every judge in the country is committing treason.

Just for the record, The Obly's

Respondent's Response to Rule 60 Motion
http://www.scribd.com/doc/100735924/2012-07-16-IN-RESPONDENTS-Response-to-Rule-60-Motion

seems to be missing at least one page ... it jumps from p4 (with an incomplete sentence) to certificate of service.

Comment : she plucks a 1/2 paragraph admission that some aspects were not before the original court as a "Thank you god" while ignoring 4 (and counting) pages of Nothing, like you've ever seen before, lists of her uncorrectable failures.

Yephora
July 21st, 2012 @ 8:22 pm

“Thank you god!”

god = any pagan deity, idol.

God = the Creator of Heaven and earth in the Bible.

So yes, thank you God!

Well put. And I know it. But if a Court would be direct and non-legalese in at least part of its ruling, especially with regard to standing, it would also get reported that simply. "No standing." The fact that Reid hasn't said that already mystifies me. Orly was a witness -- and a crummy, hostile one at that, but I won't go there. She was a witness, is not a voter in IN and has not been allowed pro se status, so how does she have standing? She doesn't. For once, it would be good to reduce it to a reportable 3 or 4 words, a slap in the face to her nonsense. Just sayin'.

I don't think we've seen the order of dismissal, have we? We know that the judge denied the motion for sanctions apparently without comment, but we don't know what she said in dismissing the case.

I, too, was wondering what happened to the dismissal order. I don't believe I've seen it.

I, too, was wondering what happened to the dismissal order. I don't believe I've seen it.[/quote

I know no one who has seen it. In fact, didn't even know there was one until Orly posted her lunacy. All we'd seen was the sanctions denial. Apparently there is a separate dismissal order.

IN is one of those states where documents are not easy to come by. Respondent's counsel was not willing to provide copies, and the ones we have received from the court were extremely expensive to obtain through a courier service. I'm talking expensive as in $35 to obtain a two-page document. Just sayin'.

I'll see what I can do, but... no promises.

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=194230

The post&Email and other news publications with millions of readers are covering this story and other articles from this web site

Posted on | July 22, 2012 | No Comments

And who are these "news publications" with meeeeelyons of readers you ask?

That's not very Jewish, Orly.

You mean that she didn't capitalize "god"?

Too many vowels. It should be, "thank you YHWH!". Unless, of course, she's on a casual basis in which Elohim might work.

G_d

I hope the judge doesn't get an aneurysm laughing at Orly's Reply and Proposed Order. I'll simply entice you with a tidbit from the daffyorder:



Oh, my aching sides!

I know Orly is beyond help in the truest sense, but she does dub this. As is her normal MO, DRAFT REPLY.

It is not yet filed.

Just sayin'.

Yes -- read it (Warning: do NOT have food or drink within reach of your computer), laugh at it, but DO NOT OFFER CONSTRUCTIVE CRITICISM OF IT.

Orly Taitz has, once again, nailed it. There's nothing to modify or change. It's perfect.

Rubberstamp Reid is going to rue the day she dissed defendants' motion for sanctions. Ya reap what you sow.

TOO LATE!

Is it too oate for her to change her mnd? Or would the defendants have to file another motion?

תודה רבה to-da ra-ba

To you lawyers, I guess all you can do is laugh, especially when this Moldovan incompetent feels empowered to do what she does because no one ever stops her. I -- not being a lawyer and only perfunctorily legally schooled at all via TFB -- am utterly shocked at how far Lena has gone in misconstruing just every single thing possible in one small paragraph, the meaning of which actually just trashes her for not knowing what she is doing in filing additional claims; and then building a preposterous case on that completely false premise.

Further affiant sayeth naught.

Did you see the xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on page xxxxxxxxx ?

But it fails to mention the loose emission hose in her car.

Hmmmm -- is the AG inviting her to file another frivolous case in IN as that he can swat a thick dumb fly forever?
NADT

but... but... but....

Think optimistic,
Think sua sponte about a sua sponte moment