Does that defy basic logic? I don’t think so. If you knew anything about Constitutional and statutory construction, you’d realize that it’s in your beloved adopted Constitution. So let’s try a simpler analogy. It’s kind of like how a football referee can’t assess a 15-yard penalty for celebrating in the end zone after the game is over. But if the celebration gets way out of hand, you can call the cops, but not the referee. OK?

Orly has not seen the naturalization papers either. So Obama must be an illegal alien.

That makes nr 6 even gemmier, of course. Another case, wrong jurisdiction and a completely different legal argument. But Orlylaw allows it.

The Maid of Orlyans mistakenly attacking the Burgundians rather than the English. Which state will turn out to be her Compiègne?

Orly missed class the day year when they talked about you cannot raise new issues in an appeal anything related to the actual practice of law, right?

Also, too, isn't Kreep now representing Keyes?

Orly missed class the day when they talked about you cannot raise new issues in an appeal, right?

Kreep represents Drake and Robinson.

When was the last time Keyes commented on these cases?

9th Circuit on petition for rehearing: 'Denied'

A three-judge panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals responded to an appeal of a challenge to Barack Obama’s eligibility to be president with one word: “Denied.”

[...]

The court today said, “The petitions for panel rehearing and rehearing en bank filed by Plaintiffs-Appellants Wiley S. Drake and Markham Robinson are denied.”

WND: California judges use 1-liner on eligibility case

Kreep's clients.

09/10/2010 126 ORDER from 9th CCA filed re: Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, 109 filed by Robert Lee Perry, Robin D Biron, John Bruce Steidel, Alan Keyes PhD, Douglas Earl Stoeppelwerth, Julliett Ireland, Charles Crusemire, Jeffrey Wayne Rosner, D Andrew Johnson, Pamela Barnett, Loretta G Bosley, David Smithey, Kurt C Fuqua, Richard Norton Bauerbach, Thomas S Davidson, Frank Niceley, Harry Riley, David L Bosley, Timothy Comerford, Clint Grimes, Timothy Jones, Cynthia Davis, Mark Wriggle, Eric Swafford, Jennifer Leah Clark, Jason Freese, Glenn Casada, David Fullmer LaRoque, Richard E Venable, Steven Kay Neuenschwander, Israel D Jones, Jeff Graham Winthrope, Gail Lightfoot, Neil B Turner, Harry G Butler, John D Blair, David Grant Mosby, Lita M Lott, Matthew Michael Edwards, Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, 94 filed by Markham Robinson, Wiley S Drake, CCA # 09-56827, 10-. Appellees' motion for an extension of time to file the answering brief is granted. The answering brief is due October 13, 2010. The optional reply brief is due within 14 days after service of the answering brief. Order received in this district on 9/28/2010. (lr) (Entered: 10/04/2010)

02/02/2012 127 ORDER from 9th CCA filed re: Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, 94 filed by Markham Robinson, Wiley S Drake, CCA # 09-56827. The petition for rehearing en banc filed by Plaintiff's Appellants Alan Keyes et al. (Dkt. No. 61) is DENIED. Order received in this district on 2/2/12. (car) (Entered: 02/08/2012)

02/10/2012 128 MANDATE of 9th CCA filed re: Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals 94 CCA # 09-56827. The decision of the district court is affirmed. Appellants' emergency petition for writ of mandamus, filed November 8, 2011, is denied. Mandate received in this district on 2/10/2012. (dmap); Modified on 2/16/2012 (dmap). (Entered: 02/16/2012)

02/15/2012 129 MANDATE of 9th CCA filed re: Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals,, 109 , Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, 94 , CCA # 09-56827, 10-55084. The Judgment of the district court is Affirmed. Mandate received in this district on 2/15/12. (car) (Entered: 02/17/2012)

No. 11-1225
Title:
Alan Keyes, et al., Petitioners
v.
Barack H. Obama, President of the United States, et al.
Docketed: April 12, 2012
Lower Ct: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Case Nos.: (09-56827)
Decision Date: December 22, 2011
Rehearing Denied: February 2, 2012

~~~Date~~~ ~~~~~~~Proceedings and Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Apr 10 2012 Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 14, 2012)

Kreep has taken his case to the Supreme Court. See docket entry below:



The pleading is available at Kreep's website

4) BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA (hereinafter referred to as “OBAMA”),purported President of the United States, Defendant-Respondent

Kreep states that Keyes was added to the Taitz complaint along with Drake and Robinson without their consent. I had heard that claim made about Drake and Robinson but not Keyes. Is this new information? I know later Orly tried to remove Drake and Robinson when she filed an amended complaint.

Kreep states that Keyes was added to the Taitz complaint along with Drake and Robinson without their consent. I had heard that claim made about Drake and Robinson but not Keyes. Is this new information? I know later Orly tried to remove Drake and Robinson when she filed an amended complaint.

Didn't Keyes show up at one or more of the hearings ... with The Obly and not associating with Kreep?

Kreep states that Keyes was added to the Taitz complaint along with Drake and Robinson without their consent. I had heard that claim made about Drake and Robinson but not Keyes. Is this new information? I know later Orly tried to remove Drake and Robinson when she filed an amended complaint.

Didn't Keyes show up at one or more of the hearings ... with The Obly and not associating with Kreep?

Nope, Keyes was never at any of the hearings. However, he did have one or more TV interviews with Obly.

The case goes forward, and Markham and Wiley were reinstated with the attorney they requested, Gary Kreep.