ORLY TAITZ IS NOT GOING TO BE CALIFORNIA'S JUNIOR SENATOR

bob · **Posted:** Mon Jun 18, 2012 6:35 pm

Quote:

Interesting development, suddenly a 1,000[*] votes disappeared

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=116653 :twisted:

* 933, but who (besides SoSoCA the counties) is counting?

Dallasite · **Posted:** Mon Jun 18, 2012 7:28 pm

That's it, just that one line. No additional info. Was it from her total, one of her opponents, or the total vote count? Not that it matters, just curious.

realist · **Joined:** Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm **Posts:** 23566

Dallasite wrote:

That's it, just that one line. No additional info. Was it from her total, one of her opponents, or the total vote count? Not that it matters, just curious.

That was it. :lol:

Well, there is one comment from one of her flying monkeys...

Quote:

Extirpates
June 18th, 2012 @ 2:46 pm

Vote counting fraud has become an institution!

The SoS should be held accountable.

bob · **Posted:** Tue Jun 19, 2012 2:13 pm

Quote:

More evidence of elections fraud and elections rigging

Please see attached screenshots: On Friday, even with official rigged elections I already had 146,761 votes. On Monday evening, June 18th it was reported that Orly Taitz had only 145,985 votes. It meant that not only zero votes were added in 58 counties, which are still counting the votes, but 778 votes vanished, disappeared.

On the election day even with largely rigged voting I had 113,000 votes. After 8 working days of counting I had 146,761 votes. Every day since the election night on average some 4,220 votes were added to the tally of Orly Taitz and it was expected to see some 154,000 votes by the end of the day on Friday. Instead, office of Secretary of State Bowen reported that no votes were added for Taitz from June 15 till end of the day on June 18th in all 58 counties, which was impossible, but they also reported the 778 votes that were already counted by Friday, vanished. This is a clear evidence of elections fraud.

Lw abiding US citizens are asked to write to the Secretary of State of CA Bowen and demand examination of software used for counting the votes as well as examination of ballots for verificAtion of eligibility of voters and candidates.

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=118029 :twisted:

Screenshots of SoSoCA's site; PDF:
:twisted:

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?attachment_id=118030 :twisted:

DeeLite · **Posted:** Tue Jun 19, 2012 3:42 pm

what a maroon.

Sugar Magnolia · **Posted:** Tue Jun 19, 2012 6:25 pm

DeeLite wrote:

what a maroon.

An ultra-maroon.

TollandRCR · **Posted:** Tue Jun 19, 2012 6:49 pm

The extent to which the Ebil State will go to cheat Orlena out of her fourth place finish is astonishing. She needs to sue so that she does not end up with an ignominious fifth place finish.

It has been said before and might be worth saying again: Orlena has cheating on the mind because she is expert at it.

hitch · **Joined:** Mon Oct 05, 2009 5:52 pm **Posts:** 592

Apparently orly stays up into the early morning hours refreshing the SoS website to see her numbers. Orly demostrates yet another area she's incompetent in -- arithmetic. On 19 June at 2.06 the count was 146,761 at 2.08 it was 147,206. That's an increase of 445 votes.

SueDB · **Posted:** Tue Jun 19, 2012 7:15 pm

hitch wrote:

Apparently orly stays up into the early morning hours refreshing the SoS website to see her numbers. Orly demostrates yet another area she's incompetent in -- arithmetic. On 19 June at 2.06 the count was 146,761 at 2.08 it was 147,206. That's an increase of 445 votes.

but but but.....she won the election...How can the winner have only 2.08% of the vote??? ](*,)

realist · **Joined:** Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm **Posts:** 23566

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=119888 :evil:

Update: my latest vote count is 148,347

Posted on | June 20, 2012 | No Comments

Quote:

My latest vote count is 148,347. I am only 877 votes behind Rick Williams, who is currently third out of 23 challengers to Feinstein or 4th overall. If the Secretary of State Bowen did not delete nearly 800 votes for me on Monday, I would had nearly the same votes as Williams. I am wondering, if she could delete 800 votes on Monday, and do it without any notification or explanation, she could delete much more at different times. How do we know that such delettions did not happen before or after?

tjh · **Joined:** Wed Oct 07, 2009 4:18 pm **Posts:** 2474

How do I know that Secretary of State Bowen didn't delete 441,493 of my votes, putting me ahead of Emken and into the primary ???

realist · **Joined:** Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm **Posts:** 23566

tjh wrote:

How do I know that Secretary of State Bowen didn't delete 441,493 of my votes, putting me ahead of Emken and into the primary ???

OrlyIsAnAirport · **Joined:** Sat Mar 31, 2012 6:21 pm **Posts:** 13

tjh wrote:

How do I know that Secretary of State Bowen didn't delete 441,493 of my votes, putting me ahead of Emken and into the primary ???

And she never said she did not do it. So, she must have done it. I WIN, I WIN, I WIN.

Sterngard Friegen · **Posted:** Wed Jun 20, 2012 3:41 pm

Taitz needs to demand a recount.

And put up the security to insure payment on the slight chance she loses.

Plutodog · **Posted:** Wed Jun 20, 2012 3:43 pm

What Orly doesn't realize is that all but 19 of her votes were manufactured by the ebil NWO just to make things a little more interesting for a few hours on their long, slow, tedious way to taking over the world.

:girlbutt:

ObjectiveDoubter · **Posted:** Wed Jun 20, 2012 5:27 pm

For heaven's sake ... Debra Bowen doesn't count squat. Not only that, Orly is sending off her FMs to watch the 1 percent manual count each county must conduct. Had I not been instructed how to observe and audit such a count (I did it for two separate days during a contested election in the 1990s), I would have been clueless. And I've got a brain I dare say, something Orly's minions really don't seem to possess. It is tedious beyond imagining. I believe, however, that no one ever pays attention to Orly's dictates, so it doesn't matter.

That said, I cannot for the life of me figure out what she is aiming for. She is so far behind at less than 3 percent. She LOST. That's it. Unless she is gearing up for her latest Debra Bowen lawsuit. Now that she has sent blatantly jealousy-based complaints to the CA Bar, perhaps another crazy suit will make the Bar act at last. Hello CA Bar? Anyone home? Well, one can hope.

hitch · **Joined:** Mon Oct 05, 2009 5:52 pm **Posts:** 592

ObjectiveDoubter wrote:

That said, I cannot for the life of me figure out what she is aiming for. She is so far behind at less than 3 percent. She LOST. That's it. Unless she is gearing up for her latest Debra Bowen lawsuit. Now that she has sent blatantly jealousy-based complaints to the CA Bar, perhaps another crazy suit will make the Bar act at last. Hello CA Bar? Anyone home? Well, one can hope.

she's gearing up for all the lawsuits resulting from 1) the GOP endorsement being stolen from her, 2) the 2nd place in the primary being stolen from her, and 3) the GOP, Democrats, Bowen, Emken and 100-2001 Jane Does colluding in it all.

Orly should have, at the very least, come in 2nd. The spot was hers. The fact that votes don't show this truth way clearly demonstrates vote fraud, election fraud, general fraud, theft, RICO, foreign interference with our voting, and treason in the highest of places.

I think Orly's "logic" falls along the lines: "A => B. Since I have B therefore A." We understand the problem with this but apparently Orly never took a logic course.

jtmunkus · **Joined:** Mon May 23, 2011 7:33 pm **Posts:** 3502

Who the fuck else in the world gets 3% of the vote and goes on a ballot-counting jihad because she feels "robbed" of her 2nd place finish - when she placed 5th? What a deluded POS.

I'd be willing to bet that not a single FM watches a single 1% audit, but that she tells us they did. Remember, she said she had three wetnesses for Indiana - but only one was actually present. Does a single FM give a flying fuck if Orly gets 4th or 5th place? Even the FMs are leaving Orly. And why not? They have so many [more effective!] birfing options now, with AARPiehole and Corsi seizing control of the movement.

ObjectiveDoubter · **Posted:** Wed Jun 20, 2012 8:41 pm

jtmunkus wrote:

Who the fuck else in the world gets 3% of the vote and goes on a ballot-counting jihad because she feels "robbed" of her 2nd place finish - when she placed 5th? What a deluded POS.

I'd be willing to bet that not a single FM watches a single 1% audit, but that she tells us they did. Remember, she said she had three wetnesses for Indiana - but only one was actually present. Does a single FM give a flying fuck if Orly gets 4th or 5th place? Even the FMs are leaving Orly. And why not? They have so many [more effective!] birfing options now, with AARPiehole and Corsi seizing control of the movement.

I'm already forgetting. I thought she had no witnesses show up at all. See, this is the problem; if you go to Lena's website, your brains get scrambled.

esseff44 · **Posted:** Wed Jun 20, 2012 8:45 pm

O'rly had subpoenaned the former SoS White of Indiana who had been convicted of fraud. He was in the court room with his lawyer. It is not known if he was one of those she had expected to appear or if any of them came but were not allowed to appear.

Estiveo · **Posted:** Thu Jun 21, 2012 2:53 am

jtmunkus wrote:

Who the fuck else in the world gets 3% of the vote and goes on a ballot-counting jihad because she feels "robbed" of her 2nd place finish - when she placed 5th?

In fairness, some former fringe candidates, losers all, HAVE (allegedly) hired my beloved Orlana to represent them in their failed bids for mediocrity. I'd call that a bigger fail since they actually hired teh Orly. Orly's humiliating herself on her own dime is priceless, but who's the bigger stupid-head? Orly, or the brain donors who ackshully hire her?

GreatGrey · **Posted:** Thu Jun 21, 2012 2:59 am

ObjectiveDoubter wrote:

That said, I cannot for the life of me figure out what she is aiming for.

Simple.

Berg bet her lunch at Denny's that she wouldn't get 5%.

A Legal Lohengrin · **Joined:** Tue Oct 26, 2010 9:56 pm **Posts:** 9380

esseff44 wrote:

O'rly had subpoenaned the former SoS White of Indiana who had been convicted of fraud. He was in the court room with his lawyer. It is not known if he was one of those she had expected to appear or if any of them came but were not allowed to appear.

She claimed to have paid airfare and hotel for her witlesses, who were not present and were, perhaps, cooling their heels on Orly's dime. Of course, she could have been lying.

There was no discussion or argument about whether the witnesses would be testifying, and as they were not present, and perhaps not permitted to be present, I would assume that Orly was told beforehand that she would not be allowed to have the idiots testify.

I'm not sure if there were three idiots in addition to Charlie White, or three witnesses total, including White.

I hope it cost her a lot of money to put up those buffoons.

ObjectiveDoubter · **Posted:** Thu Jun 21, 2012 11:39 am

Thanks for the reminder about pathetic Charlie White being there.

I'm sure that his appearance reinforced OrLena's belief that her subpoenas are flawless -- thus leading to her remarkable filing of a complaint with the AZ Bar, against the attorney for AZ SoS Bennett, who dissed Orly and in writing! (And aren't complaints to the Bar supposed to be confidential? And Orly blasts them around the world to practically everyone except the dead.)

btw, I do not believe that anyone else showed up, on Orly's nickel or not. Even if they had been disallowed before the circus began, I think they would have stuck around to watch it.

A Legal Lohengrin · **Joined:** Tue Oct 26, 2010 9:56 pm **Posts:** 9380

ObjectiveDoubter wrote:

btw, I do not believe that anyone else showed up, on Orly's nickel or not. Even if they had been disallowed before the circus began, I think they would have stuck around to watch it.

Witnesses, with some exceptions, are not permitted to be present if the other side objects. The court may have also excluded them as being a potential disruptive presence.

Judge Reid had set a strict timetable and was not going to deviate from it.

She was not going to look at piles of poo, enlarged zibits, or listen to screeching.

I think Orly actually was stupid enough to show up with her bogus witnesses and expected to get away with her "but they flew all this way" schtick again. Not in this court, she wasn't.

Falsehoods unchallenged only fester and grow.

ORLY TAITZ IS NOT GOING TO BE CALIFORNIA'S JUNIOR SENATOR

Who is online