Indiana ballot challenge (smackdown for Orly)

shrek · **Posted:** Fri Jun 08, 2012 5:40 am

neonzx wrote:

Daniels is doable..

I know she is a bit butch, but standards dear chap, standards

Sterngard Friegen wrote:

Shrek knows what this means.

Indeed I do $\:D/$ :mrgreen:

Somerset · **Posted:** Fri Jun 08, 2012 7:40 am

shrek wrote:

Indeed I do $\:D/$ :mrgreen:

Judge Mental · **Joined:** Fri Nov 25, 2011 11:29 am **Posts:** 342

Roboe wrote:

SuzieC wrote:

Oh, this should be rich. Who, exactly, will put these "witnesses" on the stand and elicit their testimony? Orly is neither counsel, nor pro se plaintiff. She is just another witness, as she has forgotten but she assured the Indiana Elections Commission. A witness cannot, in any court, even in Moldovia, call another witness to the stand.

She's probably hoping can do a repeat of what she did in front of the Election Commision: Causing such a stink, that they let her play-pretend to be a lawyer, just to get her out of their courtroom faster. Let's not kid ourselves here, the commission saw right through her pathetic excuse of being there as a witness, but they realised that the fastest way to get rid of her, was to give her 10 minutes and then deny whatever she suggested.

This board requires you to be registered and logged-in before you can view hidden messages

Her mind appears to have deteriorated so comprehensively these last few weeks (not that she had much sound mind to spare in the first place) that she is now probably closer to believing she is rightfully the judge for this hearing than either a counsel or pro-se plaintiff.

All memory of merely being a witness appears to have been wiped from the hard drive by a particularly nasty virus.

A Legal Lohengrin · **Joined:** Tue Oct 26, 2010 9:56 pm **Posts:** 9328

TexasFilly wrote:

Yabut she conned her way into having a Federal Judge :shock:

give her time to talk about her bullshit attempt to intervene in a case about off-shore drilling. She did that by "oh, but I've come such a long way" whine.

Well, believe me, that lwhine won't carry much weight in Indiana. The response will not be "you poor dear," but instead, "well, you'd best get back there then." They will need little excuse for a good boot to the behind to get her started on her way.

rosy · **Joined:** Sat Jan 14, 2012 5:36 pm **Posts:** 718

Tuesday is going to be an exceedingly good day for those of us who like to point and laugh at the delusionauts.

RTH10260 · **Posted:** Fri Jun 08, 2012 9:46 am

Sequoia32 wrote:

Are we going to have any boots on the ground here? [-o<

Have there been any requests to record this hearing?

I mean, VattelVision should be allowed to stream this event thruout the world, same as they did for the GA hearing. We want to have something for our supporting $$$ sent to TFB!

RTH10260 · **Posted:** Fri Jun 08, 2012 9:49 am

Piffle wrote:

CatMe wrote:

Orly knows so little about the law that she cannot even recognize when she is practicing it.

I sooo intend to steal that. :-bd

Sound like a nice signature quote

borealis · **Posted:** Fri Jun 08, 2012 11:41 am

shrek wrote:

neonzx wrote:

Daniels is doable..

I know she is a bit butch, but standards dear chap, standards

Sterngard Friegen wrote:

Shrek knows what this means.

Indeed I do $\:D/$ :mrgreen:

Offtopic :

Sure glad I'm not Anne Boleyn or Catherine Howard.

tjh · **Joined:** Wed Oct 07, 2009 4:18 pm **Posts:** 2473

Mississippi Ballot Challenge
http://thefogbow.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=88&t=7097&p=385554#p385554

neonzx wrote:

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=101736 :evil:

Quote:

What Democratic party filed with court recently in response to my motion for sanctions against them and my bar complaint, is not a BC, it’s a BS
They are concerned with the charges, bar complaints that I filed in MS and IN and a motion for sanctions against them.

Bar complaint in IN? That's new info, isn't it?

(Cross-posted that snippet)

A Legal Lohengrin · **Joined:** Tue Oct 26, 2010 9:56 pm **Posts:** 9328

tjh wrote:

Mississippi Ballot Challenge
http://thefogbow.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=88&t=7097&p=385554#p385554

neonzx wrote:

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=101736 :evil:

Quote:

What Democratic party filed with court recently in response to my motion for sanctions against them and my bar complaint, is not a BC, it’s a BS
They are concerned with the charges, bar complaints that I filed in MS and IN and a motion for sanctions against them.

Bar complaint in IN? That's new info, isn't it?

(Cross-posted that snippet)

Please, Orly, please. Make the Indiana Bar Association more aware of your disgusting existence than they already are.

borealis · **Posted:** Fri Jun 08, 2012 4:55 pm

A Legal Lohengrin wrote:

Please, Orly, please. Make the Indiana Bar Association more aware of your disgusting existence than they already are.

Nice how Orly assumes other state bar associations are as non-existent as California. That blissful ignorance might be a good thing. For us. :twisted:

realist · **Joined:** Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm **Posts:** 23530

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=101814 :evil:

Arpaio at it again, asking for money. Tell him not a cent, if he does not testify in court on Tuesday

Posted on | June 8, 2012 | No Comments

=))

News for you, Orly. He's going to continue to receive money and he's not going to testify Tuesday or ever.

Sucks to be you.

ObjectiveDoubter · **Posted:** Fri Jun 08, 2012 7:44 pm

A non-lawyer question. Well, questions regarding Tuesday in Indiana.

If I recall correctly, not one of the named plaintiffs filed anything, only Orly did. Is that correct? If that is the case, when Orly gets handed her hat ( $\:D/$ ), what happens to the others, if they show up? That is, Orly in essence acted (without license to do so) as their attorney in filing with their names. So since none of them filed on their own, even if they show up, do they still have standing and the hearing can continue on their behalf if Orly gets kicked to the curb? I mean it is her unauthorized work product that would have them there.

CatMe · **Posted:** Fri Jun 08, 2012 7:50 pm

ObjectiveDoubter wrote:

A non-lawyer question. Well, questions regarding Tuesday in Indiana.

If I recall correctly, not one of the named plaintiffs filed anything, only Orly did. Is that correct? If that is the case, when Orly gets handed her hat ( $\:D/$ ), what happens to the others, if they show up? That is, Orly in essence acted (without license to do so) as their attorney in filing with their names. So since none of them filed on their own, even if they show up, do they still have standing and the hearing can continue on their behalf if Orly gets thrown to the curb? I mean it is her unauthorized work product that would have them there.

I want to add a question to this. Can sanctions be levvied only against Orly or would all the plaintiffs be responsible for any fines? Are they considered complicit in her practicing law without a license in Indiana?

Sequoia32 · **Posted:** Fri Jun 08, 2012 8:01 pm

Oooh, oooh, oooh, I'm sooooo excited I just can't wait!

Tomorrow is Saturday, then Sunday, then Monday and then TUESDAY!!! $\:D/$

Gonna spend the next 3 days perfecting the popping of corn (Cook's Illustrated May/June had an article on it! 8-)

) and be ready to make a whole huge batch of high-quality popcorn on Tuesday!!! -xx

I'm willing to contribute $50 to the expenses of anyone who will attend.

neonzx · **Joined:** Tue Mar 10, 2009 9:27 am **Posts:** 4216

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=101864 :evil:

Quote:

Got a letter from Sec of State Bennett’s attorney that he will not testify in IN

Posted on | June 8, 2012 | No Comments

June bug · **Posted:** Fri Jun 08, 2012 8:26 pm

neonzx wrote:

:((

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=101864 :evil:

Quote:

Got a letter from Sec of State Bennett’s attorney that he will not testify in IN

Posted on | June 8, 2012 | No Comments

I'm shocked, I tells ya', shocked!

Sugar Magnolia · **Posted:** Fri Jun 08, 2012 8:45 pm

neonzx wrote:

:((

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=101864 :evil:

Quote:

Got a letter from Sec of State Bennett’s attorney that he will not testify in IN

Posted on | June 8, 2012 | No Comments

What does she think he could testify about anyway? Assuming every other insurmountable hurdle was overcome and she got him on the stand, what exactly does she expect him to say?

Sterngard Friegen · **Posted:** Fri Jun 08, 2012 8:48 pm

Quote:

Are you the SoS of AZ?

Quote:

Did you demand to see Barack HUSSEIN Obama's birth certificate?

Quote:

Did they show it to you?

(Of course, when Bennett answers "no" to question no. 2, all bets are off.)

SuzieC · **Posted:** Fri Jun 08, 2012 9:57 pm

ObjectiveDoubter wrote:

A non-lawyer question. Well, questions regarding Tuesday in Indiana.

If I recall correctly, not one of the named plaintiffs filed anything, only Orly did. Is that correct? If that is the case, when Orly gets handed her hat ( $\:D/$ ), what happens to the others, if they show up? That is, Orly in essence acted (without license to do so) as their attorney in filing with their names. So since none of them filed on their own, even if they show up, do they still have standing and the hearing can continue on their behalf if Orly gets kicked to the curb? I mean it is her unauthorized work product that would have them there.

Most likely nothing much will happen to them. The fact that they did not file anything in response will probably result in quick action on the pending motions. They never had standing and that doesn't change whether they show up or not. Anything Orly purported to file on their behalf is worthless.

Mark · **Posted:** Sat Jun 09, 2012 12:03 am

SUBPOENA WAS SERVED ON THE FORMER SECRETARY OF STATE OF IN CHARLIE WHITE, WHO GOT A YEAR HOUSE ARREST FOR NOT UPDATING HIS VOTER CARD, WHILE CRIMINAL OBAMA WAS ALLOWED ON THE BALLOT WITH ALL FORGED IDENTIFICATION PAPERS

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=101936

This is getting more and more interesting. Orly is losing it!

SueDB · **Posted:** Sat Jun 09, 2012 12:05 am

Mark wrote:

SUBPOENA WAS SERVED ON THE FORMER SECRETARY OF STATE OF IN CHARLIE WHITE, WHO GOT A YEAR HOUSE ARREST FOR NOT UPDATING HIS VOTER CARD, WHILE CRIMINAL OBAMA WAS ALLOWED ON THE BALLOT WITH ALL FORGED IDENTIFICATION PAPERS

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=101936

This is getting more and more interesting. Orly is losing it!

I wonder if he is still under house arrest. It could make it difficult to make the hearing.

Mark · **Posted:** Sat Jun 09, 2012 12:16 am

He was convicted this year to 12 months of house arrest. How and when Orly managed to obtain this subpoena is beyond me. The why is obvious - she's insane and has no concept of the term "relevance."

Mark · **Posted:** Sat Jun 09, 2012 8:56 am

I heard that the defense in the Indiana case are calling Jerry Seinfeld as a rebuttal witness to Charlie White based on the following expected testimony:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ZJdgfu3uXU

verbalobe · **Posted:** Sat Jun 09, 2012 9:00 am

I've got $5 here that says IF there is any sort of hearing in Indy on Tuesday, that at some point of the proceedings (perhaps while being dragged out of the building in a white coat) Orly mentions 'Debi Tharp' and 'civil rights defender' in the same sentence.

Falsehoods unchallenged only fester and grow.

Indiana ballot challenge (smackdown for Orly)

Who is online