TAITZ v ASTRUE - ACT II (United States Court of Appeals for District of Columbia Circuit)

realist · **Joined:** Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm **Posts:** 23548

Welsh Dragon wrote:

Orly has posted her intitial filing -

xxhttp://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?attachment_id=29447

It seems to be basically a pro-forma so there's not so much amusement value as usual.

It's not docketed yet, but it's obvious that someone filled it out for her as it does not contain her usual illegible scrawl.

Reality Check · **Posted:** Wed Dec 21, 2011 9:34 am

This board requires you to be registered and logged-in before you can view hidden messages

ZekeB · **Posted:** Wed Dec 21, 2011 9:49 am

Reality Check wrote:

This board requires you to be registered and logged-in before you can view hidden messages

You mean they used a spell checker and it didn't catch that? Oh wait....

Paul Pieniezny · **Posted:** Wed Dec 21, 2011 5:58 pm

ZekeB wrote:

Reality Check wrote:

This board requires you to be registered and logged-in before you can view hidden messages

You mean they used a spell checker and it didn't catch that? Oh wait....

Of course, we know that Obama knows what sates are.
Wikipedia article

Add Belgium to the list of countries where it is popular. You can now order sate at a frietkraam (typical Belgian fry stand) and eat it baked with your fries. It is chicken or pork, and if you get a skewer, it is one of these dirt cheap wooden ones.

Piffle · **Posted:** Thu Dec 22, 2011 12:38 am

Welsh Dragon wrote:

Orly has posted her intitial filing -

xxhttp://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?attachment_id=29447

It seems to be basically a pro-forma so there's not so much amusement value as usual.

THERE'RE A POWERFUL LOT OF CAPITAL LETTERS IN THEM THERE LAWYER PAPERS. I THINK ORLY IS REALLY, REALLY SERIOUS THIS TIME.

Butterfly Bilderberg · **Posted:** Thu Dec 22, 2011 12:45 am

ZekeB wrote:

Reality Check wrote:

This board requires you to be registered and logged-in before you can view hidden messages

You mean they used a spell checker and it didn't catch that? Oh wait....

"DEFFERED" on page 6.

lyssandri · **Posted:** Thu Dec 22, 2011 2:12 pm

Piffle wrote:

Welsh Dragon wrote:

Orly has posted her intitial filing -

xxhttp://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?attachment_id=29447

It seems to be basically a pro-forma so there's not so much amusement value as usual.

THERE'RE A POWERFUL LOT OF CAPITAL LETTERS IN THEM THERE LAWYER PAPERS. I THINK ORLY IS REALLY, REALLY SERIOUS THIS TIME.

Can it be copied here or to Scribd? Last time I went to Chez Orly, even with AVG and Malwarebytes running, I still got bit with a nasty bug that took a few days to get rid of.

realist · **Joined:** Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm **Posts:** 23548

New Docket Entries...

Quote:

12/27/2011 Open Document CERTIFICATE AS TO PARTIES, RULINGS AND RELATED CASES FILED [1350333] by Orly Taitz [Service Date: 12/22/2011] [11-5304]

12/27/2011 Open Document DOCKETING STATEMENT FILED [1350334] by Orly Taitz [Service Date: 12/22/2011] [11-5304]

12/27/2011 Open Document TRANSCRIPT STATUS REPORT [1350335] by Orly Taitz [Service Date: 12/22/2011]. Status of Transcripts: Final - No transcripts are needed for the appeal. [11-5304]

12/27/2011 Open Document STATEMENT OF INTENT REGARDING APPENDIX DEFERRAL FILED [1350336] by Orly Taitz [Service Date: 12/22/2011] Intent: AppxNotDeferred [11-5304]

12/27/2011 Open Document STATEMENT OF ISSUES FILED [1350337] by Orly Taitz [Service Date: 12/22/2011] [11-5304]

link shortly

RTH10260 · **Posted:** Sat Dec 31, 2011 7:40 am

Did I read Orlys submission correctly: in Q2 is she asking the Appeals Court to do research for her and tell her how to proceed further with her heroic campaign agaainst windmills?

Foggy · **Posted:** Sat Dec 31, 2011 9:06 am

Yep. You're getting good at this, for a furriner. :lol:

kimba · **Joined:** Tue Sep 08, 2009 3:24 pm **Posts:** 6631

Aren't they "Exemptions" not "Exceptions"?

GreatGrey · **Posted:** Sat Dec 31, 2011 10:24 am

RTH10260 wrote:

Did I read Orlys submission correctly: in Q2 is she asking the Appeals Court to do research for her and tell her how to proceed further with her heroic campaign agaainst windmills?

And she did the same thing in her latest Tatiz v Ruemmler filing.

2. SHOW ME HOW THIS THING WORKS

.

Piffle · **Posted:** Sat Dec 31, 2011 3:55 pm

kimba wrote:

Aren't they "Exemptions" not "Exceptions"?

Yup. FOIA provides for both "exemptions" and "exclusions" but there is no list of "exceptions".

realist · **Joined:** Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm **Posts:** 23548

Docket Update:

Quote:

Court of Appeals Docket #: 11-5304
Docketed: 10/31/2011
Nature of Suit: 2895 Freedom of Information Act of 1974
Orly Taitz v. Michael Astrue
Appeal From: United States District Court for the District of Columbia
Fee Status: Fee Paid

01/04/2012 ENTRY OF APPEARANCE filed [1351030] by Helen L. Gilbert and co-counsel Mark B. Stern on behalf of Appellee Michael James Astrue. [11-5304] (Gilbert, Helen)

01/04/2012 CERTIFICATE AS TO PARTIES, RULINGS AND RELATED CASES FILED [1351031] by Michael James Astrue [Service Date: 01/04/2012 ] [11-5304] (Gilbert, Helen)

01/04/2012 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE [1351032] to notice [1351030-2], certificate [1351031-2] filed by Michael James Astrue. [11-5304] (Gilbert, Helen)

realist · **Joined:** Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm **Posts:** 23548

New Docket Entry...

Quote:

01/19/2012 MOTION filed [1353593] by Michael James Astrue for summary affirmance. (Response to Motion served by mail due on 02/03/2012) [Service Date: 01/19/2012 by US Mail] Pages: 1-10. [11-5304] (Gilbert, Helen)

tjh · **Joined:** Wed Oct 07, 2009 4:18 pm **Posts:** 2474

realist wrote:

New Docket Entry...

Quote:

01/19/2012 MOTION filed [1353593] by Michael James Astrue for summary affirmance. (Response to Motion served by mail due on 02/03/2012) [Service Date: 01/19/2012 by US Mail] Pages: 1-10. [11-5304] (Gilbert, Helen)

Soo .. The Obly has stuff to file on 2/3 and 2/5 ... mo zibbits ?

realist · **Joined:** Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm **Posts:** 23548

While Orly's been out usurperatin'...

Quote:

01/19/2012

MOTION filed [1353593] by Michael James Astrue for summary affirmance. (Response to Motion served by mail due on 02/03/2012) [Service Date: 01/19/2012 by US Mail] Pages: 1-10. [11-5304] (Gilbert, Helen)

realist · **Joined:** Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm **Posts:** 23548

OOPS!! Didn't mean to "help." :lol:

New Docket Entries...

Quote:

02/13/2012 MOTION filed [1358927] by Orly Taitz to permit pro se electronic filing (Response to Motion served by mail due on 02/24/2012) [Service Date: 02/11/2012 by US Mail] Pages: 1-10. [11-5304]

Quote:

“I deserve this because I’m a licensed attorney in California … AND the Supreme Court …” :roll:

Quote:

02/13/2012 MOTION filed [1358929] by Orly Taitz to extend time to file response to motion for summary affirmance (Response to Motion served by mail due on 02/24/2012) [Service Date: 02/11/2012 by US Mail] Pages: 1-10. [11-5304]

Quote:

“I didn’t get this (served via US Mail) because I don’t have ECF and because I was traveling around the country” – and I paid $455 to have my right to appeal .. and I’m a pro se litigant … =))

links shortly

ZekeB · **Posted:** Thu Feb 16, 2012 5:05 pm

I can't even keep my Yahoo working but I want my ECF. I'm an attorney AND I'm pro se too. Also.

Tomtech · **Posted:** Thu Feb 16, 2012 5:37 pm

It appears that Orly has a new assistant* and neither of them know how to use spell check or know anything about grammar.

Quote:

Such motion for summary affirmance makes a mockery of the due process rights of the citizens, who are filing freedom of information requests such as the case at hand and are entitled to have their appela had on the merits.

* I presume that Lila Dubert is Orly's new assistant since I have never seen her referenced before.

ducktape · **Posted:** Thu Feb 16, 2012 5:46 pm

Tomtech wrote:

It appears that Orly has a new assistant* and neither of them know how to use spell check or know anything about grammar.

Quote:

Such motion for summary affirmance makes a mockery of the due process rights of the citizens, who are filing freedom of information requests such as the case at hand and are entitled to have their appela had on the merits.

* I presume that Lila Dubert is Orly's new assistant since I have never seen her referenced before.

Have you looked at her other proofs of service? Lila Dubert has been signing them for her since 2009. We even had a digression about "Daubert" regarding her experts in the Georgia thread referencing her.

Hint -- put "Dubert" in the Search block and it will bring you nice posts like this: viewtopic.php?f=22&t=1272&p=34742&hilit=Dubert#p34742

Mr. Gneiss · **Joined:** Sat Jan 01, 2011 1:37 am **Posts:** 566

No surprise, but this is the same motion as Ruemmler, esp the "Additionally, the appellant noticed that the Appellant (sic)...."

Obviously, Orlylaw dictates that when one files for an extension of time, the motion must have the appearance of a rush job (times 2)!!

nycpeter · **Joined:** Mon Aug 08, 2011 3:50 pm **Posts:** 306

realist · **Joined:** Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm **Posts:** 23548

FILING UPDATE...

Order denying ECF Privileges and Granting Extension of Time to File Response to Motion for Summary Affirmance

ZekeB · **Posted:** Fri Mar 02, 2012 9:05 pm

O'rly does not meet the technical standards? Well whoooda thunk it? They can plainly see that O'rly the Loon is obviously not a real lawyer.

Falsehoods unchallenged only fester and grow.

TAITZ v ASTRUE - ACT II (United States Court of Appeals for District of Columbia Circuit)

Who is online