Falsehoods unchallenged only fester and grow.


All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 299 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12  Next   
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Jan 19, 2012 10:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 23, 2011 7:33 pm
Posts: 3576
Location: ACORN HQ
Occupation: Secret Chimp
Didn't Sorensen make it 0-97?

_________________
"What are you talking about, 99? We have to shoot and kill and destroy - we represent everything that's wholesome and good in the world." - Maxwell Smart
ImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 19, 2012 10:16 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 12:32 am
Posts: 20284
Location: FEMA Camp 17 -- Malibu (Hey! You! Get off the lawn!)
Occupation: Schadenfreude artist.
jtmunkus wrote:
Didn't Sorensen make it 0-97?

_________________
When there are a finite number of ways to screw something up, Orly Taitz will find an infinite number of ways to do so. (The Sternsig Rule.)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 19, 2012 10:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2010 10:42 pm
Posts: 3433
Location: The 808
Occupation: World-class procrastinator and perpetual late-bloomer.
realist wrote:
Mikedunford wrote:
realist wrote:
UPDATE: Birther Scorecard as of January 19, 2012
Yes, there's a typo and it'll be fixed. :lol
:


Wolf v Fuddy should probably have a "Rehearing Denied" line added - 1st CC denied that motion on 12 January.


I disagree, respectfully, of course. Denined is denined at that level.

And, there's been no rehearing... there was a motion for one, but no hearing.


The trial court entries for the various Taitz cases, including Taitz v Fuddy, seem to have similar notations. Technically, both last week's hearing in Wolf v Fuddy and the 6 Jan hearing in Taitz v Fuddy were on Rule 60 motions for rehearing.

_________________
"If it was a legitimately stolen election, Romney's body would have had ways of shutting that down. Also, if a usurpation happens, even in that horrible situation of a stolen election, it was God's will." -A Legal Lohengrin


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 19, 2012 10:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm
Posts: 23928
Mikedunford wrote:

The trial court entries for the various Taitz cases, including Taitz v Fuddy, seem to have similar notations. Technically, both last week's hearing in Wolf v Fuddy and the 6 Jan hearing in Taitz v Fuddy were on Rule 60 motions for rehearing.


I'll pass you information on to the author. I'm sure it will be considered.

_________________
Let us tenderly and kindly cherish, therefore, the means of knowledge. Let us dare to read, think, speak, and write.
John Adams


Image x 3 Image x 21


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 19, 2012 10:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 12, 2009 10:07 pm
Posts: 6063
Location: North of Eastern Midwest University
Occupation: Spark Chaser
realist wrote:
I'll pass you information on to the author. I'm sure it will be considered.

You speak with the author? Say hi for me. :)

_________________
Image Image x 9


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 26, 2012 6:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 07, 2009 4:18 pm
Posts: 2483
How are the three GA cases going to be scored?

Birther win if Mahili recommends leaving Obama off the ballot?
Birther win if SoS leaves Obama off the ballot?

_________________
Don't pee in a tree without a TJ Hunter www.tjhunters.com)
Fog-doe 1-909 REEKO subpoenas should be properly served on Blunt Force Donato
Feel free to copy/republish anything I post, with (tjh and/or tfb) or without attribution
Moderators : feel free to delete anything that offends/provides any assistance to the enemy.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 26, 2012 6:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 9:09 pm
Posts: 7863
Location: USA
Occupation: Amateur radio host trying to figure out how to lower myself to shameless begging and stupid petition filing. It might be a good way to make a living. ;)
Since this is an administrative law court with no power to enforce anything then the decision of the SoS is the first true determination in the case. It would be the equivalent of a ruling of a magistrate judge in a federal court. I also would suggest that this is really a single case and not three. The SoS is going to issue one ruling and not three separate rulings.

_________________
The O-bot prayer:

Grant me the superior wit and biting sarcasm to mock the Birthers whose minds I cannot change
The superior facts, law, and reason to change the minds of the Birthers whom I can
And the wisdom to team up at Politijab The Fogbow with those who share my addiction and know the difference


- Allison 2/16/2009


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 26, 2012 7:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2011 12:48 am
Posts: 4825
Occupation: Professional pain in the ass.
Reality Check wrote:
Since this is an administrative law court with no power to enforce anything then the decision of the SoS is the first true determination in the case. It would be the equivalent of a ruling of a magistrate judge in a federal court. I also would suggest that this is really a single case and not three. The SoS is going to issue one ruling and not three separate rulings.


And what the judge will release isn't a ruling, it's just a recommendation. So I would say nothing gets added till Kemp makes his determination.

_________________
Pity the poor Birthers, for they know not how to Think.

Turning the Scale.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 03, 2012 8:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm
Posts: 23928
And as is only appropriate on a day/week like this one, the Birther Case List has been updated.

BIRTHER SCORECARD 0-*99* (and cases pending)

_________________
Let us tenderly and kindly cherish, therefore, the means of knowledge. Let us dare to read, think, speak, and write.
John Adams


Image x 3 Image x 21


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 03, 2012 8:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2009 3:17 pm
Posts: 3936
Location: Brigadoon
Occupation: Retired
I think the Alabama challenges are missing.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 03, 2012 9:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2009 6:36 am
Posts: 5395
Location: Belize City
Occupation: Visiting doctors.
DaveMuckey wrote:
I think the Alabama challenges are missing.


They are in with th regular cases.

_________________
If a bunch of religious nuts can vote away your fundamental civil rights, then your rights are not self-evident, inalienable, or endowed by God. Quod erat demonstrandum. -- Stonekettle Station
ImageImageImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 03, 2012 9:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm
Posts: 23928
If you'll look and Ankeny and Tisdale you'll also see a new line added (and it will most likely increase in use :P ) in cases heard "on the merits" ;) ...

Finding Obama is NBC :-bd

_________________
Let us tenderly and kindly cherish, therefore, the means of knowledge. Let us dare to read, think, speak, and write.
John Adams


Image x 3 Image x 21


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Edit 3 refining the pun
PostPosted: Tue Feb 07, 2012 8:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 07, 2009 4:18 pm
Posts: 2483
Time for GA scoring? I think it should count as TWO cases -- two almost-identical "Minor" and .... one "minimus"?

"Minor" and .... DE "minimus"?

"Da Minor" and "De Minimus"

Offtopic :
For non-British readers : students at public (=private) schools were addressed by surname only, so siblings were designated major (oldest), minor (younger/est) and minimus (youngest)
http://donaldshephard.com/AMajorMewsStory.html
Quote:
When John Major returned from service in India he retired with the rank of major to his country estate which he called Mahal. The rambling old mansion was so named because Major Major liked to think the Raj lived on in his Raj Mahal. Such was his quirky sense of humor that he named his surviving identical triplets John Major (major), John Major (minor) and John Major (minimus). All three sons, major, minor and minimus had been sent back from India to be schooled at Eton and Sandhurst, the Royal Army Military College. In the course of time, each son had earned the rank of major. On formal occasions such as the family gathering at the Raj Mahal at Christmas, the eldest son was called Major John Major, major. The middle son was Major John Major, minor and the youngest was Major John Major, minimus.
....

_________________
Don't pee in a tree without a TJ Hunter www.tjhunters.com)
Fog-doe 1-909 REEKO subpoenas should be properly served on Blunt Force Donato
Feel free to copy/republish anything I post, with (tjh and/or tfb) or without attribution
Moderators : feel free to delete anything that offends/provides any assistance to the enemy.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 07, 2012 9:17 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 12:32 am
Posts: 20284
Location: FEMA Camp 17 -- Malibu (Hey! You! Get off the lawn!)
Occupation: Schadenfreude artist.
Offtopic :
I think a patricide based upon that would have been fully defensible.

_________________
When there are a finite number of ways to screw something up, Orly Taitz will find an infinite number of ways to do so. (The Sternsig Rule.)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 07, 2012 9:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2009 3:17 pm
Posts: 3936
Location: Brigadoon
Occupation: Retired
Whatever4 wrote:
DaveMuckey wrote:
I think the Alabama challenges are missing.


They are in with th regular cases.


I noticed that, then lost the thread. OK, I was actually mired in the GA thread like everyone else.

But.... with the section on eligibility challenges at the bottom, I expected to find the three AL cases to be there.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 07, 2012 9:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2009 6:36 am
Posts: 5395
Location: Belize City
Occupation: Visiting doctors.
DaveMuckey wrote:
Whatever4 wrote:
DaveMuckey wrote:
I think the Alabama challenges are missing.


They are in with th regular cases.


I noticed that, then lost the thread. OK, I was actually mired in the GA thread like everyone else.

But.... with the section on eligibility challenges at the bottom, I expected to find the three AL cases to be there.


I think Tes puts the actual court cases in the main section, and ballot commissions or administrative (non-judicial) in the addendum.

_________________
If a bunch of religious nuts can vote away your fundamental civil rights, then your rights are not self-evident, inalienable, or endowed by God. Quod erat demonstrandum. -- Stonekettle Station
ImageImageImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 15, 2012 3:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 5:27 pm
Posts: 7371
Location: Intersection of Godwin Dr. and Poe Blvd.
Occupation: Personal security.
I'm assuming someone will announce here when we officially determine a 100th birther case loss.

Cuz there'll be all kinds of awards and prizes and celebrations and such.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 15, 2012 3:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 9:09 pm
Posts: 7863
Location: USA
Occupation: Amateur radio host trying to figure out how to lower myself to shameless begging and stupid petition filing. It might be a good way to make a living. ;)
Now that the cases in GA are moving into the judicial branch as appeals will they become "official" cases?

_________________
The O-bot prayer:

Grant me the superior wit and biting sarcasm to mock the Birthers whose minds I cannot change
The superior facts, law, and reason to change the minds of the Birthers whom I can
And the wisdom to team up at Politijab The Fogbow with those who share my addiction and know the difference


- Allison 2/16/2009


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 15, 2012 3:25 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 1:22 pm
Posts: 9399
Location: Supreme Court of clerks
Occupation: Petite treason procurer
Reality Check wrote:
Now that the cases in GA are moving into the judicial branch as appeals will they become "official" cases?

Mos def.

_________________
Image Image Image Image Image

ASSUME ANYTHING WRITTEN HERE WILL END UP ON TAITZ'S SITE AND FACEBOOK. AND JEROME CORSI WILL POST SCREENSHOTS TO WND. AND WILL BE FILED BY A BIRTHER AS AN EXHIBIT IN FEDERAL COURT. NOW HAVE FUN!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 16, 2012 8:43 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm
Posts: 23928
BIRTHER SCORECARD - UPDATED

(Total Cases *103* - 12 Pending)

Hey, I'm just the messenger. ;)

_________________
Let us tenderly and kindly cherish, therefore, the means of knowledge. Let us dare to read, think, speak, and write.
John Adams


Image x 3 Image x 21


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 16, 2012 8:51 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 2:02 pm
Posts: 11156
Location: FEMA Camp 13 Okanagan, WA 98840
Occupation: Drone Maintenance Officer - FAA Licensed and Certified "We Fix Drones©" Call (206) 622-0460 to schedule routine maintenance or repair.
Reality Check wrote:
Now that the cases Circus in GA are is moving into the judicial branch as appeals, will they become "official"*cases?


* possibly should read offal cases :turd:??? FIFY

_________________
Image ImageImage

You can follow the action, which gets you good pictures.
You can follow your instincts, which'll probably get you in trouble.

Or... you can follow the money...
which nine times out of ten will get you closer to the truth.
"The Two Jakes"


Remember, Orly NEVAH disappoints!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 16, 2012 8:52 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2009 6:06 am
Posts: 4983
Location: Glocca Morra
realist wrote:
BIRTHER SCORECARD - UPDATED

(Total Cases *103* - 12 Pending)

Hey, I'm just the messenger. ;)


Just remember what happened to Pheidippides

_________________
"What's it like being an atheist? It's like being the only sober person in a car full of drunks, and they refuse to let you drive." Thomas Jefferson

Birtherism is so ridiculous that I no longer feel obligated to treat proponents w/slightest degree of respect or civility


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 16, 2012 9:16 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2012 12:36 pm
Posts: 1997
In regards to #100, I think we should start considering the rules for tiebreaking. it is possible that the the three cases in Georgia will be dismisssed on the same day. is it posible to tell from the docket entry what time of day the dismissal orders were entered into the docket?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 16, 2012 9:23 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 9:09 pm
Posts: 7863
Location: USA
Occupation: Amateur radio host trying to figure out how to lower myself to shameless begging and stupid petition filing. It might be a good way to make a living. ;)
For reasons of poetic justice it should be Farrar's case but with Taitz removed as the attorney of record (because her PHV applications gets denied) and not as a pro se plaintiff (because she was not a plaintiff in the original case and is not a resident of Georgia). The irony would be delicious. She would be denied the infamy of being the attorney on the 100th failed case birther through her own incompetence. Even her failures are failures.

(H/T to AnitaMaria on RC Radio for pointing out that this could happen. =D> )

_________________
The O-bot prayer:

Grant me the superior wit and biting sarcasm to mock the Birthers whose minds I cannot change
The superior facts, law, and reason to change the minds of the Birthers whom I can
And the wisdom to team up at Politijab The Fogbow with those who share my addiction and know the difference


- Allison 2/16/2009


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 16, 2012 9:34 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 2:02 pm
Posts: 11156
Location: FEMA Camp 13 Okanagan, WA 98840
Occupation: Drone Maintenance Officer - FAA Licensed and Certified "We Fix Drones©" Call (206) 622-0460 to schedule routine maintenance or repair.
Reality Check wrote:
For reasons of poetic justice it should be Farrar's case but with Taitz removed as the attorney of record (because her PHV applications gets denied) and not as a pro se plaintiff (because she was not a plaintiff in the original case and is not a resident of Georgia). The irony would be delicious. She would be denied the infamy of being the attorney on the 100th failed case birther through her own incompetence. Even her failures are failures.

(H/T to AnitaMaria on RC Radio for pointing out that this could happen. =D> )


Especially when Orly has failed to follow the rules when applying PHV. I wonder when she is going to contact the Georgia State Bar and do whatever they are supposed to do? Does this state bar have any teeth/power?

_________________
Image ImageImage

You can follow the action, which gets you good pictures.
You can follow your instincts, which'll probably get you in trouble.

Or... you can follow the money...
which nine times out of ten will get you closer to the truth.
"The Two Jakes"


Remember, Orly NEVAH disappoints!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 299 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12  Next   

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: JSL515, Northland10 and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
View new posts | View active topics



Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group