Orly's latest poopies.....

RTH10260 · **Posted:** Mon Apr 23, 2012 1:40 am

neonzx wrote:

=))

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=42241 =))

Quote:

From Dr. John Drew, former classmate :^o

of Obama

Posted on | April 22, 2012 | No Comments
John C. Drew, Ph.D.
Submitted on 2012/04/22 at 12:52 pm

I’m so proud to stand with Orly Taitz in this upcoming election cycle. She has shown remarkable courage, dedication and sacrifice in the face of Obama’s efforts to turn the U.S. in the direction of a socialist society. She is right to bring attention to the abnormalities in the Obama story. As one of the few people willing to speak out about the young Obama, I can confirm he was a Marxist when I met him in 1980.

Orly makes this sound as if she were running for the office of POTUS and not just merely a senate position in primaries. =))

Paul Pieniezny · **Posted:** Mon Apr 23, 2012 3:37 am

Reality Check wrote:

Quote:

West Coast Carl, your post with addresses accidently [sic] got deleted, I can’t find it, please e-mail to orly.taitz@gmail.com

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=41951
...

Offtopic :

Er...
Cambridge Guide to English Usage by Pam Peters (Macquarie University) [first published 2004].

Accidentally or accidently
The second and shorter spelling is not obsolete as Oxford Dictionary (1989) claims. Databases show its currency, with a score of British examples in the BNC and almost 100 American ones in CCAE. These numbers suggest that accidently is somewhat commoner in American English, and its relative frequency vis-a-vis accidentally confirms it: about 1:15 in American data, whereas it's 1:28 in the British data. Accidently is sometimes regarded as a spelling mistake or malformation, but its pedigree is obscured by the fact that accident was once an adjective, from which it could derive quite regularly. Common pronunciation of the word (with stress on the first syllable) also supports the shorter form. This is not to say we should prefer it to accidentally: rather that it cannot be dismissed as a solecism.

And here I was thinking that "accidently" (stress on the first syllable, even this grammar claims) meant "as the physical result of an actual accident" (avariya, Orlyanka). Since Orly Taitz' website has always been prone to accidents. (= candidate for understatement of the year)

neonzx · **Joined:** Tue Mar 10, 2009 9:27 am **Posts:** 4216

O rly was burning the ~3:45am oil again.

Quote:

An open letter to a reader, answers regaring Larry Kleyman, WND and ORYR

Posted on | April 23, 2012 | No Comments

On February 10 there was a written solicitation to raise $25,000 for attorney Larry Kleyman and there was a written announcement that within a week, which would be by February 17, Kleyman is filing legal actions in FL and CA.

A couple of weeks later I wrote a truthful statement that Kleyman did not file any law suits.
Only about a month after he was supposed to file 2 law suits, and after I wrote my article, he finally substituted one plaintiff in one pro se law suit in FL, that’s it. Nothing was done in CA.
Recently Kleyman issued a statement, claiming that he is in discovery, saying that he is doing depositions, interrogatories, subpoenas.

It was a lie second time around. In order to be in discovery and have a right to do depositions, interrogatories and subpoenas, you need to have either a ruling from a judge, saying that a motion to dismiss by the defendants is denied and then you go into discovery or you need to have an actual answer from the defendants, not a motion to dismiss a case as one without merit, but an answer.
Again, I posted a printout from the docket of the only eligibility case, where Kleyman took over and it showed that he is not telling the truth. There was no answer filed in his case, there wasn’t even a motion to dismiss filed, there wasn’t even a proof of service of the defendants with his complaint. So he was simply outright lying to supporters, asking for money and saying that he is in discovery and doing depositions and interrogatories, when it was simply not true.

Correct me, if I am wrong, but out of over a 100 law suits filed by different attorneys and pro se plaintiffs, right now I am the only plaintiff and attorney-pro se in MS, who has an actual answer filed by the defendants and who can do discovery. As far as I know, there isn’t any other case around the country with discovery.

remainder at link above.

Yeah yeah, I know. She's a narcissist but she nails the hucksters Klaymen and the rest of the opportunists.

Foggy · **Posted:** Mon Apr 23, 2012 7:26 am

Orly's so thrilled to be in discovery, finally, at last.

With no judge on the case to hamper her efforts.

This board requires you to be registered and logged-in before you can view hidden messages

neonzx · **Joined:** Tue Mar 10, 2009 9:27 am **Posts:** 4216

Given that Orly's posted ALL FRIGGIN' NIGHT, she didn't sleep.

The latest:

:twisted:

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=43060 :twisted:

Quote:

Important. As I am getting thousands of SPAM comments from robots, I am asking my supporters to e-mail me at orly.taitz@gmail.com, if they have any important info for me, as it is hard for me to sift through SPAM

Posted on | April 23, 2012 | No Comments

I will be installing codes to cut on robot SPAM

verbalobe · **Posted:** Mon Apr 23, 2012 8:54 am

Quote:

Important. As I am getting thousands of SPAM comments from robots, I am asking my supporters to e-mail me at orly.taitz@gmail.com, if they have any important info for me, as it is hard for me to sift through SPAM

I do not understand how this woman's mind works.

Reality Check · **Posted:** Mon Apr 23, 2012 9:00 am

verbalobe wrote:

I do not understand how this woman's mind works.

That is a deep and dark place that no one should go. [-X

neonzx · **Joined:** Tue Mar 10, 2009 9:27 am **Posts:** 4216

Damn, she's still awake!

:lol:

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=43118 :twisted:

Quote:

My response to the MSNBC Grapevine reporter Kelly Lincoln and Daily Kos. Do your homework before making accusations!

Posted on | April 23, 2012 | No Comments

I got an e-mail letter from MSNBC reporter Kelly Lincoln. She accused me of lying. She said that it was impossible for a person in Moldova to be living in a shack, when her parents are teachers. So, she concluded that I was lying, that either my parents were not teachers or I did not live in a shack. Her letter was republished in another far left publication called Daily Kos.

I have news for you Kelly. That is why I am fighting so hard. You, liberals and communists, :shock:

do not understand the extent of the nightmare that Marxist policies of Obama can unleash and are unleashing on this country.

In the Soviet Union, where I lived as a child, science teachers lived in the same poor conditions and got the same minimal salaries as the factory workers. Do you remember the slogans: everyone is equal (of course the Communist bosses, just like Orwellian pigs, are more equal then others).

Actually just a couple of years ago I made a present for my parents for their golden wedding anniversary, a trip to the old country. We went with my parents and 2 of my three sons. One had to study and couldn’t go. We visited the place, where we used to live, when I was a child. It was on the corner of Ilinskaya and Kuprianovskaya in Kischinev, across Ilinskii farmers market. While a particular shack where we lived is currently demolished, a number of similar shacks are still there and can be visited. There should be records in the city hall as well. The shacks indeed are heated with stoves. I don’t know if they have heated water now, but at the time they had only cold running water, some did not even have bathrooms and used outhouses and many lived in one room shacks.

4 paragraph rule. Link above for rest. $\:D/$

SueDB · **Posted:** Mon Apr 23, 2012 10:03 am

Oh no....more at the link....I was on the edge of my seat! :yawn:

neonzx · **Joined:** Tue Mar 10, 2009 9:27 am **Posts:** 4216

With no sleep, she's on a manic roll this morning!

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=43167 :twisted:

Quote:

Another despicable, sick attack by the supporters of Barack Obama and Diane Feinstein

Posted on | April 23, 2012 | No Comments
Orly Taitz – Former Soviet for US Senate – YouTube

You +1′d this publicly. Undo

New3 hours ago – 31 sec – Uploaded by CrazyOrlyTaitz
Orly Taitz is a native of the former Soviet Union and widely known as the Queen of the Birthers. But many of …
More videos for orly taitz »

ZekeB · **Posted:** Mon Apr 23, 2012 10:19 am

Well that is a BIG lie! She didn't sleep with Levy; she slept with Charles.

At least I am not aware of her sleeping with Jonathan.

TollandRCR · **Posted:** Mon Apr 23, 2012 10:21 am

Did not Paul P. once provide information about where the Averbuch's/Auerbuch's lived in Kishinev? As I recall, it was discrepant with this tale by Orly. Contemporary accounts from the Soviet era refer to concrete housing blocks like those still seen in many Russian cities. It was the case that tenants of these blocks sometimes shared a kitchen and bathroom facilities.

Of course to someone who lives in the leaking Taj of Laguna Niguel, many American homes might be considered shacks. Some people still heat their homes with wooden stoves.

If Orly did not always lie, I would be more receptive to this story.

raicha · **Posted:** Mon Apr 23, 2012 10:29 am

neonzx wrote:

O rly was burning the ~3:45am oil again.

Quote:

An open letter to a reader, answers regaring Larry Kleyman, WND and ORYR

It was a lie second time around. In order to be in discovery and have a right to do depositions, interrogatories and subpoenas, you need to have either a ruling from a judge, saying that a motion to dismiss by the defendants is denied and then you go into discovery or you need to have an actual answer from the defendants, not a motion to dismiss a case as one without merit, but an answer.

remainder at link above.

Yeah yeah, I know. She's a narcissist but she nails the hucksters Klaymen and the rest of the opportunists.

This isn't even the rule in California, where Taitz allegedly attended law school and purportedly passed the bar exam.

In California Superior courts a defendant may commence discovery immediately - before answering - in order to gather additional facts to frame a response. The plaintiff must wait only 10 days after service of the complaint to serve interrogatories on the defendant. Since the defendant has 30 days after service to file an answer or motion, California law clearly allows discovery before such response.

Of course, the law is different in Federal courts and in state courts other than California. Real lawyers read the statutes and court rules in the jurisdiction of the case and act accordingly. But of course, Taitz is not a real lawyer in Florida or in Mississippi where she is flagrantly practicing law without a license.

She has no clue what the rules of discovery are but opts to accuse Klayman of lying and fraud. I guess Berg's lawsuit isn't enough for her. I guess she isn't busy enough with her frivolous litigation against the President. I guess she's looking to be sued by Klayman for libel.

-xx

ZekeB · **Posted:** Mon Apr 23, 2012 10:32 am

raicha wrote:

She has no clue what the rules of discovery are but opts to accuse Klayman of lying and fraud. I guess Berg's lawsuit isn't enough for her. I guess she isn't busy enough with her frivolous litigation against the President. I guess she's looking to be sued by Klayman for libel.

-xx

Haven't you heard? Taitz is now a politician. Politicians are permitted to tell lies about other people.

Or somthing like that,

neonzx · **Joined:** Tue Mar 10, 2009 9:27 am **Posts:** 4216

raicha wrote:

I guess she's looking to be sued by Klayman for libel.

That would spice things up a bit.

realist · **Joined:** Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm **Posts:** 23583

raicha wrote:

Of course, the law is different in Federal courts and in state courts other than California. Real lawyers read the statutes and court rules in the jurisdiction of the case and act accordingly. But of course, Taitz is not a real lawyer in Florida or in Mississippi where she is flagrantly practicing law without a license.

She has no clue what the rules of discovery are but opts to accuse Klayman of lying and fraud. I guess Berg's lawsuit isn't enough for her. I guess she isn't busy enough with her frivolous litigation against the President. I guess she's looking to be sued by Klayman for libel.

All true. Yet at the time of Taitz's initial diatribe against Klayman, according to the docket the defendants had not yet been served, so there's no way he was in discovery.

According to the Hun, he has now received a Motion to Dismiss. The docket (I know, not always completely up to date) has not changed.

Quote:

37 2012 CA 000467 VOELTZ, MICHAEL C vs BARACK H OBAMA FLORIDA DEMOCRAT NOMINEE FOR PRESID

2/15/2012 CIVIL COVER SHEET

2/15/2012 COMPLAINT ( CONTEST OF ELECTION AND DECLARATORY JUDGMENT AND EQUITY) Receipt: 610925 Date: 02/15/2012 $400.00

3/16/2012 AMENDED COMPLAINT CONTESTING ELECTION OF BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA

3/21/2012 COPIES Receipt: 625269 Date: 03/21/2012 $8.00

3/21/2012 COPIES Receipt: 625524 Date: 03/21/2012 $7.00

4/12/2012 SUMMONS ISSUED BARACK H OBAMA FLORIDA DEMOCRAT NOMINEE FOR PRESID (DEFENDANT); Receipt: 634008 Date: 04/12/2012 $10.00

4/12/2012 SUMMONS ISSUED FLORIDA ELECTIONS CANVASSING COMMISSION (DEFENDANT); Receipt: 634008 Date: 04/12/2012 $10.00

4/12/2012 SUMMONS ISSUED KEN DETZNER SECRETARY OF STATE OF FLORIDA (DEFENDANT); Receipt: 634008 Date: 04/12/2012 $10.00

Reality Check · **Posted:** Mon Apr 23, 2012 10:42 am

Oly is extremely jealous of "Kleyman". He is obviously getting paid for his ballot challenge nonsense and that is driving her Klazy. :lol:

Whatever4 · **Posted:** Mon Apr 23, 2012 10:52 am

Foggy wrote:

This board requires you to be registered and logged-in before you can view hidden messages

raicha · **Posted:** Mon Apr 23, 2012 10:56 am

realist wrote:

All true. Yet at the time of Taitz's initial diatribe against Klayman, according to the docket the defendants had not yet been served, so there's no way he was in discovery.

I agree that the petition has probably not been served, but a docket doesn't necessarily tell the whole story. I have a proof of service on my desk right now that I am holding until I file it with the request to enter default to save my client a few bucks in online filing fees.

But Klayman was careful about what he actually said:

Quote:

Currently, the case has been filed, amended once, and is now preparing discovery. We anticipate interrogatories, fending off a motion to dismiss, and a hearing, with witnesses, evidence.

Klayman did not claim to be "in discovery", merely that discovery was being prepared. And that he needs $10,000 in 10 days to keep preparing it.

realist · **Joined:** Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm **Posts:** 23583

Quote:

Currently, the case has been filed, amended once, and is now preparing discovery. We anticipate interrogatories, fending off a motion to dismiss, and a hearing, with witnesses, evidence.

Klayman did not claim to be "in discovery", merely that discovery was being prepared. And that he needs $10,000 in 10 days to keep preparing it.

Ah, but that's an altered comment from his initial offering after he'd been called out on stating he was "in discovery." As of a couple of days ago there were still comments quoting his initial offering.

Litlebritdifrnt2 · **Posted:** Mon Apr 23, 2012 11:06 am

Can anyone else find that Kelly Lincoln piece at Kos, cause I sure as hell cant.

ETA - never mind found it.

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/04/2 ... Orly-Taitz

realist · **Joined:** Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm **Posts:** 23583

Beat me to it Anita... I just found it and was about to post it. :-bd

neonzx · **Joined:** Tue Mar 10, 2009 9:27 am **Posts:** 4216

Litlebritdifrnt2 wrote:

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/04/22/1085532/-New-Questions-about-Orly-Taitz

From the comments....

raicha · **Posted:** Mon Apr 23, 2012 11:13 am

Klayman is a slippery fellow, ain't he?

But even his original statement is a pretty thin line to hang him by. I doubt he's doing much at all without being paid, but it is possible to do quite a lot non-publicly.

Just sayin'. I'm not out to defend Klayman; my point is that Taitz has no friggin' clue. But I guess I was just being redundant.

:lol:

realist · **Joined:** Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm **Posts:** 23583

raicha wrote:

:oops:

Klayman is a slippery fellow, ain't he?

But even his original statement is a pretty thin line to hang him by. I doubt he's doing much at all without being paid, but it is possible to do quite a lot non-publicly.

Just sayin'. I'm not out to defend Klayman; my point is that Taitz has no friggin' clue. But I guess I was just being redundant.

:lol:

Indeed, we all know she's clueless.

Here, sometimes discovery is actually included with the Complaint when filed.

Falsehoods unchallenged only fester and grow.

Orly's latest poopies.....

Who is online