Bran Mak Morn wrote:
Got to love it -- now the whole of HI's documentation must be rejected! That's right, one sheriff can override the Constitution and say HI's documentation is all invalid!
http://www.wnd.com/2012/06/investigator ... tificates/The headline at WND caught my attention: "Foreigners Bought Hawaii Birth Certificates." I mean, FINALLY. Zullo and Corsi introduced this idea of 'Japanese citizens getting Hawaiian birth certificates' back in their e-book, but didn't produce any evidence for it. I mean, NONE. Not even anonymous sources. They just stated it as fact, and moved on to another subject.
And then it came up again when Zullo mentioned it on Gillar's show the other day. And I thought, 'Three months later, and still no evidence.' Not even examples of the names in the birth announcements they claim to have found.
So WND finally has an article up on the subject. What's it got to offer?
Quote:
Mike Zullo, a retired New Jersey detective now heading Arpaio’s volunteer investigative team, explained in an interview that at the time of Obama’s birth during the state’s early years, Hawaii birth documentation routinely was purchased by foreigners for children not born in the state...
The births of Japanese children whose parents purchased Hawaii birth certificates also would be listed in the papers, he explained.
During that time period, Japanese parents would fly to Hawaii so their children, born in Japan, could have the benefits of American citizenship, he said.
Zullo says so.
That's it. That's the entire basis of WND's article: Zullo's word. There's no evidence in this article. No scans of the aforementioned papers. No examples of these 'purchased' documents. Not even testimony from 'moles' or anonymous informants. Heck, not even claims of RUMOR, or citations to random blog comments.
Just 'Zullo says so.'
It's all just one big circle-jerk. Corsi makes up some crap, shares it with Zullo, Zullo talks about it, and then WND reports it as news.