Washington State Ballot Challenge - Jordan v SoS Reed

User avatar
Reality Check
Posts: 11281
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 8:09 pm
Location: USA
Contact:

Washington State Ballot Challenge - Jordan v SoS Reed

Postby Reality Check » Fri Sep 07, 2012 8:22 pm

As I read the footnote I thought that was the case.
“The reality of what we really are is often times found in the small snips, way down at the bottom of things.” – Jean Shepherd

User avatar
AnitaMaria
Posts: 4360
Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2011 5:41 pm

Washington State Ballot Challenge - Jordan v SoS Reed

Postby AnitaMaria » Sat Sep 08, 2012 3:26 pm

Linda Jordan has appealed her case but the State Attorney General is not happy. [link]OBC,http://obamaballotchallenge.com/more-tyranny-from-state-agencies-to-protect-criminal-obama-wa-threatens-ballot-challenger-with-sanctions[/link] has posted a letter from the AG's office that says the state will ask the judge for sanctions if she does not withdraw her clearly frivolous appeal of her clearly frivolous case. :-bd

User avatar
SueDB
Posts: 21489
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 2:02 pm

Washington State Ballot Challenge - Jordan v SoS Reed

Postby SueDB » Sat Sep 08, 2012 3:33 pm

Nice letter. Both the AG and the SOS are Republicans BTW....
You can follow the action, which gets you good pictures.
You can follow your instincts, which'll probably get you in trouble.
Or... you can follow the money - The Two Jakes -

User avatar
esseff44
Posts: 9247
Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2011 12:40 am

Washington State Ballot Challenge - Jordan v SoS Reed

Postby esseff44 » Sat Sep 08, 2012 3:34 pm

Linda Jordan has appealed her case but the State Attorney General is not happy. [link]OBC,http://obamaballotchallenge.com/more-tyranny-from-state-agencies-to-protect-criminal-obama-wa-threatens-ballot-challenger-with-sanctions[/link] has posted a letter from the AG's office that says the state will ask the judge for sanctions if she does not withdraw her clearly frivolous appeal of her clearly frivolous case. :-bd

It's going to be fun to watch what Linda does with this. Of course, she will accuse them all of being corrupt just like O'rly does, but who will pay her costs?

User avatar
realist
Posts: 30740
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 12:33 pm

Washington State Ballot Challenge - Jordan v SoS Reed

Postby realist » Sat Sep 08, 2012 3:35 pm

Linda Jordan has appealed her case but the State Attorney General is not happy. [link]OBC,http://obamaballotchallenge.com/more-tyranny-from-state-agencies-to-protect-criminal-obama-wa-threatens-ballot-challenger-with-sanctions[/link] has posted a letter from the AG's office that says the state will ask the judge for sanctions if she does not withdraw her clearly frivolous appeal of her clearly frivolous case. :-bd

While I suspect Ms. Jordan will listen to her birther morons and proceed with her appeal, she'd do well to listen to Mr. Even, rather than Pammy...





More [highlight]Tyranny[/highlight] :roll: From State Agencies to Protect Criminal Obama, WA threatens ballot challenger with sanctions





Posted by By Pamela Barnett at 8 September, at 18 : 17 PM Print






[highlight]Tyrannical Deputy Solicitor General Even[/highlight] of Washington State threatens a state citizen with sanctions if she appeals the court decision [highlight]that was based on faulty reasoning by the judge.[/highlight] [-( This is an example of a growing list of tyrannical behavior by state agencies to protect criminal fraud aka Barack Hussein Obama.





[highlight]The judge cherry picked faulty rulings[/highlight] [-X to dismiss ballot challenger Linda Jordan’s complaint. Now the Washington State Attorney General’s office threatens her. I wonder if this is standard operating procedure when citizens sue the state or if Obama and the federal purse strings he controls are the reason.

The reason is the taxpayers should not have to continue to pay for obviously frivolous lawsuits and appeals by morons.

User avatar
SueDB
Posts: 21489
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 2:02 pm

Washington State Ballot Challenge - Jordan v SoS Reed

Postby SueDB » Sat Sep 08, 2012 3:37 pm

From Mr. Evan's letter, I doubt the state is going to put up with any more BS. I wonder whose tit she is feeding on. She had another woman in court sitting at the table with her. I didn't get her name...
You can follow the action, which gets you good pictures.
You can follow your instincts, which'll probably get you in trouble.
Or... you can follow the money - The Two Jakes -

User avatar
mimi
Posts: 27927
Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 12:01 am

Washington State Ballot Challenge - Jordan v SoS Reed

Postby mimi » Sat Sep 08, 2012 4:00 pm

i think she'll go forward anyway.somebody ended up paying for carol greenberg's costs. then again stevie pidgeon might be all tapped out. and joey farah is the biggest cheapskate alive. hmmmm.

User avatar
SueDB
Posts: 21489
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 2:02 pm

Washington State Ballot Challenge - Jordan v SoS Reed

Postby SueDB » Sat Sep 08, 2012 4:50 pm

From [/break1]courts.wa.gov/index.cfm?fa=home.casesummary&crt_itl_nu=S34&casenumber=12-2-01763-5&searchtype=sName&token=14E845BBCECECE538E0BE218ABC44564&dt=0F18AAB14F074059AE4D9CE8F3D7D5B9&courtClassCode=S&casekey=160396074&courtname=THURSTON%20SUPERIOR]Washington State Court Records





Superior Court Case Summary





Court: Thurston Superior


Case Number: 12-2-01763-5





Sub Docket Date Docket Code Docket Description Misc Info


- 08-27-2012


1 08-27-2012 CASE INFORMATION COVER SHEET Case Information Cover Sheet


2 08-27-2012 FILING FEE RECEIVED Filing Fee Received 240.00


3 08-27-2012 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT


ACTION Notice Of Assignment


Scheduling Conference 11-30-2012


4 08-27-2012 MEMORANDUM Memorandum


5 08-27-2012 AFFIDAVIT Affidavit


6 08-27-2012 EXHIBIT LIST Exhibit List Proposed.


7 08-27-2012 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE Notice Of Appearance


8 08-27-2012 MOTION FOR ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Motion For Order To Show Cause


9 08-27-2012 NOTICE OF ISSUE


ACTION Notice Of Issue


Show Cause 09-07-2012


10 08-28-2012 DECLARATION Declaration Sheryl Moss


11 08-28-2012 DECLARATION Declaration Tami Davis


12 08-29-2012 DECLARATION Declaration S Hamlin


13 08-29-2012 MOTION HEARING Motion Hearing


Cc Bales Cr Jones


JDG0004 Judge William Thomas Mcphee


14 08-29-2012 COURT'S DECISION Court's Decision


15 08-29-2012 ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE Order Of Dismissal With Prejudice


16 08-29-2012 MEMORANDUM Memorandum Response


17 08-30-2012 COST BILL Cost Bill


18 08-31-2012 PROPOSED ORDER/FINDINGS Proposed Order/findings


19 09-04-2012 NOTICE OF APPEAL TO SUPREME COURT Notice Of Appeal To Supreme Court


20 09-04-2012 APPELLATE FILING FEE Appellate Filing Fee 290.00


21 09-05-2012 LETTER Letter To Supreme Court W/notice


You can follow the action, which gets you good pictures.
You can follow your instincts, which'll probably get you in trouble.
Or... you can follow the money - The Two Jakes -

User avatar
SueDB
Posts: 21489
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 2:02 pm

Washington State Ballot Challenge - Jordan v SoS Reed

Postby SueDB » Sat Sep 08, 2012 4:53 pm

When will she send in the "emergency appeal" as it's less than 60 days before the election????
You can follow the action, which gets you good pictures.
You can follow your instincts, which'll probably get you in trouble.
Or... you can follow the money - The Two Jakes -

Tarrant
Posts: 1310
Joined: Fri Jan 13, 2012 4:05 pm

Washington State Ballot Challenge - Jordan v SoS Reed

Postby Tarrant » Sat Sep 08, 2012 5:12 pm

The judge "cherry picked" faulty rulings? What pro-birther rulings are there the judge could have chosen from again?





It would either be "cherry pick" rulings, or have zero citations.

User avatar
verbalobe
Posts: 8406
Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 5:27 pm

Washington State Ballot Challenge - Jordan v SoS Reed

Postby verbalobe » Sat Sep 08, 2012 5:23 pm

http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8174/7957957368_d6f2b8750e_o.jpg

User avatar
TexasFilly
Posts: 14584
Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2009 12:52 pm

Washington State Ballot Challenge - Jordan v SoS Reed

Postby TexasFilly » Sat Sep 08, 2012 5:34 pm

Linda Jordan's ass should be in a jail cell right now. Unfortunately, the government attorneys value their time as only a fraction of what private attorneys would, thus minimizing the amount of sanctions. In any event, I'll be happy with whatever sanction the appellate court metes out.

User avatar
realist
Posts: 30740
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 12:33 pm

Washington State Ballot Challenge - Jordan v SoS Reed

Postby realist » Sat Sep 08, 2012 5:43 pm

Orly chimes in with her lunatic ravings...





:evil:[/break1]orlytaitzesq.com/?p=282186]http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=282186 :evil:





PLEASE, REPORT TO THE DA DEPUTY SOLICITOR JEFFREY T.EVEN FOR INTIMIDATION OF A FEDERAL WHISTLEBLOWER LINDA JORDA


Posted on | September 8, 2012 | No Comments

](*,)





Federal whistleblower my ass. Lying seditionist. Same as you, Orly.

User avatar
SueDB
Posts: 21489
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 2:02 pm

Washington State Ballot Challenge - Jordan v SoS Reed

Postby SueDB » Sat Sep 08, 2012 6:19 pm

But, but, but if she withdraws in time ( :shock: :-? ) wouldn't she lose her $290.00 in Birfer Bucks???
You can follow the action, which gets you good pictures.
You can follow your instincts, which'll probably get you in trouble.
Or... you can follow the money - The Two Jakes -

User avatar
SueDB
Posts: 21489
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 2:02 pm

Washington State Ballot Challenge - Jordan v SoS Reed

Postby SueDB » Sat Sep 08, 2012 6:25 pm

Orly chimes in with her lunatic ravings...





:evil:[/break1]orlytaitzesq.com/?p=282186]http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=282186 :evil:





PLEASE, [highlight=#bfffff]REPORT TO THE DA DEPUTY SOLICITOR JEFFREY T.EVEN[/highlight] FOR INTIMIDATION OF A FEDERAL WHISTLEBLOWER LINDA JORDA


Posted on | September 8, 2012 | No Comments

](*,)





Federal whistleblower my ass. Lying seditionist. Same as you, Orly.

I sure will report it all to the DA Deputy Solicitor Jeffery Evan....gawd Orly...what a loser.
You can follow the action, which gets you good pictures.
You can follow your instincts, which'll probably get you in trouble.
Or... you can follow the money - The Two Jakes -

User avatar
SueDB
Posts: 21489
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 2:02 pm

Washington State Ballot Challenge - Jordan v SoS Reed

Postby SueDB » Sat Sep 08, 2012 6:26 pm

and Orly is trying to make a "Federal Case" out of a State issue. No wonder she has lost every birfer case on the books. I love it when the judges throw them out of court on their asses citing Orly's loser cases as precedent and authority. =)) =)) =)) =))
You can follow the action, which gets you good pictures.
You can follow your instincts, which'll probably get you in trouble.
Or... you can follow the money - The Two Jakes -

User avatar
SueDB
Posts: 21489
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 2:02 pm

Washington State Ballot Challenge - Jordan v SoS Reed

Postby SueDB » Sat Sep 08, 2012 6:28 pm

Linda Jordan's ass should be in a jail cell right now. Unfortunately, the government attorneys value their time as only a fraction of what private attorneys would, thus minimizing the amount of sanctions. In any event, I'll be happy with whatever sanction the appellate court metes out.

So far it is just a civil complaint. I can't wait until someone swears out a warrant against the President...Just a thought, but with all this going on, why hasn't some stupid birfer filed charges???? ?( :-({|= :-({|= :(( :((
You can follow the action, which gets you good pictures.
You can follow your instincts, which'll probably get you in trouble.
Or... you can follow the money - The Two Jakes -

User avatar
Piffle
Posts: 6322
Joined: Sun Sep 26, 2010 12:39 pm

Washington State Ballot Challenge - Jordan v SoS Reed

Postby Piffle » Sat Sep 08, 2012 6:48 pm

So far it is just a civil complaint. I can't wait until someone swears out a warrant against the President...Just a thought, but with all this going on, why hasn't some stupid birfer filed charges???? ?( :-({|= :-({|= :(( :((

See Susan Daniel's affidavit in the Ohio thread. That's exactly what she's attempting to do.

User avatar
SueDB
Posts: 21489
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 2:02 pm

Washington State Ballot Challenge - Jordan v SoS Reed

Postby SueDB » Sat Sep 08, 2012 7:04 pm

So far it is just a civil complaint. I can't wait until someone swears out a warrant against the President...Just a thought, but with all this going on, why hasn't some stupid birfer filed charges???? ?( :-({|= :-({|= :(( :((

See Susan Daniel's affidavit in the Ohio thread. That's exactly what she's attempting to do.

I do believe she is on the wrong side (civil side) of the courts though. It is nice that the AG's office is handling this. If there was any truth to the bullshit, the GOP AG and crew would have squealed like little piglets.
You can follow the action, which gets you good pictures.
You can follow your instincts, which'll probably get you in trouble.
Or... you can follow the money - The Two Jakes -

A Legal Lohengrin
Posts: 10412
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2010 9:56 pm

Washington State Ballot Challenge - Jordan v SoS Reed

Postby A Legal Lohengrin » Sat Sep 08, 2012 7:07 pm

and Orly is trying to make a "Federal Case" out of a State issue. No wonder she has lost every birfer case on the books. I love it when the judges throw them out of court on their asses citing Orly's loser cases as precedent and authority.


=)) =)) =)) =))

Orly often likes to complain about courts citing Ankeny, claiming it doesn't count because it was brought by pro se litigants. It would be funny if people objected to courts citing Orly's cases on the grounds that the cases were argued by an incompetent lunatic who is arguably the worst attorney in the history of the universe.

User avatar
Kriselda Gray
Posts: 6860
Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2009 4:17 am
Location: FEMA Camp 2112 - a collaborative facility run by the U.S. And Canada
Contact:

Washington State Ballot Challenge - Jordan v SoS Reed

Postby Kriselda Gray » Sat Sep 08, 2012 7:10 pm

But, but, but if she withdraws in time ( :shock: :-? ) wouldn't she lose her $290.00 in Birfer Bucks???

I sure as hell hope so! I'm just glad to see SOMEONE biting back at the birthers. It's a pathetic commentary on our justice system that it's so overloaded that no one wants - or maybe even can - take the time and effort to deal with this crap. (Of course, maybe if they WOULD deal with crap - not just this, but other obvious crap that comes across their desks - people would be more hesitant to file nuisance and clearly frivolous suits and the courts wouldn't be quite so bogged down.... )

User avatar
realist
Posts: 30740
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 12:33 pm

Washington State Ballot Challenge - Jordan v SoS Reed

Postby realist » Sat Sep 08, 2012 7:41 pm

From [/break1]courts.wa.gov/index.cfm?fa=home.casesummary&crt_itl_nu=S34&casenumber=12-2-01763-5&searchtype=sName&token=14E845BBCECECE538E0BE218ABC44564&dt=0F18AAB14F074059AE4D9CE8F3D7D5B9&courtClassCode=S&casekey=160396074&courtname=THURSTON%20SUPERIOR]Washington State Court Records





Superior Court Case Summary





Court: Thurston Superior


Case Number: 12-2-01763-5





Sub Docket Date Docket Code Docket Description Misc Info


- 08-27-2012


1 08-27-2012 CASE INFORMATION COVER SHEET Case Information Cover Sheet


2 08-27-2012 FILING FEE RECEIVED Filing Fee Received 240.00


3 08-27-2012 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT


ACTION Notice Of Assignment


Scheduling Conference 11-30-2012


4 08-27-2012 MEMORANDUM Memorandum


5 08-27-2012 AFFIDAVIT Affidavit


6 08-27-2012 EXHIBIT LIST Exhibit List Proposed.


7 08-27-2012 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE Notice Of Appearance


8 08-27-2012 MOTION FOR ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Motion For Order To Show Cause


9 08-27-2012 NOTICE OF ISSUE


ACTION Notice Of Issue


Show Cause 09-07-2012


10 08-28-2012 DECLARATION Declaration Sheryl Moss


11 08-28-2012 DECLARATION Declaration Tami Davis


12 08-29-2012 DECLARATION Declaration S Hamlin


13 08-29-2012 MOTION HEARING Motion Hearing


Cc Bales Cr Jones


JDG0004 Judge William Thomas Mcphee


14 08-29-2012 [link]COURT'S DECISION,http://www.scribd.com/doc/105338849[/link] Court's Decision


15 08-29-2012 [link]ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE,http://www.scribd.com/doc/105338848[/link] Order Of Dismissal With Prejudice


16 08-29-2012 [link]MEMORANDUM,http://www.scribd.com/doc/105338847[/link] Memorandum Response


17 08-30-2012 [link]COST BILL,http://www.scribd.com/doc/105338867[/link] Cost Bill


18 08-31-2012 PROPOSED ORDER/FINDINGS Proposed Order/findings


19 09-04-2012 [link]NOTICE OF APPEAL TO SUPREME COURT,http://www.scribd.com/doc/105338868[/link] Notice Of Appeal To Supreme Court


20 09-04-2012 APPELLATE FILING FEE Appellate Filing Fee 290.00


21 09-05-2012 [link]LETTER,http://www.scribd.com/doc/105338845[/link] Letter To Supreme Court W/notice


Have added some links to docs.





H/T to SueDB :-bd

User avatar
SueDB
Posts: 21489
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 2:02 pm

Washington State Ballot Challenge - Jordan v SoS Reed

Postby SueDB » Sat Sep 08, 2012 7:47 pm

Thank you very much...it pretty much completes the pertinent paperwork for the initial case. Now on to the appeal... :hitthefan: :bwaha: :hammer: [hidden]Hi Orly!!! :horse:[/hidden]
You can follow the action, which gets you good pictures.
You can follow your instincts, which'll probably get you in trouble.
Or... you can follow the money - The Two Jakes -

User avatar
PatGund
Posts: 7398
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 4:41 pm
Location: Edmonds. WA
Contact:

Washington State Ballot Challenge - Jordan v SoS Reed

Postby PatGund » Sat Sep 08, 2012 9:52 pm

As a Washington State taxpayer, I would prefer that the state go after costs when a defendant wastes the court time like this.

User avatar
SueDB
Posts: 21489
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 2:02 pm

Washington State Ballot Challenge - Jordan v SoS Reed

Postby SueDB » Sat Sep 08, 2012 10:12 pm

As a Washington State taxpayer, I would prefer that the state go after costs when a defendant wastes the court time like this.

She'll get our bill in the mail... :lol: :lol:
You can follow the action, which gets you good pictures.
You can follow your instincts, which'll probably get you in trouble.
Or... you can follow the money - The Two Jakes -


Return to “State Ballot Challenges”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests