In my part of the country there is little recycle demand for used toilet paper.

As a notary, all my certification means that whatever it was, was a copy of a page - All I certify is that this is the exact same piece that I validated the copy and the Acceptable ID of the customer.
$10.00 a signature is usually how I work, but when you have so many (350) pages to be certified in a bundle - make an offer and I will consider signing that this pile of shit is the same pile of shit that was dropped on my desk by someone with an acceptable ID card - all Notary Public rules and regs are governed by each state's law.

I ain't gonna do 350 pages of shit for $10.00 (one signature?)...and neither is anyone else with any sense.

Well, It's gonna cost her big. Her scanner "expert" should have DONATED a large capacity tree killer like the old xerox 8500.

Orly and your ilk, you can pay me now, or pay much more later....

It is the RED one marked for BioHazard and CONTAMINATED material.
In the latest studies on the transmission vector/mechanism - birtherism spreads through the a cycle of contaminated electrons that run along the Internet. You do have to go out of your way to contract it though.

Oh, the guys in the yellow suits are here to empty it.

Oh, it will get more expensive. Wait for Orly to get her certified Georgia stuff admitted in Mississippi and after it, together with some "new" "evidence", being dismissed as irrelevant unauthenticated hearsay (certified hearsay is still hearsay) asks for certified copies of it all so as to dump them on New Hampshire, Indiana and ... Georgia (Pennsylvania waiting in the wings).

Orly is playing Towers of Hanoi.

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=32269

Oh! I get it! You mean like... the courts have been insisting that Orly's stuff be authenticated ... like have something FROM the officials at eVerify that officially vouches for the fact that their system DID produce that result, and DOES mean what Orly says it means... like that? Basically have the issuing authority or agency that possesses jurisdiction provide official, certified confirmation. Passport records... that would be, say, the State Dept. Selective Service... that would be the Selective Service Administration. For allegations of BC forgery, that would be a certified expert in BC fraud and document authentication. Etc. Right?

And for Obama's COLB, that would be... Hawaii's DoH attest to the facts? Checkmate!

I sure am glad you're not requiring anything different of Obama than one would require of any regular citizen!

I'm sure Orly's going to get right on that. NOT.

Let's see. That's 400+ pages, times 150, so we're looking at 60,000+ pages, just for this stage of Orly's lunacy. We're getting into the range of an entire old-growth forest just for Orly's filings.

I'd say she's got more to worry about than Obama, anti-birthers, or the fact that she is doomed to lose everything she tries. She keeps killing trees at this rate, Treebeard will take notice.

"Taitz! A lawyer should know better!"

Then the ents will storm Appealing Dentistry.

OK, I have issues.

As long as we all get to sample the leaf after the rout.

And as long as CEL III plays the Wormtongue part.*

*NADT

FedEx guys offloading the plane that was full of just Orly's massive pile of 'evidence' in the 12th state down the line
"I think you're gonna need a bigger boat truck"

However, with Hanoi, there's a way to win, with the minimum being 2^n-1 with n being the number of rings. This can be a really long time, or a really short time.

For any value of n, though, Orly loses, forever. She has 50 states, though. That should keep her busy, at least until she runs out of money and brain cells.

I've added a Special Report containing Woodworker's Evidence post, and Loh's Difference between a Hearing and A Trial. It will be in the navigation once Foggy gets back cuz I don't know how to do that... Here ya go!

• Rules of Evidence: A Guide for Birthers and Others Who Don't Know What "Evidence" Means
• It was a Trial! It was a Hearing! It was a Cereal Topping! A Guide for Birthers and Others Who Don't Know the Difference Between a Trial and a Hearing

http://www.thefogbow.com/rules-and-roles/

PM me with edits or comments, please.

I think it's more like the wheat-and-chess-board problem.

She's been out of brain cells for quite a while now. Money doesn't seem to be a problem, though.

Thanks for putting these together. I suppose sometimes an irritated oyster produces a pearl.

Fantastic, boy is that ever needed!

Thank you again for all your hard work putting this together. I also want to give Woodworker and LOH inputs a big hand.

Farewell and adieu, my fine Spanish maiden. Farewell and adieu my Lady of Spain ...

A few days late in catching up with this fast evolving discussion (over 1000 posts to start with, and about half of them still to come):

Picking up on this your second marked quote above, first:
At the very beginning of the hearing of the objections of the first guy (Kessler?, seated left of Orly), the commission explained to Orly why her "evidence" was not considered evidence, eg nothing was certified in a correct manner. IOW nothing that Orly offered was representing "original matter". It was all hearsay. Take the Indonesian stuff as example, Orly never visited the school herself and had some Indonesian official confirming that a copy of whatever came directly from the schools administrative books. Also all Orly had to offer was affidavits from witnesses at the Georgia hearing (not a trial!). What Orly would need is the final ruling of a judge over a criminal or civil case, and handing in a certified copy of said ruling as real evidence.

As for the first highlighted quote of yours above, the Election Commission would have discussed the merits, had Orly given them some meat on the bone, eg certified documents. Without those there was nothing that merited a discussion.

The great failing of Orly is in general that she does not see that election commissions have no power to determine the truth of matter, this is all up to judges of the judicial branch working on either criminal or civil cases.

I guess the guy was frustrated cause he started off introducing himself and then handing over word to Orly with the words "she is representing us". And Orly even managed to see the trap and mention that she was only showing up as supporting witness, then giving the micro back to the local guy. I guess the local guy was surprised and unprepared to present his cause himself, having relied totally on Orly and her "evidence".

Orly clearly panicked at the end of the second part after the recess. When the commission told her the time was up and gave her another thirty seconds to wrap up, the screeching turned audible panic.

Great job Woodworker, Loh & W4!

Of course even if you had done the entire thing in crayons and finger-paints birfers still wouldn’t get it. Trying to teach a birfer to understand reality is like trying to teach a fish to ride a bicycle. T’aint possible!

Having finally finished this thread (phew!), a quick question:

Is anyone in birtherstan discussing how to appeal seek review of this decision?

The point in filing this challenge was to overturn Arnkeny; Malihi taught the birthers this case is a quick way to dispose of the two-citizen-parent arguments. But if no review is sought, Ankeny remains good law.