ORLY TAITZ IS NOT GOING TO BE CALIFORNIA'S JUNIOR SENATOR

realist · **Joined:** Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm **Posts:** 23596

bob wrote:

Feinstein might as well concede now:

Quote:

A beautiful endorsement from Commander FitzPatrick. Please send me your endorsements, I will post them

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=33944 :twisted:

Orly can't get the endorsement of her party, but ex-cons? No problem. :lol:

kate520 · **Posted:** Mon Apr 02, 2012 8:55 pm

Why is my IP banned at GLP, Bran? I've never been there before?

A Legal Lohengrin · **Joined:** Tue Oct 26, 2010 9:56 pm **Posts:** 9410

kate520 wrote:

Why is my IP banned at GLP, Bran? I've never been there before?

It's a bunch of paranoid nutjobs. They may have banned your entire ISP for who knows what brain-charred reason.

ObjectiveDoubter · **Posted:** Mon Apr 02, 2012 9:29 pm

A Legal Lohengrin wrote:

kate520 wrote:

Why is my IP banned at GLP, Bran? I've never been there before?

It's a bunch of paranoid nutjobs. They may have banned your entire ISP for who knows what brain-charred reason.

It must be the cat and other cleaver avatars, as I am banned, too. Too weird.

ZekeB · **Posted:** Mon Apr 02, 2012 10:55 pm

realist wrote:

Orly can't get the endorsement of her party, but ex-cons? No problem. :lol:

FIFY

Bran Mak Morn · **Posted:** Tue Apr 03, 2012 5:15 am

A Legal Lohengrin wrote:

kate520 wrote:

Why is my IP banned at GLP, Bran? I've never been there before?

It's a bunch of paranoid nutjobs. They may have banned your entire ISP for who knows what brain-charred reason.

It's more than that. It's an attempt to get people to pay not to be banned, at times. And it is a control mechanism of the owners. The place is a freaky place. But it is a major source to see what crap is being spread -- there is a large number of birthers there always taking control of things.

bob · **Posted:** Tue Apr 03, 2012 3:37 pm

Quote:

Great! working towards a debate

I just talked to a candidate for US Senate Democrat David Levitt. He is very interested in a debate. We are checking venues. If Diane Feinstein will join-Great!. If she decides not to join, we will debate without her and will point out everything she was supposed to do and did not do or did it wrong, in such a way that is harmed the citizens of CA

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=33982 :twisted:

Taitz debating Levitt (who lives north of San Francisco) would be amazing.

Sterngard Friegen · **Posted:** Tue Apr 03, 2012 3:55 pm

Does she know that he's the kind of politician she likes to sue?

verbalobe · **Posted:** Tue Apr 03, 2012 4:34 pm

Sometimes Orly's tenuous grasp of English goes comically awry:

O RLY wrote:

If she decides not to join, we will debate without her and will point out everything she was supposed to do and did not do or did it wrong, in such a way that is harmed the citizens of CA

Great plan! :-bd

bob · **Posted:** Wed Apr 04, 2012 2:03 pm

TollandRCR · **Posted:** Wed Apr 04, 2012 2:45 pm

L'Orly is trying to track down what she thinks is another Obot and probably knows nothing about the three denials in the GA Supreme Court. My working assumption is that she expected to have the appeals heard and that she would be permitted to introduce shocking new evidence during a personal appearance before the GA Supreme Court, such as a video of the Cold Case Posse press conference.

Treason! has a strong track record for being her response, followed closely by Corruption! She has an alternative: the Judge was a Muslim!, but I doubt that she can find a way to hint that applies here. I personally wish we could see new reactions from time to time. She is getting boring.

Bran Mak Morn · **Posted:** Wed Apr 04, 2012 3:17 pm

I find it hilarious: Orly, after talking with GLP people, ditched them at the last minute. I guess she felt they were too small time or something.

RTH10260 · **Posted:** Thu Apr 05, 2012 8:32 am

bob wrote:

Quote:

This video is private

Run, Orly, Run it's a scary candidate!

bob · **Posted:** Thu Apr 05, 2012 12:22 pm

Quote:

More evidence of corruption on the board of CA GOP

Yesterday I had an opportunity to meet with some 200 voters of the CA constitutional sheriffs association [oathkeepers?].

Today I drove 2 hours each direction to meet with some 200 women, leaders of the southern conference of the CA Republican women federated. At the meeting I had an opportunity to meet with 2 other candidates: businessmen Dan Hughes and John Boruff. They advised me of the following.

Hughes got a call 2 weeks before the official endorsement conference ostensibly from the CA GOP board member, who advised him that the endorsement process was fixed and the board already decided on the nominee. Additionally, candidate Boruff stated that a week before the endorsement board meeting he talked to Tom Del Becarro, chairman of the CA GOP, who told Boruff not to bother showing up at the endorsement meeting as the board already decided to endorse Emken.

[...]

Now they would not allow me, the top candidate according to polling, to address any of the central committee meetings. When my supporters asked the central committee chairs to allow me to speak and present my platform, they were told that since the board endorsed Emken, they will not allow other candidates speak.

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=34033 :twisted:

I am shocked, shocked to learn there is politicking in the business of politics!

SueDB · **Posted:** Thu Apr 05, 2012 12:35 pm

Seems like Orly is sticking her nose into a Private Organization. They can nominate basically who they want, and their job is to guide the endorsements for their "official" candydate.

They know that Orly is the KISS-O-DEATH® to any issue, candidate, or office.

Should be a sign above the basement door of Orly's HQ that states:

"ABANDON HOPE ALL YE WHO ENTER HERE"

This board requires you to be registered and logged-in before you can view hidden messages

A Legal Lohengrin · **Joined:** Tue Oct 26, 2010 9:56 pm **Posts:** 9410

bob wrote:

Quote:

More evidence of corruptionSANITY on the board of CA GOP

[They wouldn't let Orly screech.]

bob · **Posted:** Thu Apr 05, 2012 3:54 pm

Quote:

More attacks from the left. David Levitt claims he can beat the front runner GOP senatorial candidate Taitz

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=34249 :twisted:

Taitz links to this presser: Levitt for US Senate Ad Campaign Challenges Feinstein, Taitz

Quote:

US Senate candidate David Levitt, on the ballot to represent California as a Democrat, launches the first video campaign ad of the 9-week Senate primary race today. In the video, Levitt explains how, under new rules, his campaign can push Republican frontrunner Orly Taitz, proud “Queen of the birthers” entirely off the November ballot, leaving two Democrats: Levitt and incumbent Dianne Feinstein.

[...]

To be a winner in June, Levitt may only have to receive more votes than the Republican frontrunner. That’s currently attorney Orly Taitz, whose claim to fame is her insistence that the president’s birth certificate is fake, amid her efforts to challenge his 2012 candidacy in court.

...the indignity! A candidate campaigning!

bob · **Posted:** Thu Apr 05, 2012 3:57 pm

Quote:

More evidence of corruption on the board of CA GOP

Now an ad in the Washington Times!:

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=34244 :twisted:

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?attachment_id=34243 :twisted:

listeme · **Posted:** Thu Apr 05, 2012 3:58 pm

Somebody's still helping her with commas.

SueDB · **Posted:** Thu Apr 05, 2012 4:35 pm

Good chance we will see 2 Dems going after it. :lol:

Sugar Magnolia · **Posted:** Thu Apr 05, 2012 4:43 pm

Is getting knocked off the R ballot by a D better or worse than losing to a piece of furniture?

fava · **Joined:** Mon Oct 05, 2009 12:51 pm **Posts:** 152

listeme wrote:

Somebody's still helping her with commas.

Maybe but noone helped her with the URL at the bottom.

:lol:

ObjectiveDoubter · **Posted:** Thu Apr 05, 2012 4:47 pm

bob wrote:

Quote:

More evidence of corruption on the board of CA GOP

Now an ad in the Washington Times!:

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=34244 :twisted:

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?attachment_id=34243 :twisted:

Hughes is going to be livid when he sees this. Obviously, he had no idea that saying something to Orly could be placed in the public record -- and with her spin on it. Who knows what he told her exactly or how he told it to her? As I understand it, Hughes actually has some support among GOP elected officials, present or past. He will be burned for this and the injury will last awhile. What a way to learn that he needs to distance himself from the poisonous Orly. Wonder if he will respond. Certainly, she continues to burn more and more bridges, in wildfire fashion.

raicha · **Posted:** Thu Apr 05, 2012 5:00 pm

Orly is thrilled to be "working toward a debate" with Leavitt: :evil:

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=33982 :evil:

Quote:

I just talked to a candidate for US Senate Democrat David Levitt. He is very interested in a debate. We are checking venues. If Diane Feinstein will join-Great!. If she decides not to join, we will debate without her and will point out everything she was supposed to do and did not do or did it wrong, in such a way that is harmed the citizens of CA

But then she finds out Mr. Leavitt won't be following the "Feinstein did it all wrong" script and intends to actually debate Orly!

:evil:

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=34249 :evil:

Quote:

MORE ATTACKS FROM THE LEFT. DAVID LEVITT CLAIMS HE CAN BEAT THE FRONT RUNNER GOP SENATORIAL CANDIDATE TAITZ

Oops!

How will she get out of that debate now after she already agreed to fight it out with Leavitt for 2nd place? I know, sue him! Certainly a man of his complexion must be ineligible for the ballot!

BillTheCat · **Joined:** Fri Jan 13, 2012 5:25 pm **Posts:** 1430

raicha wrote:

:lol:

Orly is thrilled to be "working toward a debate" with Leavitt: :evil:

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=33982 :evil:

Quote:

I just talked to a candidate for US Senate Democrat David Levitt. He is very interested in a debate. We are checking venues. If Diane Feinstein will join-Great!. If she decides not to join, we will debate without her and will point out everything she was supposed to do and did not do or did it wrong, in such a way that is harmed the citizens of CA

But then she finds out Mr. Leavitt won't be following the "Feinstein did it all wrong" script and intends to actually debate Orly!

:evil:

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=34249 :evil:

Quote:

MORE ATTACKS FROM THE LEFT. DAVID LEVITT CLAIMS HE CAN BEAT THE FRONT RUNNER GOP SENATORIAL CANDIDATE TAITZ

Oops!

How will she get out of that debate now after she already agreed to fight it out with Leavitt for 2nd place? I know, sue him! Certainly a man of his complexion must be ineligible for the ballot!

When I saw her trying to be all cozy with Levitt at first, my first thought was "How long before she turns on him and sues?" :lol:

Falsehoods unchallenged only fester and grow.

ORLY TAITZ IS NOT GOING TO BE CALIFORNIA'S JUNIOR SENATOR

Who is online