Mississippi Ballot Challenge (ACT I & I.5) :)

Foggy · **Posted:** Sun Apr 15, 2012 3:51 pm

This just in:

She's filing an Emergency Motion for a Mississippi Subpoena to Support California Subpoena.

Quote:

Plaintiff Orly Taitz is a pro se plaintiff in MS and a licensed attorney in California.

As the defendants Secretary of State of Mississippi and the Democratic Party of Mississippi filed an answer, the parties are in the discovery phase.
Plaintiff, as a licensed California attorney, served two Plaintiff's witnesses with a California subpoena for deposition and production of documents. Witnesses: Producer Bettina Sofia Viviano and director Gigi Gaston are creators of a documentary movie "We Will Not Be Silenced" and they personally gathered a large amount of evidence crucial in this case, specifically evidence of Barack Obama lacking valid identification papers and an ongoing intimidation of witnesses and whistleblowers, who aware of this information.
As both the Plaintiff, the witnesses and one of the defense attorneys are residents of California, it is the most convenient and cost effective to hold the deposition in California.
As the deposition was scheduled, Plaintiff is asking in this emergency motion for a Mississippi subpoena to support the California subpoena.

Declaration of Orly Taitz is attached.
/s/ Dr. Orly Taitz, ESq

SWORN DECLARATION OF ORLY TAITZ

I Orly, Taitz, am over 18 years old, have personal knowledge of the fact below and will competently testify to following:

1. I am a pro se plaintiff in MS and a licensed attorney in California.

2. as the defendants Secretary of State of Mississippi and the Democratic Party of Mississippi filed an answer, the parties are in discovery phase.
3. I, as a licensed California attorney served two Plaintiff's witnesses with a California subpoena for deposition and production of documents to appear in my office in rancho Santa Margarita, Ca on April 20, 2012
4. Witnesses: Producer Bettina Sofia Viviano and director Gigi Gaston are creators of a documentary movie "We Will Not Be Silenced" and they personally gathered a large amount of evidence crucial in this case, specifically evidence of Barack Obama lacking valid identification papers and an ongoing intimidation of witnesses and whistleblowers, who aware of this information. a lot of information gathered by Ms. Viviano and Ms. Gaston was not included in the movie.
5. I, as a Plaintiff , have been a victim of similar intimidation and retaliation and the time is of the essence.
6. As both the Plaintiff, the witnesses and one of the defense attorneys are residents of California, it is the most convenient and cost effective solution to hold the deposition in California.
7. as the deposition was scheduled for April 20, 2012, Plaintiff is asking in this emergency motion for a Mississippi subpoena to support the California subpoena.
I declare under penalty of perjury that all of the above is true and correct.

/s/ Orly Taitz
04.15.2012

I, Orly Taitz, attest that I served all parties in the case with above motion petition on 04.15.2012

/s/ Orly Taitz

neonzx · **Joined:** Tue Mar 10, 2009 9:27 am **Posts:** 4216

Foggy wrote:

This just in:

She's filing an Emergency Motion for a Mississippi Subpoena to Support California Subpoena.

No words!

RTH10260 · **Posted:** Sun Apr 15, 2012 4:09 pm

ZorbasLeGreque wrote:

I hope Mr. Tepper is available on the (whatever) day of the deposition

Quote:

Response from Orly to “Convoluted” (whoever you are) ...

Notice of deposition
Orly Taitz to Robert, scottjtepper, Brian, Fran, Harold, gilbert, nagamine, Justin, Laurie, leahlax1234, sbegley1, Tom
show details 12:39 AM (7 hours ago)
...
Respectfully,

/s/ Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ

Will Ms.Nagamine take "judicial notice" that Orly continues to harass HI officials and that she continues to use invalid legal procedures? Inquiring minds may want to ask the HI AG

Piffle · **Posted:** Sun Apr 15, 2012 4:10 pm

Ya gotta love the precarious straddle she's attempting. She's pro se in Mississippi, but now she's donning the mantle of a California licensed attorney for the purposes of conducting discovery outside the state of Mississippi.

If any doubt remained that she's potentially subject to the full range of attorney discipline for professional misconduct in this case, I'd say she's pretty much erased it.

Piffle · **Posted:** Sun Apr 15, 2012 4:15 pm

RTH10260 wrote:

Will Ms.Nagamine take "judicial notice" that Orly continues to harass HI officials and that she continues to use invalid legal procedures? Inquiring minds may want to ask the HI AG

Yup. Might just provide the jump-start needed to get that sanctions/vexlit motion back on track.

A Legal Lohengrin · **Joined:** Tue Oct 26, 2010 9:56 pm **Posts:** 9326

Piffle wrote:

Ya gotta love the precarious straddle she's attempting. She's pro se in Mississippi, but now she's donning the mantle of a California licensed attorney for the purposes of conducting discovery outside the state of Mississippi.

If any doubt remained that she's potentially subject to the full range of attorney discipline for professional misconduct in this case, I'd say she's pretty much erased it.

And to think I thought she couldn't make it worse.

I have to quit expecting too little of Orly.

realist · **Joined:** Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm **Posts:** 23525

2012-04-15 - MS - EMERGENCY MOTION/ PETITION FOR A MISSISSIPPI SUBPOENA TO SUPPORT CALIFORNIA SUBPOENA

Translation = I read Fogbow, and now that I've actually issued the subpoenas I'd like to try to comply with summa da rulz. ](*,)

ObjectiveDoubter · **Posted:** Sun Apr 15, 2012 4:53 pm

Foggy wrote:

This just in:

She's filing an Emergency Motion for a Mississippi Subpoena to Support California Subpoena.

Quote:

Plaintiff Orly Taitz is a pro se plaintiff in MS and a licensed attorney in California.

As the defendants Secretary of State of Mississippi and the Democratic Party of Mississippi filed an answer, the parties are in the discovery phase.
Plaintiff, as a licensed California attorney, served two Plaintiff's witnesses with a California subpoena for deposition and production of documents. Witnesses: Producer Bettina Sofia Viviano and director Gigi Gaston are creators of a documentary movie "We Will Not Be Silenced" and they personally gathered a large amount of evidence crucial in this case, specifically evidence of Barack Obama lacking valid identification papers and an ongoing intimidation of witnesses and whistleblowers, who aware of this information.
As both the Plaintiff, the witnesses and one of the defense attorneys are residents of California, it is the most convenient and cost effective to hold the deposition in California.
As the deposition was scheduled, Plaintiff is asking in this emergency motion for a Mississippi subpoena to support the California subpoena.

Declaration of Orly Taitz is attached.
/s/ Dr. Orly Taitz, ESq

SWORN DECLARATION OF ORLY TAITZ

I Orly, Taitz, am over 18 years old, have personal knowledge of the fact below and will competently testify to following:

1. I am a pro se plaintiff in MS and a licensed attorney in California.

2. as the defendants Secretary of State of Mississippi and the Democratic Party of Mississippi filed an answer, the parties are in discovery phase.
3. I, as a licensed California attorney served two Plaintiff's witnesses with a California subpoena for deposition and production of documents to appear in my office in rancho Santa Margarita, Ca on April 20, 2012
4. Witnesses: Producer Bettina Sofia Viviano and director Gigi Gaston are creators of a documentary movie "We Will Not Be Silenced" and they personally gathered a large amount of evidence crucial in this case, specifically evidence of Barack Obama lacking valid identification papers and an ongoing intimidation of witnesses and whistleblowers, who aware of this information. a lot of information gathered by Ms. Viviano and Ms. Gaston was not included in the movie.
5. I, as a Plaintiff , have been a victim of similar intimidation and retaliation and the time is of the essence.
6. As both the Plaintiff, the witnesses and one of the defense attorneys are residents of California, it is the most convenient and cost effective solution to hold the deposition in California.
7. as the deposition was scheduled for April 20, 2012, Plaintiff is asking in this emergency motion for a Mississippi subpoena to support the California subpoena.
I declare under penalty of perjury that all of the above is true and correct.

/s/ Orly Taitz
04.15.2012

I, Orly Taitz, attest that I served all parties in the case with above motion petition on 04.15.2012

/s/ Orly Taitz

I wonder if we didn't blab so much about her deficiencies and OrlyOnlyLaw, if she would back track like this less often -- not that issuing it and then trying to clean up her mess is all that much better. I am learning to keep my mouth shut a bit more.

Also, Foggy, I see she let your post through today. I've given up, even when I am being sly. Although our dear Orly did steal my moniker to post one herself. I guess I don't need to bother when she can do it for me.

mimi · **Posted:** Sun Apr 15, 2012 4:53 pm

A Legal Lohengrin wrote:

Piffle wrote:

Ya gotta love the precarious straddle she's attempting. She's pro se in Mississippi, but now she's donning the mantle of a California licensed attorney for the purposes of conducting discovery outside the state of Mississippi.

If any doubt remained that she's potentially subject to the full range of attorney discipline for professional misconduct in this case, I'd say she's pretty much erased it.

And to think I thought she couldn't make it worse.

I have to quit expecting too little of Orly.

True. But I have also learned to expect nothing, absolutely nothing, from the California Bar.

Tomtech · **Posted:** Sun Apr 15, 2012 4:59 pm

I hope the Teppernator is busy on the 20th.

I believe the 8 named defendants, in order to protect their clients interests, should find the newest attorney available, who has a decent singing voice, in whichever firm, plus the AG's office, are representing those defendants and send them on an expenses paid, by Orly, weekend vacation to sunny Orange County Ca.

They can form the We Object Chorus and sing a verse every time Orly finishes a sentence. =))

Sugar Magnolia · **Posted:** Sun Apr 15, 2012 5:01 pm

My poor friend from the SoS's office has a headache from trying to understand all her crap (and from rolling his eyes.)

He says "Doesn't she know Sunday is a day of REST!!?"

RTH10260 · **Posted:** Sun Apr 15, 2012 5:05 pm

ZorbasLeGreque wrote:

I hope Mr. Tepper is available on the (whatever) day of the deposition

Quote:

Response from Orly to “Convoluted” (whoever you are) . All of the attorneys were notified 6 hours before you sent your nasty comment. Additionally, I do not want to bother former President Clinton and Secretary of State Clinton with requests to appear at deposition until I have evidence on the record, showing that they knew that there was a problem with Obama’s documents and were intimidated into silence.

Notice of deposition
Orly Taitz to Robert, scottjtepper, Brian, Fran, Harold, gilbert, nagamine, Justin, Laurie, leahlax1234, sbegley1, Tom
show details 12:39 AM (7 hours ago)
from

Orly Taitz orly.taitz@gmail.com
to

Robert Kenneth Coleman redacted
[redacted],
Brian Fedorka redacted
redacted
Harold Pizzetta [redacted],
“helen. l. gilbert” [redacted],
“jill. t. nagamine” [redacted],
Justin Matheny [redacted],
Laurie J Roth redacted
leahlax1234 redacted
Orly Taitz <orly.taitz@gmail.com>,
“SAMUEL BEGLEY ([redacted])” <[redacted]>,
Tom MacLeran redacted
date
Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 12:39 AM
subject
Notice of deposition
mailed-by
gmail.com
Important mainly because it was sent directly to you.
Images from this sender are always displayed. Don’t display from now on.
hide details 12:39 AM (7 hours ago)
Dear Judge Coleman and counsel

Notice of Deposition

Due to the fact that Defendants filed today their answer to the complaint, I am starting depositions. This is a notice of deposition of Plaintiff’s witnesses Hollywood producer Bettina Viviano and director Gigi Gaston, who were the producer and the director of the BBC documentary “We Will Not Be Silent” devoted to elections fraud and intimidation during the 2008 election. Deposition will also address Ms. Viviano’s recent interview, where she alleged that the 2008 murder of Bill Gwatney, Chairman of Arkansas Democratic party was associated with his knowledge of Mr. Obama’s lack of eligibility and a form of intimidation of former President Bill Clinton in order to prevent him from talking on the issue.

The article is in the attachment.
Respectfully,

/s/ Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ

Is it only me that sees Orly tripping over her shoe laces and ending in a face plant?

According to above blog quote, Orly is behaving as if her First Amended Complaint has already been accepted by the MS Court. She lists all those new defendants and plaintiffs to inform them of the intended deposition.

From another blog entry we know that Orly is still collecting the signatures of the new plaintiffs. Therefor the new defendants have not been served process after submitting (what?) to the court.

And if Orly in some other snippet tells us, that the defendants have submitted their initial answer and therefor its open field for discovery, doesn't she need to await the initial answers from her new guild of defendants to the FAC?

Piffle · **Posted:** Sun Apr 15, 2012 5:05 pm

It's a crying shame that Orly didn't include a proposed form of order with this "submission". I'd love to see what a subpoena to support a subpoena looks like. Am I the only one who's never seen one?

Also, I like the way she used what looks like the Court Clerk's letterhead instead of the boring usual format for motions and fancy papers. Or, for that matter, her own letterhead. She's a real trend-setter, I telz ya.

Edit: Oh I get it now. I think she's just asking the clerk for a signed blank subpoena. Or two. Or three. Silly me. Well sure, that oughta work. :lol:

realist · **Joined:** Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm **Posts:** 23525

I'm glad you're paying attention, Piffle. You worthless Fogbow attorneys could really learn a lot from watching Orly craptice law. ;;)

realist · **Joined:** Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm **Posts:** 23525

Quote:

As both the Plaintiff, the witnesses and one of the defense attorneys are residents of California, it is the most convenient and cost effective to hold the deposition in California.

Well, except the venue is MS. And 7 parties' attorneys flying to CA rather than 2 witnesses and one attorney flying to MS is more cost efficient how, exactly?

Oh, Orly doesn't have to pay travel and expenses if everyone else flies to CA.

Of course, it's not going to happen, just sayin'.

A Legal Lohengrin · **Joined:** Tue Oct 26, 2010 9:56 pm **Posts:** 9326

ObjectiveDoubter wrote:

I wonder if we didn't blab so much about her deficiencies and OrlyOnlyLaw, if she would back track like this less often -- not that issuing it and then trying to clean up her mess is all that much better. I am learning to keep my mouth shut a bit more.

Actually, she made it worse. Maybe a lot worse. I guess we'll see.

DaveMuckey · **Posted:** Sun Apr 15, 2012 5:18 pm

I'm a bit lost. Has Orly simply assumed discovery out of her tookus?

Isn't this an appeal? If yes, how does she get to push another wheelbarrow full of fresh cowpies into the case?

Piffle · **Posted:** Sun Apr 15, 2012 5:23 pm

DaveMuckey wrote:

I'm a bit lost. Has Orly simply assumed discovery out of her tookus?

Isn't this an appeal? If yes, how does she get to push another wheelbarrow full of fresh cowpies into the case?

Orly has proclaimed this the "discovery phase" and that's the first thing she says now every time she opens her mouth.

And nope, this isn't an appeal. Yet. It's what you call an original proceeding. Very original.

Edit: With sincere apologies to William Carlos Williams, so much depends on the cowpie wheelbarrow.

Shagnastie · **Posted:** Sun Apr 15, 2012 5:35 pm

While researching an entirely separate issue today, I learned a new word ... jactitation.

Websters: jactitation (L. jactitare to utter, tell in public) 1. bragging. 2. in law,a false boast or false statement that causes harm to another person. 3. in medicine, a restless tossing or twitching of the body, a muscle, etc.

OMG! ORLY IS THE JACTITAITZOR!

ObjectiveDoubter · **Posted:** Sun Apr 15, 2012 6:14 pm

Piffle wrote:

DaveMuckey wrote:

I'm a bit lost.Has Orly simply assumed discovery out of her tookus?

Isn't this an appeal? If yes, how does she get to push another wheelbarrow full of fresh cowpies into the case?

Orly has proclaimed this the "discovery phase" and that's the first thing she says now every time she opens her mouth.

And nope, this isn't an appeal. Yet. It's what you call an original proceeding. Very original.

Edit: With sincere apologies to William Carlos Williams, so much depends on the cowpie wheelbarrow.

So glad you said you are lost because my brain is about to explode. I am not sure how much beyond the usual absurdities Orly has ventured. It seems to me that she is trying to circumvent the requirement to be admitted to the Mississippi bar to practice, even temporarily, by doing a depo in California. Unless, can a pro se plaintiff conduct a deposition? Do you have to be a lawyer to do one? Anyhow, I am so glad I just move numbers around for a living and don't have to be logical because this is proving too confusing for me! :-k

Butterfly Bilderberg · **Posted:** Sun Apr 15, 2012 6:16 pm

RTH10260 wrote:

[I]f Orly in some other snippet tells us, that the defendants have submitted their initial answer and therefor its open field for discovery, doesn't she need to await the initial answers from her new guild of defendants to the FAC?

Yes, my brilliant prodigy. She cannot have it both ways. Either the original Complaint is the operative complaint, or the FAC -- which has NOT been answered -- is the operative complaint, in which case discovery must await responses to the FAC (and if those responsive pleadings are MTDs, she must await the court's ruling to see if the case survives).

I sure would hate to see that beautiful RICO pleading go to waste. $\:D/$

Piffle · **Posted:** Sun Apr 15, 2012 6:32 pm

ObjectiveDoubter wrote:

So glad you said you are lost because my brain is about to explode. I am not sure how much beyond the usual absurdities Orly has ventured. It seems to me that she is trying to circumvent the requirement to be admitted to the Mississippi bar to practice, even temporarily, by doing a depo in California. Unless, can a pro se plaintiff conduct a deposition? Do you have to be a lawyer to do one? Anyhow, I am so glad I just move numbers around for a living and don't have to be logical because this is proving too confusing for me! :-k

Yes, a non-lawyer pro se litigant may depose a party or a witness. Whether they can is another matter. :lol:

As for what's going on at the moment, when the cat's away the mice will play. As long as the judge is recovering from whatever caused his hospitalization, Orly is charging ahead into her "discovery phase" without adult supervision. But not to worry, the parental unit will come home sooner or later. Ya think he'll be pissed when he sees how badly she's trashed the house?

Foggy · **Posted:** Sun Apr 15, 2012 6:46 pm

ObjectiveDoubter wrote:

I am not sure how much beyond the usual absurdities Orly has ventured.

So far the consensus is WAY beyond.

This is what I love so much about her. :xo

All the lawyers (and recovering lawyers

) who were on the board this morning have been following her for years. They're all familiar with litigation. They all know the possibilities. I haven't practiced for a dozen years, but I stumble along the best I can.

NOT ONE of us thought of an "Emergency Motion for a Subpoena to Support a Subpoena". #-o

She doesn't just think outside the box, she thinks outside the Eighth Dimension. Buckaroo Banzai eat yer heart out, broseph.

There's no keeping ahead of her. There's no guessing what she'll do next. She's an AWESOME work of performance art, unfolding on a continuing basis before our astounded eyebones. She leaves me gaping in wonder. :shock:

OuR LadY Liberty!

jtmunkus · **Joined:** Mon May 23, 2011 7:33 pm **Posts:** 3491

Piffle wrote:

Edit: Oh I get it now. I think she's just asking the clerk for a signed blank subpoena. Or two. Or three. Silly me. Well sure, that oughta work. :lol:

I'm sure Judge Malihi wouldn't mind if Orly used some of the Georgia subpoenas. I mean, after the historic trial and all. And since Malihi did refuse to quash the one, she does have precedent.

:argument:

kingfish · **Joined:** Fri Mar 23, 2012 7:34 pm **Posts:** 28

Um, that latest "filing" by her has no court stamp on it. All of these "filings" on her website have not shown up at the clerk's office nor have they appeared on the docket. I'm assuming she has mailed them and sent them in but they have not arrived yet. I'll be at the clerk's office tomorrow covering the Supervisors so I'll stop over and see if anything is cooking. Literally actually if its around lunchtime. The Circuit Clerk loves to cook and has an actual kitchen in the back.

Falsehoods unchallenged only fester and grow.

Mississippi Ballot Challenge (ACT I & I.5) :)

Who is online