GreatGrey wrote:
She doubled down.
Quote:
"Based on Arpaio's work, I'll file with the #Illinois State's Attorney to investigate Obama. If they refuse, I'll file a Quo Warrento #phnm"
Gee, I hope Marooni learns how to spell 'Warranto' first. Or not.
And while it's true that a citizen in Illinois can (specifically, may be permitted with leave of the circuit court, with some other hurdles also accomplished) file a Quo Warranto action, she can only do so if the Illinois Attorney General and the (whichever) county State's Attorney refuse to do so. Sadly for Marooni, in Illinois, a Quo Warranto action is only permitted by statute where "Any person usurps, intrudes into, or unlawfully holds or executes any office, or franchise, or any office in any corporation
created by authority of this State."
Link to statute.
I dunno, maybe I'm wrong, but I'm pretty darn sure that the office of the President of the United States was not created by authority of the state of Illinois. Again, I may be wrong, but I'm pretty sure all that was wrapped up almost 40 years before Illinois was ever admitted to the Union.
What a stupid moroni...but
damn, she's a hoot!

Edit: Edited to add (from link to Illinois statute, above):
Also take note of 735 ILCS 5/18-105, "Security for Costs" - Marooni would have to pony up a bond (at the time she filed the Quo Warranto complaint), and 735 ILCS 5/18-108, "Judgment" - "When judgment is entered in favor of any defendant, such defendant shall recover costs against the relator." Not
might and not
may, but "shall." Quo Warranto in Illinois is clearly a pay-to-play and pay-more-when-you-lose proposition.

NOTE: The time for Marooni to file any sort of election challenge (to be heard by the ISBOE) with regard to the upcoming Presidential preference primary is long past. She did that (based on petition signatures) and failed miserably and hilariously. And the time for Marooni to file any sort of election challenge (to be heard by the ISBOE) with regard to the general election is not yet here.