Orly's latest poopies.....

listeme · **Posted:** Sun Feb 26, 2012 1:49 pm

xxhttp://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=32166

Quote:

I JUST GAVE AN INTERVIEW TO CHANNEL 4 BAY AREA. PICTURES WITH NEWT GINGRICH, TIM POWLENTY AND GOP NATIONAL CHAIRMAN RENSE PREIBUS WILL BE POSTED LATER TODAY

Pics with Newt!

She gives an incoherent summary of her interview and her candidate positions, ending with:

Quote:

This was the jest of my answer

realist · **Joined:** Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm **Posts:** 23596

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=32166 :evil:

Still nothing about her "most explosive *new* evidence" on IN commissioners, but..

I just gave an interview to Channel 4 Bay area. Pictures with Newt Gingrich, Tim Powlenty and GOP national chairman Rense Preibus will be posted later today

Posted on | February 26, 2012 | No Comments

Quote:

I was interviewed by Channel 4 Bay Area and was asked, whether a more conservative platform of the California GOP will cause the candidates to lose independant voters.

My response was, that the voters look at individual candidates, to see, if the platform of those candidates appeal to them. Typically the voters do not look at the platform of the party as a whole.

I explained that the economic provisions of my platform will be beneficial for every Californian, regardless, whether he is a Republican, Independant or a Democrat. My proposal of a 5 year moratorium on taxation of the companies, which repatriate to the US and hire American citizens, will be an employment incentive, which will benefit any employee or emploer regardles of party affiliation.

My provision of a tariff or duty on the corporations importing products from the third world countries will help overcome the disparity in cost, which is caused by the added expense of stringent EPA regulations. It will help CA and US companies as a whole to stay more competitive

OOPS!! listeme beat me tothe scoop... sorry listeme, didn't see yours before I hit submit. :oops:

BFB · **Posted:** Sun Feb 26, 2012 2:01 pm

realist wrote:

Orly sez wrote:

My provision of a tariff or duty on the corporations importing products from the third world countries will help overcome the disparity in cost, which is caused by the added expense of stringent EPA regulations. It will help CA and US companies as a whole to stay more competitive

Now I am about the furthest thing from an economist a human can be, but it seems to me that imposing tariffs on products from Third World countries will do nothing more than damage the economies of said Third World countries. Which would perpetually keep them Third World countries.

mimi · **Posted:** Sun Feb 26, 2012 2:03 pm

listeme wrote:

She gives an incoherent summary of her interview and her candidate positions, ending with:

Quote:

This was the jest of my answer

She got confuzled ever since that blog post at The Supreme Court Jesters.

Sterngard Friegen · **Posted:** Sun Feb 26, 2012 2:06 pm

Most of her suggestions would violate our GAAT obligations, violate numerous treaties we have throughout the world and spur a trade war. It's simply another area of human endeavor where Taitz doesn't know what she's doing.

But Taitz's proposal to give corporations tax breaks to repatriate profits and hire Americans sounds vaguely familiar. I believe a prolific poster here suggested something along those lines last year. So, Taitz's grazing here has paid off with one idea which is of interest (although not in its current form).

TollandRCR · **Posted:** Sun Feb 26, 2012 2:11 pm

BFB wrote:

Now I am about the furthest thing from an economist a human can be, but it seems to me that imposing tariffs on products from Third World countries will do nothing more than damage the economies of said Third World countries. Which would perpetually keep them Third World countries.

Steep tariffs, i.e. tariffs focused on imports from "Third World" countries according to Taitz's jest of her platform, could have effects here as well. At the time of the Great Depression, imports were an insignificant part of our economy. The Smoot-Hawley tariffs did little to sustain the Great Depression, which had begun seven months earlier. Today the effect might be far greater. There are better ways of addressing the disparity between American costs and "Third World" costs of production, beginning with improving the economies of developing countries.

GreatGrey · **Posted:** Sun Feb 26, 2012 2:12 pm

Poor TPaw...

In 2008, he got passed over for the VP nod, in spite of the announcer welcoming Gov. Pawlenty when introducing Sarah Palin.

He got hammered in the GOP primaries this time around.

He was forced into being a shill for Romney.

And now Orly spells his name wrong.

I guess that's the jest gist of it.

esseff44 · **Posted:** Sun Feb 26, 2012 2:13 pm

Nothing about her KRON Channel 4 interview has appeared so far. Cutting room floor?

http://www.kron4.com/Article.aspx?ArticleID=3232

SueDB · **Posted:** Sun Feb 26, 2012 2:17 pm

BFB wrote:

realist wrote:

Orly sez wrote:

My provision of a tariff or duty on the corporations importing products from the third world countries will help overcome the disparity in cost, which is caused by the added expense of stringent EPA regulations. It will help CA and US companies as a whole to stay more competitive

Now I am about the furthest thing from an economist a human can be, but it seems to me that imposing tariffs on products from Third World countries will do nothing more than damage the economies of said Third World countries. Which would perpetually keep them Third World countries.

Trade Wars - move from using military might to economic might to subjugate the "enemy".

Chilidog · **Joined:** Mon Jan 09, 2012 12:36 pm **Posts:** 1971

esseff44 wrote:

Nothing about her KRON Channel 4 interview has appeared so far. Cutting room floor?

http://www.kron4.com/Article.aspx?ArticleID=3232

I can just hear the producers /editors screaming at the field staff: "What the fuck is this shit? Where is the real news segment?"

ZekeB · **Posted:** Sun Feb 26, 2012 3:04 pm

Chilidog wrote:

I can just hear the producers /editors screaming at the field staff: "What the fuck is this shit? Where is the real news segment?"

Can someone who is in the Channel 4 viewing area get back to us on Feb 30? As I understand it, they plan on running an edited version then. It takes a bit of time to edit a 30 minute interview down to the essential 20 seconds.

MaineSkeptic · **Joined:** Thu Mar 19, 2009 2:48 pm **Posts:** 5295

ZekeB wrote:

Can someone who is in the Channel 4 viewing area get back to us on Feb 30? As I understand it, they plan on running an edited version then. It takes a bit of time to edit a 30 minute interview down to the essential 20 seconds.

I think that's true, not to mention the fact that Feb 30th is the one day of the year when Orly's presentations make sense.

nycpeter · **Joined:** Mon Aug 08, 2011 3:50 pm **Posts:** 306

Piffle · **Posted:** Sun Feb 26, 2012 3:33 pm

vic wrote:

Taft -> Tufts... It's easy, just photoshop the diploma.

Yup. Just change it to "William Howard Tufts" and no one will be the wiser.

Butterfly Bilderberg · **Posted:** Sun Feb 26, 2012 5:57 pm

Quote:

kelley
February 26th, 2012 @ 9:08 am

Orly, has anyone run Eric Holder’s SS#?

Quote:

orly taitz
February 26th, 2012 @ 9:10 am

not as far as I know

Dr. Caligari · **Joined:** Thu Dec 09, 2010 7:22 pm **Posts:** 225

MaineSkeptic wrote:

I think that's true, not to mention the fact that Feb 30th is the one day of the year when Orly's presentations make sense.

I thought that was February 31.

MaineSkeptic · **Joined:** Thu Mar 19, 2009 2:48 pm **Posts:** 5295

Dr. Caligari wrote:

MaineSkeptic wrote:

I think that's true, not to mention the fact that Feb 30th is the one day of the year when Orly's presentations make sense.

I thought that was February 31.

Only one year in four.

Tink · **Posted:** Sun Feb 26, 2012 8:08 pm

Orly has pictures up of her with the Gingrich's and one of her with Preibus and Pawlenty. She appears to have done a wardrobe change between shots. She really needs to get to her hairstylist and get those roots taken care of.

gimmeabreak · **Joined:** Sat Jan 24, 2009 12:36 pm **Posts:** 399

Orly with Newtie and Callie. If Gingrich were not so far out of contention now, this picture would do some damage.

LM K · **Posted:** Sun Feb 26, 2012 9:34 pm

Well, we know that she was admitted for entrance to the event; she has yet to say anything about being allowed to speak at the event. :lol:

listeme · **Posted:** Sun Feb 26, 2012 9:40 pm

The outfit change really does have me mystified!

justlw · **Joined:** Sun Feb 05, 2012 5:04 pm **Posts:** 18

Has anyone else noticed that she changed "jest"?

...to "jist." :-bd

GreatGrey · **Posted:** Sun Feb 26, 2012 9:49 pm

listeme wrote:

The outfit change really does have me mystified!

THREADJACK

/THREADJACK

justlw · **Joined:** Sun Feb 05, 2012 5:04 pm **Posts:** 18

Can anyone explain what the "time warp" feature of Orly's site is all about? I'm pre-guessing the answer to that is "no."

gimmeabreak · **Joined:** Sat Jan 24, 2009 12:36 pm **Posts:** 399

justlw wrote:

Has anyone else noticed that she changed "jest"?

...to "jist." :-bd

Gettin' closer!

Falsehoods unchallenged only fester and grow.

Orly's latest poopies.....

Who is online