Falsehoods unchallenged only fester and grow.


All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 152 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next   
Author Message
 Post subject: Taitz v. Cook (N.H.)
PostPosted: Fri Dec 09, 2011 7:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2009 6:36 am
Posts: 5187
Location: Belize City
Occupation: Visiting doctors.
nbc wrote:
Welsh Dragon wrote:
nbc wrote:

Yes the appointment may have been effective October 6, 2010 but the term for alternates does not start until July 1. And I have found so far no evidence that French ever was involved until November 18, 2011



I'd go a bit stronger - the Ballot Law Commission doesn't seem to have met between 18th November 2010 which French did not attend and 18th November 2011. (They had busy 2010 though - ten cases and something about ballot machines)


Excellent data. Now I understand that there is no real urgency to have the alternate's term started... Hmm Did French show up at any of the 2010 meetings after October 6 and before Nov 18?

The answer is nope...


Right. So we now agree that Jameson French presence on the Ballot Law commission was legit?
1. His first official appearance is Nov 18th, 2011.
2. Hi last political contribution is June 20, 2011.
3. His term began July 1, 2011.
4. His position doesn't require a particular political party affiliation.

Next?

_________________
If a bunch of religious nuts can vote away your fundamental civil rights, then your rights are not self-evident, inalienable, or endowed by God. Quod erat demonstrandum. -- Stonekettle Station
ImageImageImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Taitz v. Cook (N.H.)
PostPosted: Fri Dec 09, 2011 8:03 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 10, 2009 3:29 pm
Posts: 2577
Location: In exile in NOVA
Not quite W4 - his term began 6th October 2010. He was appointed to serve the remainder of a term that runs from July 2009 to July 2013. I do think he is legit though even in the worse case scenario I wouldn't have thought it would have merited more than a quiet "don't do that again" reprimand.

_________________
They laughed at Columbus, they laughed at Fulton, they laughed at the Wright brothers. But they also laughed at Bozo the Clown. – Carl Sagan


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Taitz v. Cook (N.H.)
PostPosted: Fri Dec 09, 2011 8:20 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 24, 2009 3:26 pm
Posts: 5522
Location: You Sue-We Serve Legal Support Services, 500 Ala Moana Blvd., Honolulu, HI 96813
Welsh Dragon wrote:
Not quite W4 - his term began 6th October 2010. He was appointed to serve the remainder of a term that runs from July 2009 to July 2013. I do think he is legit though even in the worse case scenario I wouldn't have thought it would have merited more than a quiet "don't do that again" reprimand.


The case that Orly fails to make: Why an illegal campaign contribution by one member should taint the whole Commission. It doesn't. At most it invalidates Mr. Jameson's vote. There still was a quorum that allowed the Commission to proceed. The vote was still unanimous in favor of the resolution to allow Obama's name on the ballot.

_________________
“I can assure you that already in the Pavlovian swamps of the nutso right, the glands are swelling. Theirs is a different planet from the one you and I inhabit. ” - Newsweek/Daily Beast special correspondent and editor of Democracy: A Journal of Ideas, Michael Tomasky, May 12, 2013


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Taitz v. Cook (N.H.)
PostPosted: Fri Dec 09, 2011 11:29 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2009 6:36 am
Posts: 5187
Location: Belize City
Occupation: Visiting doctors.
Welsh Dragon wrote:
Not quite W4 - his term began 6th October 2010. He was appointed to serve the remainder of a term that runs from July 2009 to July 2013. I do think he is legit though even in the worse case scenario I wouldn't have thought it would have merited more than a quiet "don't do that again" reprimand.


But he was to replace Martin.

Quote:
Ballot Law Commission
(Alternate member appointed by Governor and Council)
Jameson S. French, (r), Portsmouth Effective: Upon confirmation
Succeeding: Gregory T. Martin (d) Keene Term: July 1, 2013


Martin was part of the BLC hearings on Nov 18, 2010.

So it seems to me that French didn't start his term in Oct 2010 but in July 2011.

_________________
If a bunch of religious nuts can vote away your fundamental civil rights, then your rights are not self-evident, inalienable, or endowed by God. Quod erat demonstrandum. -- Stonekettle Station
ImageImageImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Taitz v. Cook (N.H.)
PostPosted: Fri Dec 09, 2011 1:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 12:38 am
Posts: 2532
Welsh Dragon wrote:
Not quite W4 - his term began 6th October 2010. He was appointed to serve the remainder of a term that runs from July 2009 to July 2013. I do think he is legit though even in the worse case scenario I wouldn't have thought it would have merited more than a quiet "don't do that again" reprimand.


The code provides for appointments of members but not alternates to fill vacancies IIRC. He may have been appointed to serve the remainder, but according to the statute, his term would not have started until july 1. That he was not involved in any Ballot Law Commission decisions until Nov 18, 2011 supports this.

Remember he was nominated and then confirmed as an alternate in October. But the appointment by law could not have started until 1 july


Quote:
665:1 Organization. –

I. There shall be a ballot law commission consisting of 5 members. Two members shall be appointed by the speaker of the house of representatives, one from each of the 2 major political parties in the state based on votes cast for governor in the most recent state general election. Two members shall be appointed by the president of the senate, one from each of the 2 major political parties in the state based on votes cast for governor in the most recent state general election. One member shall be appointed by the governor with the advice and consent of the council, and shall be a person particularly qualified by experience in election procedure. No person shall be appointed to the commission who holds an elected office or who is an election official. The terms of all commissioners shall be for 4 years, except that the first appointments shall be as follows: the members appointed by the speaker of the house of representatives shall be appointed for terms of 2 years, the members appointed by the president of the senate shall be appointed for terms of 3 years, and the member appointed by the governor shall be appointed for a term of 4 years. A member may be re-appointed upon the expiration of his or her term. The members shall elect annually a chairperson from among the members. Members shall be appointed and terms of office shall expire on July 1. Vacancies shall be filled in the same manner for the unexpired term. The secretary of state shall be recording officer and clerk of the commission, but shall have no vote in its decisions.

II. There shall be 5 alternate members for the ballot law commission. Two alternate members shall be appointed by the speaker of the house of representatives, one from each of the 2 major political parties in the state based on votes cast for governor in the most recent state general election. Two alternate members shall be appointed by the president of the senate, one from each of the 2 major political parties in the state based on votes cast for governor in the most recent state general election. One alternate member shall be appointed by the governor with the advice and consent of the council, and shall be a person particularly qualified by experience in election procedure. The alternate members appointed by the speaker of the house of representatives and the president of the senate shall not be members of the general court. The terms of all alternate members shall be for 4 years, except that the first appointments shall be as follows: the alternate members appointed by the speaker of the house of representatives shall be appointed for terms of 2 years, the alternate members appointed by the president of the senate shall be appointed for terms of 3 years, and the alternate member appointed by the governor shall be appointed for a term of 4 years. The term of each new alternate member shall begin on July 1.

_________________
- Credimus quod credere volumus -


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Taitz v. Cook (N.H.)
PostPosted: Fri Dec 09, 2011 2:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 10, 2009 3:29 pm
Posts: 2577
Location: In exile in NOVA
W4 - confusing ain't it. But Martin was appointed by the Governor and Council as alternate in 2009. In May 2010 the member resigned; Martin resigned as alternate ; at the same Council meeting the Governor nominated him as member and the Council confirmed it a coupl of weeks later. It was as a member in his own right that he attended the 18th November 2010 meeting not as alternate.

nbc -that's a mighty big rabbit hole you're teetering on the brink of. If your reading was correct and the whole commission was wiped out in an accident after 1st July then the no new members could start until the following July.

You say -
Quote:
...but according to the statute, his term would not have started until july 1. That he was not involved in any Ballot Law Commission decisions until Nov 18, 2011 supports this


His non-involvment until 18th November 2011 is irrelevent - he was only the alternate and the member he was alternate for was present at the only meetings that took place in the intervening timescale. In contrast, the Senate President's Republican appointee, Sheila Roberge, was only appointed in September 2010 (after the end of her final term in the State Senate) and did take part in the 18th November 2010 meeting.

_________________
They laughed at Columbus, they laughed at Fulton, they laughed at the Wright brothers. But they also laughed at Bozo the Clown. – Carl Sagan


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Taitz v. Cook (N.H.)
PostPosted: Fri Dec 09, 2011 2:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2009 6:36 am
Posts: 5187
Location: Belize City
Occupation: Visiting doctors.
Welsh Dragon wrote:
W4 - confusing ain't it. But Martin was appointed by the Governor and Council as alternate in 2009. In May 2010 the member resigned; Martin resigned as alternate ; at the same Council meeting the Governor nominated him as member and the Council confirmed it a coupl of weeks later. It was as a member in his own right that he attended the 18th November 2010 meeting not as alternate.

nbc -that's a mighty big rabbit hole you're teetering on the brink of. If your reading was correct and the whole commission was wiped out in an accident after 1st July then the no new members could start until the following July.

You say -
Quote:
...but according to the statute, his term would not have started until july 1. That he was not involved in any Ballot Law Commission decisions until Nov 18, 2011 supports this


His non-involvment until 18th November 2011 is irrelevent - he was only the alternate and the member he was alternate for was present at the only meetings that took place in the intervening timescale. In contrast, the Senate President's Republican appointee, Sheila Roberge, was only appointed in September 2010 (after the end of her final term in the State Senate) and did take part in the 18th November 2010 meeting.


Hmmm... I'm beginning to see... I wonder if the BLC and those that appoint them are confused as well.

_________________
If a bunch of religious nuts can vote away your fundamental civil rights, then your rights are not self-evident, inalienable, or endowed by God. Quod erat demonstrandum. -- Stonekettle Station
ImageImageImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Taitz v. Cook (N.H.)
PostPosted: Fri Dec 09, 2011 10:39 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Mar 02, 2010 9:52 am
Posts: 3940
Location: Switzerland
bob wrote:
Taitz never disappoints!:
Quote:
petition to the Supreme Court of New Hampshire
...
Also:
Quote:
Arequest for stay of the decisionpending review by the Supreme Court was submitted to the Sec of State of NH and the Ballot Law Commission

xxx-http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=28770
...


What's with this new Orly fetish of asking for a stay on judgements ? Does such a thing really exist in any jurisdiction or in any legal procedure manual ? And doesn't such a "stay" actually send a case into judicial limbo, make it sort of a zombie ? When a case hasn't become final at one jurisdictional level, how can it be appealed at a higher authority ?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Taitz v. Cook (N.H.)
PostPosted: Fri Dec 09, 2011 11:04 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 12:32 am
Posts: 19976
Location: FEMA Camp 17 -- Malibu (Hey! You! Get off the lawn!)
Occupation: Schadenfreude artist.
When a judgment orders a party to do something, usually to pay money, if an appeal is taken there are ways to stave off doing the thing required. If it's to perform an act, in California the judgment is usually automatically stayed by taking an appeal. If it's to pay money (and not just attorney's fees and costs), in California an appeal bond or other undertaking is required to be posted. (If it's not posted and the prevailing party collects, that pretty much moots the appeal.)

In Taitz's lawsuits no one is being ordered to do anything because Taitz loses and the cases get dismissed. Thus, life goes on (Ob-La-Di, Ob-La-Da) and there is nothing to be stayed.

I think what Taitz is trying to accomplish is to obtain the relief which the trial court had already ruled she wasn't entitled to receive. Which will never happen.

But they don't teach such things at Taft Law Skool. I'm not sure what they teach there quite frankly, after watching this disaster operate for 2 1/2 years.

_________________
When there are a finite number of ways to screw something up, Orly Taitz will find an infinite number of ways to do so. (The Sternsig Rule.)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Taitz v. Cook (N.H.)
PostPosted: Sat Dec 10, 2011 1:33 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2011 7:47 am
Posts: 102
Sterngard Friegen wrote:
When a judgment orders a party to do something, usually to pay money, if an appeal is taken there are ways to stave off doing the thing required. If it's to perform an act, in California the judgment is usually automatically stayed by taking an appeal. If it's to pay money (and not just attorney's fees and costs), in California an appeal bond or other undertaking is required to be posted. (If it's not posted and the prevailing party collects, that pretty much moots the appeal.)

In Taitz's lawsuits no one is being ordered to do anything because Taitz loses and the cases get dismissed. Thus, life goes on (Ob-La-Di, Ob-La-Da) and there is nothing to be stayed.

I think what Taitz is trying to accomplish is to obtain the relief which the trial court had already ruled she wasn't entitled to receive. Which will never happen.

But they don't teach such things at Taft Law Skool. I'm not sure what they teach there quite frankly, after watching this disaster operate for 2 1/2 years.



I think you're on to something, She says stuff like:

This man is rotting in prison so we need to see the LFBC
The Judge mentioned the LFBC so we are entitled to see it
I was fined so I need to see it
I need the LFBC to defend against complaint to the California Bar
I need the LFBC to support another case where access to it was denied
oh, and my favorite, I have new evidence, I filed (and lost) a complaint so I should be allowed to bring experts

_________________
I am not a wetback, I just got out of the shower


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Taitz v. Cook (N.H.)
PostPosted: Sat Dec 10, 2011 2:36 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 24, 2009 3:26 pm
Posts: 5522
Location: You Sue-We Serve Legal Support Services, 500 Ala Moana Blvd., Honolulu, HI 96813
IllAlien wrote:
I think you're on to something, She says stuff like:

This man is rotting in prison so we need to see the LFBC
The Judge mentioned the LFBC so we are entitled to see it
I was fined so I need to see it
I need the LFBC to defend against complaint to the California Bar
I need the LFBC to support another case where access to it was denied
oh, and my favorite, I have new evidence, I filed (and lost) a complaint so I should be allowed to bring experts



And they are cumulative.

_________________
“I can assure you that already in the Pavlovian swamps of the nutso right, the glands are swelling. Theirs is a different planet from the one you and I inhabit. ” - Newsweek/Daily Beast special correspondent and editor of Democracy: A Journal of Ideas, Michael Tomasky, May 12, 2013


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Taitz v. Cook (N.H.)
PostPosted: Sat Dec 10, 2011 2:53 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 1:22 pm
Posts: 9178
Location: Supreme Court of clerks
Occupation: Petite treason procurer
Sterngard Friegen wrote:
But they don't teach such things at Taft Law Skool. I'm not sure what they teach there quite frankly, after watching this disaster operate for 2 1/2 years.

It teaches how to open the checkbook. A skill that will be required once its graduates attempt to practice law.

_________________
Image Image Image Image Image

ASSUME ANYTHING WRITTEN HERE WILL END UP ON TAITZ'S SITE AND FACEBOOK. AND JEROME CORSI WILL POST SCREENSHOTS TO WND. AND WILL BE FILED BY A BIRTHER AS AN EXHIBIT IN FEDERAL COURT. NOW HAVE FUN!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Taitz v. Cook (N.H.)
PostPosted: Sat Dec 10, 2011 3:16 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 24, 2009 3:26 pm
Posts: 5522
Location: You Sue-We Serve Legal Support Services, 500 Ala Moana Blvd., Honolulu, HI 96813
bob wrote:
Sterngard Friegen wrote:
But they don't teach such things at Taft Law Skool. I'm not sure what they teach there quite frankly, after watching this disaster operate for 2 1/2 years.

It teaches how to open the checkbook. A skill that will be required once its graduates attempt to practice law.



Taft is currently charging $7,920.00 tuition per year. For $31,680 anyone can be awarded the ability to earn -$20,250.00 annually (plus expenses).

_________________
“I can assure you that already in the Pavlovian swamps of the nutso right, the glands are swelling. Theirs is a different planet from the one you and I inhabit. ” - Newsweek/Daily Beast special correspondent and editor of Democracy: A Journal of Ideas, Michael Tomasky, May 12, 2013


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Taitz v. Cook (N.H.)
PostPosted: Sat Dec 10, 2011 7:40 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 3:53 pm
Posts: 12886
Location: location, location
Occupation: Ruler of the Intarwebz
Butterfly Bilderberg wrote:
Taft is currently charging $7,920.00 tuition per year. For $31,680 anyone can be awarded the ability to earn -$20,250.00 annually (plus expenses).

No, you can't earn that much. That took three years to rack up.

You can only earn minus $6,750 annually, sad to say.

_________________
... then one day I found some birthers on my planet. Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Taitz v. Cook (N.H.)
PostPosted: Sat Dec 10, 2011 10:23 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 2:02 pm
Posts: 10988
Location: Stalag 13 Okanagan, WA 98840
Occupation: Drone Maintenance Officer - FAA Licensed and Certified "We Fix Drones©" Call (206) 622-0460 to schedule routine maintenance or repair.
Foggy wrote:
Butterfly Bilderberg wrote:
Taft is currently charging $7,920.00 tuition per year. For $31,680 anyone can be awarded the ability to earn -$20,250.00 annually (plus expenses).

No, you can't earn that much. That took three years to rack up.

You can only earn minus $6,750 annually, sad to say.


2011 isn't over yet, give a girl a chance!

_________________
Image ImageImage

You can follow the action, which gets you good pictures.
You can follow your instincts, which'll probably get you in trouble.

Or... you can follow the money...
which nine times out of ten will get you closer to the truth.
"The Two Jakes"


Remember, Orly NEVAH disappoints!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Taitz v. Cook (N.H.)
PostPosted: Tue Dec 13, 2011 2:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm
Posts: 23566
Orly sez... I work sooooooooooo hard...

:evil: http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=28946 :evil:

Update

Posted on | December 13, 2011 | No Comments


Quote:
It took me some time to put together some 10 books of over 200 pages of complaint and all the xhibits for NH. People do not realise, how much work goes into this. The books had to be put together, printed, bound and shipped. It is donee Supreme Court [WTF?]


Of course, she leaves out that all her "work" accomplishes nothing but waste her flying monkeys' money. :lol:

_________________
Let us tenderly and kindly cherish, therefore, the means of knowledge. Let us dare to read, think, speak, and write.
John Adams


ImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Taitz v. Cook (N.H.)
PostPosted: Tue Dec 13, 2011 2:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 2:02 pm
Posts: 10988
Location: Stalag 13 Okanagan, WA 98840
Occupation: Drone Maintenance Officer - FAA Licensed and Certified "We Fix Drones©" Call (206) 622-0460 to schedule routine maintenance or repair.
realist wrote:
Orly sez... I work sooooooooooo hard...

:evil: http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=28946 :evil:

Update

Posted on | December 13, 2011 | No Comments


Quote:
It took me some time to put together some 10 books of over 200 pages of complaint and all the xhibits for NH. People do not realise, how much work goes into this. The books had to be put together, printed, bound and shipped. It is donee Supreme Court [WTF?]


Of course, she leaves out that all her "work" accomplishes nothing but waste her flying monkeys' money. :lol:



And all for nothing...Kewl...eating up FlyingMonkeyBucks along with the FlyingMonkeyMiles.
Chomp Chomp

_________________
Image ImageImage

You can follow the action, which gets you good pictures.
You can follow your instincts, which'll probably get you in trouble.

Or... you can follow the money...
which nine times out of ten will get you closer to the truth.
"The Two Jakes"


Remember, Orly NEVAH disappoints!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Taitz v. Cook (N.H.)
PostPosted: Tue Dec 13, 2011 3:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 23, 2011 7:33 pm
Posts: 3502
Is Orly talking about ObamaFraudGate or ObamaForgeryGate? I can never keep them separate.

_________________
"What are you talking about, 99? We have to shoot and kill and destroy - we represent everything that's wholesome and good in the world." - Maxwell Smart
ImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Taitz v. Cook (N.H.)
PostPosted: Tue Dec 13, 2011 6:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2009 6:36 am
Posts: 5187
Location: Belize City
Occupation: Visiting doctors.
I wanna go watch this in NH! Please please please please NH Supreme Court schedule the case for oral arguments! [-o< [-o< [-o< [-o<

_________________
If a bunch of religious nuts can vote away your fundamental civil rights, then your rights are not self-evident, inalienable, or endowed by God. Quod erat demonstrandum. -- Stonekettle Station
ImageImageImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Taitz v. Cook (N.H.)
PostPosted: Tue Dec 13, 2011 7:16 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 12:32 am
Posts: 19976
Location: FEMA Camp 17 -- Malibu (Hey! You! Get off the lawn!)
Occupation: Schadenfreude artist.
[-X

D 9 D

_________________
When there are a finite number of ways to screw something up, Orly Taitz will find an infinite number of ways to do so. (The Sternsig Rule.)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Taitz v. Cook (N.H.)
PostPosted: Tue Dec 13, 2011 7:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2010 5:10 pm
Posts: 5759
Location: My business address is in Pennsylvania
D 9 D without even getting out of the gate.

_________________
ImageImageImageImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Taitz v. Cook (N.H.)
PostPosted: Tue Dec 13, 2011 7:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 2:02 pm
Posts: 10988
Location: Stalag 13 Okanagan, WA 98840
Occupation: Drone Maintenance Officer - FAA Licensed and Certified "We Fix Drones©" Call (206) 622-0460 to schedule routine maintenance or repair.
Sterngard Friegen wrote:
[-X

D 9 D



Dead at the starting gate bell. I wonder how long Orly is going to flog this dead corpse?

_________________
Image ImageImage

You can follow the action, which gets you good pictures.
You can follow your instincts, which'll probably get you in trouble.

Or... you can follow the money...
which nine times out of ten will get you closer to the truth.
"The Two Jakes"


Remember, Orly NEVAH disappoints!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Taitz v. Cook (N.H.)
PostPosted: Tue Dec 13, 2011 7:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 9:09 pm
Posts: 7777
Location: USA
Occupation: Amateur radio host trying to figure out how to lower myself to shameless begging and stupid petition filing. It might be a good way to make a living. ;)
Sterngard Friegen wrote:
[-X

D 9 D

Link?

_________________
The O-bot prayer:

Grant me the superior wit and biting sarcasm to mock the Birthers whose minds I cannot change
The superior facts, law, and reason to change the minds of the Birthers whom I can
And the wisdom to team up at Politijab The Fogbow with those who share my addiction and know the difference


- Allison 2/16/2009


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Taitz v. Cook (N.H.)
PostPosted: Tue Dec 13, 2011 7:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 1:22 pm
Posts: 9178
Location: Supreme Court of clerks
Occupation: Petite treason procurer
SuEdB wrote:
I wonder how long Orly is going to flog this dead corpse?

Until 2013 2017 21317.

_________________
Image Image Image Image Image

ASSUME ANYTHING WRITTEN HERE WILL END UP ON TAITZ'S SITE AND FACEBOOK. AND JEROME CORSI WILL POST SCREENSHOTS TO WND. AND WILL BE FILED BY A BIRTHER AS AN EXHIBIT IN FEDERAL COURT. NOW HAVE FUN!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Taitz v. Cook (N.H.)
PostPosted: Tue Dec 13, 2011 7:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2010 5:10 pm
Posts: 5759
Location: My business address is in Pennsylvania
Reality Check wrote:
Sterngard Friegen wrote:
[-X

D 9 D

Link?


Not an actual result, a prediction.

_________________
ImageImageImageImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 152 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next   

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Paul Lentz, Sterngard Friegen and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
View new posts | View active topics



Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group