Gee, another one of those safeguards that Taitz claims do not exist.

Yabbut they weren't gonna do it if Lena hadn't insisted the get on it!

"Birther" activist disputes primary results
Ray Minchew
LA County Political Buzz Examiner

Ah, a new defendant for the RICO and defamation actions to follow!

I think Orly might be on the verge of establishing a new legal maneuver - the Reverse Class Action - where she charges the one million voters who chose Emken, Hughes, or Williams with voter fraud and demands that the votes be changed to votes for her.

On second thought, perhaps it will be the Reverse Class Action with RICO

Hi NBC...Like you, I do realize that once the percentages are basically established after x number of votes are counted - All following ballots will most likely fall in the same percent bracket regardless of how many votes.

Orly was a failure at 2000 hours on Tuesday with the posting of the first results.

She was a failure from the first moment she decided to "practice" law. But in terms of the election, yes, from the first polls and then from the first results.

Anyone want to start a pool as to when Orly will demand a recount to determine fourth and fifth place?

Sorry, my date for that has already passed.

Yeah and you were probably one of them Orly. Where is the Naturalization Certificate? You STILL have not produced it.

California does not disenfranchise former felons. Once they have been released and are no longer on parole, they can vote.

Maybe you want to move to FL, Orly? Please?

As if Florida doesn't have enough problems.

HEY!

The truth is that Oily could never make it in Florida. With our humidity, her face would slide off.

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=103097

This is from Nov 2008. Really going all out pulling the stops on the old moldy deteriorating brifer crap.

She is so in denial about what happened: an election took place, no evidence of anything funny going on, detailed procedures for safeguarding the vote including matching up signatures, sign in sheets, numbers of votes, etc., and then a 1 percent random hand count canvass (not 10 percent mentioned by that idiot Wagener), an audit that takes place in each county. In fact, the precincts are picked randomly, hand counted without reference to the machine count results and only then then compared to the machine count to assure there is a match in the count. It's kind of boring and you have to know what is going on, or it's useless to watch. God she is such a dope, trying to get observers, but to observe what?

btw, here is the California procedures, for the SoS website which I am sure Orly hasn't read or learned. All these nuisance calls from her FMs must be driving them crazy!

http://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/elections_oc.htm

This is the obvious reason that they don't allow screeching lunatics to disrupt the process with torrents of gibberish, something that Orly would never have the wits to understand. Of course, her whole purpose is to disrupt the process, so she wouldn't care even if she did.

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/



Orly's good at imagining... doing, not so much.

Yeah, with a court system that pays attention, Orly never would have made the ballot.

This may come as a surprise to O'rly, but there are a large number of folks who have moved out of the state who still legally vote in all California elections, me included. The State of California makes it pretty easy for us citizens who happen to live abroad to remain involved in the election process.

She's invincible !!

She's proven time and again that she doesn't believe laws, rules and procedures apply to her, so why should she believe that California's election laws do?

Then again, nobody else did as many or said as many utterly braindead and wrong-headed things as you, to deserve it.

Sometimes there's so little difference between character assassination and reporting the truth...

I wonder why Orly, in her candidate statement, never mentioned her support of medical marijuana laws.

Here are some interesting, perhaps interrelated facts, which journalists may be interested in pursuing:

(1) Orly Taitz owns two buildings from which she conducts her dental practices:
http://www.drtaitz.com/map.htm

(2) At one of her addresses, one of her tenants is a medical corporation whose doctors prescribe medical marijuana: http://ocmmes.com/contact.htm

(3) At her other address, her other tenant was a pot dispensary: http://www.ocregister.com/articles/city ... uncil.html

(4) The City of Santa Margarita, in 2011, voted for a moratorium on pot dispensaries: http://www.ocregister.com/articles/city ... uncil.html

(5) OrlyTaitz, in 2012, becomes involved with Debbie Tharp's crusade against municipalities which ban pot dispensaries.

(6) Is Orly Taitz's motivation an idealistic cause or the loss of rental income which these municipal laws have caused her?

(7) Did Orly Taitz, as a licensed dentist, write prescriptions for medical marijuana or refer patients to other tenants in exchange for a referral fee or being able to send a bogus dental bill to Medi-Cal or insurance companies?

Mark - the discussion of Taitz renting to marijuana dispensaries is now on another thread: viewtopic.php?f=24&t=7806

I think it is likely that Taitz was not choosy about who her tenants were and I think she should have known that renting to marijuana dispensaries violated Federal law. But there is no evidence that she has committed insurance fraud. Around here, we avoid baseless accusations.