Quixotic as it may appear at first blush, given the vagrancies of the Electoral
College system, Montgomery could be elected President with only 13% of the nation-wide popular
vote cast in 26 select states and the District of Columbia as detailed in the attached chart.

snippy

Accordingly, Montgomery has filed in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia a Quo Warranto suit seeking
to oust Barrack Hussein Obama II as President of the United States and/or preventing him from
holding the franchise of being on the ballot for that office on November 6, 2012, insomuch as he is
not a “natural born Citizen” of the United States as required by Article II, §1 of the Constitution.
At the time of the adoption of the Constitution, that phrase was defined as: “The natives, or
natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens.” (The Law of
Nations, Emerich de Vattel, 1758, Chapter 19, § 212). Notably, there are thus two plain
requirements: being born (i) in the United States and (ii) of two parents, both of whom must be
United States citizens.

Significantly, Congress exercised its authority to expand the definition of “natural born
Citizen” in the Act of 1790 stating: “the children of citizens of the United States, that may be born
beyond sea, or out of the limits of the United States, shall be considered as natural-born citizens:
Provided, that the right of citizenship shall not descend to persons whose fathers have never been
resident in the United States.” 1 Stat. 104. Notably, Congress subsequently removed the legal-termof-
art “natural born Citizen” from all citizenship statutes post-1790 and now only confers
“citizenship”. See: 8 U.S.C. §1401 – “Nationals and citizens of the United States at birth”, “The
following shall be nationals and citizens of the United States at birth . . . “.

Snippy (Obama says his dad wasn't a citizen).

Moreover, even allowing for an in futuro judicially-by-fiat-created definition of “natural born
Citizen” to include one born within the United States to only one United States citizen parent, the
significant questions concerning the location of the birth of Barrack Hussein Obama, II raised by his
publicly released “Certificates of Live Birth” would nonetheless challenge his eligibility to be
President of the United States. A detailed analysis of the apparent tampering with Barrack Hussein
Obama, II’s putative “Certificates of Live Birth” is contained in the Quo Warranto lawsuit.

01/31/2012 5 AMENDED COMPLAINT against JOHN DOE #1, JOHN DOE #2, ERIC H. HOLDER, JR, RONALD C. MACHEN, JR, BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II filed by MONTGOMERY BLAIR SIBLEY.(dr) (Entered: 01/31/2012)

02/13/2012 7 NOTICE of Filing Rule 201 Necessary Information by MONTGOMERY BLAIR SIBLEY (dr) (Entered: 02/13/2012)

New Docket Entry...



Sibley gives the Court notice of the GA Administrative hearing and attaches the transcript of the hearing.

link shortly

And what a surprise - no mention of the result of said hearing.

And I can't see what the point to a transcript of Dr. Orly's performance might be, except to tell the court "see, there's a worse lawyer out there!"

SIBLEY v. OBAMA et al
Assigned to: Judge John D. Bates
Demand: $1,000,000
Cause: 28:1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights

Date Filed: 01/03/2012
Jury Demand: Plaintiff
Nature of Suit: 440 Civil Rights: Other
Jurisdiction: Federal Question


03/09/2012 11 Amended MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint (Unopposed) by BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Soskin, Eric) (Entered: 03/09/2012)

03/09/2012 MINUTE ORDER: Upon consideration of 11 defendants' unopposed amended motion for an extension of time to respond to plaintiff's complaint, and the entire record herein, it is hereby ORDERED that defendants' motion is GRANTED; it is further ORDERED that defendants shall respond to plaintiff's complaint by not later than April 2, 2012; and it is further ORDERED that 10 defendants' motion for an extension of time to respond to plaintiff's complaint is DENIED AS MOOT. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge John D. Bates on 3/9/2012. (lcjdb2) (Entered: 03/09/2012)

...and included a plaintiff's 1st amended complaint with her opposition (save on postage).

...
And I can't see what the point to a transcript of Dr. Orly's performance might be, except to tell the court "see, there's a worse lawyer out there!"

When they are taking care of their briefs, they are thinking "Bend it like Orly!" "Smear it like Orly!" "Com(m)atize it like Orly!" "Massage it like Orly!" It adds gratification to their briefs.

He's asking the Supreme Court to take up the case on the grounds that the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia has been too slow in responding to the birther suit he filed against President "Barrack" Obama in January. (The misspelling was corrected in the subsequent filings.)

In a press release, Sibley says his "filings procedurally forces (sic) the Supreme Court to declare whether they will take up the question of Obama’s eligibility to be President or allow the question to be relegated to a judicial process that would not reach the Supreme Court until well after the November 6, 2012, election, let alone before the September 3, 2012, Democratic Convention."

“The district court’s delay in ruling on the petition for writ of quo warranto is not so egregious or unreasonable as to warrant the extraordinary remedy of mandamus.”

What does he mean "too slow"? They denied his petition on March 6th, didn't they?

Sibley v. D. D.C., No. 11-1185.

Sibley also recently filed for cert. in a case involving him suing his father's estate to enforce a promise made by Sibley's father to pay for Silbley's son's education.

Sibley v. D. D.C., No. 11-1185.

Sibley also recently filed for cert. in a case involving him suing his father's estate to enforce a promise made by Sibley's father to pay for Silbley's son's education.

U.S. District Court
District of Columbia (Washington, DC)
CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:12-cv-00001-JDB

SIBLEY v. OBAMA et al
Assigned to: Judge John D. Bates
Demand: $1,000,000
Cause: 28:1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights

Date Filed: 01/03/2012
Jury Demand: Plaintiff
Nature of Suit: 440 Civil Rights: Other
Jurisdiction: Federal Question

04/02/2012 12 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint by JOHN DOE #1, JOHN DOE #2, ERIC HIMPTON HOLDER, JR, RONALD C. MACHEN, JR, BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Soskin, Eric) (Entered: 04/02/2012)

Sibley v. D. D.C., No. 11-1185.