Quote:
Emergency motion for reconsideration, showing pinnacle of corruption by the elections commission of Indiana. More explosive evidence will be relieved later
This motion is brought by a witness Dr. Orly Taitz ESQ, who presented testimony and submitted exhibits into evidence at the Election Commission Hearing in the cases of petitioners Edward Kesler and Andrew Swihart, seeking to remove the name of a candidate Barack Hussein Obama from the Indiana state ballot due to the fact that Barack Hussein Obama (Hereinafter “Obama”) is not a natural born US citizen and does not possess any identification papers to show him to be even a citizen, and due to the fact that the decision by the commission to place Obama’s name on the ballot will constitute election fraud, aiding and abetting elections fraud, aiding and abetting forgery of the identification papers and treason against the state of Indiana and people of the state of Indiana, as well as treason against the United States of America and the people of the United States of America on part of the commission members Mr. Dumezich, Mr. Long, Ms Steele-Riordan and Mr. Bennett. This motion is brought by Dr. Taitz , ESQ (hereinafter “Taitz”) not as an attorney representing any parties, but as a witness who testified at the administrative hearing in front of the commission. While Petitioners are not represented by Taitz, they join Taitz in this motion. Taitz is asserting, that the members of the commission abused their discretion and showed an impermissible bias by not following the Indiana Code rules of administrative hearings by refusing to admit into evidence some 300 pages of documents submitted by Taitz and assuming that Obama is qualified, even though Obama defaulted, did not show up at the hearing, showed contempt towards Indiana Election Commission and contempt towards the state of Indiana and people of the state of Indiana and could not find one single attorney or proxy willing to risk his law license and his freedom by submitting to the commission Obama’s identification papers in light of the fact, that it was shown, that the alleged copies of the identification papers posted by Obama on line represent a forgery. Out of abundance of caution Taitz is submitting herein a certified copy of the evidence, which is available to her and ordered certified copies of other evidence.
[...]
Prior to the commission hearing Taitz, as well as petitioner Karl Swihart, submitted to the commission some 300 pages of transcripts and case file exhibits entered into evidence by the administrative judge in the stat of Georgia. Three of the commission members did not even have this evidence before them and there is no evidence to believe, that they read a single word of what was written, One of the commission members, Ms. Steele-Riordan stated that she glanced at the paperwork. It was clear that it was just a cursory review and she didn’t even understand what was provided to her. She either was not understanding or was not willing to understand what was submitted to her. She was stating that there was no value in submission of the proposed summary of facts and law, even though it provided an explanation and references to the rest of the evidence.
At the beginning of the hearing, when petitioner Edward Kessler stated that the petition alleges, that Obama is not eligible due to the fact, that Obama was a foreign national at birth and does not have a valid birth certificate and Social Security number and there is no evidence to believe, that the name he is using is indeed his legal name. At that time commissioner Long asked, where in the Constitution does it state that the President is supposed to have a valid Social Security number. The whole auditorium gasped hearing the question. The question in itself represented such an unprecedented level of corruption of the governmental bureaucrat, that the audience gasped. If one were to look up in the Merriam- Webster dictionary the word corrupt, he would find, that it means, “does not work properly”. A commissioner, who works properly should be able to grasp, that if a requirement for one to be a natural born citizen, it means one should have valid primary identification documents, such as a valid original birth certificate and a valid Social Security number. Not everything is written and spelled out in the Constitution and surely the framers of the Constitution believed that the bureaucrats, who will come after them, will have some minimal IQ and some logical thinking to understand such simple facts. Moreover, Mr. Long proceeded to ask “Surely you are not saying that our President is an illegal alien from Mexico”. It showed, that Mr. Long not only did not use any minimal logical thinking, he did not spend any minimal time to read the case and the evidence submitted with the edition. If he were to do any due diligence, he would know that the evidence shows Obama not to be an illegal alien from Mexico, but one from Kenya and a citizen of Indonesia
[...]
Chairman of the commission Dumezich did everything in his power to shut up Taitz. When Taitz made a true and correct statement, that the members of the commission will be aiding and abetting elections fraud, if hey put Obama on the ballot with a stolen Social Security number, forged birth certificate and by name, that is not legally his, Dumezich got irritated and did not like the truth, so he personally attacked Taitz with rude and unprofessional statements, which can be appropriate for a farmers market, but not the state capitol. His behavior was so rude and unprofessional and unbecoming of a governmental official, that Dumezich should resign from the commission immediately.
More, as they say, is at the link:
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=32428 
Login
Register
FAQ
