Sheriff Joe Arpaio Appeases Birthers?

jtmunkus · **Posted:** Wed Jan 18, 2012 10:22 pm

Joe uses a "Sovereign Search Warrant." It's good anywhere the shurf sez, 'cuz the shurf sez.

Taverl · **Posted:** Wed Jan 18, 2012 11:05 pm

bob wrote:

Taverl wrote:

And they're going to Google...why, exactly? Not blogspot's offices, or the hosting company?

Google owns blogspot.

D'oh! I did not know that... :oops:

bob · **Posted:** Thu Jan 19, 2012 4:05 am

[Cross-posted for awesomeness]

Quote:

Farrar v Obama Subpoena sheriff Joe Arpaio

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?attachment_id=30510 :twisted:

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/wp-content/ ... Arpaio.pdf :twisted:

Slartibartfast · **Posted:** Thu Jan 19, 2012 4:24 am

bob wrote:

[Cross-posted for awesomeness]

Quote:

Farrar v Obama Subpoena sheriff Joe Arpaio

It's like Batman teaming up with Superman... in Bizzaro-world. :mrgreen:

I hope Sheriff Joe has something to say about Orly's invitation to a Hotlanta getway--the potential for comedy is nearly limitless...

mimi · **Posted:** Thu Jan 19, 2012 8:38 am

Slartibartfast wrote:

It's like Batman Lex Luther teaming up with Superman The Penguin ... in Bizzaro-world. :mrgreen:

aarrgghh · **Joined:** Mon Mar 23, 2009 4:05 pm **Posts:** 1286

mimi wrote:

Slartibartfast wrote:

It's like Batman Lex Luther the hamburglar teaming up with Superman The Penguin the grimace ... :mrgreen:

Epectitus · **Joined:** Fri Jan 23, 2009 3:55 pm **Posts:** 2388

Oh this is great! Another Birther feud is born!!!

Foggy · **Posted:** Sat Jan 28, 2012 7:03 am

Many sources reporting that a 33 yr. old Tennessee man, Adam Eugene Cox, was arrested for making death threats against Shurf Joe, because of the Frozen Custard Posse "investigation".

WND: http://www.wnd.com/2012/01/obama-backer ... eriff-joe/

Freeperville: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2839121/posts

WaPo: http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/ ... story.html

Gray Lady: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/28/us/ar ... -case.html

Needless to say, Tennessee has "harvested" another one of its citizens for it's corrupt judicial cesspool.

Rondoodoo will be all over this, if he isn't freed later this morning.

Edit: Now I see that somehow this was considered to be news that fit in the ORYR thread for some reason.

verbalobe · **Posted:** Sat Jan 28, 2012 8:58 am

Foggy wrote:

Edit: Now I see that somehow this was considered to be news that fit in the ORYR thread for some reason.

I think because it was first noted via ORYR.

But I think it belongs here. FWIW. Carry on.

mimi · **Posted:** Sat Jan 28, 2012 10:00 am

I'm pasting this post by jtmunkus here in the Sheriff Joe Arpaio topic. The one where he tells us that Orly posted about how Sheriff Joe couldn't be bothered to come to the big birfer event.

jtmunkus wrote:

I stand corrected. Orly's balls are bigger than I thought.

jtmunkus wrote:

Orly's got her some big balls...She never sent that one.
viewtopic.php?f=88&t=6845&p=333497&hilit=+balls#p333497

She did subpoena Arpaio, and "requiring our client to attend a pre-trial deposition in Atlanta, Georgia is unreasonable and constitutes an undue burden on him."

Quote:

Response from Arpaio
Posted on | January 27, 2012 | No Comments
:evil:

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?attachment_id=30857 :twisted:

Of course, Orly never misses an opportunity to ingratiate herself with her fellow birthers:

Quote:

Arpaio felt that testifying in GA was too much of a “burden”. Refused to appear
...
GA was a golden opportunity for Arpaio to testify, to provide his report. It gave him an opportunity to skip the step of DA or AG, who may or may not cooperate and be in front of the judge, who is willing to listen and hear the case on the merits. Arpaio blew this opportunity. I did not want to say anything before the trial, I did not want to upset people, but bottom line Arpaio simply blew it. Keep in mind, an attorney does not have to issue subpoenas. You issue subpoenas only when you are not sure the witness will appear and testify. I sent Arpaio a subpoena. I called WND and related to their political editor Bob Unruh, that I finally have one judge willing to listen. If Corsi or Farah want to testify -here is an opportunity. I also sent an e-mail to this extent.
I also explained that I sent a subpoena to Arpaio just as a cover for him, it would give him an opportunity to state, that he is not going after Obama because he wants to, but because he is complying with the subpoena. Below is a letter from Arpaio’s attorney, saying that Arpaio will not cooperate. He gave 2 reasons: it is too much of a “burden” on him and the hearing is in GA and he is in AZ. I could go to a circuit judge in AZ and extend the jurisdiction to AZ and seek reciprocal enforcement, however I concluded, that it will be a waste of my time and money.

Arpaio’s unwillingness to testify tells me that:
a. he does not have any new evidence aside from what I provided him...
I believe, that at some point Arpaio will come up with a report, but I question whether it would lead to anything.
...
Lastly, here is an explanation, why I did not need to get a subpoena enforcement in DC against Obama, but was seeking reciprocal enforcement against Fuddy. The difference is because Obama is a defendant, he availed himself to the jurisdiction of GA by placing his name on the ballot in GA and he consented top be served through his attorney, who is located in GA. So, by serving Obama through his attorney in GA, I made the subpoena against him instantaneously valid, I did not need to seek any reciprocal subpoena enforcement in DC. The judge agreemed with me on that point.

At any rate, the public is entitled to know, that Arpaio refused to cooperate, even though I did not even need a subpoena for a cooperating witness, and Arpaio could be in front of a judge immediately and he could present all his evidence immediately.
:twisted:

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=30858 :evil:

Good going, Orly.

Joe blew off the birthers.

Loren · **Joined:** Wed Jan 28, 2009 4:20 pm **Posts:** 3932

verbalobe wrote:

Foggy wrote:

Edit: Now I see that somehow this was considered to be news that fit in the ORYR thread for some reason.

I think because it was first noted via ORYR.

IIRC, the death threat in question was posted as a comment at ORYR.

A Legal Lohengrin · **Joined:** Tue Oct 26, 2010 9:56 pm **Posts:** 9708

mimi wrote:

Joe blew off the birthers.

Accusatinos to begin in 3. . .2. . .1.

realist · **Joined:** Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm **Posts:** 23931

Loren wrote:

verbalobe wrote:

Foggy wrote:

Edit: Now I see that somehow this was considered to be news that fit in the ORYR thread for some reason.

I think because it was first noted via ORYR.

IIRC, the death threat in question was posted as a comment at ORYR.

It was indeed... right through moderation.

(IIRC there was more than one)

realist · **Joined:** Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm **Posts:** 23931

A Legal Lohengrin wrote:

mimi wrote:

Joe blew off the birthers.

Accusatinos to begin in 3. . .2. . .1.

Here is his attorney's letter to ORlY re the subpoena.

verbalobe · **Posted:** Sat Jan 28, 2012 10:38 am

realist wrote:

Here is his attorney's letter to ORlY re the subpoena.

If there's a macro hotkey on that attorney's keyboard for that letter, what do you suppose it is labeled?

Edit: For the love of ahciaR, I trimmed my own quoting.

GreatGrey · **Posted:** Sat Jan 28, 2012 11:23 am

realist wrote:

A Legal Lohengrin wrote:

mimi wrote:

Joe blew off the birthers.

Accusatinos to begin in 3. . .2. . .1.

Here is his attorney's letter to ORlY re the subpoena.

Now just to prove her Hawaii stuffs aren't frivolous, she MUST go to Phoenix and demand that Arpaio honor her subpoena, even after case has been heard.

raicha · **Posted:** Sat Jan 28, 2012 2:20 pm

I have modified the thread title a little, now that Sheriff Arpaio has given Orly's subpoena the FOAD treatment.

Edit:

Verbie!

borealis · **Posted:** Sat Jan 28, 2012 6:24 pm

Hi everyone. Long-long-time lurker and procrastinator here. I would like to dip my toe into this birfer dog pile if I may.

Although Arpaio never showed up in Georgia, it appears he has thrown everyone some red meat in advance of his Cold Posse findings.

AP suspiciously released another 5pm Friday deadline story regarding the arrest of a Knoxville man who allegedly threatened Sheriff Arpaio.

http://tucsoncitizen.com/arizona-news/2 ... on-arpaio/

The timing of the arrest, press release, and eligibility "findings", IMO, can't be coincidental. AP ran this story as if it were his press agent:

"According to local sheriff’s officials, Cox’s postings indicate he is an avid supporter of President Barack Obama and that the threat may have been sparked by Arpaio’s ongoing investigation into the legitimacy of Obama’s birth certificate.

“I will not be intimidated against pursuing this investigation into Obama’s eligibility to serve as the President of the United States,” Arpaio said in a Friday news release."

Granted this is a very serious situation, but Arpaio only wants revenge now the Justice Dept cited him for abuses. IMO, he's carefully crafting himself a Willie Horton voodoo doll to hang around the president's neck hoping this will impact voters in the coming months.

What I would like to know why is AP suddenly granted exclusive tidbits and why are they posting these stories at the end of the business week?? WEll it's obvious they want these stories to filter into the blogsphere for the weekend. WP posted the article, again unedited, last night.
AP is up to its editors' asses in mischievous and unethical behavior. Was this the same reporter who wrote the "Judge Orders Obama to Court" story?

I don't condone violence. If this man did this, then he should be prosecuted. But methinks Arpaio concocted at least 50% of the story much like Brewer did. I'm sure he receives numerous death threats monthly. [b]This one he wants to spotlight.

He knows he has nothing coming from his investigation in the president's eligibility so he found something better. He can now say with a clear conscience he found nothing from his investigation. Now he can feed Cox's alleged threat to old white people's and birthers' hysterical perception of the president as a dangerous subversive like his distant association with Alinsky and Ayers.

Foggy · **Posted:** Sat Jan 28, 2012 6:50 pm

Welcome, borealis.

Offtopic :

Speaking of which ... when is Half-Life³ going to be released? If you call yourself 'borealis' you're supposed to know these things. :lol:

I will say that this jerk's comments on ORYR are nothing unusual, sad to say. For a while there were juvenile comments like that on a regular basis. Bet they stop now, except from those who know how to spoof an IP address.

borealis · **Posted:** Sat Jan 28, 2012 7:07 pm

Offtopic :

Speaking of which ... when is Half-Life3 going to be released? If you call yourself 'borealis' you're supposed to know these things.

When I start irradiating, I'll let you know. BTW call me Aurora. :mrgreen:

Sterngard Friegen · **Posted:** Sat Jan 28, 2012 7:40 pm

Any relation to Aurora Australis?

borealis · **Posted:** Sat Jan 28, 2012 8:24 pm

Stern:

off-topic

Oh that's my brother. He winters in Sydney. 8-)

Sterngard Friegen · **Posted:** Sat Jan 28, 2012 8:52 pm

Thanks for the enlightenment.

bob · **Posted:** Sat Jan 28, 2012 9:39 pm

Quote:

Vermut Lichnicht wrote:

Will you now move to find him in contempt of court and have him arrested?

Taitz wrote:

no. waste of time. I have bigger fish to fry

[various complaints about Arpaio]

Taitz wrote:

I don’t know, he may be another Trump

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=30858#comments :twisted:

SueDB · **Posted:** Sat Jan 28, 2012 9:42 pm

bob wrote:

Quote:

Vermut Lichnicht wrote:

Will you now move to find him in contempt of court and have him arrested?

Taitz wrote:

no. waste of time. I have bigger fish to fry

[various complaints about Arpaio]

Taitz wrote:

I don’t know, he may be another Trump

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=30858#comments :twisted:

I wonder what made Orly think she could poach on Pronstache's Boy Joe? :evil:

Falsehoods unchallenged only fester and grow.

Sheriff Joe Arpaio Appeases Birthers?

Who is online