Mississippi Ballot Challenge (ACT I & I.5) :)

AnitaMaria · **Joined:** Tue Mar 29, 2011 5:41 pm **Posts:** 2238

Orly has the process down pat. She says she's following all the rules:

Quote:

Response from Orly:
1. After the defendants filed their answer, we are in the discovery phase, which means that I can conduct depositions and subpoena records, I do not need any special permission from the judge
2. Since the deposition is conducted in CA, the witnesses are residing in CA, I am properly using CA forms
I hope that answers your questions

So there.

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=36678

neonzx · **Joined:** Tue Mar 10, 2009 9:27 am **Posts:** 4221

Quote:

convoluted
April 15th, 2012 @ 6:16 am

Quite the convoluted subpoena you have there Orly. Here you are issuing a subpoena in California for a case in Mississippi. Is that how it works? Have you notified the opposition? Begley probably wouldn’t be able to make it but I’m sure that Tepper would be able to attend. Besides, how can you depose a witness without having the defense there? If the defense isn’t able to depose the witness, then the testimony is for naught.

Another small problem. Isn’t the ‘witness’ just going to say shit that is questionable at best? Shouldn’t you depose Bill and Hillary Clinton to find out what they have to say about all of this?

So many problems with this. It must be difficult be an attorney with so little knowledge of rules of evidence.

Thomas/PatriotofPast
April 15th, 2012 @ 7:34 am

Convoluted… Is “Ignorance” a birth defect on the Left? Mrs. Taitz IS an Attorney, may we see YOUR Law Degree?
So my best advise to you… Shut Up.

AnitaMaria · **Joined:** Tue Mar 29, 2011 5:41 pm **Posts:** 2238

Quote:

DIDN’T WANT TO BOTHER THE READERS WITH DETAILS, BUT THE DEFENSE ATTORNEYS WERE NOTIFIED VIA E-MAIL 7 HOURS AGO, AT 12:37 AM. PS I DID NOT WANT TO BOTHER PRESIDENT CLINTON WITH A REQUEST FOR DEPOSITION UNTIL I HAVE ON THE RECORD EVIDENCE, SHOWING THAT HE KNEW ABOUT LACK OF BC FOR OBAMA, BUT WAS INTIMIDATED INTO SILENCE

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=36670 :evil:

Quote:

Response from Orly to “Convoluted” (whoever you are) . All of the attorneys were notified 6 hours before you sent your nasty comment. Additionally, I do not want to bother former President Clinton and Secretary of State Clinton with requests to appear at deposition until I have evidence on the record, showing that they knew that there was a problem with Obama’s documents and were intimidated into silence.

And here's the email she allegedly sent:

Quote:

Due to the fact that Defendants filed today their answer to the complaint, I am starting depositions. This is a notice of deposition of Plaintiff’s witnesses Hollywood producer Bettina Viviano and director Gigi Gaston, who were the producer and the director of the BBC documentary “We Will Not Be Silent” devoted to elections fraud and intimidation during the 2008 election. Deposition will also address Ms. Viviano’s recent interview, where she alleged that the 2008 murder of Bill Gwatney, Chairman of Arkansas Democratic party was associated with his knowledge of Mr. Obama’s lack of eligibility and a form of intimidation of former President Bill Clinton in order to prevent him from talking on the issue.

Old Grunt · **Joined:** Thu Feb 26, 2009 2:28 pm **Posts:** 920

LM K wrote:

Like this?

=))

This was 31 months and 5 days ago! =))

Gee, how could anyone think the teabaggers are comprised of angry, white racists after watching that?

majorbabs · **Posted:** Sun Apr 15, 2012 12:31 pm

AnitaMaria wrote:

Orly has the process down pat. She says she's following all the rules:

Quote:

Response from Orly:
1. After the defendants filed their answer, we are in the discovery phase, which means that I can conduct depositions and subpoena records, I do not need any special permission from the judge
2. Since the deposition is conducted in CA, the witnesses are residing in CA, I am properly using CA forms
I hope that answers your questions

So there.

This board requires you to be registered and logged-in before you can view hidden messages

Knowing Orlylaw rarely, if ever, it the same as "real" rules of the court and/or the law, how much of what Orly wrote is factual and how much is BS? If you could explain a little bit as to what the real procedures are in a case like this, I would greatly appreciate it.

realist · **Joined:** Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm **Posts:** 23928

Quote:

Response from Orly:
1. After the defendants filed their answer, we are in the discovery phase, which means that I can conduct depositions and subpoena records, I do not need any special permission from the judge
2. Since the deposition is conducted in CA, the witnesses are residing in CA, I am properly using CA forms
I hope that answers your questions

And in her MS case if a witness lives, say, in NY, she'll just use a NY subpoena.

So there!!! You know-nothing smarty-pants Obots.

TexasFilly · **Joined:** Mon Sep 28, 2009 12:52 pm **Posts:** 10764

This board requires you to be registered and logged-in before you can view hidden messages

esseff44 · **Posted:** Sun Apr 15, 2012 1:03 pm

Since the deposition has no legal basis or purpose, it can be placed in the same category as most of her pretend-lawyer actions. It's done for the purpose of getting another smear wider attention. Is Bettina crazy enough to repeat her crazy talk under oath? Would there be any consequences if she did? It's just to give an odor of legality to distract from the birther stink.

TexasFilly · **Joined:** Mon Sep 28, 2009 12:52 pm **Posts:** 10764

Note to all Certified California Court Reporters: get all of your money up front.

neonzx · **Joined:** Tue Mar 10, 2009 9:27 am **Posts:** 4221

esseff44 wrote:

Since the deposition has no legal basis or purpose, it can be placed in the same category as most of her pretend-lawyer actions. It's done for the purpose of getting another smear wider attention. Is Bettina crazy enough to repeat her crazy talk under oath? Would there be any consequences if she did? It's just to give an odor of legality to distract from the birther stink.

Bettina's crazy talk is all speculation and hearsay. There's nothing relevant or admissible, is there?

A Legal Lohengrin · **Joined:** Tue Oct 26, 2010 9:56 pm **Posts:** 9708

majorbabs wrote:

This board requires you to be registered and logged-in before you can view hidden messages

TexasFilly · **Joined:** Mon Sep 28, 2009 12:52 pm **Posts:** 10764

A Legal Lohengrin wrote:

majorbabs wrote:

This board requires you to be registered and logged-in before you can view hidden messages

I hereby nominate this for the "Best Sentence of 2012" award!

AnitaMaria · **Joined:** Tue Mar 29, 2011 5:41 pm **Posts:** 2238

I second that nomination. :-bd

verbalobe · **Posted:** Sun Apr 15, 2012 1:26 pm

TexasFilly wrote:

I hereby nominate this for the "Best Sentence of 2012" award!

Seconded Thirded! Loh! =D>

esseff44 · **Posted:** Sun Apr 15, 2012 1:33 pm

I fifth that!

kimba · **Joined:** Tue Sep 08, 2009 3:24 pm **Posts:** 6732

Quote:

I DID NOT WANT TO BOTHER PRESIDENT CLINTON WITH A REQUEST FOR DEPOSITION UNTIL I HAVE ON THE RECORD EVIDENCE, SHOWING THAT HE KNEW ABOUT LACK OF BC FOR OBAMA, BUT WAS INTIMIDATED INTO SILENCE

I guess I missed something, coz how could she have on the record what Bill Clinton knew until she asks Bill Clinton? Orly Law is hard.

Butterfly Bilderberg · **Posted:** Sun Apr 15, 2012 2:05 pm

AnitaMaria wrote:

Orly has the process down pat. She says she's following all the rules:

Quote:

Response from Orly:
1. After the defendants filed their answer, we are in the discovery phase, which means that I can conduct depositions and subpoena records, I do not need any special permission from the judge
2. Since the deposition is conducted in CA, the witnesses are residing in CA, I am properly using CA forms
I hope that answers your questions

So there.

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=36678

x a gazilliondebillion

Msottement · **Posted:** Sun Apr 15, 2012 2:35 pm

Quote:

Response from Orly:
1. After the defendants filed their answer, we are in the discovery phase, which means that I can conduct depositions and subpoena records, I do not need any special permission from the judge
2. Since the deposition is conducted in CA, the witnesses are residing in CA, I am properly using CA forms
I hope that answers your questions

Most of my comments don't make it through moderation at Orly's Site. But apparently I've kept my trolliness to a minimum.

It's good to know that she's a real person, though, and not a figment of her own imagination.

Msottement (Andy)

verbalobe · **Posted:** Sun Apr 15, 2012 2:36 pm

Offtopic :

O RLY wrote:

I DID NOT WANT TO BOTHER PRESIDENT CLINTON ....

These Republican Party eligibility-skeptics have such decensy -- they never bother anyone unless they have rock-solid ebidence.

Like Trump bothering the President about the LFBC. He held back and held back, until he was absolutely sure that he had the real, hard facts at his fingertips, facts like "so many people have so many questions, one wonders what he might be hiding." That's decensy!

Another very descent eligibility-skeptic is Dean something (I forget his name). He did NOT want to bother the mother of a long-dead infant, so he went with two other people to fill her in on the rock-solid facts, which were that someone might have stolen her daughter's identity. This would have been upsetting news to bother someone with, except for the ebidence clearly pointing at the Sunaharas: Sometimes in the 70's some identity thieves were known to take advantage of juvenile deaths.

Orly is in good company, being so careful and sensitive to only bother people, judges, courts, clerks, candidates, attorneys, etc., when she is sure she has indisputable certified 100%-rejected inadmissible and self-contradictory rumors, conjectures, and allegations IN HAND, and no sooner.

rosy · **Joined:** Sat Jan 14, 2012 5:36 pm **Posts:** 773

This documentary that Orly is talking about, which she claims was made by the BBC:

This board requires you to be registered and logged-in before you can view hidden messages

Furthermore:

This board requires you to be registered and logged-in before you can view hidden messages

Interestingly:

This board requires you to be registered and logged-in before you can view hidden messages

Res Ipsa · **Posted:** Sun Apr 15, 2012 2:48 pm

The amended Complaint has all of the necessary elements which, as we know, requires at least one allegation relating to a disconnected emissions hose.

And she is clearly tracking the recent amendment to the Birfer Rules of Civil Procedure in relation to the mandatory inclusion of the phrase "carnival barker".

RTH10260 · **Posted:** Sun Apr 15, 2012 3:10 pm

Butterfly Bilderberg wrote:

Rule 45(d):[/color]

Quote:

Unless for good cause shown the court shortens the time, a subpoena for production or inspection shall allow not less than ten days for the person upon whom it is served to comply with the subpoena.

Let's count. April 13 (plus let's give it three days for personal service, so round it to April 16) plus ten equals ... April 20??????????? Must be Moldavan math.

Thanks for answering one of my questions from further up. I was really wondering if a witness could be ordered to show up the next day.

RTH10260 · **Posted:** Sun Apr 15, 2012 3:15 pm

Foggy wrote:

HOWEVER ...
...
Now here we have a knowing abuse of process, IMHO. She knows from her adventures in Hawaii and Georgia that she can't validly subpoena Ms. Viviano with that subpoena. She's faking the authority of the courts of California to compel Viviano's appearance at Orly's office for the deposition. If Ms. Viviano doesn't check with an attorney, she may be fooled into showing up for the deposition. All without notice to opposing counsel.
...

Let me guess!

neonzx · **Joined:** Tue Mar 10, 2009 9:27 am **Posts:** 4221

This board requires you to be registered and logged-in before you can view hidden messages

Mikedunford · **Posted:** Sun Apr 15, 2012 3:49 pm

This board requires you to be registered and logged-in before you can view hidden messages

Falsehoods unchallenged only fester and grow.

Mississippi Ballot Challenge (ACT I & I.5) :)

Who is online