Orly's latest poopies.....

listeme · **Posted:** Wed Feb 08, 2012 11:59 pm

I wonder how many "tricks" he/she tried before finding the right mouse/keystroke combo.

bob · **Posted:** Thu Feb 09, 2012 12:10 am

Quote:

Big brother is blocking citizens from going on my web site. Need tech help asap

Quote:

I have had to do it this way for several days now.

Over/under on Taitz's new copyright script being the culprit?

borealis · **Posted:** Thu Feb 09, 2012 12:14 am

CatMe: I like the idea of just renaming it: c.difficile. A difficult to eradicate intestinal bacterium that is difficult to eradicate would be much more appropriate.

(Having probs w double posts again. I switched to Firefox but now it takes forever to load. I cleared the cache too. Hope I didn't catch puter cooties.)

mimi · **Posted:** Thu Feb 09, 2012 12:17 am

bob wrote:

Quote:

Big brother is blocking citizens from going on my web site. Need tech help asap

Quote:

I have had to do it this way for several days now.

Over/under on Taitz's new copyright script being the culprit?

SueDB · **Posted:** Thu Feb 09, 2012 1:27 am

listeme wrote:

I wonder how many "tricks" he/she tried before finding the right mouse/keystroke combo.

Which triggers several various pieces of Mal-ware....

Plutodog · **Posted:** Thu Feb 09, 2012 1:51 am

I'm perhaps not as reverent as I oughta be -- but I think dingleberries beats poopies.

It makes me smiles and happies and stuff.
;;)

$\:D/$

Somerset · **Posted:** Thu Feb 09, 2012 4:06 am

Plutodog wrote:

I'm perhaps not as reverent as I oughta be -- but I think dingleberries beats poopies.

Dingleberries is probably a better description of the stuff O'rly "produces," but the mental image equating O'rly with a toddler proudly showing off their latest poopie is priceless :lol:

Dr. Blue · **Joined:** Sat Jan 07, 2012 11:01 am **Posts:** 307

mimi wrote:

Obama is keeping birfers from posting on Obly's site.

And "Anonymous" is revealed.....

Attachment:

obama-computer-featured.jpg

Reality Check · **Posted:** Thu Feb 09, 2012 9:32 am

mimi quoting Obly wrote:

Posted on | February 8, 2012 | No Comments
Lisa
Submitted on 2012/02/08 at 4:46pm

I have found a trick that lets me post here again.

Hold down your left mouse key and rapidly type a letter. Any letter, just do it within a split second of pressing the left mouse key. Now continue holding down the left mouse key while you type your message. Repeat for the captia.

I have had to do it this way for several days now.

You should be able to post or comment again this way.

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=31426

Then place the keyboard in a paper bag and wave it above your head while squawking like a chicken!

(Bonus points for anyone who knows the reference.

)

realist · **Joined:** Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm **Posts:** 23530

Congratulations!!!!

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=31434 :evil:

Thanks to you this web site is the most popular in the U.S. on the issues of Obama’s eligibility

Posted on | February 9, 2012 | No Comments

Even if true, I don't think that necessarily means what she thinks it means. :lol:

kimba · **Joined:** Tue Sep 08, 2009 3:24 pm **Posts:** 6626

It tells me reading batshit crazy stuff on the toobz is popular. :lol:

ZekeB · **Posted:** Thu Feb 09, 2012 9:50 am

kimba wrote:

It tells me reading batshit crazy stuff on the toobz is popular. :lol:

She writes the funny pages of the internet newspaper. Of course people go there for a read. :lol:

GreatGrey · **Posted:** Thu Feb 09, 2012 12:20 pm

realist wrote:

Congratulations!!!!

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=31434 :evil:

Thanks to you this web site is the most popular in the U.S. on the issues of Obama’s eligibility

Posted on | February 9, 2012 | No Comments

Even if true, I don't think that necessarily means what she thinks it means. :lol:

Yea, ever since Ed Hale dropped below the 21 million people a day mark Obly's been the leader.

bob · **Posted:** Thu Feb 09, 2012 1:11 pm

Quote:

from Lieutenant Colonel Earl Graef to Chief justice Roberts

It has now been over three years since I last wrote you begging for the good of the Country the Court take on the Presidential Eligibility issue which continues to cause division and angry discourse among the Citizens. The opportunity has been before you multiple times and still you deny the American people a hearing on the Merits. Justice Thomas in a House subcommittee last year appears to have confirmed that the Court is intentionally “evading” this issue which indeed seems to be the case. If this is the case to what good end do you see this avoidance? I do not desire to cast aspersions but I am perplexed at the workings of the court seeming to hear and decide cases which, in the weight of importance, pale in comparison. I shake my head in disbelief. Rest assured I would not raise such questions as these and those I am about to if I had not heard Justice Thomas indicate you had taken a course of evasion.

[...]

I am certain the court must be aware of the recent ballot challenge in Georgia in which the defendant Mr. Obama chose willfully to ignore the Court and not produce any documentation to support his claim that he is eligible to be on the ballot. It is obvious that the decision by Judge Malihi in favor of the defendant is fatally flawed as the defendant produced no documents, no sworn testimony and in fact the defendant produced absolutely nothing in defiance of a court order even though the burden of proof according to Georgia law resided with the defendant in the affirmative. This decision and Secretary of State Brian Kemps decision to uphold the ruling no doubt are going to appeal and there are other cases pending. Does the court not think it wise to settle this issue urgently? Certainly the Court recognizes that the preservation of the integrity of the free election process we are approaching hangs in the balance. To this effect there are pressing questions that deserve immediate answers.

[...]

If you do plan to hear this before the general election exactly when do you intend to do so?

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=31444 :twisted:

MUCH MORE at the link (the LTC needs an editor).

esseff44 · **Posted:** Thu Feb 09, 2012 1:19 pm

Some folks just cannot understand how you can argue a case so pathetically devoid of substance that you lose to an empty chair. Dumber than furniture is right.

ObjectiveDoubter · **Posted:** Thu Feb 09, 2012 1:41 pm

Piffle wrote:

mighty dawg wrote:

So I mentioned in another thread that Ms. Taitz has been engaging me in a protracted email exchange. I had sent a note to her gmail account and received a reply from an entirely unique email aol address. The following is one her latest responses:

Quote:

To: allmightydawg@hotmail.com
Subject: Re: Some Serious Advice
From: bmwildsea@aol.com
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2012 21:50:22 -0500

If you apply for a job you show your qualifications. <snip>

You repeatedly use projection in your arguments on the issues and the personal statements. Are you a psychiatrist? <snip>

Yoo hoo, Dr. Orly! Who's using projection here?

Up, up, up, stop, down, up, hokay, down, down, down. I rest my case.

IMO that is way too intelligent a comment and is way too light on commas to have come from the lips of Ms. Histrionic.

BFB · **Posted:** Thu Feb 09, 2012 1:45 pm

bob wrote:

Quote:

from Lieutenant Colonel Earl Graef to Chief justice Roberts

It has now been over three years since I last wrote you begging for the good of the Country the Court take on the Presidential Eligibility issue which continues to cause division and angry discourse among the Citizens. The opportunity has been before you multiple times and still you deny the American people a hearing on the Merits. Justice Thomas in a House subcommittee last year appears to have confirmed that the Court is intentionally “evading” this issue which indeed seems to be the case. If this is the case to what good end do you see this avoidance? I do not desire to cast aspersions but I am perplexed at the workings of the court seeming to hear and decide cases which, in the weight of importance, pale in comparison. I shake my head in disbelief. Rest assured I would not raise such questions as these and those I am about to if I had not heard Justice Thomas indicate you had taken a course of evasion.

[...]

I am certain the court must be aware of the recent ballot challenge in Georgia in which the defendant Mr. Obama chose willfully to ignore the Court and not produce any documentation to support his claim that he is eligible to be on the ballot. It is obvious that the decision by Judge Malihi in favor of the defendant is fatally flawed as the defendant produced no documents, no sworn testimony and in fact the defendant produced absolutely nothing in defiance of a court order even though the burden of proof according to Georgia law resided with the defendant in the affirmative. This decision and Secretary of State Brian Kemps decision to uphold the ruling no doubt are going to appeal and there are other cases pending. Does the court not think it wise to settle this issue urgently? Certainly the Court recognizes that the preservation of the integrity of the free election process we are approaching hangs in the balance. To this effect there are pressing questions that deserve immediate answers.

[...]

If you do plan to hear this before the general election exactly when do you intend to do so?

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=31444 :twisted:

MUCH MORE at the link (the LTC needs an editor) shrink.

FIFY.

SueDB · **Posted:** Thu Feb 09, 2012 1:56 pm

Say didn't we have some other nutter that used to be a LTC around here somewhere?

bob · **Posted:** Thu Feb 09, 2012 2:01 pm

Quote:

Lying wikipedia thugs

please demand one drop of honesty from far left wikipedia thugs. The word truth is obviously not in their vocabulary. They are intentionally defrauding the public. In regards to GA hearing they did not write a word about 7 witnesses, among them a senior deportation officer John Sampson, Detective Susan Daniels and others testifying that Obama does not have a valid Social Security number and the alleged copy of his birth certificate is a computer generated forgery. The transcripts and video footage of the proceedings are widely available, while Obama thugs on Wikipedia are not reporting a word of truth. Please, spread the word and write to Wikipedia. I am busy submitting docs to different courts and Secretaries of state, I simply don’t have time to deal with this bunch of despicable thugs of Wilipedia. Maybe some of my supporters have time to deal with them

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=31457 :twisted:

borealis · **Posted:** Thu Feb 09, 2012 2:32 pm

bob wrote:

Quote:

Lying wikipedia thugs

please demand one drop of honesty from far left wikipedia thugs. The word truth is obviously not in their vocabulary. They are intentionally defrauding the public. In regards to GA hearing they did not write a word about 7 witnesses, among them a senior deportation officer John Sampson, Detective Susan Daniels.
:twisted:

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=31457 :twisted:

The judge held their testimony was useless so why include them? It would only serve to further embarrass their cause. Hey wiki gurus maybe you should add a footnote about the witnesses and judge's comments torn verbatim from the hearing transcript? If they insist on fair treatment, I say why not? :-bd

Welsh Dragon · **Posted:** Thu Feb 09, 2012 2:39 pm

SueDB wrote:

Say didn't we have some other nutter that used to be a LTC around here somewhere?

Funnily enough, I suspect that LTC Earl-Graef is one of the "friends" that Lakin consulted before going birfer. He's one of Orly's long standing plaintiffs, an MD, based in Virginia so not too far away, and some of Lakin's comments are remarkably similar to his.

mimi · **Posted:** Thu Feb 09, 2012 2:44 pm

Excellent point. Direct quote from the judge on how their testimony was useless.

MaineSkeptic · **Joined:** Thu Mar 19, 2009 2:48 pm **Posts:** 5295

ZorbasLeGreque wrote:

In todays English it would be "Duke-Duke"...

Yes, but it would be considered short for "Duke-Duke Duke-Duke of Earl."

BillTheCat · **Joined:** Fri Jan 13, 2012 5:25 pm **Posts:** 1428

lol "Wikipedia Thugs", that's a new one :lol:

bob · **Posted:** Thu Feb 09, 2012 3:24 pm

Quote:

In regards to GA hearing they did not write a word about 7 witnesses

Taitz's wikipedia page has been update to now include this sentence:

Quote:

With respect to Taitz's case [Malihi] wrote: "The Court finds the testimony of the witnesses, as well as the exhibits tendered, to be of little, if any, probative value, and thus wholly insufficient to support plaintiffs’ allegations"

Falsehoods unchallenged only fester and grow.

Orly's latest poopies.....

Who is online