Falsehoods unchallenged only fester and grow.


All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 637 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 26  Next   
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Apr 05, 2012 8:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 12:38 am
Posts: 2532
Mario has decided to take his ideas to New Jersey. The primary for New Jersey is on June 5, 2012. The rules of a challenge can be found here and the NJSA Title 19 can be found here

Quote:
In all challenges, the objector has the burden of proving that a nomination petition is invalid.


Self proclaimed 'expert' Apuzzo announces on Kerchner's blog:

Quote:
U.S. Constitution Article II Section 1 Clause 5 (Presidential Eligibility Clause) Constitutional Law Expert Attorney Mario Apuzzo of Jamesburg NJ Files on Behalf of Objectors in NJ a Ballot Access Challenge/Objection Against Obama Today in NJ – copy of the complaint and filing will be posted here later upon receipt


Quote:
19:13-11 Determination of validity of objections.

19:13-11. The officer with whom the original petition was filed shall in the first instance pass upon the validity of such objection in a summary way unless an order shall be made in the matter by a court of competent jurisdiction and for this purpose such officer shall have power to subpoena witnesses and take testimony or depositions. He shall file his determination in writing in his office on or before the ninth day after the last day for the filing of petitions, which determination shall be open for public inspe

_________________
- Credimus quod credere volumus -


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 05, 2012 8:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 13, 2012 5:25 pm
Posts: 1428
Another Aputtzo winner.

_________________
"It’s time for this charade to stop” - Cold Case Posse Member Mike Zullo, destroying Irony Meters worldwide


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 05, 2012 9:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 12:38 am
Posts: 2532
Well the document for nomination does contain the following statement but since the challenge can only be based on the statutory requirements in N.J.S.A. Title 19 for petitions, the Constitutional requirements cannot be addressed in the challenge.

Quote:
QUALIFICATIONS OF CANDIDATE FOR THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES

Minimum age requirement: 35 years Natural born citizen of the United States A
resident of the United States 14 years


But no other reference is made to this. Apuzzo may want to argue that the President is not natural born but that by itself may not be a valid ballot challenge.

Note that the instructions state:

Quote:
Pursuant to the Constitution of the United States, Article II, Section I, Clause 4, to qualify as a candidate for the office of President, you must meet the following qualifications:

shall have attained the age of 35 years
a natural born citizen of the United States
a United States resident for at least fourteen years



But the challenge has to refer statutory requirements in N.J.S.A. Title 19 which only includes the following:

Quote:
In accordance with N.J.S.A. 19:25-3 et seq., petitions must meet the following requirements:

Must be signed by at least 1000 voters throughout the entire State. (N.J.S.A. 19:25-3).
Candidate’s name and address must appear on each petition. (N.J.S.A. 19:23-7).
The circulator/witness is the person who collected the signatures on the petition and must complete and sign the affidavit where indicated. Note: Affidavit must be notarized. (N.J.S.A. 19:23-11).
Circulator/witness must sign the petition as a petitioner on a numbered line and location of signature
must be identified.

Bummer

Read here

Quote:
Procedure for Filing a Challenge

Objections must be based on the statutory requirements in N.J.S.A. Title 19 for petitions.
Objections must specify in detail each individual defect.
Objectors should retain a copy of their challenges.
Objectors must provide the Division with the names address and contact number of any legal representative, or, it no represented, their contact number. The contact number must be a phone where the individual can be reached during and after regular business hours.

_________________
- Credimus quod credere volumus -


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 06, 2012 12:27 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 12:38 am
Posts: 2532
Apuzzo's complaint

Extremely poorly written with only few references to the only relevant statute NJSA Title 19.

References Cold Case Posse findings, not born to two US citizen parents, 5th Amendment, 14th Amendment and the irrelevant statute NJSA 19-29-1.b which is only relevant for challenges after the election...

Funny how Purpura has signed on once again, this time with Mario...

_________________
- Credimus quod credere volumus -


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 06, 2012 1:56 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2012 1:08 pm
Posts: 565
Location: Betwixt the Big and Black Cypress Bayous.
Occupation: Disabled. Krebb's disease.
nbc wrote:
Apuzzo's complaint

The crux of the matter:
Quote:
In other words, Candidate Obama cannot prove that he was born in the United States unless he first proves his identity and he cannot prove his identity unless he first proves where he was born.
People keep harping on birth certificates, but I believe the one document which would conclusively prove that he is Barrack Obama would be his Marriage License.

That would provide legal proof of identity and since his Birth Certificates use the same name as the Marriage License they prove his citizenship at birth.

And with those and Wong v U.S. you complete the circle and prove that he is eligible to be the President.
Edit: We have a new Adams affidavit wherein he declares that he has heard things.

Between that and the discussion on the evidential value of the LFBC we can conclude that Apuzzo has no idea what hearsay evidence is and what the exceptions are under the hearsay rule.

I believe this is also the first use of SCAL Justice Parker's published unpublished doubts.

_________________
IANALBIRTFb

ImageImageImage I, for one, have no problem being led by a 3500 year old Pharaoh who was trained by space aliens on a distant star.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 06, 2012 7:38 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 3:53 pm
Posts: 12899
Location: location, location
Occupation: Ruler of the Intarwebz
Quote:
U.S. Constitution Article II Section 1 Clause 5 (Presidential Eligibility Clause) Constitutional Law Expert Attorney Mario Apuzzo of Jamesburg NJ ...
What I like most about Mario is his humbleness. Orly runs around reveling in the name "Queen of the Birthers" and comparing herself to Nelson Mandela and so forth.

Mario claims to be an expert in just one clause of the U.S. Constitution. Humble guy.

"And how did you become an expert in that one clause, Mr. Apoozoh?"

"I did some shoddy cherrypicking research and then wrote a lot of bullshit on a blog for several years. And I represented a guy in a lawsuit that was dismissed. I appealed it all the way to the Supreme Court!"

"Have you been recognized as an expert on that one clause of the Constitution by your peers?"

"No. Actually, all the other lawyers except Leo and Orly and Von Aryan and Hatfull think I'm full of shit."

"Have the courts shown any indication of considering some change in the law based on your expertise?"

"No. In fact, a court recently denied me admission pro hac vice because the opposing counsel said I'd just raise frivolous arguments like I did in Kerchner v. Obama.


Before the 2008 election, I had no idea there were lawyers who specialized in being wrong about just one clause of the Constitution. I had no idea you could proclaim yourself an expert if you write a lot of bullshit on one topic for a few years. I was unaware that you could proclaim yourself an expert after handling just one lawsuit in that area of the law.

Which you lost.

This whole birther movement has been wonderfully educational for me. I've learned all sorts of interesting things. ;;)

_________________
... then one day I found some birthers on my planet. Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 06, 2012 8:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 12:32 am
Posts: 19999
Location: FEMA Camp 17 -- Malibu (Hey! You! Get off the lawn!)
Occupation: Schadenfreude artist.
Apuzzo -- Didn't some court say his filings were also frivolous? But because sanctions weren't ultimately issued, didn't Apuzzo say that was magically removed, too? His "expertise" goes beyond just being wrong about one section of the Constitution.

_________________
When there are a finite number of ways to screw something up, Orly Taitz will find an infinite number of ways to do so. (The Sternsig Rule.)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 06, 2012 9:59 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2012 1:21 pm
Posts: 411
Corsi was just in Morristown NJ for a book signing, and he did a presentation of the CCP's "stuff". It influenced some poor NJ state legislator to publicly express doubts about President Obama's citizenship......and now this challenge, loaded with Sheriff Joe crap, and all the other self contradictory birther assertions (does this Complaint argue Obama was born in Hawaii, but he wasn't, ? Is he a changeling, or is he the same person who was/was not born in Hawaii ? ).

I smells a WND book selling cornspucee between Corsi and this sack of NJ poop. The result: 42 pages of Smear Smear Smear.
They even attached the Dismissal of the AL challenge, because Judge Parker wrote a comment that could be construed to be birther friendly, and it adds to the Smear factor.....good lord, these critters are 100% disgusting.
They will push the PR side of this challenge. Every birther wants to be a media star and get his face in front of a camera to spread their feces.

Any hope for sanctions - against Apuzzo and Purpura, who are both serial filers of frivolous harassment suits ?

_________________
It is not clear, how these two individuals merge into one person. It is not clear, who came back from Indiana, Orly Taitz or Lena. We have no idea, who is residing in the Taitz house: is it Orly Taitz or is it
Lena Lettmifeeenisch ? If it is Lena, what, happened to Orly Taitz ?
Lila Dubert


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 06, 2012 10:16 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 26, 2010 12:39 pm
Posts: 4002
Location: Southwest of down east
Quote:
U.S. Constitution Article II Section 1 Clause 5 (Presidential Eligibility Clause) Constitutional Law Expert Attorney Mario Apuzzo of Jamesburg NJ Files on Behalf of Objectors in NJ a Ballot Access Challenge/Objection Against Obama Today in NJ – copy of the complaint and filing will be posted here later upon receipt

I find myself chuckling whenever it's pointed out that Apuzzo is from Jamesburg.

During my junior high school years in New Jersey, the state "Reform School" was located in Jamesburg and so Jamesburg was used colloquially to epitomize the worst and scariest place in the state. Examples:

Quote:
If he gets caught doing [such and such], they'll send him to Jamesburg.

Q. What ever happened to [insert hoodlum's name]?
A. He moved to Jamesburg.
--- or ---
A. Skipped a grade and got a full scholarship to Jamesburg.


Naturally, they no longer label it a reform school. It's now called the New Jersey Training School for Boys, and although it's still New Jersey's largest youth corrections facility for wayward boys, it isn't the only youth detention center in the state these days.

_________________
Hope springs eternal within the human uniboob. - Thomas Jefferson.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 06, 2012 10:34 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 10, 2009 3:29 pm
Posts: 2578
Location: In exile in NOVA
Seems the Putz and Purple/Moron have a hearing on this:-

Quote:
There will be a plenary hearing on Tuesday, April 10, 2012, at 10:00 a.m. before an Administrative Law Judge at the Office of Administrative Law, 9 Quakerbridge Plaza, Trenton, New Jersey 08625


http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2012/04/attorney-mario-apuzzo-files-ballot.html

_________________
They laughed at Columbus, they laughed at Fulton, they laughed at the Wright brothers. But they also laughed at Bozo the Clown. – Carl Sagan


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 06, 2012 10:39 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Aug 04, 2009 5:21 pm
Posts: 372
Sterngard Friegen wrote:
Apuzzo -- Didn't some court say his filings were also frivolous? But because sanctions weren't ultimately issued, didn't Apuzzo say that was magically removed, too? His "expertise" goes beyond just being wrong about one section of the Constitution.


The 3rd circuit said “Because we have decided that this appeal is frivolous, we will order counsel for appellants to show cause why just damages and costs should not be imposed....We have stated that “an appeal from a frivolous claim is likewise frivolous.” Beam, 383 F.3d at 108. Appellants had ample notice that this appeal had no merit. They should have been aware that we rejected almost identical claims in Berg, as have courts in other jurisdictions."

After he filed a 95 page POS, the Court said:

"On July 2, 2010, this Court filed an Order to Show Cause directing Appellants’ counsel to show cause in writing why he should not be subject to an Order pursuant to F.R.A.P. 38 for pursuing a frivolous appeal. In response, Mario Apuzzo filed a 95-page statement that contains, inter alia, numerous statements directed to the merits of this Court’s opinion, which the Court finds unpersuasive. His request that the Court reconsider its opinion is denied, as the appropriate procedure for that issue is through a Petition for Rehearing. However, based on Mr. Apuzzo's explanation of his efforts to research the applicable law on standing, we hereby discharge the Order to Show Cause, filed. Sloviter, Authoring Judge."

Apuzzo thinks this exonerates him somehow. Of course, the Court never took back the frivolous charge.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 06, 2012 10:41 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm
Posts: 23582
Welsh Dragon wrote:
Seems the Putz and Purple/Moron have a hearing on this:-

Quote:
There will be a plenary hearing on Tuesday, April 10, 2012, at 10:00 a.m. before an Administrative Law Judge at the Office of Administrative Law, 9 Quakerbridge Plaza, Trenton, New Jersey 08625


http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2012/04/attorney-mario-apuzzo-files-ballot.html


IIRC, that's the date all challenges will be heard... nothing special for Apuzzo/Purpura|Moran.

_________________
Let us tenderly and kindly cherish, therefore, the means of knowledge. Let us dare to read, think, speak, and write.
John Adams


ImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 06, 2012 10:51 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2011 12:48 am
Posts: 4592
Occupation: Professional pain in the ass.
The Bayshore Tea Party is already mobilizing the troops to attend. Should be interesting.

_________________
Pity the poor Birthers, for they know not how to Think.

Turning the Scale.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 06, 2012 10:53 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2011 12:48 am
Posts: 4592
Occupation: Professional pain in the ass.
Welsh Dragon wrote:
Seems the Putz and Purple/Moron have a hearing on this:-

Quote:
There will be a plenary hearing on Tuesday, April 10, 2012, at 10:00 a.m. before an Administrative Law Judge at the Office of Administrative Law, 9 Quakerbridge Plaza, Trenton, New Jersey 08625


http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2012/04/attorney-mario-apuzzo-files-ballot.html



This board requires you to be registered and logged-in before you can view hidden messages

_________________
Pity the poor Birthers, for they know not how to Think.

Turning the Scale.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 06, 2012 11:03 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 24, 2009 12:36 pm
Posts: 399
I will not be able to make that Trenton show. If it moves past that hearing, I'll make a concerted effort to get off work to be there.

_________________
"MacArthur Park is melting in the dark, all the sweet green icing flowing down." - John Adams, letter to Thomas Jefferson, July 16, 1814


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 06, 2012 11:13 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2010 9:56 pm
Posts: 9399
ballantine wrote:
Sterngard Friegen wrote:
After he filed a 95 page POS, the Court said:

"On July 2, 2010, this Court filed an Order to Show Cause directing Appellants’ counsel to show cause in writing why he should not be subject to an Order pursuant to F.R.A.P. 38 for pursuing a frivolous appeal. In response, Mario Apuzzo filed a 95-page statement that contains, inter alia, numerous statements directed to the merits of this Court’s opinion, which the Court finds unpersuasive. His request that the Court reconsider its opinion is denied, as the appropriate procedure for that issue is through a Petition for Rehearing. However, based on Mr. Apuzzo's explanation of his efforts to research the applicable law on standing, we hereby discharge the Order to Show Cause, filed. Sloviter, Authoring Judge."

Apuzzo thinks this exonerates him somehow. Of course, the Court never took back the frivolous charge.


Judge Sloviter is an excellent judge (and there are a few) on the otherwise-currently-undistinguished Third Circuit. She is sort of the Justice Ginsburg of that Court. I forgive her for not issuing the appropriate sanctions in this case, and note that it is often a trait of liberal judges not to sanction nutjobs of any political stripe, while supposedly "conservative" judges engage in "judicial activism" by overly sanctioning civil rights lawyers.

_________________
L—d! said my mother, what is all this story about? — A Cock and a Bull, said Yorick — And one of the best of its kind I ever heard. -- Sterne


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 06, 2012 11:30 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2011 12:48 am
Posts: 4592
Occupation: Professional pain in the ass.


:roll:

_________________
Pity the poor Birthers, for they know not how to Think.

Turning the Scale.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 06, 2012 11:40 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 1:22 pm
Posts: 9195
Location: Supreme Court of clerks
Occupation: Petite treason procurer
nbc wrote:
Extremely poorly written with only few references to the only relevant statute NJSA Title 19.

Similar problem to Keyes v. Bowen: makes a serious sounding allegation that the Secretary of State has a duty to investigate, but doesn't exactly explain the origin of that duty.

Who is this new Moran?

_________________
Image Image Image Image Image

ASSUME ANYTHING WRITTEN HERE WILL END UP ON TAITZ'S SITE AND FACEBOOK. AND JEROME CORSI WILL POST SCREENSHOTS TO WND. AND WILL BE FILED BY A BIRTHER AS AN EXHIBIT IN FEDERAL COURT. NOW HAVE FUN!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 06, 2012 11:42 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2012 1:21 pm
Posts: 411
Welsh Dragon wrote:
Seems the Putz and Purple/Moron have a hearing on this:-

Quote:
There will be a plenary hearing on Tuesday, April 10, 2012, at 10:00 a.m. before an Administrative Law Judge at the Office of Administrative Law, 9 Quakerbridge Plaza, Trenton, New Jersey 08625


http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2012/04/attorney-mario-apuzzo-files-ballot.html


Seeing as how this long winded complaint addresses none of the ways listed in NJ statutes to challenge a person being on the ballot, this will be a quick dismissal. Pus and Purp might do some hand waving and shout "Treason !" because they are ALL about spreading their germs.
Can any sanctions be requested against either of them at this hearing, or as a result of it ?
If there an avenue of Appeal, through SoS or courts, these sewer rats will try like hell to crawl through it.
We gotta set traps with poison.

_________________
It is not clear, how these two individuals merge into one person. It is not clear, who came back from Indiana, Orly Taitz or Lena. We have no idea, who is residing in the Taitz house: is it Orly Taitz or is it
Lena Lettmifeeenisch ? If it is Lena, what, happened to Orly Taitz ?
Lila Dubert


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 06, 2012 11:54 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2011 12:48 am
Posts: 4592
Occupation: Professional pain in the ass.
bob wrote:

Who is this new Moran?


This board requires you to be registered and logged-in before you can view hidden messages

_________________
Pity the poor Birthers, for they know not how to Think.

Turning the Scale.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 06, 2012 12:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 10, 2009 3:29 pm
Posts: 2578
Location: In exile in NOVA
bob wrote:

Who is this new Moran?


He may be vice-president of an IT company on 5th Avenue.

He may have stood for the NJ house in 1993 for the "Peoples Choice Party" (lost badly)

He may have convictions from the early 80's for DWI, possession of pot, and assault,

He may have bought a house in Union County in 1999.

He may have written a review of a religous book on Amazon.

He may have a cottage and maybe boat in Newport.

But then again he may be a rather well preserved Revolutionary War veteran or 19th Cent. NY banker.

Can't pin him down. He certainly doesn't leap out like the nut jobs usually do.

_________________
They laughed at Columbus, they laughed at Fulton, they laughed at the Wright brothers. But they also laughed at Bozo the Clown. – Carl Sagan


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 06, 2012 12:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 23, 2011 7:33 pm
Posts: 3513
BFB wrote:


:roll:


"How do they work this thing? We don't know what's going on."

About a sign-in register.

PS: Nice job, douchebags, publishing everyone's private information from said register.

_________________
"What are you talking about, 99? We have to shoot and kill and destroy - we represent everything that's wholesome and good in the world." - Maxwell Smart
ImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 06, 2012 12:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2009 3:02 pm
Posts: 7152
Location: Moonbat cave
Occupation: Deputy Minister of Propaganda, TP and PC Divisions
:roll: grown men playing dress up. Do they ever take a look at themselves in action with a dispassionate eye? No, I'd they did they'd be embarrassed to death. :roll:

_________________
Image Image Image Image Image Image Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 06, 2012 12:47 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 3:29 pm
Posts: 3297
Location: Kailua, HI (home) Honolulu, HI (work)
Occupation: Development Director for The Arc in Hawaii (non-profit supporting adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities)
What gets to me about their little video is that I'm sure they believe it's crucially important that they document this filing for posterity. What a couple of self-important mountebanks!

_________________
"This leap...is where counsel entered the thicket of legal frivolity."
Judge Clay D. Land - Oct. 13, 2009


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 06, 2012 12:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2012 1:21 pm
Posts: 411
BFB wrote:
bob wrote:

Who is this new Moran?


This board requires you to be registered and logged-in before you can view hidden messages


If its the same feller - Theodore T. Moran, 55, lives in Tom's River, Ocean County.
He ran for NJ Assembly in 1993 on the People's Choice party line, got almost 2,500 (2.29%) votes.


http://www.ourcampaigns.com/CandidateDetail.html?CandidateID=65733

I bet he attended the TEA Party event that Purpura put on in January 10, 2011 to brag about how he was gonna swamp Kathleen Sebelius with so many filings and so many long winded briefs (all questioning President Obama's citizenship (??)), that the Feds would throw their hands up and say "I quit!" and the Affordable Care Act would be abolished.
And even if a judge throws their case out, they've still WON, because it would be reported in WND.....and the smears would be spread....which is the primary purpose.

Purpura is a delusional egomaniac with a cult personality who has pinned his hopes on Vattel....adding that Obama was also born in Kenya, and Obama's an Indonesian citizen...or something - ANYTHING. And Purpura asserts that WHEN Obama is kicked out of office due to his citizenship, the Constitution says Biden must also be ousted, and John McCain would become President....
Purpura's just a ridiculous little man, a paper terrorist who is motivated by his hate of having a black man in the Whites Only House.
Betcha dollar Moran is from the same litter of defective puppies.

_________________
It is not clear, how these two individuals merge into one person. It is not clear, who came back from Indiana, Orly Taitz or Lena. We have no idea, who is residing in the Taitz house: is it Orly Taitz or is it
Lena Lettmifeeenisch ? If it is Lena, what, happened to Orly Taitz ?
Lila Dubert


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 637 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 26  Next   

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
View new posts | View active topics



Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group