ORLY TAITZ IS NOT GOING TO BE CALIFORNIA'S JUNIOR SENATOR

neonzx · **Joined:** Tue Mar 10, 2009 9:27 am **Posts:** 4221

bob wrote:

The money quote from the linked Sac Bee article:

Quote:

"If this race plays out as a bunch of unknowns who have no serious funding, Orly Taitz will probably win the primary," said Feinstein adviser Bill Carrick, referring to the so-called "birther" activist who said last year she might enter the race.

Yeah, I saw that. And the peroxide queen was too dense to realize that the comment was dripping with sarcasm. 8-)

esseff44 · **Posted:** Mon Feb 27, 2012 11:27 pm

I didn't read Carrick assessment as being sarcastic. I think he was speaking as if we still had regular primaries and that O'rly would likely win the Republican primary or be the top GOP vote getter because she has the highest name recognition and at least as much money to lend to her campaign as the others signed up so far. So far, no wealthy CA GOP candidate has emerged who wanted to risk a small fortune trying to defeat the not-so-left and extremely well-funded incumbent. They thought Boxer was vulnerable last time around and looked what happened.

Feinstein is formidable.

ZekeB · **Posted:** Tue Feb 28, 2012 12:23 am

Talk is cheap, O'rly. Let's assume you do "win" the primary. I mean get more votes than the other Republican challengers. The acid test will be how well you do in the general election. That is the test of the real We the People. Do you honestly think you will get 35% of the vote? If your platform is only going to consist of the Usurper Must Go, you aren't going to get a sniff. The first 20% of your votes will be throw-away votes. This leaves Taitz with what? Fifteen percent? Yup, I'd wager about 15% honest votes.

jtmunkus · **Posted:** Tue Feb 28, 2012 1:01 am

But Orly's been campaigning so hard.

This board requires you to be registered and logged-in before you can view hidden messages

esseff44 · **Posted:** Tue Feb 28, 2012 1:38 am

ZekeB wrote:

Talk is cheap, O'rly. Let's assume you do "win" the primary. I mean get more votes than the other Republican challengers. The acid test will be how well you do in the general election. That is the test of the real We the People. Do you honestly think you will get 35% of the vote? If your platform is only going to consist of the Usurper Must Go, you aren't going to get a sniff. The first 20% of your votes will be throw-away votes. This leaves Taitz with what? Fifteen percent? Yup, I'd wager about 15% honest votes.

What is important to O'rly is that she gets to use the voter information booklet that goes to every register voter to publish her smears of Obama. If she comes in second in the open primary, she gets to publish her smears again in the general elections. It is a fairly cheap method to further her ambitions as a smear artist.

She is just using the election system in the same way she is abusing the legal system. Actually, the election system is the more natural place for such tactics.

Sterngard Friegen · **Posted:** Tue Feb 28, 2012 2:13 am

Taitz is self-disqualifying. Most people who read her trash realize almost immediately it is from a mentally ill racist.

SueDB · **Posted:** Tue Feb 28, 2012 4:25 am

ZekeB wrote:

Talk is cheap, O'rly. Let's assume you do "win" the primary. I mean get more votes than the other Republican challengers. The acid test will be how well you do in the general election. That is the test of the real We the People. Do you honestly think you will get 35% of the vote? If your platform is only going to consist of the Usurper Must Go, you aren't going to get a sniff. The first 20% of your votes will be throw-away votes. This leaves Taitz with what? Fifteen percent? Yup, I'd wager about 15% honest votes.

Cal has a top two primary, so it will be Senator against one other citizen not necessary GOP. You could clean Orly's clock by putting up a fairly popular Dem against her to ensure the top spot will be Dem/Dem.
=))

A Legal Lohengrin · **Joined:** Tue Oct 26, 2010 9:56 pm **Posts:** 9708

Sterngard Friegen wrote:

Taitz is self-disqualifying. Most people who read her trash realize almost immediately it is from a mentally ill racist.

And the rest are racists and approve of it. That's probably enough to get 25%.

ObjectiveDoubter · **Posted:** Tue Feb 28, 2012 12:21 pm

SueDB wrote:

ZekeB wrote:

Talk is cheap, O'rly. Let's assume you do "win" the primary. I mean get more votes than the other Republican challengers. The acid test will be how well you do in the general election. That is the test of the real We the People. Do you honestly think you will get 35% of the vote? If your platform is only going to consist of the Usurper Must Go, you aren't going to get a sniff. The first 20% of your votes will be throw-away votes. This leaves Taitz with what? Fifteen percent? Yup, I'd wager about 15% honest votes.

Cal has a top two primary, so it will be Senator against one other citizen not necessary GOP. You could clean Orly's clock by putting up a fairly popular Dem against her to ensure the top spot will be Dem/Dem.
=))

Being a Californian (who sanely voted AGAINST the Louisiana style primary which passed IMO because of the intractable extremist gridlock we have in Sacto making the electorate vote for anything that might help) -- I ought to know this, but I don't.

Here's my question: In some such jurisdictions around the country that have open primaries, if a candidate gets 50 percent +1 in the primary, there is no second go-round. Any Californian smarties know if we voted for that, as well? I myself believe in Instant Runoff Voting, so I'd hope at least if Feinstein got over half (which with the GOP field as it stands, she most certainly would), we'd be able to avoid a second costly and vitriolic election.

esseff44 · **Posted:** Tue Feb 28, 2012 12:38 pm

There is no mention of an 'instant run off ' for these offices. So far, instant run offs are just for certain local city and county offices.

What it specifies is that the top two voter getters advance to the general election regardless of party affiliation or identification and not as a nominee of any party.

It does eliminate intermediate run-offs and general election run offs. When there are only two names on a ballot for one office, the chances of an exact tie are close to nil. Someone will almost certainly get one more vote that the other.

I am not in favor of the instant run off. It produces very strange and some say undemocratic results. When there is a large field and a competitive race, I like having the extra time to vet the top two vote getters. A lot of additional information tends to pop up when the focus narrows.

http://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/2012-el ... y-info.pdf

ZekeB · **Posted:** Tue Feb 28, 2012 1:30 pm

ObjectiveDoubter wrote:

Here's my question: In some such jurisdictions around the country that have open primaries, if a candidate gets 50 percent +1 in the primary, there is no second go-round. Any Californian smarties know if we voted for that, as well? I myself believe in Instant Runoff Voting, so I'd hope at least if Feinstein got over half (which with the GOP field as it stands, she most certainly would), we'd be able to avoid a second costly and vitriolic election.

That's the way they do it here in Oregon for non-partisan offices. It saves the trouble and expense of an additional election. It only makes sense. If you did that in California for the Senatorial election, we'd go tone deaf at 3000 HZ from listening to O'rlyScreech.

SueDB · **Posted:** Tue Feb 28, 2012 1:38 pm

Washington is an open primary with declared party affiliation - Go ahead blame the Washington Grange Association.
IF there are 3 candidates, then we go through the whole deal.

If in the primary there are 2 candidate the results go to the general without a primary vote.

If someone is unopposed, then they are elected automatically during the primary.

I had forgotten about that - thanks OJ. But I do the the point now of not bothering with the general if Ms.F gets the balance of the votes. This weak pug slate could just save the Dems a boatload of money.

Yes, I did run for a local office here. Didn't win, when I started I had 0 votes and ended with 40 some %.

Edit: something don't look right - more Jameson.

ObjectiveDoubter · **Posted:** Tue Feb 28, 2012 1:43 pm

ZekeB wrote:

ObjectiveDoubter wrote:

Here's my question: In some such jurisdictions around the country that have open primaries, if a candidate gets 50 percent +1 in the primary, there is no second go-round. Any Californian smarties know if we voted for that, as well? I myself believe in Instant Runoff Voting, so I'd hope at least if Feinstein got over half (which with the GOP field as it stands, she most certainly would), we'd be able to avoid a second costly and vitriolic election.

That's the way they do it here in Oregon for non-partisan offices. It saves the trouble and expense of an additional election. It only makes sense. If you did that in California for the Senatorial election, we'd go tone deaf at 3000 HZ from listening to O'rlyScreech.

I guess even if Feinstein gets 75 percent, there has to be a general election of the top two. The only other name recognition might be Orly and GOPs tend to see GOP under a name and vote that way -- even though Feinstein is not very liberal at all.

Remember when David Duke was a candidate in LA and the Party disavowed him? Can you imagine Orly getting the second most votes and the GOP disavowing her? Plus who would give her MONEY to run ads? No one sane! It could be pretty funny all around, but in the end, I hope that someone real jumps in so that she doesn't go any further in her insanity. Can you imagine the kind of ads she would run if she had $$$ behind her? Shoot me, please, if that happens!

SueDB · **Posted:** Tue Feb 28, 2012 2:09 pm

It's not like she isn't doing any campaigning.... :lol:

realist · **Joined:** Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm **Posts:** 23928

Delusional much?

:evil:

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=32311 :evil:

because “Rally for Liberty” refused to let me speak, many are pulling out of “Rally for Liberty” and will not vote for Ron Paul

Posted on | February 28, 2012 | No Comments

Quote:

Orly,

Before the subject debacle it was a no-brainer that we would
vote for Ron Paul in the March 6th VA primary. Now we plan
to vote for Romney. No need to reply if our logic is sound.

Regards,
Dan & Maribel

Well, if 2 is "many" okay. :lol:

raicha · **Posted:** Tue Feb 28, 2012 5:29 pm

Well, that's almost 1% of the attendees, ain't it?

ZekeB · **Posted:** Tue Feb 28, 2012 7:01 pm

I thought the Ron Paul vote was going to Sanitarium.

esseff44 · **Posted:** Tue Feb 28, 2012 10:57 pm

Now we know she did not get to speak to the Paulistas. But her trip was successful because she got her picture taken with Newt and Callista. On the program, I thought I saw anyone could have their picture taken for a sizable contribution to Newt's campaign. Pay for Pose!

bob · **Posted:** Sun Mar 04, 2012 1:40 pm

Another website!

Quote:

Dr. Taitz has proven many times that she's not afraid of Obama. She relentlessly challenges him in courts to prove his eligibility that he's natural born citizen and therefore qualified to be president of the United States. As U.S. Senator, she will have the stature to fight Obama in the U.S. Senate, should he win reelection. And if he doesn't, she will make sure that nobody ever becomes president of the United States again without a valid birth certificate.

Dr. Taitz' main primary opponent is Elizabeth Emken. What has she accomplished? She's an advocate for the special needs of Autism. That's it. If she becomes U.S. Senator, she will work for more spending for Autism, SSI, Medi-Cal and more social entitlements. This will mean more taxes to pay for these expenses. Already many corporations are leaving CA to move to business-friendly states. And when corporations leave, there will be more unemployment in CA. Elizabeth Emken should join the Democrat Party. They have the same socialist agenda. -- Chito Papa

http://orlytaitzforussenate.com/ :twisted:

realist · **Joined:** Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm **Posts:** 23928

How to win friends and influence voters by Cheetos Poopie.

Because Orly Taitz believes she (hopefully) will never need any of those social services, as her husband is a multimillionaire, no one else should be able to receive them either.

Orly Taitz, your candidate for U.S. Senate who believes in Orly Taitz and Orly Taitz only.

Sterngard Friegen · **Posted:** Sun Mar 04, 2012 1:49 pm

Orly Taitz to parents of autistic children -- "Drop dead."

PatGund · **Posted:** Sun Mar 04, 2012 2:09 pm

So basically "vote for Dr. Orly. She hates Obama and anyone with special needs or who wants the Social Secuity they paid into."

Butterfly Bilderberg · **Posted:** Mon Mar 05, 2012 8:08 pm

Orly exudes empathy.

/snark

As someone who has three autistic child relatives I applaud the candidate who advocates on behalf of those afflicted with this tragic and serious neurological disorder, and their families. Living with autism is a 24/7/365 ordeal and the services required to support these families does not come cheap, either for the parents or the state and local governments that provide them. There is a special place in Heaven for the social workers, special ed teachers, speech and occupational therapists, and caregivers for these children.

Suranis · **Joined:** Sat Nov 20, 2010 8:04 am **Posts:** 5351

Well at least she didn't do something classless like include the "Esquire" on her name in small letters.

Oh wait...

Hektor · **Posted:** Mon Mar 05, 2012 8:17 pm

Chito Papa wrote:

she will work for more spending for Autism, SSI, Medi-Cal and more social entitlements.

Doesn't Dr. Orly take patients who pay using the socialist California state dental plan? Hypocrite much?

Falsehoods unchallenged only fester and grow.

ORLY TAITZ IS NOT GOING TO BE CALIFORNIA'S JUNIOR SENATOR

Who is online