Falsehoods unchallenged only fester and grow.


All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ]     
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Mar 09, 2012 11:51 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 6:22 am
Posts: 6692
Location: downstairs
Huffington Post

Quote:
WASHINGTON -- For years, the IRS has done little or nothing to check the rise of overtly political groups that claim a special tax-exempt status in order to funnel secret money into election-related advertising.

But in a sign that the agency may be waking from its slumber, the IRS has sent detailed questionnaires to several Tea Party organizations -- and possibly other political groups -- to determine if they truly qualify for the 501(c)(4) designation intended for groups whose exclusive purpose is to promote social welfare.

Should any group currently calling itself a 501(c)(4) have its designation denied or revoked, tax experts said the consequences could be severe, including fines of 35 percent or more of the money they raised in secret.

And the groups might have to make donors' names public.

Even loose talk about donor secrecy no longer being guaranteed could put a screaming halt to the extraordinary flow of money into these groups from deep-pocketed people and corporations that want to buy political ads without leaving fingerprints.

_________________
I have never made but one prayer to God, a very short one: "O Lord make my enemies ridiculous." And God granted it.--Voltaire


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 09, 2012 11:56 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2012 12:36 pm
Posts: 1999
I'd like to see the questionnaire.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 09, 2012 1:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 1:01 am
Posts: 19017
Location: Planet Earth (most the time)
Occupation: I'm not at liberty to say. In other words, I'd tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.
Chilidog wrote:
I'd like to see the questionnaire.


sure: http://www.documentcloud.org/documents/ ... tions.html

_________________
Yes We Can! ~ Thomas Jefferson


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 09, 2012 1:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 1:01 am
Posts: 19017
Location: Planet Earth (most the time)
Occupation: I'm not at liberty to say. In other words, I'd tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.
it should be noted that the letter is not specifically for TeaBaggers. Note that they are receiving 'Letter 1313', which has been around for ages.

You can see it listed here under a section dated 2003. The letter has been updated, for sure. Just like all government forms.

http://www.irs.gov/irm/part7/irm_07-021-005.html

TeaBaggers feel persecuted. Not the case.

_________________
Yes We Can! ~ Thomas Jefferson


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 09, 2012 1:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 12:32 am
Posts: 20294
Location: FEMA Camp 17 -- Malibu (Hey! You! Get off the lawn!)
Occupation: Schadenfreude artist.
The Koch Brothers and Scaife Mellon as the money behind the curtains could cause a real political explosion. I also expect John Huntsman (senior).

_________________
When there are a finite number of ways to screw something up, Orly Taitz will find an infinite number of ways to do so. (The Sternsig Rule.)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 09, 2012 1:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2012 12:36 pm
Posts: 1999
Would DoF be receiving a letter like that? What about the Article 2 PAC goofs?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 11, 2012 5:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 24, 2009 3:26 pm
Posts: 5577
Location: You Sue-We Serve Legal Support Services, 500 Ala Moana Blvd., Honolulu, HI 96813
mimi wrote:
it should be noted that the letter is not specifically for TeaBaggers. Note that they are receiving 'Letter 1313', which has been around for ages.



^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ This. The Internal Revenue Manual -- most of which is accessible online -- at section 7.21.5 describes the various letters generated during the process of considering an organization's application for recognition of tax-exempt status. Letter 1313 is the first request for additional information for cases received on Form 1024, Application for Recognition of Exemption Under Section 501(a) or Determination Under Section 120. If the org fails to establish exempt status or blows off responding to the Letter 1313, a Letter 1315 is issued, denying recognition. If an org's tax-exempt status is revoked, it will receive a termination letter, Letter 2242.

But, yeah, the 'Baggers feel picked on. :-({|= :-({|= :-({|=

Quote:

IRS battling conservatives over tax-exempt status


Associated Press

Posted on March 1, 2012 at 5:01 PM

Updated Thursday, Mar 1 at 5:03 PM

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Internal Revenue Service is embroiled in battles with tea party and other conservative groups who claim the government is purposely frustrating their attempts to gain tax-exempt status.

The fight features instances in which the IRS has asked for voluminous details about the groups' postings on social networking sites like Twitter and Facebook, information on donors and key members' relatives, and copies of all literature they have distributed to their members, according to documents provided by some organizations.

While refusing to comment on specific cases, IRS officials said they are merely trying to gather enough information to decide whether groups qualify for the tax exemption. Most organizations are applying under section 501 (c) (4) of the federal tax code, which grants tax-exempt status to certain groups as long as they are not primarily involved in activity that could influence an election, a determination that is up to the IRS.

[snip] (emphasis added)



Section 501(c)(4) provides tax exemption for social welfare organizations. See http://www.irs.gov/charities/nonprofits ... 78,00.html. As Professor Donald Tobin explains:

Quote:
Social welfare organizations must be organized primarily (although the statute says exclusively) for a social welfare purpose and political campaign advocacy is not a social welfare purpose. The regulations governing (c)(4) organizations provide that an organization qualifies as a (c)(4) if “it is primarily engaged in promoting in some way the common good and general welfare of the people of the community.” The regulations further provide that “the promotion of social welfare does not include direct or indirect participation or intervention in political campaigns on behalf of or in opposition to any candidate for public office.” See Treas. Reg. 1.501(c)(4)-1(a)(2)(i) and (ii). Intervention in a political campaign has been defined broadly by the IRS, and it is the IRS’s definition, not the FEC’s definition that applies in this instance.


Organizations whose primary purpose is to influence the “selection, nomination, election, or appointment of any individual to any federal, state or local public office" may be granted tax-exempt status under I.R.C. 527. Contributions are not taxed so long as the organization makes financial disclosure, including the names of donors. Alternatively, the organization may elect to maintain the anonymity of its donors, but at a price: the organization is subject to corporate income tax on non-disclosed contributions.

_________________
“When I ran the Social Security number through Locate Plus, which is a commercial database that's used by private nvestigators and law enforcement personnel and attorneys, the only person who was associated and affiliated with xxx-xx-4425 was Mr. Barack Hussein Obama.” - sworn testimony of former U.S. Immigration and Customs enforcement officer John N. Sampson, January 26, 2012


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 11, 2012 9:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 1:01 am
Posts: 19017
Location: Planet Earth (most the time)
Occupation: I'm not at liberty to say. In other words, I'd tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.
Thank you, Butterfly.

So, either pay the taxes, or disclose your donors. There is no way they can claim they aren't trying to influence elections.

_________________
Yes We Can! ~ Thomas Jefferson


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 12, 2012 6:27 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2010 8:04 am
Posts: 5352
How dare ou suggest they are trying to influence an election! All they are doing is trying to get a candidate elected!

:rimshot:

_________________
You cannot kill what has no life...


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ]     

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: realist, shrek, vic and 3 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
View new posts | View active topics



Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group