Indiana ballot challenge (smackdown for Orly)

Suranis · **Joined:** Sat Nov 20, 2010 8:04 am **Posts:** 5251

I'm not really surprised Orly has explosive Diarrhea with all the stress andrunning around she has been doing.

Maru · **Posted:** Sat Feb 25, 2012 12:44 pm

I bet its about the female member! Orly doesn't like girls.

ZekeB · **Posted:** Sat Feb 25, 2012 12:46 pm

They took her "evidence." They set it up so she could appeal. What more could she ask? Oh wait, they told her to get a Real Attorney. An Indiana attorney, no less.

Problem is that a Real Attorney will call her evidence what it is. Pure bullshit. O'rly knows this.

Adelante · **Posted:** Sat Feb 25, 2012 12:55 pm

I think the same.

ducktape wrote:

Any takers?

Paul Pieniezny · **Posted:** Sat Feb 25, 2012 12:55 pm

AnitaMaria wrote:

Pambly has posted an eyewitness account of the hearing. Usual birfer blather: Obama thugs, biased, corrupt, the end of the United States of America is nigh...except for this:

Quote:

...No media to even interview us after the verdict in the halls outside of the Indiana House Chamber of the Indiana Statehouse.

Good grief, Orly's hubby forgot to call Russia Today! :((

ZekeB · **Posted:** Sat Feb 25, 2012 12:57 pm

Media has more important things to do. Such as coverage of a fireman rescuing a cat from a tree.

TollandRCR · **Posted:** Sat Feb 25, 2012 1:01 pm

Orly sez:

Quote:

I just got into my hotel room in San Francisco. ... Tomorrow at 4 I will be presenting my candidacy at the California Republican Assembly (actually it is today already)

California Republican Assembly says:

Quote:

Upcoming events
There are no upcoming events

Someday Orly's careful attention to detail will slip up, and she will make a really big mistake.

Suranis · **Joined:** Sat Nov 20, 2010 8:04 am **Posts:** 5251

jtmunkus · **Joined:** Mon May 23, 2011 7:33 pm **Posts:** 3502

Maru wrote:

I bet its about the female member! Orly doesn't like girls.

Hmmm...a hot Democratic lawyer chick so incisively riling the seditious dentist? Gives me hope for the world, in so many ways!

:-bd

realist · **Joined:** Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm **Posts:** 23562

Orly, in her infinite attention to detail, initially posts an incorrect web address for the IN legislature. Immediately, a new conspiracy is created by her flying monkeys... (and this after the first poster had corrected the bad addy ](*,)

)

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=32120 :evil:

Quote:

Itisallagame
February 25th, 2012 @ 7:28 am

This link that you provided for the download of the video footage in IN does NOT work

http://www.in.gov/legislature/2441

This is the message received:
Home > 404 Error
Sorry, the page you requested was not found.

Back to previous page
Try starting from the IN.gov home page;
Try the search box above, or
Find HELP

If you typed in the web address yourself, please verify that what you’ve typed is correct.

Is this another sabotage?!?!?! ](*,)

This is becoming so “set-up” by the gov that is is beginning to look like a child is playing the cards. So ridiculous is the refusal to look at the facts presented. A child who puts their fingers in their ears and screams “I’m NOT listening” – this is the type of behavior our government has resorted to display.

Lisa
February 25th, 2012 @ 7:29 am

Guess Indiana legislature is ashamed of themselves,because the video of the proceedings comes up “File not found.”

Gawd these people are stupid.

ObjectiveDoubter · **Posted:** Sat Feb 25, 2012 1:28 pm

ducktape wrote:

Well, I'm ready to give odds that she has discovered that two of the members of the commission -- the woman who dissed her evidence and the older guy in the center who warned her about perjury are .... ready? Democrats! In fact, the woman is the legal counsel for the Democratic Party and the man is the chairman of some section of it.

So that means they were BIASED!! How explosive can you get? Oh where is justice in our court system?

(Ignore the fact that the vote against her was 4-0 -- the Republicans were RINO thugs, of course).

Any takers?

My bet for a buck still stands from yesterday: four words in her explosive news or I lose: RINO(S), THUG(S), CORRUPT(ION), FRAUD.

Epectitus · **Joined:** Fri Jan 23, 2009 3:55 pm **Posts:** 2359

BFB wrote:

I'm on pins and needles! Orly's got more explosive evidence!! (Malware warning)

Quote:

Web address for IN hearing, some explosive information about IN commission is coming, can’t disclose yet, it is big though

You know how Georgia got two nuclear power plants in exchange for their decision? Well, Indiana is going one better.

Obama is giving Indiana "The Bomb."

GreatGrey · **Posted:** Sat Feb 25, 2012 1:36 pm

realist wrote:

Orly, in her infinite attention to detail, initially posts an incorrect web address for the IN legislature. Immediately, a new conspiracy is created by her flying monkeys... (and this after the first poster had corrected the bad addy ](*,)

)

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=32120 :evil:

Quote:

Itisallagame
February 25th, 2012 @ 7:28 am

This link that you provided for the download of the video footage in IN does NOT work

http://www.in.gov/legislature/2441

This is the message received:
Home > 404 Error
<snip>

Akshully.... if ya go here
http://www.in.gov/sos/elections/index.htm
there is a link to the video, not yet available.
Indiana Election Commission Meeting Webcast Archive - February 24, 2012

.

GreatGrey · **Posted:** Sat Feb 25, 2012 1:40 pm

BFB wrote:

I'm on pins and needles! Orly's got more explosive evidence!! (Malware warning)

Quote:

Web address for IN hearing, some explosive information about IN commission is coming, can’t disclose yet, it is big though

I'm thinking something involving Soy Beans and Corn.

SueDB · **Posted:** Sat Feb 25, 2012 1:42 pm

ducktape wrote:

Well, I'm ready to give odds that she has discovered that two of the members of the commission -- the woman who dissed her evidence and the older guy in the center who warned her about perjury are .... ready? Democrats! In fact, the woman is the legal counsel for the Democratic Party and the man is the chairman of some section of it.

So that means they were BIASED!! How explosive can you get? Oh where is justice in our court system?

(Ignore the fact that the vote against her was 4-0 -- the Republicans were RINO thugs, of course).

Any takers?

And the Indiana rules permit such appointments regardless of any position held in a political party. That is why there are 2 from each party. None of the Hoosiers wanted anything to do with Orly (except her clients). The chairperson of the Romney campaign was the chairman for the board. He heard the case against Santorum and ruled frothy is still afloat in the state along with Sen Lugar.

They don't truck with much bullshit though. Indiana is a conservative state from what I can see. They have had plenty of KLan activity over the years etc. What passes for professional conduct when dealing with mania in Indiana is different then California.
THEN to have this obnoxious CALIFORNIA attorney from the LEFT COAST blow into town trying to practice law without a license. Based on the reactions of the attorneys on this board, I would have to say the 4 attorneys making up the board weren't in the best mood. It had been a long morning. This was complaint D. The Lugar hearing was a good example of the board functioning as it should. 4-0 Lugar stays. Sen Lugar had 3 previous attorneys general in Indiana provide legal opinions as to his status. He is on official business for the state of Indiana. He gets to keep his Indiana License and license plates, oh yeah he can run for another term. Sen Lugar does know how to cover his ass better than most.

SueDB · **Posted:** Sat Feb 25, 2012 1:44 pm

Isn't forum shopping bad form?

verbalobe · **Posted:** Sat Feb 25, 2012 1:53 pm

GreatGrey wrote:

I'm thinking something involving Soy Beans and Corn.

I'm thinking something we can't predict. Orly nevah disappoints!

Something like: Ag Sec Tom Vilsack was seen at a coffee shop............

Oh wait. I guess GG is right!

jtmunkus · **Joined:** Mon May 23, 2011 7:33 pm **Posts:** 3502

Foggy wrote:

I'd like to apologize for my little outburst[s] last night, especially for the word "groupthink," which has rightfully offended some of you.
...
Suddenly, I couldn't just enjoy the smackdown and the aftermath any more. Suddenly, I had to pay attention to the drama and turmoil. I couldn't be just an Obot enjoying the day.
...
But I'm sorry I lumped you all in together, and I apologize for my grumpiness and mischaracterizations.

Mr. Leghorn -

When one transforms from an individual with a passion to the leader of a group of individuals with a passion, the (usually thankless and many times unintended) position in a very real way distracts from said leader's ability to enjoy said passion. It's one paradox of leadership.

Thank you for providing this forum, that we all may share your passion.

Apology accepted.

With best regards,

J.T. Munk

esseff44 · **Posted:** Sat Feb 25, 2012 2:22 pm

mighty dawg wrote:

Quote:

I got the distinct impression that the Commission wasn't sure how they were going to handle this matter and, as a result, didn't follow their normal routines and procedures. In some ways they allowed themselves to be sucked in. Particularly telling was the motion to deny admissability of Orly's "evidence" followed by the corrective action after the five minute recess to allow the materials to be included in the record even though they didn't qualify it as evidence. And then the chair gave Orly her ten minutes of presentation time. Clearly, the Chair of the Commission had gotten procedural advice from counsel during the recess.

I got a very different impression. From the beginning, they showed they had been preparing for this group who themselves did not present themselves in a routine or normal fashion. They introduced a person speak for them who was notorious for using proceedings of all kinds to get media attention by smearing Obama. The person started off with several instances of perjury which prompted a warning. Commissioner Riordan asked the clerk to repeat the routine statement about admitting submissions into evidence and then asked that they NOT be admitted until they knew what they were. The chair nodded and said they would be 'lodged' until they had reviewed them. After Commissioner Riordan went through the stack of 'evidence' and gave descriptions and reasons that it was NOT admissible evidence, the rest of the panel agreed with her assessment. The chairman stated that they would be 'lodged' so that the record could be used if they want to take it to court for review.

Clearly, these were the normal procedures for handling situations like this. It was not so different from the way they handled the Lugar case. The big difference was that they had evidence that Lugar had used an address for voting and DMV that was not his. Again, the panel said they would have to take that information to a different venue and that it was irrelevant to his qualifying as a candidate for Senator.

The recess was called because the chair was losing control of the meeting due to provocative outbursts. That's when they decided shrouding was the best way to proceed, get it over and vote as fast as possible. Other than the response to O'rly when she accused the Republican chairman of covering up for Obama's crimes, their handling of the matter seemed routine. How could he not have been provoked or how could he handled that moment better? How much is one required to take of being accused of crimes and covering for crimes from a notorious 'witness' violating too many norms and rules to count?

justlw · **Joined:** Sun Feb 05, 2012 5:04 pm **Posts:** 18

TollandRCR wrote:

Orly sez:

Quote:

Tomorrow at 4 I will be presenting my candidacy at the California Republican Assembly

California Republican Assembly says:

Quote:

Upcoming events
There are no upcoming events

She -- and this will come as a surprise -- misspoke.

She meant the GOP Spring Convention, of course. On their agenda (and I challenge you to find it -- the state GOP site seems to have removed everything related to the convention from their site):

Quote:

4 p.m. Nomination of Candidates for  CRP National Committeeman & Committeewoman

So I'm sure they'll be delighted to learn about her candidacy for US Senate during that session.

The Newtster's due to speak there in 90 minutes. I wonder if he and Orly will have an opportunity for another heart-to-heart.

woodworker · **Joined:** Thu Jun 02, 2011 2:54 pm **Posts:** 347

Sterngard Friegen wrote:

If a Holocaust denier were to start pulling his hateful, disgusting bullshit within my earshot, you can bet I wouldn't continue to give him an audience. And that I would push back HARD. We insisted that many Republican candidates and Speaker Boehner do so, and commented when they did not immediately stop the outrage and disown it.

So when four politically savvy (and generally fair minded) connected pols in Indiana decided they would not allow hateful, calumnious and outrageous claims to be made in their presence -- or to be personally abused by a seditionist lying bitch from hell -- and pushed back, well all I have to say is hallelujah!

I do not think the commissioners who were hearing Taitz had to put up with any of it. They called the lying hateful bitch out. Good for them.

I also want to thank Loh for a terrific (and fashionable) view from the scene. And Woodworker for an exhaustive if somewhat prolix exegesis of the legal issues.

As for the troll, well I no longer care. I will never read anything else this person posts. He attempted to fuck up an interesting and important thread with either his birther-solicitous or performance art conduct, and he should be ashamed of himself. It was not a pretty thing to pull on this thread.

To paraphrase someone whose name I can't recall, I would have made it shorter, but I didn't have the time.

SLQ · **Joined:** Fri Jan 27, 2012 1:33 am **Posts:** 288

ducktape wrote:

Well, I'm ready to give odds that she has discovered that two of the members of the commission -- the woman who dissed her evidence and the older guy in the center who warned her about perjury are .... ready? Democrats! In fact, the woman is the legal counsel for the Democratic Party and the man is the chairman of some section of it.

So that means they were BIASED!! How explosive can you get? Oh where is justice in our court system?

(Ignore the fact that the vote against her was 4-0 -- the Republicans were RINO thugs, of course).

Any takers?

Ha! I'll raise you. She'll also ignore the fact that the commission is intentionally (statutorily?) made up of 2 Republicans and two Democrats.

Taverl · **Posted:** Sat Feb 25, 2012 2:32 pm

Foggy wrote:

Orly posted last night that she's in her hotel room in San Francisco.

Woke up this morning to a faint but unpleasant smell coming from outside and can still smell it. Honestly! I'm nowhere near the airport, but we all know how strong the Orly stench can be. :twisted:

Oh, Foggy, I'm so sorry to hear you're still feeling so bad. I know you said that this would be a long, painful slog, but I for one tend to forget you're sick since you're always so upbeat on the boards. :hug:

No need for apologies, just take care of yourself!

We're all Rooster Rooters here. :cheer:

tjh · **Joined:** Wed Oct 07, 2009 4:18 pm **Posts:** 2474

woodworker wrote:

To paraphrase someone whose name I can't recall, I would have made it shorter, but I didn't have the time.

Pascal. Lettres provinciales, 16, Dec.14,1656.

Quote:

Reverend fathers, my letters were not wont either to be so prolix,
or to follow so closely on one another. Want of time must plead my
excuse for both of these faults. The present letter is a very long
one, simply because I had no leisure to make it shorter.

Slartibartfast · **Joined:** Mon Aug 10, 2009 2:52 pm **Posts:** 1557

jtmunkus wrote:

Mr. Leghorn -

When one transforms from an individual with a passion to the leader of a group of individuals with a passion, the (usually thankless and many times unintended) position in a very real way distracts from said leader's ability to enjoy said passion. It's one paradox of leadership.

Thank you for providing this forum, that we all may share your passion.

Apology accepted.

With best regards,

J.T. Munk

^^^^^^^ THIS! =D>

Foggy,

Your sacrifices on behalf of the Boogle are greatly appreciated.
:wenotworthy:

(You'd get 10, but I thought that jtmunkus deserved at least one...)

Falsehoods unchallenged only fester and grow.

Indiana ballot challenge (smackdown for Orly)

Who is online