President Obama reacts upon being told of Orly's latest move.

Seems to me that Orly is giving a giant middle finger to Ms. Nagamine. If I were Ms. Nagamine, I would seek to permanently shut down Orly's long-running clown show.

Orly has said that Drs. Fuddy and Onaka are now defendants, and that the ballot challenge is now a RICO action seeking treble damages. Orly says that it is so. Clearly, therefore, it must be so, as our Orly could not possibly be mistaken.

Interestingly, I seem to recall that there was a minor Orly assplosion back in January when Ms. Nagamine advised Orly that due to the malware/virus damage that Ms. Nagamine's computer sustained shortly after Ms. Nagamine opened one of Orly's emails, Ms. Nagamine would be deleting all emails from Orly unopened.

Nice burn Mike

(Hi Orly!)

So if Orly tires to make her 'Ballot Challenges' fall under RICO, too, does that mean she gets to remove President Obama from the ballot 3 times instead of once?

Yes. Moreover, I believe it also means that President Obama will be hanged for treason three times, with the sentences to be executed consecutively, not concurrently.

No silly, it means she gets to remove Obama and the next two black Presidents.

Also being discussed in the Poopies thread, but I "think" the new case she's referring to in the letter she sent is the MS case (which she claims won't be dismissed).

Orly's attempting to "renew" (as best I can figger) a stipulation which was reached in the long-dead Keyes v Bowen case.

In other words, not only thinking outside the box but outside the known universe of boxes, Orly is attempting an... well, Orly.

2012-04-16 - Letter to AUSA Yoshinori Himel

2012-04-16 - Touhy Stipulation (Keyes v Bowen)

2012-04-16 - Final Draft - Taitz Affidavit

2012-04-16 - Transcript - Farrar v Obama

2012-04-16 - Transcript & Affidavit - Arpaio

I suggest that we refrain from discussing this in any detail so that Orly doesn't get any ideas on how to fix the defects in this unprecedented maneuver.

I totally agree. Without our critique of her CA subpoena, Orly would never have developed the ingenious strategy of the EMERGENCY MOTION/ PETITION FOR A MISSISSIPPI SUBPOENA TO SUPPORT CALIFORNIA SUBPOENA. We really shot ourselves in the foot.

Very funny but I take my Patriotisticalism SERIOUSLY!

Orly, here are the detailed instructions for fixing the defects in the current posture of your pleadings:

Well we certainly don't want her to know that naming Fuddy as a defendant in this action avoids the mootness issue which killed her previous action to compel compliance by Fuddy. She now has a new opportunity to subpoena Fuddy and file a fresh action in Hawaii, or piggyback this onto the one which is not yet closed there.

I mean, clearly, because the State of Hawaii has not moved for sanctions or any other declaration in that case, it is apparent that Orly was effective at intimidating them from doing so, since it would blow the lid off the entire den of corruption among various elected officials, the Obama administration and the Hawaii Department of Health.

2012-04-12 - MS - ORDER Cancelling Hearing on April 16

Very interesting...........

All valid points. She is using fake and misleading documents that threaten to confuse any recipient. This is improper, unethical, and possibly illegal. It is certainly conduct that may be made the subject of sanctions by either the courts of California or Mississippi. Subpoenas, as everyone can see here, contain lots of scary "legalese" language, with references to things like "hereby command," and "the state of California." For this reason, lawyers are obligated to be responsible and diligent when issuing them.

So, yes, as everyone here has discussed, it is inappropriate to use a California form to issue a Mississippi subpoena falsely cloaked with the authority of Mississippi courts.

x-posted from the poopies thread. (I couldn't resist)
___________________________________________

Hugh Touhy married Lou Touhy. It didn't take long for the marriage to go kerplooie and, before they knew it, Hugh was having an extramarital affair with a woman named Sue and Lou was having lurid affair with a man named Stu. First Lou caught Hugh in flagrante with you-know-who and then Hugh viewed Lou on her knees with Stu doing what true floozies do.

In lieu of divorce, Lou, who eschewed lawyers, proposed an open marriage. Their breakthrough agreement:



Then Lou caught the flu and died. Boo hoo!

As if on cue, Hugh met someone new. Hugh soon married Rue and within two months there arose a hullabaloo. Rue just knew Hugh was two-timing her.

"Who?", she demanded.

Out of the blue, shoe number two dropped: "A few," he said. "You need to review this Honeydew," he cooed.

"Two Touhy Stipulations?" she shrieked. "I had no clue they applied to me too."

"You're a Touhy too. Initial here to renew."

"Screw you, Hugh Touhy. I bid you adieu."

And so Rue sued Hugh in the proper venue and won, proving for all times that Touhy Stipulations cannot be renewed Hughnilaterally.

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=37399

Of course, she omitted the fact that she's already discussed this with opposing counsel and have naturally reached an accommodation for them.

Bettina Viviano is to movies as Orly Taitz is to the legal profession. law. What can she be deposed about ? Her secrets to making movies that suck more than anyone else's sucky movies ? Why she doesn't like President Obama ? How what she read on birther sites seem to confirm her suspicions and paranoia about Obama ?
Aren't opposing counsel supposed to be invited to y'know, cross examine Orly's wetness ?
I hope this costs a bundle.
Now, and after Judge Coleman gets wind of it.

The Judge is running scared from the steamroller that is Orly's RICObamafraudgatecrusade!

I hope someone informs Opposing counsel about this (as Orly sure as hell isn't going to do it) I have a strong feeling that the fact of opposing counsel being within 50 miles of her deposition will send Orly into a screech that will shatter glass for half a mile. Orly just wants to take the depo, edit it her way and dump it onto the judges lap as evidence. She doesn't even consider this might be actually part of the trial process.

I think that the lead counsel needs to be there ... and you know what airfares are like at such short notice.

I have a VENUE idea, Orly! http://www.acmecomedy.com/rentals.htm