Kinda off topic, but is this hokay for an attorney to do? I mean that paragraph toward the end where he says "If you fail to do this..."

I am so sick of the now-overused phrase "WE THE PEOPLE." It is arrogant beyond belief to use that phrase, because it assumes all of "the people" agree, which is ludicrous. Usage of that phrase should be banned, except for the preamble to the Constitution, where it belongs, as the Constitution broadly applies to all citizens.

I am so sick of the now-overused phrase "WE THE PEOPLE." It is arrogant beyond belief to use that phrase, because it assumes all of "the people" agree, which is ludicrous. Usage of that phrase should be banned, except for the preamble to the Constitution, where it belongs, as the Constitution broadly applies to all citizens.

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

Kinda off topic, but is this hokay for an attorney to do? I mean that paragraph toward the end where he says "If you fail to do this..."


http://obamaballotchallenge.com/if-for- ... ligibility

Might infringe on freedom of speech

Sam Sewell has a post up in which he says that they need $9,000 ASAP for Klayman to "get this case before a judge." Their original fundraising goal was $12,500, which means they have collected less than 1/3 of what they set out to collect.

Sam Sewell has a post up in which he says that they need $9,000 ASAP for Klayman to "get this case before a judge." Their original fundraising goal was $12,500, which means they have collected less than 1/3 of what they set out to collect.

Wasn't the original goal, way back when, $25,000 minimum or Klayman would refuse to take the case? Now it's just $12,500 and he's been working on it anyway?

The Birfer Bucks must be drying up.

What are the odds that Klayman gave a money back guarantee?

4/25/2012 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF STEPHEN F. ROSENTHAL, ESQ.,AS ATTORNEY FOR BARACK OBAMA, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES
4/27/2012 LETTER TO LARRY KLAYMAN, ESQ FROM JUDGE LEWIS OFFICE
5/15/2012 PLAINTIFFS RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT SECRETARY OF STATE AND DEFENDANT OBAMAS MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND DEFENDANT SECRETARY OF STATES ALTERNATIVE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

5/14/2012 FLORIDA ELECTIONS CANVASSING COMMISSIONs ANSWER TO AMENDED COMPLAINT JAMES PETERS (Attorney) on behalf of FLORIDA ELECTIONS CANVASSING COMMISSION (DEFENDANT)

5/21/2012
1

NTC OF HEARING

ON 071012 @330PM

5/14/2012 PLAINTIFFS RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT SECRETARY OF STATE AND DEFENDANT OBAMAS MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND DEFENDANT SECRETARY OF STATES ALTERNATIVE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
5/14/2012 FLORIDA ELECTIONS CANVASSING COMMISSIONs ANSWER TO AMENDED COMPLAINT JAMES PETERS (Attorney) on behalf of FLORIDA ELECTIONS CANVASSING COMMISSION (DEFENDANT)
5/23/2012 SECRETARY OF STATES MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER

Docket update, VOELTZ vs OBAMA
http://cvweb.clerk.leon.fl.us/process.a ... 8101756%27

Motion for Protective Order?

Docket update, VOELTZ vs OBAMA
http://cvweb.clerk.leon.fl.us/process.a ... 8101756%27

Motion for Protective Order?

(c) Protective Orders. Upon motion by a party or by the person from whom discovery is sought, and for good cause shown, the court in which the action is pending may make any order to protect a party or person from annoyance, embarrassment, oppression, or undue burden or expense that justice requires, including one or more of the following: (1) that the discovery not be had; (2) that the discovery may be had only on specified terms and conditions, including a designation of the time or place; (3) that the discovery may be had only by a method of discovery other than that selected by the party seeking discovery; (4) that certain matters not be inquired into, or that the scope of the discovery be limited to certain matters; (5) that discovery be conducted with no one present except persons designated by the court; (6) that a deposition after being sealed be opened only by order of the court; (7) that a trade secret or other confidential research, development, or commercial information not be disclosed or be disclosed only in a designated way; and (8) that the parties simultaneously file specified documents or information enclosed in sealed envelopes to be opened as directed by the court. If the motion for a protective order is denied in whole or in part, the court may, on such terms and conditions as are just, order that any party or person provide or permit discovery. The provisions of rule 1.380(a)(4) apply to the award of expenses incurred in relation to the motion.