Like many robo-calls, it is misleading: Santorum does not support the "auto bailouts" that saved General Motors and Chrysler.

I agree tolland. I would prefer that the Republican candidate be the one I am least freaked out over.

Santorum would never win the general. He's too crazy. I'm happy with the disruption going on.

Santorum lost reelection in Pennsylvania by 18 points.

All kinds of things could happen between now and then, including a "lone nut." Santorum being anywhere near the White House is too much of a risk. He would destroy the country.

Looking at the present situation, though, it doesn't look very good for Romney. Of the five biggest prizes on Super Tuesday, Romney stands to win just one of them, in a state (Virginia) where his two main rivals are not even on the ballot. He will enjoy the delegates he gains in New England, but he'll get no credit for them. And he'll probably come in third place in Georgia, which is the biggest prize of all. I can't predict how the delegates were be distributed without investigating each state's rules and doing more analysis, but if the states were based on winner take all, and Romney were to win all the small states, he'd win the night by about 223-167-76. That might seem good, but he has no guarantee of winning all the small states and he won't benefit from winner-take-all in all of them. It's more likely to be closer to a tie when the allocations are made. And then there is that calendar.

On March 10, Kansas votes, along with Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands, and the Virgin Islands. If results so far in Colorado and Missouri are any indication, Santorum will win Kansas. I don't know that anyone really cares who wins the rest of these contests.

On March 13, Alabama, Mississippi, Hawai'i, and American Samoa vote. If results in South Carolina and the Florida panhandle, and polls in Georgia are any indication, Gingrich will win Alabama and Mississippi. Romney will probably win the pacific islands because nothing is less Polynesian than Rick Santorum's attitude. But, still, the big prizes will go to Gingrich.

...

Then we get to the next really important contest. On March 20, Illinois votes. They have 69 delegates. Can Romney do what he failed to do in Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, and (most likely) Ohio? Can he win a big midwestern state where the trees aren't just the right height?

Neither did Romney.

Chill. We got this!

We know that the elections are totally rigged. Today U.S. elections became one big puppet show. Between electronic voting machines and electronics ballot scanners, that can be rigged any way you want and Secretaries of States doing away with ID verifications, any elections where the margin of victory is 10% or less, can be easily rigged. Even with bigger margins election results are often questionable. So, we have to use all the tools we have in our arsenal. Election board and legal challenges are tools, are weapons, that we can’t abandon.

If anything, Romney or any other GOP nominee will be relying on us and our legal push to remove Obama feom office, not the other way around. That is why I am pushing on all fronts.

That is not logical

Newt: Rmoney would have fired Christopher Columbus. P.S. Only Newt has big ideas.
see above...

Note: is Tiffany an Animatronics robot?

I noticed on the Birther Calendar that the Washington Caucuses are happening today.

http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/20 ... r-tuesday/

Oh my, Not feeling up to going. Bad day (flare).

Arthur Jones, congressional candidate from Illinois. Believes Obama is an illegal alien and the Holocaust never happened. From Raw Story a few snipped comments from campaign staffer identified as “Bill”

Apparently Jones is a former member of the National Socialist White People’s Party. Someone must be pushing over a lot of big rocks lately and letting idiots like this crawl out from under.

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2012/02/29/a ... -happened/

Sorry, Sue. Take care. And pet your kittehs...

The radical pioneer Saul Alinsky, who helped invent the practice of bottom-up politics through "community organizing" in the middle of the 20th century, has become a key bogeyman for Republican in the Obama era. Obama worked for Alinsky acolytes early in his career, and even contributed to an anthology titled "After Alinsky."

"Saul Alinsky radicalism is at the heart of Obama," Gingrich told CNN Sunday.

But Obama isn't the only candidate with one-degree-of-separation ties to Alinsky. In his biography of Romney's father, Michigan Governor George Romney, T. George Harris wrote in his book "Romney's Way" that the elder Romney and Alinsky met after the Detroit riots of 1967:

[...]

"I think you ought to listen to Alinsky," Romney told his reluctant white friends. ‘It seems to me that we are always talking to the same people. Maybe the time has come to hear new voices." Said an Episcopal bishop, ‘He made Alinsky sound like a Republican.

Our experience also demonstrates that getting every citizen insured doesn't have to break the bank. First, we established incentives for those who were uninsured to buy insurance. Using tax penalties, as we did, or tax credits, as others have proposed, encourages "free riders" to take responsibility for themselves rather than pass their medical costs on to others. This doesn't cost the government a single dollar. Second, we helped pay for our new program by ending an old one — something government should do more often. The federal government sends an estimated $42 billion to hospitals that care for the poor: Use those funds instead to help the poor buy private insurance, as we did.