Were she to file electronically, would she use irscantcatchme@doff.com?

Hopefully Orly will post the Form 990 for DOFF, since she is all about transparency.

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=36347


This post is accompanied by an Alex Jones video about the many nefarious activities--including possibly human sacrifices--of the Bohemian Grove/NWO/Bilderberg types. However, she also posts a disclaimer,

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=36368

I've heard the easiest way to implant those chips is to disguise them as fillings when people go to the dentist...

Well, now that we've gotten that straight...

I'd say she is playing stupid, but it's no act. She'd better bring her checkbook if she thinks that bullshit will defeat a motion to compel, since her testimony is relevant to her champerty, barratry and maintenance. It is basically automatic that if one side must file a motion to compel the testimony of an uncooperative witness, it comes with a side order of attorney's fees and costs. Depositions of the party who brought a suit are routine.

The RFID tag had to do with prosthetics and implants like defibrillators. It was taken out of the final bill that was passed and signed.

That doesn't stop right wing morons from screeching about it though.

Snopes has had a debunking of the RFID chip in HC bill for ages, the Chaleria and her flying monkeys are both gullible and stupid. http://www.snopes.com/politics/medical/microchip.asp

And Orly or Chito Purple missed the date of original publication: Posted March 29, 2010
Digging up legal zombies

Was it alreay reported, that Orly now has submitted her 'zibits to the Obama Truth Team and is asking them to skewer their candidate:

xxxhttp://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=35178

Go Orly! I think you and Yosi and all of your various corporations should refuse to pay taxes, because they are supporting corrupt judges and court systems. Just give it a try this year, just to see what happens.

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=36812

Someone explain, please.

It's simple, JimBot:

What Stern said... OR... Orly's fukkin' nutz.

As Foggy said earlier today... one just can not predict the brilliance of Orly and Orlylaw. (not his exact words, but just sayin'.)

Orly's delusions and paranoia can be fun to watch, but she is never funnier than when she is pretending to be a lawyer. She's been a hoot the last couple of days!

Someone has some 'splaining to do, huh?

It's another brilliant Crazy Lucy scheme. Which is sure to work.

I'm not sure anyone can. But I'll take a stab at it:

1: Defendants in the upcoming Mississippi case filed answers.
2: This automaxiomagically starts instant discovery, without the need for confer with anyone about anything.
3: Orly is a plaintiff, so she can conduct whatever discovery her heart desires.
4: But only in Mississippi.
5: But no fear, The Great O'Rly is an attorney pro-se-extraplenipotentiary.
6: But only California has an affirmative action program for decedent political rights visionaries at the State Bar.
7: But at least one of the witlesses O'Rly wants to present to the court in Mississippi lives in California.
8: And the witless in question is so nutzo that the People of California will undoubtedly be happy to order her (either her, actually) to go to Mississippi.
9: And there is at least a hint of a possibility that the California witless is either too dumb to know that the subpoena is toilet paper or too publicity-starved to care.
10: But Orly needs info from the DOJ, too. And other parts of the Federal Government.
11: And the US Attorney's office probably doesn't have anyone crazy enough to think that Orly's California subpoenas have meaning.
12: But Orly really wants that information.
13: And she is in the discovery farce of the tribunalization of the usurperator.
14: So there must be a way to get the information from the DOJ.
15: Of Course! The DOJ was being granting Orly the right to ask them nicely for things instead of submitting subpoenas.
16: So what if that case is dead.
17: A stipulation is a stipulation.
18: So Orly is unilaterally (under the "intergalactic planetary code of special procedures in cases of specaulemergencyurgent cases of ignoramus importance" this is allowable) renewing the stipulation from the prior case and applying it to this case.
19: So now the DOJ is forced to take Orly's fake subpoenas and treat them as legitimate Touhey demands.

Any questions?

Mike --

Whatever Crazy Lucy Typhoid Orly wants to do cannot be explained to us little people.

In other words.

That's it!

Yes - someone explain. What does renewing mean in OrlyLaw? A simple minded Swiss obot would assume that said case (Keyes vs. The World) was as dead as can be.

Speculation as good as anything: Orly is trying to pull the DOJ back into her MS litigation with a fresh Touhy conformant request. IIRC the final DOJ answer was to GTFOOMH with no permissable documents except some index quote and never show up again. Cased closed for ever.



Of course Orlys blathering seems incoherent. In the Keyes case she had first sent a subpoena to the DOJ and on objection then "stipulated" its formal conversion to a Touhy request. Orly never until now did show us a subpoena vs the DOJ, so I have difficulty to whatever pile of poo she intends to magickally convert to a new stinck.

I commend you for formulating the Silver Bullet to any question on OrlyActivism as listed in your signature. For ever and ever. Ramen.

I think it means that Orly has taken another big step down that long road that leads inexorably to wandering around the streets with underwear on your head until the nice men take you to the room with soft walls.