Orly's latest poopies.....

neonzx · **Joined:** Tue Mar 10, 2009 9:27 am **Posts:** 4216

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=36785 :roll:

Quote:

This week only over a 100,000 people read this blog

Posted on | April 15, 2012 | No Comments

Me! Me! Me! Me! Me! Me! Me! Me! Me! Me! Me! Me! Me! Me! Me!

neonzx · **Joined:** Tue Mar 10, 2009 9:27 am **Posts:** 4216

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=36844 :lol:

Quote:

Sent to the Department of Justice today, Judge Coleman and defense were copied

Posted on | April 15, 2012 | No Comments

Dear Assistant attorney General Yoshinori Himel

In 2009 US DOJ and I, as an attorney for the plaintiffs in *Keyes et al v Bowen*, CA Secretary of State, reached an agreement for the US DOJ to provide information under Touhy v Reagan regulation.

Subsequent to signing the stipulation, Judge Kenney, presiding judge in Keyes v Bowen, abruptly dismissed the case, finding that it was moot, as it was filed after the general election. Upon dismissal of the case the Department of Justice sent a letter, stating that the Touhy agreement was moot as well, as the case was dismissed. Currently, a similar case is filed and it will not be dismissed as moot as it was filed in February 2012, full 9 months before the general election. Today the need for the information requested in the affidavit attached to the Touhy agreement, is even greater and more acute. I am providing for your review transcripts from January 26, 2012 hearing in *Farrar v Obama*in GA and a transcript of the press conference of Sheriff Joe Arpaio of Maricopa County, AZ.

I represented plaintiffs in Farrar. Seven witnesses and experts attested under the penalty of perjury to multiple signs of forgery in Mr. Obama’s long form birth certificate posted by him on WhiteHouse.gov as well as to the fact that the Connecticut Social Security number REDACTED used by Mr. Obama in his tax returns and his selective service certificate was never assigned to him. Sheriff Arpaio confirmed the findings presented by me and my experts and witnesses in *Farrar v Obama.*

Based on all of the above I am renewing my demand for production of records under *Touhy v Ragan.*

Respectfully
/s/ Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ
Attachments
1. Filed signed Touhy agreement between Department of Justice and Attorney Orly Taitz on behalf of Plaintiffs in *Keyes et al v Bowen*
2. Draft of the affidavit. Fully executed signed and notarised affidavit was forwarded to the department of Justice and was filed in the Superior Court of CA
3. Transcript of Farrar v Obama

RTH10260 · **Posted:** Mon Apr 16, 2012 2:44 am

neonzx wrote:

:twisted:

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=36844 :lol:

Quote:

Sent to the Department of Justice today, Judge Coleman and defense were copied

...
Respectfully
/s/ Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ
Attachments
1. Filed signed Touhy agreement between Department of Justice and Attorney Orly Taitz on behalf of Plaintiffs in *Keyes et al v Bowen*
2. Draft of the affidavit. Fully executed signed and notarised affidavit was forwarded to the department of Justice and was filed in the Superior Court of CA
3. Transcript of Farrar v Obama

I have the distinct impression that Orly is panicing. I have never seen such an incoherent writeup recently. She gives no reason why she should suddenly have access to stuff. She pulls an old dismissed case, mixes up some GA transcript (rather than the ACJ ruling). She desn't even ask what exact records she seeks.

My guess: no answer or an outright denial. Then Orly can turn up in D.C. courts once again and work her way thru rejections and appeals. It's my guess that she will meet up again with a well known judge to oversee her antics.

jtmunkus · **Joined:** Mon May 23, 2011 7:33 pm **Posts:** 3517

RTH10260 wrote:

My guess: no answer or an outright denial. Then Orly can turn up in D.C. courts once again and work her way thru rejections and appeals. It's my guess that she will meet up again with a well known judge to oversee her antics.

I've always been amused at the birther fairytale about needing "only one honest judge" to agree with their oh, so bulletproof case.

Seems to me like a winning case is one with whose decision all the [subsequent] honest judges concur.

You know, like US v. Wong Kim Ark.

Another BirtherLaw fallacy.

Piffle · **Posted:** Mon Apr 16, 2012 3:20 am

Hugh Touhy married Lou Touhy. It didn't take long for the marriage to go kerplooie and, before you knew it, Hugh was having an extramarital affair with a woman named Sue and Lou was having lurid affair with a man named Stu. First Lou caught Hugh in flagrante with you-know-who and then Hugh viewed Lou on her knees with Stu doing what true floozies do.

In lieu of divorce, Lou, who eschewed lawyers, proposed an open marriage. Their breakthrough agreement:

Quote:

Two Touhy Stipulations
One: You, Hugh, may screw whoever you can woo.
Two: You, Lou, can do Stu (the guy you blew).

Then Lou caught the flu and died. Boo hoo!

As if on cue, Hugh met someone new. Hugh soon married Rue and within two months there arose a hullabaloo. Rue just knew Hugh was two-timing her.

"Who?", she demanded.

Out of the blue, shoe number two dropped: "A few," he said. "You need to review this Honeydew," he cooed.

"Two Touhy Stipulations?" she shrieked. "I had no clue they applied to me too."

"You're a Touhy too. Initial here to renew."

"Screw you, Hugh Touhy. I bid you adieu."

And so Rue sued Hugh in the proper venue and won, proving for all times that Touhy Stipulations cannot be renewed Hughnilaterally..

Edit: Spelling

lyssandri · **Posted:** Mon Apr 16, 2012 3:23 am

Mikedunford wrote:

19: So now the DOJ is forced to take Orly's fake subpoenas and treat them as legitimate Touhey demands.

Any questions?

Yeah, I got one: What's she smoking and where do I get some?

Whatever4 · **Posted:** Mon Apr 16, 2012 3:28 am

Piffle wrote:

Hugh Tuhey

Phooey.

Chilidog · **Joined:** Mon Jan 09, 2012 12:36 pm **Posts:** 1971

Piffle wrote:

And so Rue sued Hugh in the proper venue and won, proving for all times that Touhy Stipulations cannot be renewed Hughnilaterally..

mimi · **Posted:** Mon Apr 16, 2012 9:26 am

realist · **Joined:** Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm **Posts:** 23597

Cross-posting from the MS thread (explained below)

Also being discussed in the Poopies thread, but I "think" the new case she's referring to in the letter she sent is the MS case (which she claims won't be dismissed).

Orly's attempting to "renew" (as best I can figger) a stipulation which was reached in the long-dead Keyes v Bowen case.

In other words, not only thinking outside the box but outside the known universe of boxes, Orly is attempting an... well, Orly.

2012-04-16 - Letter to AUSA Yoshinori Himel

2012-04-16 - Touhy Stipulation (Keyes v Bowen)

2012-04-16 - Final Draft - Taitz Affidavit

2012-04-16 - Transcript - Farrar v Obama

2012-04-16 - Transcript & Affidavit - Arpaio

Whatever4 · **Posted:** Mon Apr 16, 2012 9:43 am

realist wrote:

2012-04-16 - Transcript & Affidavit - Arpaio

Hmmm... wonder how it compares to our transcript?

interestedbystander · **Joined:** Mon Mar 02, 2009 8:47 am **Posts:** 253

Piffle

neonzx · **Joined:** Tue Mar 10, 2009 9:27 am **Posts:** 4216

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=37238 :evil:

Quote:

No more red ink campaign by WND. Will it work?

Posted on | April 16, 2012 | No Comments

WND unveiled a new campaign, plan B to save the country. What is it? For everyone to send to WND $29.99 , so that WND will send 241 red letters from every person, who paid $29.99 to Republican members of the House of Representatives telling them: no more red ink, balance the budget.

First, I noticed that WND no longer mentions Obama eligibility. It appears that the only way they feel we can fight, is by sending letters to Congress, asking them to cut the budget.

What about Obama? Isn’t removing him from office and criminally prosecuting him represents the number one goal? But let’s go back to the budget.

In general it is always a good idea to balance the budget. We sent them to Congress with this mandate. We elected some 90 new Congressmen running on this very platform. What did they do? Nothing. Why so?
(snip)

Much more drivel at the link.

I haven't seen this "Plan B" from WND and I don't see it on their front page. ??

mimi · **Posted:** Mon Apr 16, 2012 11:06 am

Whatever4 wrote:

realist wrote:

2012-04-16 - Transcript & Affidavit - Arpaio

Hmmm... wonder how it compares to our transcript?

Is Terence Brennan a Court Reporter?

BFB · **Posted:** Mon Apr 16, 2012 11:11 am

realist wrote:

Cross-posting from the MS thread (explained below)

Also being discussed in the Poopies thread, but I "think" the new case she's referring to in the letter she sent is the MS case (which she claims won't be dismissed).

Orly's attempting to "renew" (as best I can figger) a stipulation which was reached in the long-dead Keyes v Bowen case.

In other words, not only thinking outside the box but outside the known universe of boxes, Orly is attempting an... well, Orly.

I've been away. Has the Earth shattered yet?

realist · **Joined:** Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm **Posts:** 23597

Take me off your email list
and
More baseless threats from Orly... Write what I say and how I say it or you are in deep doo doo. :roll:

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=37358 :evil:

Sent to yet another media ostrich with her head burried in the sand (or somewhere else) : Jodi Cohen of Tribune

Posted on | April 16, 2012 | No Comments

Quote:

RICO complaint filed against Obama for America and Obama, answer received, discovery and depositions are starting

Cohen Jodi S. jscohen@tribune.com
8:17 AM (5 minutes ago)

Orly,

I have asked you to remove my email from your mailings several times now. Can you please do it?

Thanks, Jodi

And Orly doubles down...

Quote:

From: Orly Taitz [mailto:orly.taitz@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, April 14, 2012 11:55 AM
Subject: RICO complaint filed against Obama for America and Obama, answer received, discovery and depositions are starting

Please, read the latest on RICO (Racketeering Influenced Corrupt organization) complaint filed on my website OrlyTaitzESQ.com

[snip part of mass BS email]
Please, read more on the site, please donate, so I can continue the work and donate on RunOrlyRun.com, so I can win this election.

According to Pulse (Rasmussen method) I am widening the lead over all other GOP candidates

Orly Taitz

Quote:

8:22 AM (4 minutes ago)

to Jodi

this is going not to you personally, but to Tribune,

it is your duty to forward the information to the readers and not to be complicit in the biggest fraud in the US history. Not only you are not providing the information to the readers, you have the hutzgah to tell me that you as an employee of the Tribune don’t want to receive the information of national importance.

Report the truth to the readers or sooner or later you will be one of the defendants in a RICO action, because of your actions in aiding and abetting ObamaFraudGate.

MrBrown · **Joined:** Sat Feb 25, 2012 1:21 pm **Posts:** 411

She's lashing out in all directions. Something has spooked her frantic. I think she's scared to death of what will happen when she is standing before Judge R. Kenneth Coleman.

Sequoia32 · **Posted:** Mon Apr 16, 2012 12:43 pm

Why doesn't Jodi just label Orly's crap as the spam it is?

everalm · **Posted:** Mon Apr 16, 2012 12:45 pm

I don't think she has the critical thinking ability, introspection or self awareness to be spooked, I feel she is simply entering the manic stage of her rollercoaster insanity.

When the crash arrives it won't be pretty, not that anything she does is....... -xx

Hektor · **Posted:** Mon Apr 16, 2012 12:45 pm

Sequoia32 wrote:

Why doesn't Jodi just label Orly's crap as the spam it is?

Because Jodi made the mistake of assuming that Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq is a reasonable person who will graciously honour unsubscribe requests. You know, like a normal person would.

Mikedunford · **Posted:** Mon Apr 16, 2012 12:52 pm

everalm wrote:

I don't think she has the critical thinking ability, introspection or self awareness to be spooked, I feel she is simply entering the manic stage of her rollercoaster insanity.

^^^^^
This. She was more or less this manic during the Georgia thing.

Tarrant · **Joined:** Fri Jan 13, 2012 5:05 pm **Posts:** 757

Does she really believe that this RICO action - which she as a pro se plaintiff somehow crazily believes she can initiate - is the magic bullet that can change everything?

"Every human being on the planet that doesn't do EXACTLY what I say I will simply add to my RICO case! That way when I am triumphant they will all go to jail!"

She seems to include every semi-regular poster here, every judge that's ever ruled against her, every lawyer that ever faced against her in court. Soon she'll ask for a list of every one of the 69 million people that voted for Obama in 2008 as accomplices, ignoring that whole secret ballot thing.

It's like seeing her slowly descend into madness.

everalm · **Posted:** Mon Apr 16, 2012 1:01 pm

Without coming off as a complete sexist male-beast (ahhhh classic Ole Skool Squeeky) and based on her reported age it is also possible Immoraly Tainted is having a bad peri-menopause/menopause or an inadequate HRT management regime.

Could explain the mood swings, irritability, lack of focus, fatigue, inability to sleep she moans about etc.

Or, she's just an insane, vindictive, immoral, ethically vacuous, bigotted evil bitch..... :-k

Picks ya poison.....

raicha · **Posted:** Mon Apr 16, 2012 1:12 pm

everalm wrote:

Without coming off as a complete sexist male-beast (ahhhh classic Ole Skool Squeeky) and based on her reported age it is also possible Immoraly Tainted is having a bad peri-menopause/menopause or an inadequate HRT management regime.

Could explain the mood swings, irritability, lack of focus, fatigue, inability to sleep she moans about etc.

Or, she's just an insane, vindictive, immoral, ethically vacuous, bigotted evil bitch..... :-k

Picks ya poison.....

Unsuccessful, but thanks for playing.

:cry:

raicha · **Posted:** Mon Apr 16, 2012 1:14 pm

Orly's refusal to remove people from her email list violates Federal law and her repeated threats to have folks criminal prosecuted violates the canon of...

Oh never mind.

Why do we bother?

Falsehoods unchallenged only fester and grow.

Orly's latest poopies.....

Who is online