Indiana ballot challenge (smackdown for Orly)

nbc · **Joined:** Thu Mar 19, 2009 12:38 am **Posts:** 2530

How can we get our hands on these filings?

realist · **Joined:** Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm **Posts:** 23548

nbc wrote:

How can we get our hands on these filings?

It's being worked on.

raicha · **Posted:** Mon Apr 23, 2012 1:46 pm

BillTheCat · **Joined:** Fri Jan 13, 2012 5:25 pm **Posts:** 1428

raicha wrote:

haha you must be old like me

borealis · **Posted:** Mon Apr 23, 2012 2:43 pm

BillTheCat wrote:

raicha wrote:

haha you must be old like me

Lord I can't go back there!

I don't believe it! Raicha just hijacked a thread! :taunt:

Plutodog · **Posted:** Mon Apr 23, 2012 8:20 pm

Still, them cop cars aren't accurate for the era...They look like pretty current Chargers.

raicha · **Posted:** Mon Apr 23, 2012 8:26 pm

borealis wrote:

I don't believe it! Raicha just hijacked a thread! :taunt:

Did not.

I was merely making a pithy, humorous comment on Taitz' quandary. She returns to Indiana at her own risk.

And without a cool looking Charger.

TexasFilly · **Joined:** Mon Sep 28, 2009 12:52 pm **Posts:** 10650

raicha wrote:

borealis wrote:

I don't believe it! Raicha just hijacked a thread! :taunt:

Did not.

I was merely making a pithy, humorous comment on Taitz' quandary. She returns to Indiana at her own risk.

And without a cool looking Charger.

I don't care if it was a hijack, I =))

when I read your original post.

Mikedunford · **Posted:** Mon Apr 23, 2012 9:57 pm

borealis wrote:

I don't believe it! Raicha just hijacked a thread! :taunt:

"A threadjack is always legal when it is in the first person, such as "our threadjack". It is only in the third person - "their threadjack" - that it becomes illegal."

Whatever4 · **Posted:** Mon Apr 23, 2012 10:45 pm

Mikedunford wrote:

borealis wrote:

I don't believe it! Raicha just hijacked a thread! :taunt:

"A threadjack is always legal when it is in the first person, such as "our threadjack". It is only in the third person - "their threadjack" - that it becomes illegal."

Stealing...

MaineSkeptic · **Joined:** Thu Mar 19, 2009 2:48 pm **Posts:** 5295

Whatever4 wrote:

Stealing...

ducktape · **Posted:** Mon Apr 23, 2012 11:27 pm

Mikedunford wrote:

borealis wrote:

I don't believe it! Raicha just hijacked a thread! :taunt:

"A threadjack is always legal when it is in the first person, such as "our threadjack". It is only in the third person - "their threadjack" - that it becomes illegal."

That's a corollary to the rule of stuff and shit.

As in -- "this is my stuff (don't touch it)" -- "that's your shit (clean it up)"

Plutodog · **Posted:** Tue Apr 24, 2012 12:36 am

ducktape wrote:

Mikedunford wrote:

borealis wrote:

I don't believe it! Raicha just hijacked a thread! :taunt:

"A threadjack is always legal when it is in the first person, such as "our threadjack". It is only in the third person - "their threadjack" - that it becomes illegal."

That's a corollary to the rule of stuff and shit.

As in -- "this is my stuff (don't touch it)" -- "that's your shit (clean it up)"

Stealing that. $\:D/$

Piffle · **Posted:** Tue Apr 24, 2012 1:28 am

Quote:

Case:
ORLY TAITZ DR VS.ELECTIONS COMMISSION
Cause Number:
49D141203MI012046

<snipsies>04/16/12 OBJECTION TO TAITZ'S APPEARANCE FILED BY RESPONDENTS

04/16/12 ATTORNEY KATE SHELBY FILES APPEARANCE FOR RESPONDENT.

04/17/12 MOTION FILED. TO RECUSE JUDGE SHAHEED UNDER RULE 79 OF

04/17/12 MOTION FILED. FOR SANCTIONS FILED BY RESPONDENTS

Yessssss!

I wonder if Orly knows what an "objection to Taitz's appearance" means. No Orly, it isn't about your Tammy Faye Makeup or your Jackson Pollock sleeveless dress or your one-size-fits-two undergarments.

I have a feeling these are going to be standard fare going forward. And if you're ever admitted again PHV, it'll only happen if you're getting rope-a-doped in for $anction$.

Deal with it.

neonzx · **Joined:** Tue Mar 10, 2009 9:27 am **Posts:** 4216

Piffle wrote:

I wonder if Orly knows what an "objection to Taitz's appearance" means. No Orly, it isn't about your Tammy Faye Makeup or your Jackson Pollock sleeveless dress or your one-size-fits-two undergarments.

RTH10260 · **Posted:** Tue Apr 24, 2012 3:27 am

Piffle wrote:

Quote:

Case:
ORLY TAITZ DR VS.ELECTIONS COMMISSION
Cause Number:
49D141203MI012046

<snipsies>04/16/12 OBJECTION TO TAITZ'S APPEARANCE FILED BY RESPONDENTS

04/16/12 ATTORNEY KATE SHELBY FILES APPEARANCE FOR RESPONDENT.

04/17/12 MOTION FILED. TO RECUSE JUDGE SHAHEED UNDER RULE 79 OF

04/17/12 MOTION FILED. FOR SANCTIONS FILED BY RESPONDENTS

Yessssss!

I wonder if Orly knows what an "objection to Taitz's appearance" means. No Orly, it isn't about your Tammy Faye Makeup or your Jackson Pollock sleeveless dress or your one-size-fits-two undergarments.

I have a feeling these are going to be standard fare going forward. And if you're ever admitted again PHV, it'll only happen if you're getting rope-a-doped in for $anction$.

Deal with it.

Are we going to see some more entries for liens placed on the Taitz Palace in near future?

realist · **Joined:** Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm **Posts:** 23548

Documents to be posted soon. :-bd

Reality Check · **Posted:** Tue Apr 24, 2012 9:51 am

I can't wait! $\:D/$

realist · **Joined:** Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm **Posts:** 23548

As promised...

Quote:

ORLY TAITZ DR VS.ELECTIONS COMMISSION
Cause Number:
49D141203MI012046

03/23/12 CASE FILED. PETITION FOR EMERGENCY INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

03/27/12 SUMMONS SERVED BY CORPORATE SERVICE ON A BUSINESS ON

03/27/12 SUMMONS SERVED BY CORPORATE SERVICE ON A BUSINESS ON

04/04/12 MOTION TO RECUSE JUDGE SHAHEED, FILED BY PLAINTIFFS

04/10/12 ATTORNEY JEFFERSON GARN FILES APPEARANCE FOR DEFENDANT.

04/10/12 MOTION FILED. MOTION TO DISMISS PETITIONERS "MOTION TO

04/10/12 JACKET ENTRY:MOTION FOR JUDGE RECUSAL IS GRANTED

04/12/12 CLERK FILES NOTICE OF APPOINTMENT OF SPECIAL JUDGE PURSUANT

04/12/12 CASE HAS BEEN TRANSFERRED TO 49D141203MI012046

04/12/12 CASE HAS BEEN TRANSFERRED FROM 49D011203MI012046.

04/16/12 MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT FILED BY RESPONDENTS

04/16/12 MOTION TO DISMISS FILED. BY RESPONDENTS

04/16/12 OBJECTION TO TAITZ'S APPEARANCE FILED BY RESPONDENTS

04/16/12 ATTORNEY KATE SHELBY FILES APPEARANCE FOR RESPONDENT.

04/17/12 MOTION FILED. TO RECUSE JUDGE SHAHEED UNDER RULE 79 OF

04/17/12 MOTION FILED. FOR SANCTIONS FILED BY RESPONDENTS

Edit: ETA: The approximate 300 pages attached to Orly's petition (referred to in the documents filed) was not included.

MaineSkeptic · **Joined:** Thu Mar 19, 2009 2:48 pm **Posts:** 5295

realist wrote:

As promised...

03/23/12 CASE FILED. PETITION FOR EMERGENCY INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

....

04/16/12 OBJECTION TO TAITZ'S APPEARANCE FILED BY RESPONDENTS

For me, the second link leads erroneously to the same document as the first.

everalm · **Posted:** Tue Apr 24, 2012 10:26 am

I lurves me some Orly Numbers and format......

Parties goes 1....2....5....6....7 (7 indented right)

First Cause of Action goes 2.....3......3...... then we have 16 thrown to the right, 19 not indented

Never, mind the, comma's and punc.tuation

Welsh Dragon · **Posted:** Tue Apr 24, 2012 10:30 am

The link to the objection to Taitz' appearance seems to be pointing to the original petition.

realist · **Joined:** Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm **Posts:** 23548

MaineSkeptic wrote:

realist wrote:

As promised...

03/23/12 CASE FILED. PETITION FOR EMERGENCY INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

....

04/16/12 OBJECTION TO TAITZ'S APPEARANCE FILED BY RESPONDENTS

For me, the second link leads erroneously to the same document as the first.

The links are different, but my result is the same... Scribd maybe? I'll see if I can fixeded it. Give me a minute or two.

realist · **Joined:** Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm **Posts:** 23548

!	realist wrote:
	Weird... but I hope I have it fixeded now. Works for me. If not for you, let me know.

TexasFilly · **Joined:** Mon Sep 28, 2009 12:52 pm **Posts:** 10650

A huge thank you to our people on the ground in Indiana and Jack Ryan for obtaining and publishing these documents. =D>

Falsehoods unchallenged only fester and grow.

Indiana ballot challenge (smackdown for Orly)

Who is online