LIBERI, et al. v TAITZ, et al. (C.D. CA)

mimi · **Posted:** Tue Apr 17, 2012 8:27 pm

A bunch of stuff was uploaded to scribd. Probably easiest to just go to the scribd account:

http://www.scribd.com/nocompromisewtruth

But I'll post the direct links too:

Ed Hale Jimbot Post - Threat at Liberty and Freedom Radio

http://www.scribd.com/doc/89744757/Ed-H ... edom-Radio

That one isn't part of the court filings. But it's recent. I'll copy to the ed hale thread.

Declaration of Todd Sankey Doc 496-2
http://www.scribd.com/doc/89743895/Decl ... -Doc-496-2

Memorandum Points and Authorities Doc 496-1
http://www.scribd.com/doc/89743628/Memo ... -Doc-496-1

Motion for Discovery Doc 496
http://www.scribd.com/doc/89743438/Moti ... ry-Doc-496

Notice of Deficiency in Electronically Filed Documents (G-112) Doc 495
http://www.scribd.com/doc/89741348/Noti ... 12-Doc-495

Exhibit B (Neil Sankey) Doc 494-2
http://www.scribd.com/doc/89740066/Exhi ... -Doc-494-2

Exhibit a (Neil Sankey) Doc 494-1
http://www.scribd.com/doc/89739555/Exhi ... -Doc-494-1

Declaration (Motion Related) Neil Sankey Doc 494
http://www.scribd.com/doc/89739134/Decl ... ey-Doc-494

Declaration (Motion Related) Doc 493
http://www.scribd.com/doc/89738766/Decl ... ed-Doc-493

Exhibit C Doc 492-3
http://www.scribd.com/doc/89738656/Exhibit-C-Doc-492-3

Exhibit B Doc 492-2
http://www.scribd.com/doc/89738409/Exhibit-B-Doc-492-2

Exhibit a Doc 492-1
http://www.scribd.com/doc/89738015/Exhibit-a-Doc-492-1

Declaration (Motion Related) Doc 492
http://www.scribd.com/doc/89737517/Decl ... ed-Doc-492

Proposed Order Granting LexisNexis Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment Doc 491-3
http://www.scribd.com/doc/89736965/Prop ... -Doc-491-3

Proposed Order Statement of Uncontroverted Facts and Conclusions of Law on LexisNexis Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgement Doc 491-2
http://www.scribd.com/doc/89736283/Prop ... -Doc-491-2

Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of LexisNexis Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgement Doc 491-1
http://www.scribd.com/doc/89736038/Memo ... -Doc-491-1

Motion for Summary Judgment Doc 491
http://www.scribd.com/doc/89735310/Moti ... nt-Doc-491

Order on Ex Parte Application for Extension of Time to File a Document Doc 490
http://www.scribd.com/doc/89734741/Orde ... nt-Doc-490

Reply (Morrison - Foerster) Doc 488
http://www.scribd.com/doc/89734478/Repl ... er-Doc-488

(I already posted the following three, but I'm posting again cuz they were uploaded with all of the above.)

Liberi v Taitz - Plffs Opp to Reed's Ex Parte Motion Re Continuance Doc 487
http://www.scribd.com/doc/89734091/Libe ... ce-Doc-487

Reed Defendants Ex Parte Motion for Ext of Time Doc 486
http://www.scribd.com/doc/89733727/Reed ... me-Doc-486

Minutes of in Chambers Order-Directive - No Proceeding Held Doc 485
http://www.scribd.com/doc/89733367/Minu ... ld-Doc-485

The link to the scribd account:
http://www.scribd.com/nocompromisewtruth

edit.

Sequoia32 · **Posted:** Tue Apr 17, 2012 8:39 pm

Did I read that right? Neal Sankey and his hate (birfing) sunk his son's company without his son's knowledge?

Yet another birfer who damaged family connections?

raicha · **Posted:** Tue Apr 17, 2012 10:21 pm

Say, ain't everybody supposed to ask for permission before filing a boatload of pleadings?

A Legal Lohengrin · **Joined:** Tue Oct 26, 2010 9:56 pm **Posts:** 9369

raicha wrote:

Say, ain't everybody supposed to ask for permission before filing a boatload of pleadings?

I guess the last round of sanctions didn't teach Berg anything.

mimi · **Posted:** Thu Apr 19, 2012 8:12 pm

Give a Birfer a hearing...

Liberi v Taiitz Philip J Berg Esq Decl in Opp ToSankey's Rule 36(b) Motion_Doc 499
(Declaration of Phil Berg)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/90210586/Libe ... on-Doc-499

Liberi v Taitz Plaintiffs Opp to Sankey's Rule 36(b) Motion Doc 498
http://www.scribd.com/doc/90210308/Libe ... on-Doc-498

Motion in Chambers Regarding Hearing for Sankey Summary Judgment Doc 497
http://www.scribd.com/doc/90210043/Moti ... nt-Doc-497

tjh · **Joined:** Wed Oct 07, 2009 4:18 pm **Posts:** 2474

Filed yesterday
:evil:

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=40531 :evil:

Liberi v Doff 9th circuit filed final reply 04.13.2012
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/Liberi-v-Doff-9th-circuit-filed-final-reply-04.13.2012.pdf

Liberi v DOFF filed reply by Orly Taitz
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/Liberi-v-DOFF-filed-reply-by-Orly-Taitz.pdf

Edit: Not written by The Obly -- the grammar is too good. (And commas)
By: /s/ - Jeffrey P. Cunningham, Esq

Berg Report 02.10.2012 Disciplinary trial

Berg complaint by the disciplinary board

Berg answer to the disciplinary board

[ links on Obly site ]

raicha · **Posted:** Fri Apr 20, 2012 1:23 pm

Quote:

This brief complies with the typeface requirements of Fed. R. App. P. Rule
32(a)(5) and the type style requirements of Fed. R. App. P. Rule 32(a)(6) because
this brief has been prepared in a proportionally spaced typeface using WordPerfect
in Times New Roman font size 14.

Except for the random parts printed in Courier, font size 10.

:roll:

tjh · **Joined:** Wed Oct 07, 2009 4:18 pm **Posts:** 2474

The first link above IS by The Obly.

LM K · **Posted:** Fri Apr 20, 2012 2:47 pm

Piffle wrote:

lyssandri wrote:

Trying to read through all of those notes, my eyes are just glazing over and my brain is getting tied up in knots. Would someone be kind enough to maybe summarize the overall effect of all of that and just post a cumulative summary overview of the high points of what happened?

Thanks!!

Mini-Cliff's:

3. Now that Intelius has won its part of the battle, the judge also granted leave for them to file a motion for sanctions aginst Berg & Buddies. Reading the tea leaves, this would tend to suggest that the judge may be poised to lower the boom on Berg for frivolously (and maybe even maliciously) bringing Intelius into the lawsuit. While there's no guarantee that he'll order sanctions, I'd guess there's a better than even chance that Intelius will collect attorneys' fees and expenses, accompanied by written findings that will not be flattering to Berg.

This Judge lost his patience with Berg and Taitz ages ago. As long as the motion for Intelius is well-reasoned, I can't imagine the Judge not ordering sanctions.

Have we heard any update about Berg's disciplinary results? It would be a bummer if he had to report yet another sanctions ruling! I would weep crocodile tears!

realist · **Joined:** Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm **Posts:** 23561

Quote:

Have we heard any update about Berg's disciplinary results? It would be a bummer if he had to report yet another sanctions ruling! I would weep crocodile tears!

Nothing new since the 2/10 hearing.

LM K · **Posted:** Fri Apr 20, 2012 3:55 pm

realist wrote:

Quote:

Have we heard any update about Berg's disciplinary results? It would be a bummer if he had to report yet another sanctions ruling! I would weep crocodile tears!

Nothing new since the 2/10 hearing.

I'm reading the "Investigative Report" regarding the PA State Board disciplinary hearing; it's a doozy.

At Orly's!

:evil:

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/wp-content/ ... -trial.pdf :evil:

This report was written for Orly; I think she hired someone to attend the hearing. The report is marked:

Quote:

This report is confidential and is intended solely for the use and information of the client to whom it is addressed.

But when has Orly cared about anyone's privacy but her own?

Quote:

Mr. Berg admitted to all charges regarding violations of the rules of conduct, including competence, scope of responsibility, lack of diligence, constant communications, conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice, and misrepresentation to the client. He admits that this is not acceptable behavior for an attorney. He claimed that the case occurred during the time of family duties but recognizes that this is not an excuse.

Mr Berg stated that he was reprimanded in 2005 for commingling funds and in 2006 for not properly communicating with a client. He also admits that his bad behavior has had a negative effect on the legal community.

snip .....

Mr. Berg also stated that he owed an apology to the panel for frivolous claims and suits. When his attorney asked why, he said that in the past he simply had the wrong thought process. He agrees that he acted irresponsibly. He accepts full responsibility. Ha understands and admits that Mrs. McCracken did not receive letters and he dropped his original defense to this case against him.

snip .....

Many of the questions by Ms. Dugan revolved around the letters that Ms. Liberi sent to Mrs. McCracken. Mr. Berg claims that he did not direct Ms. Liberi to write the letters and therefore he not have firsthand knowledge of them. He said that it was not uncommon for his staff to take it upon themselves to write letters when they felt it was appropriate.

Oh my!

raicha · **Posted:** Fri Apr 20, 2012 4:02 pm

According to this report, character witness Carol Ann Miller has been Berg's fiance' for 16 years!

This length of this lawsuit is nuttin'. Berg can stall for decades.

Sterngard Friegen · **Posted:** Fri Apr 20, 2012 4:05 pm

A lawyer who pays little attention to his law practice, and then blames the problems on his staff, should not be a lawyer for long.

LM K · **Posted:** Fri Apr 20, 2012 4:09 pm

Ya, after reading that I can't imagine Berg not being disbarred.

Piffle · **Posted:** Fri Apr 20, 2012 4:11 pm

raicha wrote:

According to this report, character witness Carol Ann Miller has been Berg's fiance' for 16 years!

This length of this lawsuit is nuttin'. Berg can stall for decades.

So should we conclude that Ms. Miller is extremely dumb or extremely wise?

raicha · **Posted:** Fri Apr 20, 2012 4:20 pm

Sterngard Friegen wrote:

A lawyer who pays little attention to his law practice, and then blames the problems on his staff, should not be a lawyer for long.

Hard to say who is taking the fall for whom. Sounds like the guy did not communicate with the client and then when he was accused by the Bar, Liberi falsified and backdated correspondence.

So he's covering her fraud on the Bar and she's covering his incompetence.

They are a super team.

Whatever4 · **Posted:** Fri Apr 20, 2012 9:44 pm

Piffle wrote:

raicha wrote:

According to this report, character witness Carol Ann Miller has been Berg's fiance' for 16 years!

This length of this lawsuit is nuttin'. Berg can stall for decades.

So should we conclude that Ms. Miller is extremely dumb or extremely wise?

Or nervous about bankruptcies...

mimi · **Posted:** Fri Apr 20, 2012 11:46 pm

Liberi Et Al v Taitz Et Al - Plaintiffs Memorandum in Opp to Reeds MSJ Doc 500
http://www.scribd.com/doc/90435214/Libe ... SJ-Doc-500

Liberi Et Al v Taitz Et Al - Statement of Genuine Facts Doc 501
http://www.scribd.com/doc/90434876/Libe ... ts-Doc-501

Liberi Et Al v Taitz Et Al - Berg Decl_opt Doc 502
http://www.scribd.com/doc/90434207/Libe ... pt-Doc-502

Liberi v Taitz Liberi Declaration_opt Doc 503
http://www.scribd.com/doc/90433810/Libe ... pt-Doc-503

Liberi v Taitz Ostella Declaration Doc 504
http://www.scribd.com/doc/90433398/Libe ... on-Doc-504

Liberi Et Al v Taitz Et Al - Brent Liberi Declaration Doc 505
http://www.scribd.com/doc/90433248/Libe ... on-Doc-505

Liberi v Taitz Decl of Dr Frank Ostella Doc 506
http://www.scribd.com/doc/90433013/Libe ... la-Doc-506

Liberi Et Al v Taitz Et Al - Req to Strike and Objections Doc 507
http://www.scribd.com/doc/90432848/Libe ... ns-Doc-507

Highlands · **Posted:** Fri Apr 20, 2012 11:48 pm

I wonder how many trees these asshats have killed filing all of this inane bullshit? :((

ZekeB · **Posted:** Sat Apr 21, 2012 12:02 pm

Liquidated damages... $5000 per tree. That would provide an incentive.

rosy · **Joined:** Sat Jan 14, 2012 5:36 pm **Posts:** 733

It looks more like Jarndyce v Jarndyce with every new document. Is there provision in law for the judge to bang all of the parties' heads together, rather than disentangling this mountain of claim and counterclaim? I can't help feeling it would be more productive and a better use of the court's time.

mimi · **Posted:** Tue Apr 24, 2012 1:30 pm

Plutodog · **Posted:** Tue Apr 24, 2012 1:32 pm

Yabbut...what's it all mean? :?:

mimi · **Posted:** Tue Apr 24, 2012 1:38 pm

Plutodog wrote:

Yabbut...what's it all mean? :?:

I think it means a lot more trees died.

Sterngard Friegen · **Posted:** Tue Apr 24, 2012 1:50 pm

Plutodog wrote:

Yabbut...what's it all mean? :?:

The appellant doesn't understand what an appeal is, how to take one, argue one or support one. And that her ghost may write better than she does but has no other demonstrable skills.

Falsehoods unchallenged only fester and grow.

LIBERI, et al. v TAITZ, et al. (C.D. CA)

Who is online