Falsehoods unchallenged only fester and grow.


All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 637 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 ... 26  Next   
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Apr 20, 2012 10:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2009 6:36 am
Posts: 5201
Location: Belize City
Occupation: Visiting doctors.
Snopesed!

_________________
If a bunch of religious nuts can vote away your fundamental civil rights, then your rights are not self-evident, inalienable, or endowed by God. Quod erat demonstrandum. -- Stonekettle Station
ImageImageImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 21, 2012 2:16 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2009 6:06 am
Posts: 4929
Location: Glocca Morra
Whatever4 wrote:
AnitaMaria wrote:
The stupidity and futility of the entire birfer movement is summed up very nicely in the 30 seconds from 43:30-44:00 in the second video where Ms. Hill stipulates that the pdf of the LFBC does not matter to this case. The look on Mario's face is priceless, poor sap. :-*


Can somebody make a clip of that part? I think that's the part that birthers are claiming shows her admitting to forgery. Thanks. :xo


Here are the last 5½ minutes of that video.

flv File format : flv

_________________
"What's it like being an atheist? It's like being the only sober person in a car full of drunks, and they refuse to let you drive." Thomas Jefferson

Birtherism is so ridiculous that I no longer feel obligated to treat proponents w/slightest degree of respect or civility


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 21, 2012 2:51 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2009 6:36 am
Posts: 5201
Location: Belize City
Occupation: Visiting doctors.
GreatGrey wrote:
Here are the last 5½ minutes of that video.


Thanks!

Mouse Pie for the Bird Man:


_________________
If a bunch of religious nuts can vote away your fundamental civil rights, then your rights are not self-evident, inalienable, or endowed by God. Quod erat demonstrandum. -- Stonekettle Station
ImageImageImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 21, 2012 3:05 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2010 8:04 am
Posts: 5253
Granny!!!! :((

_________________
You cannot kill what has no life...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 21, 2012 3:54 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2009 6:36 am
Posts: 5201
Location: Belize City
Occupation: Visiting doctors.
Suranis wrote:
Granny!!!! :((


Owl pie for the Mouse Man?


_________________
If a bunch of religious nuts can vote away your fundamental civil rights, then your rights are not self-evident, inalienable, or endowed by God. Quod erat demonstrandum. -- Stonekettle Station
ImageImageImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 21, 2012 9:17 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2010 5:10 pm
Posts: 5769
Location: My business address is in Pennsylvania
[-X

No more pies in this thread please.

_________________
ImageImageImageImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 21, 2012 9:33 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 09, 2009 1:27 am
Posts: 1671
Location: Southern Gondwana
raicha wrote:
[-X

No more pies in this thread please.

Why, are you on a diet?
Regards .............Dick


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 21, 2012 10:08 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2010 8:04 am
Posts: 5253
Image

Anyway, I just got around to seeing the first part of the case. Mario juses like to waffle dosent he... and I was getting definate my cousin Vinney vides at times there.

And once again I am very impressed with americas judges.

_________________
You cannot kill what has no life...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 21, 2012 10:30 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2012 1:21 pm
Posts: 411
GreatGrey wrote:
AnitaMaria wrote:
The stupidity and futility of the entire birfer movement is summed up very nicely in the 30 seconds from 43:30-44:00 in the second video where Ms. Hill stipulates that the pdf of the LFBC does not matter to this case. The look on Mario's face is priceless, poor sap. :-*
flv File format : flv


Once again, this NJ ruling and the way the case was handled, with the Judge allowing Apuzzo's birther arguments to be heard and discussed on their "merits", shoots down everything put out by Taitz and the Cold Case Posse concerning the online image of Obama's birth certificate.
The analysis and all the speculation and smears derived from those online images is irrelevant nonsense that no court, anywhere, will ever EVER again consider.
That entire birther segment of attack based upon "layers" and "forgery", etc. etc. is now legally moot. It is gone.
Zullo can make idiot birthers go "oooh...ahhh" with his slick WND produced videos at his completely phoney book sales events, and Taitz can send to courts her "package" of similar gibberish she tried to present in Georgia, but no court will allow it as evidence. Analysis and speculation about an online image of a document is irrelevant - it is not evidence.

As Apuzzo stated in this NJ hearing, birthers rely upon this concept of "totality" - "but, but, but Your Honor....you have to be overwhelmed by how many disconnected pieces of nonsense I am piling up...."
They have convinced themselves that the more they pile up - regardless of each piece being irrelevant to the matter before the court, regardless of the lack of veracity of each piece, without concern that their case becomes a jumbled amorphic mess, without concern that some of their pieces contradict others - they are basing their entire legal argument upon the false concept that the more "totality" they can dump on a court, the stronger their case becomes.....
That only works with people who are stuck in some fantasy land of utter stupidity.

This case shows the the way to take the birthers down. Confront them in a courtroom. Let them present their "case".
Dismantle and thoroughly discredit each part of their wild unfounded assertions and accusations with logic, facts, and the law.
Knock their feet from under them, leave them no place to stand.

_________________
It is not clear, how these two individuals merge into one person. It is not clear, who came back from Indiana, Orly Taitz or Lena. We have no idea, who is residing in the Taitz house: is it Orly Taitz or is it
Lena Lettmifeeenisch ? If it is Lena, what, happened to Orly Taitz ?
Lila Dubert


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 21, 2012 4:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2012 1:33 am
Posts: 289
Whatever4 wrote:
AnitaMaria wrote:
The stupidity and futility of the entire birfer movement is summed up very nicely in the 30 seconds from 43:30-44:00 in the second video where Ms. Hill stipulates that the pdf of the LFBC does not matter to this case. The look on Mario's face is priceless, poor sap. :-*


Can somebody make a clip of that part? I think that's the part that birthers are claiming shows her admitting to forgery. Thanks. :xo


Actually, I think they are referring to her statement (opening statement) where she essentially says, "Even if the online BC was a valid birth certificate, it wouldn't matter." She means this to say that the online BC is not a valid BC because ITS ONLINE and not a certified hard copy (which hasn't been presented because it's not necessary.) They take it to mean that she's admitting the online BC is not valid because of the layers, etc..


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 25, 2012 9:24 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 9:09 pm
Posts: 7781
Location: USA
Occupation: Amateur radio host trying to figure out how to lower myself to shameless begging and stupid petition filing. It might be a good way to make a living. ;)
Mario showed up on John Woodman's blog a couple of days ago. He seems miffed that John has been taking apart his arguments point by point for the past few weeks. Most of the comments are in on this topic: http://www.obamabirthbook.com/http:/www ... n-citizen/

ballantine is there too. Mario claims that Jefferson supports his Vattle nonsense with his wording of the 1779 citizenship act. Mario makes this claim:

Apuzzo wrote:
Jefferson said in his 1779 citizenship law:

“[A]ll white persons born within the territory of this commonwealth . . . and all infants wheresoever born, whose father, if living, or otherwise, whose mother was a citizen at the time of their birth . . . shall be deemed citizens of this commonwealth, until they relinquish that character in manner herein after expressed.”

So, if you were at the time the law went into effect a “white person” who was born in Virginia, you were a citizen of Virginia. But if you were an infant born in Virginia, you became a citizen only if your father was a citizen. So Jefferson grandfathered white adults to be jus soli citizens. But for infants, they had to be born to citizen parents (jus sanguinis). Note that Jefferson did not require in his law that the infants had to be white, for by requiring that they followed the condition of their fathers it was not necessary for him to say so explicitly. Other than the racial element which was later removed from the Virginia citizenship laws, sure sounds like Article II, Section 1, Clause 5, which grandfathered “citizens of the United States” (by jus soli or naturalization) to be eligible to be President and then after the adoption of the Constitution, provided that they had to be “natural born Citizens” (only by jus soli and jus sanguinis combined) in order to be so eligible. Sure also sounds like the Naturalization Acts of 1790, 1795, 1802, and 1855, which provided that a child born in the United States or out of it to alien parents was himself or herself an alien.


Here is what the law actually said without the deceptive omissions:

Quote:
Be it enacted by the General Assembly, that all white persons born within the territory of this commonwealth and all who have resided therein two years next before the passing of this act, and all who shall hereafter migrate into the same; and shall before any court of record give satisfactory proof by their own oath or affirmation, that they intend to reside therein, and moreover shall give assurance of fidelity to the commonwealth; and all infants wheresoever born, whose father, if living, or otherwise, whose mother was, a citizen at the time of their birth, or who migrate hither, their father, if living, or otherwise their mother becoming a citizen, or who migrate hither without father or mother, shall be deemed citizens of this commonwealth, until they relinquish that character in manner as herein after expressed: And all others not being citizens of any the United States of America, shall be deemed aliens…. And in order to preserve to the citizens of this commonwealth, that natural right, which all men have of relinquishing the country, in which birth, or other accident may have thrown them, and, seeking subsistance and happiness wheresoever they may be able, or may hope to find them: And to declare unequivocably what circumstances shall be deemed evidence of an intention in any citizen to exercise that right, it is enacted and declared, that whensoever any citizen of this commonwealth, shall by word of mouth …openly declare to the same court, that he relinquishes the character of a citizen,…such person shall be considered as having exercised his natural right of expatriating himself, and shall be deemed no citizen of this commonwealth from the time of his departure. The free white inhabitants of every of the states, parties to the American confederation, paupers, vagabonds and fugitives from justice excepted, shall be intitled to all rights, privileges, and immunities of free citizens in this commonwealth, and shall have free egress, and regress, to and from the same, and shall enjoy therein, all the privileges of trade, and commerce, subject to the same duties, impositions and restrictions as the citizens of this commonwealth….


Mario is trying to argue that the law relied on jus soli for children born in Virginia up until the act was passed then magically changed to jus sanguinus (but based primarily on the father's citizenship) after the law was enacted. The law was further clarified in 1783 to show that the meaning was that anyone (except a slave) born in Virginia was a citizen. ballantine quoted it:

Quote:
“Be it therefore enacted by the General Assembly, That all free persons, born within the territory of this commonwealth; all persons not being natives, who have obtained a right to citizenship under the act intituled “An act declaring who shall be deemed citizens of this commonwealth;” and also all children wheresoever born, whose fathers or mothers are or were citizens at the time of the birth of such children, shall be deemed citizens of this commonwealth, until they relinquish that character in manner herein after mentioned;….’


The comments are worth a read just to show that Mario is willing to twist the meaning of plain English rather than admit he quoted the Virginia citizenship law without understanding what it said and that it really destroyed his case.

_________________
The O-bot prayer:

Grant me the superior wit and biting sarcasm to mock the Birthers whose minds I cannot change
The superior facts, law, and reason to change the minds of the Birthers whom I can
And the wisdom to team up at Politijab The Fogbow with those who share my addiction and know the difference


- Allison 2/16/2009


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 25, 2012 10:03 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 1:01 am
Posts: 18609
Location: Planet Earth (most the time)
Occupation: I'm not at liberty to say. In other words, I'd tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.
Woodman:

Quote:
[...]But if we search at google books for books published between the publication of Vattel’s work (1758) and up to about the end of the lifetime of the Framers of the Consitution (1825), for the following choices:

1) “offenses against the law of nations” vattel, and

2) “offenses against the law of nations” blackstone,

the first choice produces exactly one result (“Pamphlets of the American Revolution,” which as I’ve noted elsewhere has reference to a BUNCH of different topics),

and the second choice — the one with Blackstone instead of Vattel — produces 3 results.

There is therefore no evidence that when the Framers of the Constitution wrote that Congress had the power to punish “Offenses Against the Law of Nations,” they were referring to Vattel.

Actually, it gets worse… much worse.

It turns out the title of Book 4, Chapter 5, of Blackstone’s Commentaries is:

“Of Offenses against the Law of Nations”

[...]



:lol:

_________________
Yes We Can! ~ Thomas Jefferson


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 15, 2012 12:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2011 5:41 pm
Posts: 2128
Apuzzo has filed an appeal of his ballot challenge:
http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2012/05/purpu ... allot.html


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 15, 2012 1:05 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 13, 2012 5:25 pm
Posts: 1430
AnitaMaria wrote:
Apuzzo has filed an appeal of his ballot challenge:
http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2012/05/purpu ... allot.html


W..why mommy? Why won't the bad man stop?

](*,)

_________________
"It’s time for this charade to stop” - Cold Case Posse Member Mike Zullo, destroying Irony Meters worldwide


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 15, 2012 2:23 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 23, 2009 3:38 pm
Posts: 1714
Location: about 26,000 light years from the center of the Milky Way Galaxy,
Occupation: Chemtrail Scheduling Supervisor, Southwest Division
AnitaMaria wrote:
Apuzzo has filed an appeal of his ballot challenge:
http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2012/05/purpu ... allot.html

He's claiming in his appeal there is a third type of US citizenship, the "Article II "natural born citizen"" :-?

_________________
“I wish I would have a real tragic love affair and get so bummed out that I'd just quit my job and become a bum for a few years, because I was thinking about doing that anyway.”
Jack Handey


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 15, 2012 2:36 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 12:38 am
Posts: 2532
Such a rich imagination but really unsupportable by legal argument. Mario is in his usual form.

_________________
- Credimus quod credere volumus -


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 15, 2012 7:33 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm
Posts: 23593
Who will play Apuzzo? De Niro perhaps? :lol:

Quote:
Art Telles said...

Another appeal for the history books...

Mr. Apuzzo,

When Hollywood awakens from it's leftist, progressive and marxist stupor, movies will be made about your efforts, and others, of course, to speak truth to power, specifically the courts, about the OCCUPIER-in-Chief BHObama, the "occupy" insurgent, THE "putsch(er)" Man, the puppet on the George Soros string, the latest iteration of the progressive insurrection, and it seems, the first marxist/islamic "putsch" of the 21st century.

Of course, I could be wrong.

It could be simply a marxist "putsch" using the Islamic jihad as a shield.

Art


=))

_________________
Let us tenderly and kindly cherish, therefore, the means of knowledge. Let us dare to read, think, speak, and write.
John Adams


ImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 15, 2012 7:41 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 3:53 pm
Posts: 12902
Location: location, location
Occupation: Ruler of the Intarwebz
ORYR links to an order by the court imposing a greatly accelerated briefing schedule:

  • Appellants' Opening Brief: May 18 (this Friday)
  • Respondents' Briefs (Obama and NJ AG): May 25 (next Friday)
  • Telephonic oral argument: Wednesday, May 30 at 1:00 p.m.

The appeal will be heard and decided by a panel of three Appellate Division judges, Clarkson S. Fisher, P.J.A.D., Linda G. Baxter, J.A.D., and Philip S. Carchman, J.A.D.

I will add dates to the Birther Events Calendar.

Edit: Doesn't look like the NJ AG is a party, or even the Secretary of State. Not sure why the court is going overboard to make sure the AG gets all the briefs and has the opportunity to file a brief (even though not a party!). I suspect the state of New Jersey is getting ready to kick some Putzo butt.

_________________
... then one day I found some birthers on my planet. Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 15, 2012 8:52 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 12:32 am
Posts: 19999
Location: FEMA Camp 17 -- Malibu (Hey! You! Get off the lawn!)
Occupation: Schadenfreude artist.
This is a case that could use a good notice of removal to Federal court.

_________________
When there are a finite number of ways to screw something up, Orly Taitz will find an infinite number of ways to do so. (The Sternsig Rule.)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 15, 2012 9:11 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 3:53 pm
Posts: 12902
Location: location, location
Occupation: Ruler of the Intarwebz
I'm assuming that P.J.A.D. means Presiding Judge of the Appellate Division.

The boss.

And he wants pedal to the metal and wrap up the whole enchilada in 15 days. No, not wrap the enchilada in metal. You know what I mean.

I suspect there's a reason for all that, and it's not because they plan to take the President off the ballot. I think Mario better be mighty damned careful what he writes in this brief, but I know he won't be.

I dunno. I smell the hammer. Been wrong before, though ...

_________________
... then one day I found some birthers on my planet. Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 15, 2012 9:14 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2009 11:17 pm
Posts: 13608
Location: New England
Occupation: Professor of Sociology
Mario cannot think that fast. His only recourse will be to pick and choose nuggets from his other filings if he is to make that Friday deadline.

_________________
"Someone should tell Mrs. Reagan that young people -- not even young people on drugs -- are not the ones responsible for the major problems besetting the world!" John Irving, A Prayer for Owen Meany: A Novel, p. 370.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 15, 2012 9:19 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 3:53 pm
Posts: 12902
Location: location, location
Occupation: Ruler of the Intarwebz
The pressure will add to his troubles.

Four days to prepare an appellate brief is not a lot of time. He's not going to have a lot of time to play on John Woodman's blog this week. And he'll be wondering WHY the big hurry on this.

"Could it be a good thing, the court recognizes this is a great Constitutional Emergency?

"Or is it that they want to pound the hammer on my headbone and they don't want to wait months to do it?"

:-k

_________________
... then one day I found some birthers on my planet. Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 15, 2012 9:36 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm
Posts: 23593
Foggy wrote:
Four days to prepare an appellate brief is not a lot of time. He's not going to have a lot of time to play on John Woodman's blog this week. And he'll be wondering WHY the big hurry on this.


As I understood it, Mario requested an expedited scheduling. He got it.

I'd bet dollars to donuts he already has his brief written (and I'll also bet it's not very brief).

_________________
Let us tenderly and kindly cherish, therefore, the means of knowledge. Let us dare to read, think, speak, and write.
John Adams


ImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 15, 2012 9:48 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 12:32 am
Posts: 19999
Location: FEMA Camp 17 -- Malibu (Hey! You! Get off the lawn!)
Occupation: Schadenfreude artist.
If page limits are imposed on Apuzzo's filings he will be hard pressed to get it done in time. Unlike most lawyers, who deal with precedents, Apuzzo deals in forms of "statutory interpretation" which are as abstruse as they are simply wrong -- because all the precedents (as well as the "legislative" history) are against him. What makes Apuzzo's filings especially egregious (and frivolous) is that he refuses to acknowledge the bad precedents and distorts what he considers to be the "holdings" of good precedents (which are nothing of the sort).

I hope that after he files his papers on an expedited schedule this case is removed to Federal court so that Apuzzo can have another opportunity for the Third Circuit to impose sanctions on him.

_________________
When there are a finite number of ways to screw something up, Orly Taitz will find an infinite number of ways to do so. (The Sternsig Rule.)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 15, 2012 10:27 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2012 1:21 pm
Posts: 411
Anyone know who will be representing President Obama at this Appeal ? They won't have much time to prepare a detailed response to the illogical aimless and wordy hairball that Putz will cough up, but they should take the opportunity to smack his "arguments" around, prove that the proceedings were fair hearing of Putz's "arguments",
that the rulings by the ALH and SoS were 100% correct. Further the defense counsel should show that Putz's entire legal effort has been, and still is, abuse of process and frivolous harassment - nothing more.
Ask the court to strunk the Putz to the fullest extent possible.
This is futile and not necessary. It appears that Mario is deliberately trying to put himself in the same penalty box as Strunk. There is no glory (or cash rewards) for becoming a birther martyr. Its like stepping in front of a train.
What an Idiot. Mario absolutely refuses to accept that ALL of his arguments and misinterpretations have all been shot down, completely refuted by many decisions and multiple courts.
He might be suffering from syphilis, or rabies, or some other neurological disorder.

_________________
It is not clear, how these two individuals merge into one person. It is not clear, who came back from Indiana, Orly Taitz or Lena. We have no idea, who is residing in the Taitz house: is it Orly Taitz or is it
Lena Lettmifeeenisch ? If it is Lena, what, happened to Orly Taitz ?
Lila Dubert


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 637 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 ... 26  Next   

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
View new posts | View active topics



Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group