Falsehoods unchallenged only fester and grow.


All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9601 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 171, 172, 173, 174, 175, 176, 177 ... 385  Next   
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Jun 09, 2012 7:29 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Mar 02, 2010 9:52 am
Posts: 3936
Location: Switzerland
MN-Skeptic wrote:
Mario (aka, the Putz) has stated:

Quote:
The attorneys for the Tennessee Democratic Party have opened the door which will allow Orly Taitz access to all the original Obama records contained in the Hawaii Health Department. Those attorneys and Dr. Onaka have done an end run around the defendant having to provide a certified true copy of Obama’s birth certificate to the Court as true evidence that Obama, his attorneys, and the Hawaii Department of Health have not engaged in a fraud upon the court as Orly Taitz alleges. They have done that end run under the guise that the verification is needed for purposes of litigation. Well, Ms. Taitz also has litigation needs. She has to be able to access all available evidence that supports her allegation of a fraud upon the court. Since the defendants have introduced the verification into evidence for purposes of opposing her allegation, Ms. Taits also has the due process right to test the validity of that evidence by being able to subpoena Dr. Onaka for cross examination and subpoena the original documents upon which he says he relied in producing his Verification of Birth. As the old saying goes, what good for the goose is good for the gander.


http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2012/05/purpura-and-moran-file-their-brief-and.html?commentPage=2 (at 1:17pm 6/8/12)
as corrected by Foggie a post later it's Mississippi...

But: can anyone check if Mario this putz has really visited, participated in and understood his Continued Education lectures?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 09, 2012 7:38 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Mar 02, 2010 9:52 am
Posts: 3936
Location: Switzerland
verbalobe wrote:
That's right. Bupkis.

And that's all that will ever be available to her.

[-( Bupkis. [-(

Thanks the FSM there is the intertoobs and the WikiedMedia =))


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 09, 2012 11:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 2:02 pm
Posts: 10980
Location: Stalag 13 Okanagan, WA 98840
Occupation: Drone Maintenance Officer - FAA Licensed and Certified "We Fix Drones©" Call (206) 622-0460 to schedule routine maintenance or repair.
Interesting, the Putz doesn't even know which case he is bungling.

_________________
Image ImageImage

You can follow the action, which gets you good pictures.
You can follow your instincts, which'll probably get you in trouble.

Or... you can follow the money...
which nine times out of ten will get you closer to the truth.
"The Two Jakes"


Remember, Orly NEVAH disappoints!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 14, 2012 7:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm
Posts: 23530
Docket Update...

Quote:
Document Number: 36
Docket Text:
ATTACHMENT re [34] Response in Opposition to Motion Notice of Supplemental Authority by Democrat Party of Mississippi (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit Exhibit 1.Taitz v. Astrue Affirmance(D.C.Cir. May 25,2012))(Begley, Samuel)


_________________
Let us tenderly and kindly cherish, therefore, the means of knowledge. Let us dare to read, think, speak, and write.
John Adams


ImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 14, 2012 7:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2009 3:24 pm
Posts: 6626


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 14, 2012 7:24 pm 
Online

Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 5:52 am
Posts: 2156
Location: The Little Red Dot
Occupation: ASEAN bureau chief; Keeper of the Bahasa; CSI for Semiconductors
What kimba said

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 14, 2012 7:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 13, 2012 5:25 pm
Posts: 1428
ohhh SNAP. -xx

_________________
"It’s time for this charade to stop” - Cold Case Posse Member Mike Zullo, destroying Irony Meters worldwide


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 14, 2012 8:31 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 01, 2011 1:37 am
Posts: 565
This board requires you to be registered and logged-in before you can view hidden messages


Edit: Typo


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 14, 2012 8:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 26, 2010 12:39 pm
Posts: 3972
Location: Southwest of down east
Well done, B&T. I love it that you fellows gave Orly ample opportunity to "self-report" this development that is adverse to her position of record. In "real law" she had a clear duty to the court to do so.

I am shocked...shocked I tell you that Orly failed to fulfill her duty with all deliberate speed. :lol:

_________________
Hope springs eternal within the human uniboob. - Thomas Jefferson.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 14, 2012 9:10 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 01, 2011 1:37 am
Posts: 565
With Orly's penchant for doing the unthinkable, B&T may sit on their hands a while in case she files a "Motion in Opposition to Response in Opposition to Motion Notice of Supplemental Authority by Democrat Party of Mississippi". She can include her Petition for Rehearing en banc review as a zibit. That will teach B&T to be so mean to a decedent civil-rights attorney!

This board requires you to be registered and logged-in before you can view hidden messages


Edit: Darned fat fingers and additions to hidden text


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 15, 2012 2:33 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Mar 02, 2010 9:52 am
Posts: 3936
Location: Switzerland
Piffle wrote:
Well done, B&T. I love it that you fellows gave Orly ample opportunity to "self-report" this development that is adverse to her position of record. In "real law" she had a clear duty to the court to do so.

I am shocked...shocked I tell you that Orly failed to fulfill her duty with all deliberate speed. :lol:

I fear that Orlena may use this as reason to send another complaint to the various state BARs cause the Teppernator&Co did not grant her sufficient time to do this task herself within OrlyLaw timeframe :lol: :lol: :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 15, 2012 3:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 06, 2012 3:40 pm
Posts: 423
Not so fast! According to Orlylaw, the SCOTUS will rule favorably.

Ah-ha! she's got them now!!

_________________
There's nothin' wrong with being a fool for Christ. I ain't here to uh, you know, we should not be here to impress people with our intelligence, I think God, uh, respects loyalty and obedience and uh, loyalty and obedience much more than, you know, showing off how smart you are. But anyway... ~ LoneStar1776


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 15, 2012 9:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 07, 2009 4:18 pm
Posts: 2473
Penguin 0302 wrote:
Not so fast! According to Orlylaw, the SCOTUS will rule favorably.


Should get to conference shortly after inauguration day. Deja Vu and all that.

The MS defense team DID warn the Judge that waiting for all the Obly's eggs to hatch / chickens to come home to roost is like swimming in a cold bath of molasses. Or something.

_________________
Don't pee in a tree without a TJ Hunter www.tjhunters.com)
Fog-doe 1-909 REEKO subpoenas should be properly served on Blunt Force Donato
Feel free to copy/republish anything I post, with (tjh and/or tfb) or without attribution
Moderators : feel free to delete anything that offends/provides any assistance to the enemy.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jun 17, 2012 6:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm
Posts: 23530
More of those pesky rulz thingys...

Quote:
Motion for Judicial notice of a sworn affidavit by sheriff joseph M. arpaio deeming barack obama’s birth certificate, selective service certificate and social security card to be forgeries PLAINTIFF’S reply in opposition TO DEFENDANT’S motion to supplement and request for an emergency evidentuary hearing due to evidence of forgery and fraud in documents submitted by the defendants


What duz the rulz say about that?

Quote:
From Uniform Local Rules: Rule 7(b)(3):

(B) A separate response must be filed as to each separately docketed motion.

(C) A response to a motion may not include a counter-motion in the same document. Any motion must be an item docketed separately from a response.

(D) A response to a motion may not be included in the body of a pleading, but rather should be a separately docketed item denominated in the record as a response and should be associated by docket number with the motion to which it responds.

_________________
Let us tenderly and kindly cherish, therefore, the means of knowledge. Let us dare to read, think, speak, and write.
John Adams


ImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jun 17, 2012 7:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 6:19 pm
Posts: 1866
Location: Hollywood (okay, the Valley)
Occupation: Some-time, big-time studio numbers shuffler; full-time gadfly
realist wrote:
More of those pesky rulz thingys...

Quote:
Motion for Judicial notice of a sworn affidavit by sheriff joseph M. arpaio deeming barack obama’s birth certificate, selective service certificate and social security card to be forgeries PLAINTIFF’S reply in opposition TO DEFENDANT’S motion to supplement and request for an emergency evidentuary hearing due to evidence of forgery and fraud in documents submitted by the defendants


Is LenOrly suggesting that Arpaio's "may" and "I believe" should be admitted as proof, to counter what the state of Hawaii submitted, certified, signed and initialed for authentication? IANAL blah, blah, blah, but can she make an ordinary copy of an affidavit from heaven knows what source, and submit it? (An emergency, of course. And for an evidentuary? I thought those only happened in Dunbarry-Stamfort, CT courts, and with CNN, ABC, NBC, MSNBC and Fox present and broadcasting to millions.)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jun 17, 2012 8:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2009 11:17 pm
Posts: 13570
Location: New England
Occupation: Professor of Sociology
ObjectiveDoubter wrote:
...
...I thought those only happened in Dunbarry-Stamfort, CT courts, and with CNN, ABC, NBC, MSNBC and Fox present and broadcasting to millions.)

I took the train through Stamfort, CT today on my way back from a union meeting in Washington. The town had a big sign by the tracks

Orly Taitz is a lying POS

I think the town put this up before Orly attacked the Kennedy family.

_________________
"Someone should tell Mrs. Reagan that young people -- not even young people on drugs -- are not the ones responsible for the major problems besetting the world!" John Irving, A Prayer for Owen Meany: A Novel, p. 370.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 18, 2012 12:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 10, 2009 9:27 am
Posts: 4216
Orly has a word document on her site.

Response by Plaintiff Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ to Defendants' 06.14.2012 notice of supplemental authority

I don't know if she's filed it yet, but I'm sure realist will find out. :)

_________________
@Orly: "No one is listening to you anymore. And that’s the way it should always be." - Scott J. Tepper (11/5/2012)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 18, 2012 12:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2012 5:36 pm
Posts: 718
neonzx wrote:
Orly has a word document on her site.

Response by Plaintiff Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ to Defendants' 06.14.2012 notice of supplemental authority

I don't know if she's filed it yet, but I'm sure realist will find out. :)


Oh, she haz a real sad with B&T. Call the WAAAAAAAAAAAmbulance!

_________________
I am not able to rightly comprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a document. - Thomas Jefferson, quoting Charles Babbage on Orly Taitz's submissions.

She [Orly] names Fogbow all the time! How can Fogbow be unnamed if she keeps naming it as unnamed? That's metaphysically absurd, man! - Foggy


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 18, 2012 1:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm
Posts: 23530
neonzx wrote:
Orly has a word document on her site.

Response by Plaintiff Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ to Defendants' 06.14.2012 notice of supplemental authority

I don't know if she's filed it yet, but I'm sure realist will find out. :)
I

It is not yet filed, which is why I've not yet sent it to Jack or linked to it.

_________________
Let us tenderly and kindly cherish, therefore, the means of knowledge. Let us dare to read, think, speak, and write.
John Adams


ImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 18, 2012 1:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 24, 2009 3:26 pm
Posts: 5510
Location: You Sue-We Serve Legal Support Services, 500 Ala Moana Blvd., Honolulu, HI 96813
LOLOLOLOL. Orlena has no clue what constitutes "finality". The D.C. Circuit's ruling to uphold Judge Lambert's decision IS final. A motion for rehearing en banc is an effort to resuscitate a dead case.

_________________
“I can assure you that already in the Pavlovian swamps of the nutso right, the glands are swelling. Theirs is a different planet from the one you and I inhabit. ” - Newsweek/Daily Beast special correspondent and editor of Democracy: A Journal of Ideas, Michael Tomasky, May 12, 2013


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 18, 2012 1:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 22, 2009 6:04 pm
Posts: 1992
Location: Soviet Canuckistan
Occupation: I'm the Grand Panjandrum of the uber-sekrit cabal that controls our faithful puppet George Soros, the Trilateral Commission, and Agenda 21 (among other things) as part of our grand plan to dominate maple syrup production.
A case remains open in the mind of Orly Taitz if she can still file a motion to inspect the computer systems with her own "forensic" investigators after her re-motion for re-consideration en banc was rejected electronically. You know, because of the daffydavids of Sheriff Joe and other hundreds of pages of "evidence" documenting social security fraud and election fraud means that someone hacked into the system.

You know, the court system is from my understanding very backlogged as it is. Imagine if Orly's system was followed by real lawyers. Nothing would ever be decided.

_________________
It is easy to hope when things go right. Harder to choose to believe in it when things are blackest. However even the greatest darkness can be slain with the faintest of lights. And hope is more than enough to flicker in the dark.

I blog about my life and mental health issues @ Life of a Schizophrenic


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 18, 2012 2:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 6:19 pm
Posts: 1866
Location: Hollywood (okay, the Valley)
Occupation: Some-time, big-time studio numbers shuffler; full-time gadfly
neonzx wrote:
Orly has a word document on her site.

Response by Plaintiff Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ to Defendants' 06.14.2012 notice of supplemental authority

I don't know if she's filed it yet, but I'm sure realist will find out. :)



Quote:
Unhinged Pretend-lawyer Lena says:
Honorable Magistrate Anderson has stayed all discovery pending decision on Motion to Remand the case to the state court.


That isn't correct, as I recall. What is the status of this mess in Mississippi? Isn't the wait for a judge to be assigned? I am sooooo confused.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 18, 2012 2:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm
Posts: 23530
Yes, discovery was stayed.

Orly, however, seemed to believe the entire case was stayed, based on the order staying discovery, which was ordered prior to her motion to stay the entire case.

She claimed her motion had been granted, but it had not.

_________________
Let us tenderly and kindly cherish, therefore, the means of knowledge. Let us dare to read, think, speak, and write.
John Adams


ImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 18, 2012 3:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 07, 2012 11:01 am
Posts: 306
neonzx wrote:
Orly has a word document on her site.

Response by Plaintiff Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ to Defendants' 06.14.2012 notice of supplemental authority

I don't know if she's filed it yet, but I'm sure realist will find out. :)

Heh, heh, heh.... she said "inconceivable"....


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 18, 2012 3:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 6:19 pm
Posts: 1866
Location: Hollywood (okay, the Valley)
Occupation: Some-time, big-time studio numbers shuffler; full-time gadfly
realist wrote:
Yes, discovery was stayed.

Orly, however, seemed to believe the entire case was stayed, based on the order staying discovery, which was ordered prior to her motion to stay the entire case.

She claimed her motion had been granted, but it had not.



OMFG ... TY, TY, TY!!! If there was ever a reason that I am glad I am not an attorney, this is it. My brain is swimming. I kind of recalled that she had filed something to stay the case, and then took credit for it actually when "it" had been stayed before her motion could even have gotten there. But I am presuming that she thinks the whole case is stayed because NOTHING has happened since. Which also makes me wonder. I was getting used to the Friday Smackdowns. Having withdrawals as a matter of fact!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9601 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 171, 172, 173, 174, 175, 176, 177 ... 385  Next   

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
View new posts | View active topics



Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group