Orly once again touts her legal acumen...
got several e-mails, where I was told that ORYR (supposedly Bob Nelson) and Sam Sewell are promoting a video clip with a recorded phone call from Larry Kleyman. In this phone call Kleyman is saying that in a case of Mike Voeltz, for which he now substituted as an attorney, discovery is under way and he can do it immediately. He said something afterwards that he needs to wait for something else, but I could not hear well the recording and I am not sure what was this something else for which he needs to wait for.
He did say that discovery is under way and they can do it immediately. Here is an explanation again. When a party files a case, they need to serve a complaint. Then they need to wait typically 30-60 days depending on jurisdiction and the type of the defendant for the defense to respond. If the defense files an answer, discovery can start. In Obama eligibility cases for the last 4 years the defense typically did not file an answer, but rather a motion to dismiss, saying that the case has no merit. When a party files a motion to dismiss, you cannot do discovery: you cannot depose them, you cannot subpoena a document, you cannot do interrogatories. Motion to dismiss is filed in order to protect the parties from discovery, for the parties not to have to appear in depositions. In over a 100 eligibility cases filed, motions to dismiss were granted and there was never any discovery.
I got a copy of the docket of the case of Mike Voeltz, where Larry Kleyman is an attorney. They filed their first amended complaint. I do not know, whether they served the defense with this complaint. I did not see proof of service yet. After the defense is served, you have to wait for the defense to respond. Most probably they will file a motion to dismiss.
As I said, most of those motions were granted and there is a 99% chance that this motion to dismiss will be granted as they were granted in most cases and no discovery will ever be done in that case.So, somebody needs to ask Larry Kleyman, why is he saying that the discovery in that case is under way and he can do it immediately? On what basis?
[...]
My case in Mississippi was filed two months ago. Originally the defense filed motions to dismiss. I responded to those motions.
Either the defense felt that the motions to dismiss will be denied or most probably they got wind of me getting ready to file an amended complaint with RICO causes of action, and they changed their strategy and filed an answer in order to try to limit the case to the original causes of action and avoid civil RICO. I filed RICO anyways. An actual answer was filed by both the attorney General of Mississippi on behalf of the Secretary of State of Mississippi and on behalf of the Democratic party of Mississippi. This is the difference between my case in MS and Kleyman’s case and a couple of other cases.
Much more at the link. Bascially, Orly's pissed at WND/Corsi, et al. cuz they are promoting everyone's cases except hers and are trying to syphon off 2 million birfer bucks.
She talks about other campaigns to raise money by WND and WTF happened to it? What was done/accomplished.
And she spent 6k on her "fliers" and getting them out to 40 meeeelyon people and it's all there about Obama's fraudgate-ness.
Send money to Orly... NOT TO WND!!
Login
Register
FAQ
check out:
TFB Online Law School question by an IANAL:
I believe BB pointed out that the DIY Ballot Challenge Kit does not include instructions nor fill-in-the-blank forms to deal wtih a MTD. Now what?