http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=32538

Can someone please translate this post, if anyone can follow it? Who was supposed to meet with Breitbart? Is that coming from Orly, or from Kern???? I cannot follow what is attributed to Taitz v. her FM.

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=32705

* A U.S. senator, however, must be a U.S. citizen.

<Highlighting mine>

And poor O'rly doesn't see the irony? Of course not. She's too busy with her own agenda to bother looking into a mirror.




Except to put the spiders on her eyelids.

Has anyone done a FOIA request for Oily's INS records? She must have lied about something on her residency or naturalisation applications. If she's even naturalised that is. We need Republican from CA to file a ballot challenge, assuming she makes it on the Senate primary slate.

I did a FOIA request for INS records of a deceased in-law, it took about 9 months to get the files.

Ms. Taitz allegedly acquired citizenship in the United States after marrying Yosi. However, Orly has not provided ONE SHRED of evidence that she became a naturalized citizen holding allegiance to the United States.

Until she produces verified PROOF of citizenship (and whatever documents she might present as 'proof' need to be independently authenticated), I hold her, through her actions, as an enemy combatant of the United States of America.

Hm, then her kids -- as children of members of an occupying army -- aren't eligible to the Presidency.

That's because you didn't use the magic words "EMERGENCY REQUEST."

I read on the Internet somewhere that until she produces affirmative proof (i.e. proof to my personal satisfaction) that she is a citizen, if her name appears on any ballot, then the CA Secretary of State and all CA election officials are probably, as a matter of law, guilty of treason. Now you have also read that.

USCIS requires proof of death for requests for records less than 100 years old.

If you made an FOIA request, you'd get the same answer Orly did when she FOIA'd Pres Obama's SSA records: records of living persons are protected by privacy laws.

However, a ballot challenge (usually, except Georgia) needs to present affirmative proof that the candidate is not in compliance of one or more requirements. Like a listed address outside the district.

It might be interesting to draft an objection (if only for the sheer fun of it) that contained two columns: on the left, the clauses of the oath of allegiance taken by naturalized citizens, plus selected exam questions; on the right, certified quotes of Orly's (ideally from court pleadings, not just blog posts) illustrating circumstantially, but overwhelmingly, that she could not possibly have studied for, passed, and sworn her naturalization.

An interesting exercise at least.

As children of an alien agent of another country, they would not even be eligible for citizenship even if born here. All her activities are irrefutable evidence that she is a foreign agent sent to create havoc in the judicial and election systems.

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=32722

Complaint filed with Federal Postal Inspector

Posted on | March 5, 2012 | No Comments

OND


O'rly never disappoints

I hope he skools her about this barcode

Quick question, does the US grant automatic citizenship as a result of marrying an American? I didn't think that was the case, I thought one would still have to go thru the naturalisation process, with the marriage giving them a step up towards that process, but not automatically making them citizens. Hell, in the UK, you have to get a 2 year probationary visa, then re-apply for permanent status, and after 5 years you can apply for naturalisation, but only afte passing all the checks, taking the test, etc. I wonder if Orly ever did any of that in the US, or if she's merely a green card resident.

Simple answer is no, although they can apply for citizenship after 3 years rather than the usual 5.

My strong suspicion is that Orly is a citizen. We know she visited Israel relatively recently. Israel is not, I believe, on the visa waiver country list. So she either had to travel on a US passport or on an Israeli passport but with a visa for US entry.

Prior to about 1924, when a citizen woman married an alien man, she lost her citizenship (but may not have automaticly gained her husband's). If an alien woman married a citizen man, she automaticaly gained U.S. citizenship.

All of this is different now, but I don't know when the different changes took place

Is she a dual citizen?

If she has a Green Card no need to a re-entry visa.....

My understanding is she did have Israeli citizenship. You still have to question whether or not she married just for US citizenship subverting immigration law in order to enter the US as a possible unregistered foreign agent. My second scenario alleges she is so poorly schooled in law, as we have witnessed in her disregard for following strict paperwork protocol, she may never have properly completed the citizenship process. She may think she is a citizen by virtue of her marriage as she is so eager to avoid showing us her papers. Funny how she demands satisfaction from the POTUS regarding his paperwork but has a tantrum if you ask her for hers. And so her minions should start asking her questions as well. She may not be that poor downtrodden immigrant she claims. She may not be a US citizen. She flies around the world, but does she fly on an Israeli or US passport?

It’s highly likely, but IF she is a U.S. Citizen she would have an American passport. (And we have NO proof that she is) I think I’d like to see that as well as her Israeli passport. For all we know she could be traveling anywhere on her Israeli passport, places that Homeland Security might be interested in. After all she has been slandering this country, it’s government, and the POTUS publicly around the world for the last 4 years. She has openly called for revolution and armed revolt against this country by the U.S. military. Who knows what else she’s been up to in other not so friendly countries that the U.S is unaware of. I certainly wouldn’t trust her as far as I could spit.

This CalBear is definitely loving me some Bruins today![/offtopic][/quote]

I be a double bruin, UCLA 1988, UC Berkeley 1991 (and my dogs were named bruin (the big puppy, a 225# english mastiff) and berkeley (the little puppy, a 185# great dane)). Although as I was expelled three times, really, from UCLA I don't know if they acknowledge my existence.