Indiana ballot challenge (smackdown for Orly)

MrBrown · **Joined:** Sat Feb 25, 2012 1:21 pm **Posts:** 411

bob wrote:

Opposition and the order:

:twisted:

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/wp-content/ ... ranted.pdf :twisted:

Hm. Looks like at least one Deputy AG in Indiana has a very very bad taste in his mouth from dealing with Dr. Orly.
She may have to resort to threatening him with being a possible future Defendant as a way to keep him out of the courtroom....

I agree that Judge Shaheed made the right call to recuse himself to deprive Orly of that as the sham basis to file yet another frivolous appeal of a loss.

This next hearing could be ugly if this DAG decides to make a scrap of it, no ? Can the AG, as counsel for defense, bring up PHV and Conduct unbecoming, and introduce the facts of Dr.Orly's nationwide campaign of Frivolous lawsuits - and pursue sanctions - and ask this pest be blocked from Indiana's courts, for life ?
Barratry...Champerty...Maintenance....defamation...aren't they the real issue at hand in this matter ?

Or will Mr. Garn just say "Ef it" and file a MTD ?

Chilidog · **Joined:** Mon Jan 09, 2012 12:36 pm **Posts:** 1971

bob wrote:

Opposition and the order:

:twisted:

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/wp-content/ ... ranted.pdf :twisted:

There is a glaring mistake in that first document.

Where is says: "This case involves involuntary commitment?" it is checked, "No." It should be "Yes."

borealis · **Posted:** Thu Apr 12, 2012 5:16 pm

Chilidog wrote:

bob wrote:

Opposition and the order:

:twisted:

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/wp-content/ ... ranted.pdf :twisted:

There is a glaring mistake in that first document.

Where is says: "This case involves involuntary commitment?" it is checked, "No." It should be "Yes."

Calling Bellevue!

P.K. · **Posted:** Thu Apr 12, 2012 6:26 pm

borealis wrote:

Shaheed is indeed politically savvy and I believe he did the right thing. But it will not make any difference for poor Bobby and Orly. Just hope Orly realizes she will still get the same answers she always gets no matter who the jurist is.

I'm guessing his thought process may have been something like "Awesome - now I won't have to deal with the crazy lady! Woo-hoo! Recusal approved!!!"

Piffle · **Posted:** Thu Apr 12, 2012 7:20 pm

Chilidog wrote:

bob wrote:

Opposition and the order:

:twisted:

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/wp-content/ ... ranted.pdf :twisted:

OK, so I called it a toss-up but since the rest of the table bet on the flush, I'm reaching for this pot.

nycpeter · **Joined:** Mon Aug 08, 2011 3:50 pm **Posts:** 308

neonzx · **Joined:** Tue Mar 10, 2009 9:27 am **Posts:** 4216

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=37449 :evil:

Quote:

Update. a special judge was appointed in my case in Indiana: Judge S. K Reid, Master commissioner of the Marion county Superior Court from 1996-2000

Posted on | April 16, 2012 | No Comments

Special Judge

Bob Kern
10:19 AM (1 minute ago)
Cause# 49D14-1203-MI-012046

Judge S.K Reid

Marion Superior Court, Civil 14
City-County Building, T-542
Center Tower, 5th Floor

Elected: 1-Jan-2001
B.A., Purdue University, 1985
J.D., Indiana University, Indianapolis, 1988

Master Commissioner, Marion Superior Court, 1996-2000

borealis · **Posted:** Mon Apr 16, 2012 1:48 pm

Good. They are still keeping this in Marion County.

jtmunkus · **Joined:** Mon May 23, 2011 7:33 pm **Posts:** 3516

nycpeter wrote:

We need to demand a photo of her holding a newspaper with today's date.

With, of course, no layers.

Sterngard Friegen · **Posted:** Mon Apr 16, 2012 1:53 pm

Her case? I thought she was a witness.

realist · **Joined:** Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm **Posts:** 23597

Sterngard Friegen wrote:

Her case? I thought she was a witness.

She filed a HAVA complaint.

rosy · **Joined:** Sat Jan 14, 2012 5:36 pm **Posts:** 739

Any case to which she has a connection, no matter how tangential, is "her" case. Plaintiff, defendant, appellant, respondent, witness, citation, read it in the newspaper...

Sterngard Friegen · **Posted:** Mon Apr 16, 2012 2:01 pm

Thanks, Realist. I forgot she was denied access to the polls in Indiana.

borealis · **Posted:** Mon Apr 16, 2012 2:10 pm

What date? And time?

raicha · **Posted:** Mon Apr 16, 2012 2:37 pm

Note that the AG argues that Karl has no standing as he was not one of the parties originally before the Elections Commission.

The judge's recusal doesn't affect that argument, IMO, and it will certainly apply to Taitz as well in the upcoming Motion to Dismiss.

nycpeter · **Joined:** Mon Aug 08, 2011 3:50 pm **Posts:** 308

realist · **Joined:** Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm **Posts:** 23597

Docket Activity to Date...

Quote:

ORLY TAITZ DR VS.ELECTIONS COMMISSION
Cause Number: 49D141203MI012046

03/23/12 CASE FILED.

03/27/12 SUMMONS SERVED BY CORPORATE SERVICE ON A BUSINESS ON

03/27/12 SUMMONS SERVED BY CORPORATE SERVICE ON A BUSINESS ON

04/04/12 MOTION TO RECUSE JUDGE SHAHEED, FILED BY PLAINTIFFS

04/10/12 ATTORNEY JEFFERSON GARN FILES APPEARANCE FOR DEFENDANT.
ATTORNEY JEFFERSON GARN FILES APPEARANCE FOR DEFENDANT.

04/10/12 MOTION FILED. MOTION TO DISMISS PETITIONERS "MOTION TO MOTION FILED. MOTION TO DISMISS PETITIONERS "MOTION TO RECUSE JUDGE SHAHEED UNDER RULE 79OF INDIANA RULES OF TRIAL PROCEDURE", FILED BY REPSONDENTS BY COUNSEL

04/10/12 JACKET ENTRY: MOTION FOR JUDGE RECUSAL IS GRANTED
JACKET ENTRY: MOTION FOR JUDGE RECUSAL IS GRANTED

04/12/12 CLERK FILES NOTICE OF APPOINTMENT OF SPECIAL JUDGE PURSUANT
CLERK FILES NOTICE OF APPOINTMENT OF SPECIAL JUDGE PURSUANT TO TRIAL RULE 79H AND APPOINTS HONORABLE S.K. REID AS SPECIAL JUDGE-PARTIES NOTIFIED

04/12/12 CASE HAS BEEN TRANSFERRED TO 49D141203MI012046
CASE HAS BEEN TRANSFERRED FROM 49D011203MI012046.

04/12/12 CASE HAS BEEN TRANSFERRED FROM 49D011203MI012046.

TexasFilly · **Joined:** Mon Sep 28, 2009 12:52 pm **Posts:** 10672

nycpeter wrote:

Wasn't it a HAVA Nagila Complaint she filed?

borealis · **Posted:** Tue Apr 17, 2012 1:42 pm

Would someone please republish the court date and time for me?
I know this is somewhere upthread, but I can't find it. Thanks.

realist · **Joined:** Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm **Posts:** 23597

borealis wrote:

Would someone please republish the court date and time for me?
I know this is somewhere upthread, but I can't find it. Thanks.

I've seen the appointment of a new judge, due to the recusal of the original judge assigned.

I've not seen a scheduled date for a hearing with the newly-appointed judge.

Perhaps I've missed it, but just sayin'.

Foggy · **Posted:** Tue Apr 17, 2012 2:10 pm

Me neither. I don't think we have a date and time for this one yet.

A Legal Lohengrin · **Joined:** Tue Oct 26, 2010 9:56 pm **Posts:** 9410

Foggy wrote:

Me neither. I don't think we have a date and time for this one yet.

I'm glad to hear that, because I too have been looking for one in vain, hoping I was not missing it.

realist · **Joined:** Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm **Posts:** 23597

Docket Update...

Quote:

Case:
ORLY TAITZ DR VS.ELECTIONS COMMISSION
Cause Number:
49D141203MI012046

03/23/12 CASE FILED.

03/27/12 SUMMONS SERVED BY CORPORATE SERVICE ON A BUSINESS ON

03/27/12 SUMMONS SERVED BY CORPORATE SERVICE ON A BUSINESS ON

04/04/12 MOTION TO RECUSE JUDGE SHAHEED, FILED BY PLAINTIFFS

04/10/12 ATTORNEY JEFFERSON GARN FILES APPEARANCE FOR DEFENDANT.

04/10/12 MOTION FILED. MOTION TO DISMISS PETITIONERS "MOTION TO

04/10/12 JACKET ENTRY:MOTION FOR JUDGE RECUSAL IS GRANTED

04/12/12 CLERK FILES NOTICE OF APPOINTMENT OF SPECIAL JUDGE PURSUANT

04/12/12 CASE HAS BEEN TRANSFERRED TO 49D141203MI012046

04/12/12 CASE HAS BEEN TRANSFERRED FROM 49D011203MI012046.

04/16/12 MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT FILED BY RESPONDENTS

04/16/12 MOTION TO DISMISS FILED. BY RESPONDENTS

04/16/12 OBJECTION TO TAITZ'S APPEARANCE FILED BY RESPONDENTS

04/16/12 ATTORNEY KATE SHELBY FILES APPEARANCE FOR RESPONDENT.

04/17/12 MOTION FILED. TO RECUSE JUDGE SHAHEED UNDER RULE 79 OF

04/17/12 MOTION FILED. FOR SANCTIONS FILED BY RESPONDENTS

Gee... wonder why Orly hasn't mentioned those.

Edit: ETA: Attempting to obtain documents. Any boot on the ground, PM me.

TexasFilly · **Joined:** Mon Sep 28, 2009 12:52 pm **Posts:** 10672

Ooooh, this could be good!

Sterngard Friegen · **Posted:** Mon Apr 23, 2012 1:35 pm

Taitz hasn't bragged about these latest honors on her website yet.

Falsehoods unchallenged only fester and grow.

Indiana ballot challenge (smackdown for Orly)

Who is online