ORLY TAITZ IS NOT GOING TO BE CALIFORNIA'S JUNIOR SENATOR

Highlands · **Posted:** Sun Mar 11, 2012 4:48 pm

ZekeB wrote:

So fighting the Obama regime is the GOP's most important product? How about representing We The People, O'rly? Ya know, there is a very strong majority of people in California who have more urgent needs besides "fighting the Obama regime."

Oh I forgot, when you live in a 4 million dollar house you really don't care about the middle class, do you?

It's all about MEMEMEMEMEmememememe

Orly's campaign slogan should be

Cuntry First

ZekeB · **Posted:** Sun Mar 11, 2012 4:57 pm

If I didn't know that you are, in fact, a woman. Highlands! :lol:

bob · **Posted:** Sun Mar 11, 2012 5:38 pm

Quote:

I JUST ADDRESSED CA GOP BOARD AND I WAS TOLD TO GET BACK ON THE LINE FOR THEIR DECISION

I addressed CA GOP board. I was not told in advance that I will have an opportunity to address the board before their endorsement. I got a call 5 minutes before the meeting. Also, I was not told that I will have an opportunity to address the board in person. It appears that the other 3 leading candidates actually were there and appeared in person, while I addressed on the phone, which is a disadvantage. My guess that the CA GOP will endorse the establishment pick Washington Lobbyist Elizabeth Emken or Al Ramirez, who happened to be Hispanic and they are hoping for another Marco Rubio, even though Ramirez got only 2% of the vote the last time around when he ran for the US Senate against Barbara Boxer. It is interesting that in his 5 minutes speech al Ramirez stated that other candidates stick their nose, where it doesn’t belong. I believe, that he referred to me and meant that my nose does not belong in investigation of Obama’s birth certificate. The guy is a real constitutionalist, isn’t he?

The board decided to discus candidates in private and vote in private, so I will not know the answer for a while.

Ken Armstrong wrote:

They can’t endorse you because you would probably win. Please understand that these people are all on the same side. When the press is not so subtilely endorsing Romney, it should wake people up to what is happening. They want Dianne back in office because she won’t rock the boat, and because she knows too much. They also want his Highness back in office, because he is doing such a great job in furthering their agenda.

As is becoming increasingly more evident as a result of your work, this not so invisible power has a firm grip on the neck of the free world, and is beginning to squeeze harder.

This problem can no longer be solved by the NONEXISTENT democratic process. It will only be solved by the return of Christ.

And to those of you intercepting this comment, beware. It applies equally to you.

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=33051 :twisted:

PatGund · **Posted:** Sun Mar 11, 2012 6:05 pm

I wonder if Dr. Orly will sue Al Ramirez if he gets the endorsement and Dr. Orly doesn't.

rosy · **Joined:** Sat Jan 14, 2012 5:36 pm **Posts:** 736

SueDB wrote:

ZekeB wrote:

I wish we had a roving reporter who could relay O'rly's rant screeeeech when she finds out her name hasn't even been considered.

Wherever you live, I think you'll be able to hear her... :mrgreen:

I'm approximately 5,200 miles away, and I've already placed an order for earplugs....

borealis · **Posted:** Sun Mar 11, 2012 6:27 pm

Ken Armstrong wrote:

They can’t endorse you because you would probably win. Please understand that these people are all on the same side. When the press is not so subtilely endorsing Romney, it should wake people up to what is happening. They want Dianne back in office because she won’t rock the boat, and because she knows too much. They also want his Highness back in office, because he is doing such a great job in furthering their agenda.

As is becoming increasingly more evident as a result of your work, this not so invisible power has a firm grip on the neck of the free world, and is beginning to squeeze harder.

This problem can no longer be solved by the NONEXISTENT democratic process. It will only be solved by the return of Christ.

And to those of you intercepting this comment, beware. It applies equally to you.
:twisted:

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=33051 :twisted:

Sorry Ken. Under the US Constitution Jesus isn't an NBC. Knowing how he refused to usurp Herod and Caesar, he tends to be more law-abiding than you birthers do. You recall I'm sure "Render unto Caesar that which is Caesar's. And that which is God's to God." Hmmm he even approved of separating religion from state. I think you'd be mighty disappointed if he comes back soon. You might even recrucify him.

Sequoia32 · **Posted:** Sun Mar 11, 2012 6:53 pm

ObjectiveDoubter wrote:

At the same time, these statements are challenged frequently and ARE changed. Usually it is the political parties challenging them, with high power attorneys however.

Well dang! We should have asked the CA Dem party to challenge her statement. Isn't tomorrow some kind of deadline?

ZekeB · **Posted:** Sun Mar 11, 2012 7:02 pm

PatGund wrote:

I wonder if Dr. Orly will sue Al Ramirez if he gets the endorsement and Dr. Orly doesn't.

The cornerstone of the suit would be O'rly's claim that no Hispanic person is allowed to register as a Republican.

Paul Lentz · **Posted:** Sun Mar 11, 2012 7:12 pm

ZekeB wrote:

PatGund wrote:

I wonder if Dr. Orly will sue Al Ramirez if he gets the endorsement and Dr. Orly doesn't.

The cornerstone of the suit would be O'rly's claim that no Hispanic person is allowed to register as a Republican.

Well, that's a problem...after all, just a few months ago, Oily described herself as a "Latina Woman." :roll:

AnitaMaria · **Joined:** Tue Mar 29, 2011 5:41 pm **Posts:** 2127

I seriously doubt that Orly is fluent in Spanish, although she might think she is. Several weeks ago, she did an interview with a radio station in Bogota, Colombia The interview was conducted in English with the Colombian interviewer translating after she finished talking. It was very awkward.

I had the impression that the radio station was probably told she could speak Spanish and then, when they tried to converse with her in Spanish, all she could say was, "The pencil is yellow" and "Where is the bathroom?" so they decided to talk to her in English and translate to Spanish.

Sterngard Friegen · **Posted:** Sun Mar 11, 2012 7:29 pm

Like Sarah Palin, Taitz has supreme confidence in what she perceives to be her competence. For someone as stoopid and narcissistic as Taitz, and with a law license, that's a dangerous combination. it would be even worse if she were a doc . . .

Oh, wait! :yikes:

ObjectiveDoubter · **Posted:** Sun Mar 11, 2012 7:38 pm

Sequoia32 wrote:

ObjectiveDoubter wrote:

At the same time, these statements are challenged frequently and ARE changed. Usually it is the political parties challenging them, with high power attorneys however.

Well dang! We should have asked the CA Dem party to challenge her statement. Isn't tomorrow some kind of deadline?

It has to be in Sacto, filed tomorrow and the SoS served -- she would be the respondent. The CDP would never do it. It would look like David and Goliath.

Anyhow, the legal folks on TFB have me convinced now that it could be not just a losing battle, Orly could potentially get a "I won" out of it from her screwy perspective, simply by not losing. And you know how she is, I mean this insane woman is selling tapes of her most embarrassing moments and thinks they are flattering! Who know what she would do it one word we wanted to strike were kept in. I, too, am very disappointed, but because I am not a lawyer, I defer to those here who are, especially because I am prone to what my friends call Lucy moments, jumping in before thinking and ending up in a proverbial vat of grapes to stomp so to speak.

borealis · **Posted:** Sun Mar 11, 2012 8:30 pm

OB: She is the Dont Poster Child for the GOP. I'd love it if she won the primary. Think of all the fun we will have.

AnitaMaria · **Joined:** Tue Mar 29, 2011 5:41 pm **Posts:** 2127

Tweeted by the Chairman Emeritus of the CA GOP and retweeted by Elizabeth Emken:

Quote:

Ron Nehring ‏ @RonNehring Reply Retweet Favorite · Open
The Calif Rep Party UNANIMOUSLY endorses @ElizabethEmken for US Senate! Great candidate!
Retweeted by Elizabeth Emken

Tough break for Orly.

borealis · **Posted:** Sun Mar 11, 2012 10:51 pm

AnitaMaria wrote:

Tweeted by the Chairman Emeritus of the CA GOP and retweeted by Elizabeth Emken:

Quote:

Ron Nehring ‏ @RonNehring Reply Retweet Favorite · Open
The Calif Rep Party UNANIMOUSLY endorses @ElizabethEmken for US Senate! Great candidate!
Retweeted by Elizabeth Emken

Tough break for Orly.

Screeching in 3...2...1 :((

Traitors! Corruption! Treason! Fraud! She so predictable -xx

ObjectiveDoubter · **Posted:** Mon Mar 12, 2012 1:02 am

borealis wrote:

AnitaMaria wrote:

Tweeted by the Chairman Emeritus of the CA GOP and retweeted by Elizabeth Emken:

Quote:

Ron Nehring ‏ @RonNehring Reply Retweet Favorite · Open
The Calif Rep Party UNANIMOUSLY endorses @ElizabethEmken for US Senate! Great candidate!
Retweeted by Elizabeth Emken

Tough break for Orly.

Screeching in 3...2...1 :((

Traitors! Corruption! Treason! Fraud! She so predictable -xx

I don't see it on any news site yet, and Orly doesn't seemed to have acknowledged it yet. So, do you think anyone has warned Emken that she is likely to be sued at least once and maybe twice, before the election is done, and that win or lose in the primary or the final election, the suit will go on for years?

SueDB · **Posted:** Mon Mar 12, 2012 2:13 am

ObjectiveDoubter wrote:

So, do you think anyone has warned Emken that she is likely to be sued at least once and maybe twice, before the election is done, and that win or lose in the primary or the final election, the suit will go on for years?

I predict it will go on until January 20, 2017 when the next Democrat is inaugurated.

vic · **Posted:** Mon Mar 12, 2012 3:08 am

The California Republican Party Newsroom has a a PDF of endorsements List of Endorsements

And right at the top:

OFFICIAL ENDORSEMENT RESULTS
United States Senate Endorsement
Elizabeth Emken

I guess the conspiracy has grown. :lol:

MsDaisy · **Posted:** Mon Mar 12, 2012 6:37 am

As predictable as the sunrise, anyone not on Orly’s side is corrupt. :roll:

Quote:

As expected, corrupt GOP establishment endorsed an insider Washington lobbyist Elizabeth Emken for endorsement
Posted on | March 12, 2012 | No Comments

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=33079 :twisted:

SueDB · **Posted:** Mon Mar 12, 2012 7:16 am

MsDaisy wrote:

As predictable as the sunrise, anyone not on Orly’s side is corrupt. :roll:

Quote:

As expected, corrupt GOP establishment endorsed an insider Washington lobbyist Elizabeth Emken for endorsement
Posted on | March 12, 2012 | No Comments

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=33079 :twisted:

Poor baby... :-({|=

Hektor · **Posted:** Mon Mar 12, 2012 7:28 am

SueDB wrote:

Poor baby... :-({|=

Yeah, she should go back to the Soviet Union where there's less corruption and she'd feel more at home informing on her neighbours to the KGB.

GreatGrey · **Posted:** Mon Mar 12, 2012 7:43 am

Hektor wrote:

SueDB wrote:

Poor baby... :-({|=

Yeah, she should go back to the Soviet Union where there's less corruption and she'd feel more at home informing on her neighbours to the KGB.

What do you have against the old Soviet Union to wish such a curse upon them?

MsDaisy · **Posted:** Mon Mar 12, 2012 7:56 am

Hektor wrote:

Yeah, she should go back to the Soviet Union where there's less corruption and she'd feel more at home informing on her neighbours to the KGB.

Yea, and stuff like impersonating Putin to access his personal information :lol:

SueDB · **Posted:** Mon Mar 12, 2012 8:04 am

MsDaisy wrote:

Hektor wrote:

Yeah, she should go back to the Soviet Union where there's less corruption and she'd feel more at home informing on her neighbours to the KGB.

Yea, and stuff like impersonating Putin to access hackses his personal information :lol:

FiFY

RTH10260 · **Posted:** Mon Mar 12, 2012 9:04 am

Butterfly Bilderberg wrote:

She truly has no idea how bad she is at lawyering. This video should be sealed, not sold.

Can university law libraries obtain copies for free, to be used as study examples how NOT to engage in an administrative hearing aka "trial", but teach future generations of lawyers the Empty Chair approach ?

Falsehoods unchallenged only fester and grow.

ORLY TAITZ IS NOT GOING TO BE CALIFORNIA'S JUNIOR SENATOR

Who is online