Sterngard Friegen wrote:
Can someone remind me what social security and selective service numbers have to do with eligibility.
It's very simple.
Certain members of our society are assigned numbers, which then
become their identity. Many have the number tattooed, sometimes on the inner wrist. These people are far less than full citizens -- they are chattel. Any full citizen can approach any one of these 'others,' at any time, on any pretense, and demand their identity. If they answer false, or even if they answer true but perhaps too slowly or insolently, they can be imprisoned and in some cases shot dead on the spot. This is considered great sport in some communities.
There is no traffic between the conditions of the numbered "others" and the "full citizens." They may not intermarry nor share any commerce or any amenity of society. Full citizens know their own place by the words of our founding documents: We The People. "Others" are non-people, and thus not part of "we." Full citizens usually are assigned many of the same sorts of identification codes as the "others," for we are a modern, industrial land that thrives on numbers, but notably, among and between full citizens only, such numbers are accepted on faith. If I tell you my place of birth and my age, you nod politely and ask,
ah, did you know the Penobscots? And would you care for another cup of tea?But the "others" must prove such things, which they can in fact never do, because they are all liars, thieves, and rogues, hungry for a power that they could never properly exercise without bringing ruin on all around them.
Our Framers forbade any but "full citizens" to be chief executive -- it is self-evident that an "other," incapable of living a normal life, incapable of responsibility, or intelligence, or loyalty, was never meant to be able to achieve this status. And yet, in 2008, our country entered a sort of parallel dimension, a dimension of impossibility, where just such an "other"
was elected by a probably fraudulent and certainly delusional bloc of voters.
But even as putative chief executive he is no more than he ever was, no more than any other, and subject to the same challenge from "full citizens" to ascertain his identity upon any whim. His occupation of the
White House is tantamount to a home invasion, and the issue is not so much his eligibility to the Presidency -- that is easily seen to be nil -- but rather his eligibility to
exist. And as full citizens we're entitled to toy with him thus, until we tire of his jigging and jiving. He could show us his identification numbers engraved on Mosaic tablets, and we would reject them -- that's what makes us great, and him nothing.
So yeah. Those numbers don't have anything to do with eligibility.
They are tools of subjugation and humiliation, and those who carry on about them are merely grasping at a sense of superiority by asserting authority over an "other". To accept any knowledge of the man at face value is to risk accepting him as an equal, something We The People can never risk.
Login
Register
FAQ
