barnie
May 10th, 2012 @ 3:12 am

Arpaio will not testify because all of his “facts” are hearsay.
orly taitz
May 10th, 2012 @ 4:22 am

no, it is not hearsay, he did independent investigation and came to the same conclusions. You obots are desperate and are saying things that are not true

And this gem of an encounter from the link posted just above here:



Ms. ESQ indeed!

It's as if she never studied law or passed a bar exam. I know!! Huh?

Why does she not realize that neither Mr. Arpaio nor Mr. Zullo did any investigation at all?

Who can forget when Judge Lamberth wrote that she should get a Black's Law Dictionary and look up "evidence". Apparently she's been too bizzy for that.

Somebody sent me this:

http://www2.dca.ca.gov/pls/wllpub/WLLQR ... TE_ID=1201


lila?

If you click on the INCOMPLETE RENEWAL Definition, this pops up:



Also, you can see this on the google, but the site requires registration. I hate that.




So, she's real, but has no fingers.

While I was critical of the fact that sheriff Arpaio did not agree to testify in GA in response to subpoena and did not submit his report in ObamaForgeryGate, I never the less support sheriff Arpaio and I hope that he will come through and will testify in MS, IN and in other cases that I am conducting now.

Holder attacks sheriff Arpaio! You fight fire with fire! It is time to sue Holder for violation of our civil rights and for Fast and Furious!

Posted on | May 11, 2012 | 6 Comments

Holder Quo warranto 1,2

James v Obama quo warranto application

This is the second time I am posting this article. There is more tampering with my web site. Important articles disappear and the site is flooded with garbage and SPAM articles which show as pending. I have now over 2,000 pending articles. I believe it is done in order for me not to notice missing, deleted important articles.
(snip)

Ahhh, the primary challenges in Mississippi and Indiana, which have already held their primaries.

Arpaio will surely be lifting at least one finger to help Taitz.

Jeff S.
May 11th, 2012 @ 9:43 am

Since you asked what we thought, I would say that it appears that you still don’t understand standing. Plus, I have a question for you:

Exactly what makes you think you are important enough for anyone from the “regime” to tamper with your site?




Assumed
May 11th, 2012 @ 12:02 pm

Orly:

Your plate is full enough. But if the family of the slain Border Patrol agent would like to sue Holder and company, I’d be willing to contribute. If they don’t have standing, (for the idiot concerned about standing)no one does.

orly taitz
May 11th, 2012 @ 12:36 pm

contact them
also, the state of AZ should have standing

President Obama became the Democratic presumptive nominee on April 3, 2012 by securing the minimum number of pledged delegates needed to clinch the nomination

We'd totally love Edward Klein's story of how Bill Clinton called Obama an "amateur" and told his wife to quit the amazing job she was doing as Secretary of State if, you know, the Clintons weren't denying the whole thing and Klein hadn't already written another Clinton-challenged book in the past.

The New York Post being, well, The New York Post, is reporting Klein's account as if it were news even though they note that Bill Clinton's spokesperson called Klein, a former editor of the New York Times Magazine and Newsweek, "a known liar," that Hillary's spokesperson has come out against him, and that the White House has denied Klein's account. According to Klein (via The Post 's Carl Campanile), these are the types of conversations the Clintons were having at a gathering with some close friends:
...
True or not, those alleged conversations fit nicely with current political narratives like Bill Clinton wanting to call the shots for Obama's reelection campaign and Hillary, well, Hillary being badass and taking names.

That's a puzzler -- how the State of Arizona has standing to bring a civil action against the U.S. Attorney General for the death of a federal agent of another agency.

Things that make you go hmmmmmmmmmm.

...
Update:

http://www2.dca.ca.gov/pls/wllpub/WLLQR ... TE_ID=1201

Now, it shows the license is renewed and current but it expires at the end of July, 2012. Does that mean she has been working w/o a license for the last year and 10 months. (Renewal every two years +continuing education).

Yep, Lila is much more than a receptionist. She's dental/legal/financial assistant.

(cross-posted in MS thread)

That's a puzzler -- how the State of Arizona has standing to bring a civil action against the U.S. Attorney General for the death of a federal agent of another agency.

Things that make you go hmmmmmmmmmm.

How was the state of AZ and citizens harmed by Holder and by the fast and furious?

Posted on | May 12, 2012 | No Comments
Paul Jackson
11 approved
Submitted on 2012/05/12 at 6:25 am

@ The Truth…

Perhaps, since you seem to believe you are some legal genius, you could explain to those of us of lesser legal acumen just exactly how AZ would have standing.

I wait with great anticipation.



I will respond for Lonnie,

First and for most the people, who have the best standing to sue Holder and the DOJ, are the ones who lost their family members and who were wounded in the shootouts with the drug lords using thousands of Holder assault weapons.

Whistleblowers from the ATf, who were silenced, persecuted, demoted, fired for speaking out have a great standing as well under the whistleblower federal statutes.

But let’s go to the state of AZ itself. How about AZ suffering enormous financial damage caused by criminals armed with Holder weapons, roaming the state, looting, kidnapping, smuggling drugs, you name it
Do you even imagine the magnitude of damage?
Holders actions were reckless at best, or it was an intentional assault by Obama regime on a rebellions state, whereby Mexican mob and god knows who else, was used.
I sat on a presentation by a CA assemblyman talking about kidnappings in the border towns, as atrmed smugglers do not want to make a trip back to Mexico empty-handed, they kidnap people for ransom.
Just as scoundrels in our Injustice Department of Justice joined the Mexican government in suing the state of AZ, I hope that the law abiding citizens of Mexico, who lost their loved ones and who lost their property due to thousands of Holder weapons given to Mexican drug cartels, would join us in a civil action for violation of our civil rights by our own Justice Department and by Holder.

Additionally I forwarded to Holder a quo warranto, alerting him to the fact that we have a criminal with forged BC, forged selective service certificate and a stolen Social Security number. He got all the information twice by certified mail and refused to respond. He intentionally subjected 311 million Americans to the usurpation of the US Presidency. He is complicit in aiding and abetting forgery, uttering of forged documents, elections fraud, Social Security fraud, wire fraud, mail fraud and quite possibly treason. Do you know what is the punishment for treason? Life in prison or death penalty.

Is this explanation would be sufficient for you?

Orly

Uh, no.

Thank you, Orly, for proving you have no clue.

And thanks to Paul Jackson for asking the question.