Mississippi Ballot Challenge (ACT I & I.5) :)

Sterngard Friegen · **Posted:** Tue Mar 27, 2012 9:57 pm

bob wrote:

Under Orlylaw, do these NTAs allow her to reopen the Georgia proceedings, the Hawaii proceedings, or both?

Both. Plus Indiana, New Hampshire and the Damon Dunn election.

kate520 · **Posted:** Tue Mar 27, 2012 10:22 pm

Wait, so Orly might be committed to MSPrison for felony? How deliciously ironic! :lol:

DaveMuckey · **Posted:** Tue Mar 27, 2012 10:24 pm

kate520 wrote:

Wait, so Orly might be committed to MSPrison for felony? How deliciously ironic! :lol:

I pity the other inmates.

borealis · **Posted:** Tue Mar 27, 2012 10:31 pm

Orly workin on a Mississippi chain gang. What a photo op. [-o<

Sterngard Friegen · **Posted:** Tue Mar 27, 2012 10:38 pm

Mississippi is one of the reddest states in the Union. What could possibly go wrong?

This board requires you to be registered and logged-in before you can view hidden messages

TollandRCR · **Posted:** Tue Mar 27, 2012 10:54 pm

With all that is piling up on Orly in Mississippi, I am wondering if she will just not show up. This one went really bad for her awful quickly.

Sterngard Friegen · **Posted:** Tue Mar 27, 2012 10:58 pm

Pffft, Tollie. She's got a motion for summary judgment (and sanctions) pending.

All it takes is one judge . . .

esseff44 · **Posted:** Tue Mar 27, 2012 10:59 pm

No, O'rly never disappoints. She would never miss an opportunity to brand another set of state officials as being corrupt and treasonous.

Butterfly Bilderberg · **Posted:** Tue Mar 27, 2012 11:17 pm

I can barely contain my excitement about attending this hearing. $\:D/$

Hotel reservation. :-bd

Oil change, fluid and tire pressure inspection. :-bd

Classic rock CDs for the road trip. :-bd

Laptop computer for writing my report. :-bd

Call-in number for RC Radio. :-bd

Camera.

Red marker for signing my name in BIG RED LETTERS. :-bd

June bug · **Posted:** Tue Mar 27, 2012 11:18 pm

Don't forget a spare dipstick, 'k?

Reality Check · **Posted:** Tue Mar 27, 2012 11:22 pm

I have to book this show time slot now. [-X

borealis · **Posted:** Tue Mar 27, 2012 11:23 pm

June bug wrote:

Don't forget a spare dipstick, 'k?

Offtopic :

Don't forget your best lipstick either.

TollandRCR · **Posted:** Tue Mar 27, 2012 11:29 pm

esseff44 wrote:

No, O'rly never disappoints. She would never miss an opportunity to brand another set of state officials as being corrupt and treasonous.

This set of officials might bite back hard. I wonder how Orly would look in the orange jumpsuits favored by prison wardens? (Maybe if they had one with a fur collar, she would be fine.)

kingfish · **Joined:** Fri Mar 23, 2012 7:34 pm **Posts:** 28

Oh, I see a meeting the night before at Keifers or some establishment close to downtown.

Sterngard Friegen · **Posted:** Wed Mar 28, 2012 12:03 am

Butterfly Bilderberg wrote:

I can barely contain my excitement about attending this hearing. $\:D/$

Hotel reservation. :-bd

Oil change, fluid and tire pressure inspection. :-bd

Classic rock CDs for the road trip. :-bd

Laptop computer for writing my report. :-bd

Call-in number for RC Radio. :-bd

Camera.

Red marker for signing my name in BIG RED LETTERS. :-bd

I envy you, BB.

Tomtech · **Posted:** Wed Mar 28, 2012 12:40 am

Butterfly Bilderberg wrote:

I can barely contain my excitement about attending this hearing. $\:D/$

Laptop computer for writing my report. :-bd

Call-in number for RC Radio. :-bd

Red marker for signing my name in BIG RED LETTERS. :-bd

I might make the 4 hour trip myself.

I'll could sleep the day before and give myself 6 hours to get there (4 hour trip time). Stay for the hearing, enjoy the after hearing meet-up, and drive home that afternoon. I could easily be home before RC goes on the air.

Gas and a couple of meals is the limit of my available funds.

This board requires you to be registered and logged-in before you can view hidden messages

BillTheCat · **Joined:** Fri Jan 13, 2012 5:25 pm **Posts:** 1452

Piffle wrote:

For a variety of reasons, Orly cannot be convicted of champerty in these proceedings. Just as Orly cannot bring criminal charges against President Obama, Mr. Begley cannot directly bring criminal charges against Orly.

I'm curious if you could expand on this a little?

Why can't she be convicted of that? And if she can't, what other remedies may she face otherwise as a result of this hearing?

Chilidog · **Joined:** Mon Jan 09, 2012 12:36 pm **Posts:** 2000

RTH10260 wrote:

- she can always ask Arpaio for a sample of free underware.

Talk about malware. . . :rimshot:

Chilidog · **Joined:** Mon Jan 09, 2012 12:36 pm **Posts:** 2000

DaveMuckey wrote:

Do MS Prisons have Windows? Or is that redundant?

Chilidog · **Joined:** Mon Jan 09, 2012 12:36 pm **Posts:** 2000

kate520 wrote:

Wait, so Orly might be committed to MSPrison for felony? How deliciously ironic! :lol:

Very punny.

Somerset · **Posted:** Wed Mar 28, 2012 3:07 am

BillTheCat wrote:

Piffle wrote:

For a variety of reasons, Orly cannot be convicted of champerty in these proceedings. Just as Orly cannot bring criminal charges against President Obama, Mr. Begley cannot directly bring criminal charges against Orly.

I'm curious if you could expand on this a little?

Why can't she be convicted of that? And if she can't, what other remedies may she face otherwise as a result of this hearing?

I don't know about champerty, and IANAL, but I would guess that the most likely thing to get her on would be perjury. Sadly, I also know that the bar for getting someone charged with perjury is pretty high, and people perjure themselves all the time in civil cases.

Foggy · **Posted:** Wed Mar 28, 2012 6:37 am

realist wrote:

As Stern stated upthread, many documents were obtained today ...

Awesome.

I'm going to try, just to try to clarify in my own poor headbone, to rearrange what we have on the motion practice, so I can see what we're missing. Y'all know, even the IANALs, that a motion in court usually follows this pattern:

Motion --► Opposition --► Reply in Support of the Motion (if any) (--► and if you're Phil, sur-replies and godonlyknows)

Here's what I think we got, with the documents we don't have in red. D = Miss. Democratic Party, S = Miss. Secy. of St. P = plaintiff
Reply briefs are apparently styled as Responses in MS. Orly helpfully posted the whole docket yesterday. The bold numbers are taken from that. Orly is tryin' to confuzzle me by including new motions in her oppositions, a tactic only used in Orlylaw (real lawyers usually file the opposition to one motion and their own following motion separately).

#7 S's Motion to Dismiss --► #12 P's Opposition (also included: Motion to recuse the Attorney General and Motion for Summary Judgment) --► #15 S's Reply (Response)

#9 D's Motion to Dismiss and for Sanctions --► #14 P's Opposition (also included: Motion for Sanctions and Motion to Amend Complaint) --► #17 D's Reply (Response)

#19 D's Motion in Limine --► Opposition (no docket number; hasn't been filed yet)

Realist and Sterny, please review this and see if I have it right.

Foggy · **Posted:** Wed Mar 28, 2012 7:01 am

Hope Tomtech is able to make it. That would be cool.

This board requires you to be registered and logged-in before you can view hidden messages

realist · **Joined:** Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm **Posts:** 23944

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=33826 :evil:

Urge Arpaio or Zullo to testify under penalty of perjury before a judge

Posted on | March 27, 2012 | No Comments

Quote:

[...]

Why isn’t Sheriff Arpaio submitting an official report to the authorities, why isn’t he testifying?

So far, for some 8-9 months WND has been heavily soliciting donations to Arpaio and heavily soliciting book sales of the book under names of Corsi and Zullo, however fist and foremost duty of a sheriff, is to forward his official report of criminal activity to the District Attorney for prosecution. If he is refusing to submit the official report, nothing will be done. He can submit his report to his District attorney, who will prepare the case for the grand jury. After the grand jury indictment the District attorney will file the indictment for trial. This process might take at least half a year or a year.

Another opportunity to bring all the evidence before the judge, is by testimony in a case like mine. This way the evidence will be before the judge not in half a year but in half a month. The judge can issue an injunction immediately.

[...]

Keep in mind: this is secondary. In order to remove Obama from the balot we do not need to know the name of the forger. It is sufficient to know that the birth certificate is forged. For over half a year I was saying the same thing: it takes 5 minutes to run E-verify and see that Obama is using a Social Security number, which was never assigned to him. He could have been sent to prison long time ago just for using the Social Security number that is not his.

[...]

Delusional Orly rides again.

Call and harass Zullo and Arpaio. Demand that they come to MS and testifycommit perjury. :-bd

more, as they say, at the link

realist · **Joined:** Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm **Posts:** 23944

Orly plays lawyer...

:evil:

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=33826 :evil:

Quote:

Now, I was asked by some of my supporters, why I issued a subpoena in GA, but just a notice in MS. This has to do with the rules of the court in different states. In MS in order to get a subpoena I need a special hearing. Also, it is hard to enforce a subpoena from a state court against someone in another state. For that reason it is important for people, who state that they are on the same side to testify voluntarily.

She just forgets to say the Notices to Appear are worthless crap (in this case) also. Too.

Falsehoods unchallenged only fester and grow.

Mississippi Ballot Challenge (ACT I & I.5) :)

Who is online