Well okay then. The birfers are probably right. North Carolina will frog march him outta there in 30 days.

Like I said, I know that this is going nowhere. I know that. BUT, in the wild offchance that it might, someone showing up in Onslow County before the Board of Elections and spouting the kind of stuff that Orly frequently spouts about our POTUS would not get a friendly reception. I have several attorney friends (male and female) who view the POTUS as their BFF. One particular female attorney here (my former boss) has been known to cut a bitch. Just saying.

Mr. Wright,

Can an out of state attorney represent me?

Danny Vestal

On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 1:50 PM, Wright, Don wrote:

Dear Mr. Vestal,

You have filed nothing with this agency. You have sent us e-mails involving a matter filed under Hawaiian law. The North Carolina State Board of Elections does not have jurisdiction over social security numbers , the President’s birth records from another state, or whether the name he uses for legal purposes today is different from his passport records when he was a child. Finally, any question about his eligibility to be on the ballot in the future is not yet ripe as he has not been named the nominee of a political party for 2012.

Several court decisions have confirmed that he was and is qualified to hold the office of President. They have been no court decisions to the contrary.

Again we have received your e-mails, but they are not considered as filings since they are under Hawaiian law and we lack jurisdiction over the subject matter. Also I know of no provision in North Carolina law that allows the State Board of Elections to hold an emergency hearing on the qualifications of a setting U.S. President.

Don Wright

General Counsel

NC State Board of Elections

Dear Mr. Wright,
I am a licensed attorney in the state of CA. Mr. Danny Vestal asked me to assist him. I am not filing a legal action against you, Elections Board and Secretary of State in either state or federal court yet, I am simply providing you with some clarifications and requesting a hearing

1. your response to Mr. Vestal was an insult to human intelligence and a de facto violation of Mr. Vestal’s civil right to participate in a lawful election, which was done under the color of authority
2. Mr. Vestal forwarded to youmy complaint from the state of HI, not for you to act based on statutes of the state of HI, but to act upon evidence that Barack Hussein Obama is committing the biggest elections fraud in the history of this nation. He is running under a name, which is not legally his, he is fraudulently using a CT Social Security number xxx-xx-4425, [my redaction] which is not legally his according to E-Verify, and he is using a computer generated forgery instead of a valid birth certificate. Obama provided no evidence of any valid identification papers, which would make him eligible to be on the ballot.
3. Your statement, that courts found Obama to be eligible, is an outright lie. No court has ever reviewed this matter on the merits, no court ever found that Obama possesses any valid identification papers, All courts simply kicked the can, passed the buck and stated that they either do not have jurisdiction or plaintiffs do not have standing.

5. I demand an immediate hearing for me and for Danny Vestal to appear before the Secretary of State or the elections board and provide all the evidence, Mr. Obama can provide his rebuttle and a decision has to be made, if he can be on the ballot in N.C. primary. If this is not done, than you are criminally complicit in elections fraud, forgery, uttering of forged identification documents by Obama, obstruction of justice, misprision of multiple felonies and possibly treason, and a criminal complaint will be filed with all the proper agencies against you, elections board and the Secretary of state in due time.

Rule 5-100 Threatening Criminal, Administrative, or Disciplinary Charges

(A) A member shall not threaten to present criminal, administrative, or disciplinary charges to obtain an advantage in a civil dispute.

(B) As used in paragraph (A) of this rule, the term "administrative charges" means the filing or lodging of a complaint with a federal, state, or local governmental entity which may order or recommend the loss or suspension of a license, or may impose or recommend the imposition of a fine, pecuniary sanction, or other sanction of a quasi-criminal nature but does not include filing charges with an administrative entity required by law as a condition precedent to maintaining a civil action.

(C) As used in paragraph (A) of this rule, the term "civil dispute" means a controversy or potential controversy over the rights and duties of two or more parties under civil law, whether or not an action has been commenced, and includes an administrative proceeding of a quasi-civil nature pending before a federal, state, or local governmental entity.

I have emailed Mr. Wright with a copy of California Rule of Professional Conduct 5-100

12/13/11

COMPLAINT UNDER §19-3 ELECTIONS FRAUD
EMERGENCY HEARING REQUESTED

Danny Alan Vestal
170 Vista Circle Apt. D
Winston-Salem, NC 27106
Phone: 336-922-1263

http://BuenaVistaMall.com/PressRelease.htm

Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ.
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688
ph: 949-683-5411 fax: 949-766-7603

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com

http://www.orlytaitzforussenate2012.com

Orly.Taitz@gmail.com

Dear Mr. Wright,

It is another gorgeous day here in North Carolina.

As per our complaint, in doing the right thing North Carolina will make great American history.

Do you have any status report on our request for an emergency hearing?

We are very anxious for our Country to expel this tyranny and in doing so our Country, North Carolina and people
will shine beautifully.

Good day to you.

Thank you,
Danny Vestal

Isn't that Hawaii law?

You have filed nothing with this agency. You have sent us e-mails involving a matter filed under Hawaiian law.

Is this our Danny?


http://pacer.ca4.uscourts.gov/opinion.pdf/966089.P.pdf

Is this our Danny?


http://pacer.ca4.uscourts.gov/opinion.pdf/966089.P.pdf

Is this our Danny?


http://pacer.ca4.uscourts.gov/opinion.pdf/966089.P.pdf

Is this our Danny?


http://pacer.ca4.uscourts.gov/opinion.pdf/966089.P.pdf

All begun while Mr. Vestal was incarcerated.

I don't have his criminal history handy, but I would not be surprised if Orly is hooking up with a felon yet again.

I have emailed Mr. Wright with a copy of California Rule of Professional Conduct 5-100

I got the impression he was in prison. In general, don't you have to be convicted of a felony in order to be sent to prison (as opposed to the county jail)?

Yes. In California non violent offenders with prison sentences are now serving that time in jail for budget considerations. Perhaps budget considerations will also cause the various states to re-think incarceration as a method of punishment.