Birther Presidential Candidates

Welsh Dragon · **Posted:** Sat Dec 17, 2011 8:44 am

Leah Lax needs money, surprise, surprise:

Quote:

Very important- we need $2,500 in donations to Leah Lax by Monday to put her on the ballot in TX, as a Democrat directly challenging Obama.

Posted on | December 17, 2011 | No Comments

The deadline to submit applications in TX is Monday. I am greatly concerned, that all the challenges will be denied either by election commissions or courts due to lack of standing, unless we have candidates running in the same election, such as Democrats running against BO in primary, or national party nominees, running in general election. Candidates, running directly against Obama, have strong standing. On Monday is the deadline to submit in TX. We already missed deadlines in AL and OK. Instead of spinning wheels, I am asking you to help with something, that will really count and will make a difference. TX requires $2,500 fee. We need donors to donate to Democrat Leah Lax $2,500 so she can put her name on the ballot in Conservative TX. I am representing her in legal actions, challenging Obama. If she on the ballot in TX, she will have standing to go to court in TX and sue Obama and TX Democratic party. I am grealy concerned, that without a Democrat on the ballot in the state, where Obama is challenged, all the law suits will be dismissed due to lack of standing.

xxhttp://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=29238

And she would have missed TX too if the Federal courts hadn't intervened ( original deadline was 15th), I wonder if Orly will send them a thank you note?

raicha · **Posted:** Sat Dec 17, 2011 1:12 pm

Orly is encouraging her minions to "donate" directly to Leah Lax via the Lax paypal button. So Lax (who goes by a false name and refuses to release information about her real identity) may collect moola from the masses and then claim she didn't raise enough to get on the ballot.

Great scam.

nbc · **Joined:** Thu Mar 19, 2009 12:38 am **Posts:** 2535

Welsh Dragon wrote:

And she would have missed TX too if the Federal courts hadn't intervened ( original deadline was 15th), I wonder if Orly will send them a thank you note?

Don't worry, she somehow forgot the requirement for 5,000 signatures... These people are hilarious, they cannot even do the necessary research... Bunch of incompetent fools

kimba · **Joined:** Tue Sep 08, 2009 3:24 pm **Posts:** 6640

Leah Lax tells a tall tale:

Quote:

Today I went shopping and a woman saw my button to elect me. She walked over and asked me why would I run against her President. I asked if it is against the law? Her response was no. I asked her what has Obama done. Her proud answer was bring home the troops and Jobs. I asked her is she working and her answer was no she was looking for a job for 2 years and her employment benefits ran out and now she is on welfare and food stamps and she also lost her home in a foreclosure but now is living in a section 8 home. I stood there and let her talk. And she talked herself out of voting for Obama.

Now this women lives in a section 8 home with no life. She is on Medicaid but her home is run down and needs repair which section 8 promised to do. I asked her what would you say the Jobs that Obama promised you went to immigrates who barely speak English and don't pay taxes and as I was saying this ICE raids the parking lot picking up Islamic Merchants who were selling stolen goods in the parking lot. How do I know they were Muslims. They pulled out a prayer rug and began to pray on the dirty street blocking traffic. After that the Prayer Leader goes to his van and pulls out stolen goods and distributes them to the others.

As they were taken into custody they began screaming You will burn in Hellfire. Allah will kill all of you. Death to America and you Kafiahs.

mimi · **Posted:** Sun Dec 18, 2011 3:36 pm

I don't believe anything she says. we know nothing about her. she's running for president on no record whatsoever. she's a joke candidate. nothing to show how her life's experiences can be applied to any leadership role.

she wouldn't be elected to dogcatcher.

without a compelling life's story, no media will even bother to mention her name.

esseff44 · **Posted:** Sun Dec 18, 2011 3:39 pm

mimi wrote:

Quote:

without a compelling life's story, no media will even bother to mention her name.

which is not even her real name.

Sterngard Friegen · **Posted:** Sun Dec 18, 2011 3:44 pm

Leah Lax sits with her sad face looking into her computer, and blogs away all day. Just as any Presidential candidate would do.

She claims she is a "retired entrepreneur." I suspect that really means she lives off the money she received from a highly satisfactory divorce (from a husband who was only too happy to be rid of her), or from an inheritance or the proceeds of a legal settlement for something. She can't write or spell. Her thought processes are impaired. I don't see how she could make it on her own. So I don't believe her thin, self proclaimed, fact free resume. Indeed, I don't even know if she is a natural born Citizen or that she has lived in the U.S. for 14 years. (As for her age, I'll give her a pass.)

Her only accomplishment, other than running a fake political campaign and spewing religious and social hatred -- while accusing others of being anti-Semites -- has been to partner up with the most thoroughly incompetent and dishonest lawyer the world has ever seen.

Is she qualified to run, yet, in Texas? How's she doing getting those 5,000 signatures?

jtmunkus · **Joined:** Mon May 23, 2011 7:33 pm **Posts:** 3517

Sterngard Friegen wrote:

Her only accomplishment, other than running a fake political campaign and spewing religious and social hatred -- while accusing others of being anti-Semites -- has been to partner up with the most thoroughly incompetent and dishonest lawyer the world has ever seen.

One must question the presidential capabilities of a 'candidate' who hires an attorney like Taitz whose own judgement compels her to publicly display her incompetence to handle even the most mundane function like finding the candidate a state primary ballot application.

Oops. I forgot. Lax is not running for president, she's running for Birther Litigant.

realist · **Joined:** Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm **Posts:** 23597

Quote:

Oops. I forgot. Lax is not running for president, she's running for Birther Litigant.

DING! DING! DING!!

No more calls, folks. We have a winner.

bob · **Posted:** Mon Dec 19, 2011 1:22 pm

Quote:

Abu Baker wrote:

How do we know Leah Lax is a Natural Born Citizen?

She says on her site she has traveled the world, has she ever been to Indonesia or Pakistan?

The family portrait on her site lookes awfully mixed, how many of them are from the same father?

She want’s to raise import taxes, won’t that hurt all the people that shop at WalMart?

xxx-http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=29238#comments

mimi · **Posted:** Mon Dec 19, 2011 1:45 pm

that's hilarious. even more so when you see the family portrait, which is a stock photo of a bunch of people smiling.

http://leahlax.com/

But it does ask a serious question. How do we know leah lax is a natural born citizen. :-?

I suggest nobody donate until that question is answered.

Where's the birth certificate!

Welsh Dragon · **Posted:** Tue Dec 20, 2011 1:03 pm

Don't know if she's found the filing fee yet but Leah Lax's application for the "Democrat" Party primary in Tx is up on Orly's site

xxhttp://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=29405

It confirms her real name as Loretta Lax Miller" but wants it to appear as "Leah Lax" . Interestingly she lists here occupation as "politician".

BFB · **Posted:** Tue Dec 20, 2011 1:07 pm

Welsh Dragon wrote:

Don't know if she's found the filing fee yet but Leah Lax's application for the "Democrat" Party primary in Tx is up on Orly's site

xxhttp://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=29405

It confirms her real name as Loretta Lax Miller" but wants it to appear as "Leah Lax" . Interestingly she lists here occupation as "politician".

I think I posted in some thread several months ago that aspects of this birther thing remind me of making fun of the developmentally disabled kid drooling in the corner. This Lax woman is starting to remind me of that.

mimi · **Posted:** Tue Dec 20, 2011 3:38 pm

Leah's husband was a veterinarian. This is him.
http://www.animallaw.info/cases/causpa626a2d637.htm

The case was so outrageous it's used here:

Quote:

2004] FUTURE VETERINARY LIABILITY 179
2. Failure of Existing Mechanisms to Deter Veterinary Harm

PDF. It starts on page 179.
http://www.animallaw.info/journals/jo_p ... 0_p163.pdf

Her husband died. She told us that.
She sued this rabbi.
http://articles.sun-sentinel.com/2006-1 ... e-children

Yes, she lived in florida as well. In Wellington. Near West Palm Beach. And she had a real estate license. (idunno if she's a black belt though.)

GreatGrey · **Posted:** Tue Dec 20, 2011 3:44 pm

mimi wrote:

She sued this rabbi.
http://articles.sun-sentinel.com/2006-1 ... e-children

Quote:

"He always gave chicken legs for dinners and suddenly he's giving chicken breasts and putting better wine on [his] table than he normally has. He became very wealthy on my money."

Wow, $18,000 put her rabbi in the top 1%

BFB · **Posted:** Tue Dec 20, 2011 4:00 pm

mimi wrote:

Leah's husband was a veterinarian. This is him.
http://www.animallaw.info/cases/causpa626a2d637.htm

The case was so outrageous it's used here:

Quote:

2004] FUTURE VETERINARY LIABILITY 179
2. Failure of Existing Mechanisms to Deter Veterinary Harm

PDF. It starts on page 179.
http://www.animallaw.info/journals/jo_p ... 0_p163.pdf

Boy, I really wish I hadn't read that.

My cat died two weeks ago. Reading this wants me to go dig up that motherfucker and beat the shit out of his carcass. There's a special place in what I'll call hell for people who abuse animals, and I hope this scumbag is a permanent resident.

I was starting to feel sorry for this Leah Lax. Now what I'm feeling is not prudent to print. :evil:

raicha · **Posted:** Tue Dec 20, 2011 5:25 pm

mimi wrote:

Yes, she lived in florida as well. In Wellington. Near West Palm Beach. And she had a real estate license. (idunno if she's a black belt though.)

No, she applied for a real estate license and the application expired.

raicha · **Posted:** Tue Dec 20, 2011 5:56 pm

The cited case sets forth allegations relevant to determining whether the Perainos could sue for intentional infliction of emotional distress. It does not make a finding that Dr. Miller actually beat the dog. It does not reveal what the findings may have been on other causes of action at trial.

Full text of case

raicha · **Posted:** Tue Dec 20, 2011 6:09 pm

ZorbasLeGreque wrote:

raicha wrote:

The cited case sets forth allegations relevant to determining whether the Perainos could sue for intentional infliction of emotional distress. It does not make a finding that Dr. Miller actually beat the dog. It does not reveal what the findings may have been on other causes of action at trial.

Full text of case

raicha, we do not always need findings by a court to know the truth. His two assistants quit because of the beating and offered their witness.

In the United States, the credibility of witnesses is tested in court. The assistants made that claim. I'm certain Dr. Miller had some other explanation why they left his employ. But since we don't have all the facts, I'm not going to assume guilt or innocence.

BFB · **Posted:** Tue Dec 20, 2011 6:11 pm

raicha wrote:

The cited case sets forth allegations relevant to determining whether the Perainos could sue for intentional infliction of emotional distress. It does not make a finding that Dr. Miller actually beat the dog. It does not reveal what the findings may have been on other causes of action at trial.

Full text of case

The question at hand was not whether he beat the dog, so it would make sense that the main allegations and their proofs would not lead to any finding that he beat the dog. But the evidence of the dog beating, presented in the course of offering evidence on the actual claim, shows that sick bastard beat the dog to death.

mimi · **Posted:** Tue Dec 20, 2011 8:22 pm

There's also the treatment of the Perainos afterward. Telling them that he'd own their truck and their house. And I wonder what happened in the other 19 civil suits against him? :-?

Then there's the other veterinarian (Wellens) that Miller put up posters saying that Wellens was the guy who killed the Perainos dog, not Miller. Wellens won a settlement. And threatening phonecalls to that vet were traced to a payphone connected to Miller.

Sterngard Friegen · **Posted:** Tue Dec 20, 2011 8:41 pm

The "animal rights" industry has an incentive in pushing stories (and, apparently, even law review articles) about the horrible treatment by human beings of animals. (The Sarah Maclachlan ads on TV show a bunch of pets who just happen, for the most part, to look unhappy. They arent, but the sad music makes it seem so. It's propaganda.) It gives them a reason to rationalize more regulation of pet ownership.

This law review article is propaganda, too, starting with the loaded term "companion animals."

The "animal rights" industry wants to make the ownership of pets so onerous and expensive that people will stop doing it. Right now they're after horse and dog owners. For all my joking about cats, cat owners are also on their list. You're next.

So I take this so-called law review article, with the unprofessional footnote of the author thanking everyone in the world, to the footnotes with the follow up phone calls helping to support claims that aren't in the legal opinion, with a grain of sodium chloride. Sadly, this is what "movement" scholarship has become -- trash and worthless.

While Loretta Miller (Leah Lax) may have been married to an abusive vet, I can't tell from the opinion and I completely distrust the law review article.
/rant //off topic

listeme · **Posted:** Tue Dec 20, 2011 8:57 pm

Offtopic :

For what it's worth, I concur completely with Stern's off-topic rant.

"You're next" is right.

kimba · **Joined:** Tue Sep 08, 2009 3:24 pm **Posts:** 6640

Quote:

Stern's off-topic rant.

Stern doesn't rant, he opines. :lol:

Sterngard Friegen · **Posted:** Tue Dec 20, 2011 9:04 pm

Expertly.

Falsehoods unchallenged only fester and grow.

Birther Presidential Candidates

Who is online