VITAL RECORDS INDICATE OBAMA NOT BORN IN HAWAII HOSPITAL (PART 2)

SHOCK AND ODD –Along with previous evidence proving the image of Obama’s alleged 1961 “Certificate of Live Birth” posted on the internet in April, 2011 was digitally fabricated, we reveal powerful new evidence which shows that data contained on the document contradicts Obama’s birth narrative and vital statistical accounting methods used at the alleged time of his birth. Vast disparities between the natal information appearing in the image and the standard methods used by federal and municipal governments to code, identify and report the contents of U.S. vital records prove that Obama’s alleged Hawaiian birth record was assembled to intentionally obscure the truth about his natal biography.

By Penbrook Johannson and Dan Crosby
of THE DAILY PEN

NEW YORK, NY – An intensive examination of the contents of Obama’s alleged 1961 “Certificate of Live Birth” image by the most respected experts in vital records accounting and identity investigation reveals that much of the contrived information about his alleged Hawaiian birth simply renders his Natural-born status impossible.

In cooperation with former members of the Social Security Administration’s Records and Claims Investigation office, along with information provided by the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS), this installment of our report reveals evidence, for the first time, which shows the content of Obama’s document image was hastily and recently manufactured by criminal counterfeiters secretly working in collaboration with both the White House and the municipal government of the State of Hawaii.

Most importantly, the actual data found in the document image reveals that Obama’s natal history is in direct, and even absurd, conflict with historical precedents defining citizenry, demographics and birth metrics as well as protocols governing vital statistics accounting while exposing epic deceptions on a scale never before seen in American political history.

Haven't looked deeper yet, as I'm getting ready for the Arpaiopalooza. But here's a brand new Birther theory:

http://thedailypen.blogspot.com/2012/02/vital-records-indicate-obama-not-born_29.html

The comments are cute. Polland/Polarik is now claiming the Nordyke twins certificates are forgeries too.

Haven't looked deeper yet, as I'm getting ready for the Arpaiopalooza. But here's a brand new Birther theory:

http://thedailypen.blogspot.com/2012/02/vital-records-indicate-obama-not-born_29.html

Haven't looked deeper yet, as I'm getting ready for the Arpaiopalooza. But here's a brand new Birther theory:

http://thedailypen.blogspot.com/2012/02/vital-records-indicate-obama-not-born_29.html

Lets look a the logic here.

He focuses on the pencilled in 6 next to the "Place of birth" field and completely ignore the part where it says Hawaii.

He then assumes that the 6 really is 56 which means “Remainder of the World”.

Therefore Obama must not have been born in Hawaii.

Makes sense right?

I notice that he has helpfully omitted the actual table that lists what these location numbers means, he does show them in other cases where it is "usefull" to his case.

What are the odds that either 06, 16, 26, 36 or 46 actually corresponds to Hawaii?

He focuses on the pencilled in 6 next to the "Place of birth" field and completely ignore the part where it says Hawaii.

He then assumes that the 6 really is 56 which means “Remainder of the World”.

Both of the Nordyke certificates have the pencil codes written on them so the odd even conspiracy is easily debunked. (Susan's certificate number is 10637).

What we don't have are the 1961 codes for Race, although based on decades of experience with vital records systems, code "9" probably means missing or not stated. I would judge that a mistake, but a one easily explained when presented with an outlier response like "African." Keep in mind that 1961 was the first year that Hawaii data appeared in NCHS statistics, and they were just getting started with the procedures.

The very presence of these pencil markings consistent with obscure NCHS practices screams authenticity to me except for one thing. (Sometimes I hate being honest.) According to Vital Statistics of the United States - Natality 1961 (
http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/vsus/vsus_1961_1.pdf ), they only sent EVEN-NUMBERED certificates to the NCHS. So why was Obama's odd-numbered certificate coded? One obvious answer is that while they only reported even-numbered certificates, the state wanted a complete file for themselves.

The very presence of these pencil markings consistent with obscure NCHS practices screams authenticity to me except for one thing. (Sometimes I hate being honest.) According to Vital Statistics of the United States - Natality 1961 (
http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/vsus/vsus_1961_1.pdf ), they only sent EVEN-NUMBERED certificates to the NCHS. So why was Obama's odd-numbered certificate coded? One obvious answer is that while they only reported even-numbered certificates, the state wanted a complete file for themselves.

The Johanna Ah'Nee heavily redacted one from WND.

Image link, anyone?

Here you go. By the way the certificate number is odd and it has code numbers.

http://rcradioblog.wordpress.com/2011/1 ... -the-foot/

In cooperation with former members of the Social Security Administration’s Records and Claims Investigation office, along with information provided by the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS), this installment of our report reveals evidence, for the first time, which shows the content of Obama’s document image was hastily and recently manufactured by criminal counterfeiters secretly working in collaboration with both the White House and the municipal government of the State of Hawaii.