Georgia Ballot Challenge

raicha · **Posted:** Thu Dec 01, 2011 5:14 pm

Orly has an example of how to properly caption her request to the "court" but, as we know, she is incapable of learnin' stuff.

realist · **Joined:** Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm **Posts:** 23526

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=28467 :evil:

Orly sez...

Continuance in GA till December 9
Posted on | December 1, 2011 | No Comments

But that's not what the communication sez... (read from bottom up)

Quote:

Kim Beal to Michael, me, David, kwainscott, orly

show details 12:11 PM (11 minutes ago)
Ok. If an extension is granted, the new deadline would be next Friday, December 9th for the plaintiff’s pleadings and then the following Friday, December 16th for the defendant’s. It would not be a 30 day continuance.

Quote:

From: Michael Jablonski [mailto:michael.jablonski@comcast.net]
Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2011 3:07 PM
To: Kim Beal; ‘Orly Taitz’
Cc: ‘David Farrar’; kwainscott@barackobama.com; ‘orly taitz’
- Show quoted text -
Subject: RE: Order on the Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice

- Show quoted text -

We’re conferring. I will get you a response as soon as possible.
Michael Jablonski

And I notice Mr. Farrar is still on the email string. With Orly as counsel, I suppose that's a good idea,

but I think we can all guess what is the inevitable there. :roll:

Piffle · **Posted:** Thu Dec 01, 2011 5:19 pm

realist wrote:

I have no idea what "court" she's talking about

(okay... administrative court

) and I've not read her "Motion" yet, but if granted, I suspect Mr. Farrar's eligibility challenge is about to get more screwed up than it already is...

:evil:

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=28464 :evil:

motion for leave of court to file an amended complaint in GA

Posted on | December 1, 2011 | No Comments

Farrar v Obama motion for leave to file an amended complaint

Meh, at Orlylaw, an amended complaint is a mandatory step -- she always needs one. But moreover, I'm sure that her client just forgot to include lots and lots of crap about selective service records, the missing year when the President says he was enrolled at Columbia, social security fraud..you get the picture.

In order to properly represent her client, Orly needs to make sure that all of her personal conspiracy theories, daffydavits & zibits are included because, as they say in Orlylaw, muddy waters run deep.

raicha · **Posted:** Thu Dec 01, 2011 5:21 pm

jtmunkus wrote:

Orly thinks she got skoooled in Hawai'i? Meet Mr. Jablonski, and let the games begin:

Quote:

Michael Jablonski to Kim, me, David, kwainscott, orly

show details 12:16 PM (5 minutes ago)
We have no opposition.posting.php?mode=reply&f=46&t=6845
...
Michael Jablonski[/color][/b]

michael.jablonski@comcast.net

Hmm. No opposition to Orly's wish to drag this out while preparations for the election continue? Where have I seen this strategy employed successfully before? :-k

A Legal Lohengrin · **Joined:** Tue Oct 26, 2010 9:56 pm **Posts:** 9326

jtmunkus wrote:

Orly thinks she got skoooled in Hawai'i? Meet Mr. Jablonski, and let the games begin:

Quote:

I note that Mr. Farrar is on these email strings. I am hesitant about sending emails that go to him when he is represented by counsel.
Michael Jablonski

xxxxxxxx@comcast.net

Imagine that. He actually knows and follows the Rules of Professional Conduct.

Loren · **Joined:** Wed Jan 28, 2009 4:20 pm **Posts:** 3891

A 30-day extension?!

That would push the hearing into late January. Concerning an election in early March.

If Jablonski doesn't object to it then I guess it may be granted; then again, maybe the court itself will balk. But Orly's been at this for three YEARS. Why on earth does she need 30 extra days to summarize her case?

GreatGrey · **Posted:** Thu Dec 01, 2011 5:31 pm

Loren wrote:

Why on earth does she need 30 extra days to summarize her case?

Those zibits don't enlarge themselves Loren.

realist · **Joined:** Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm **Posts:** 23526

Loren wrote:

A 30-day extension?!

That would push the hearing into late January. Concerning an election in early March.

If Jablonski doesn't object to it then I guess it may be granted; then again, maybe the court itself will balk. But Orly's been at this for three YEARS. Why on earth does she need 30 extra days to summarize her case?

The email string states she will not receive a 30-day extension IF... IF an extension is granted.

Quote:

Kim Beal to Michael, me, David, kwainscott, orly

show details 12:11 PM (11 minutes ago)
Ok. If an extension is granted, the new deadline would be next Friday, December 9th for the plaintiff’s pleadings and then the following Friday, December 16th for the defendant’s. It would not be a 30 day continuance.

raicha · **Posted:** Thu Dec 01, 2011 5:34 pm

Orly has posted the order. She has until the 9th to amend and she has an "if necessary" hearing date.

raicha · **Posted:** Thu Dec 01, 2011 5:35 pm

Loren wrote:

A 30-day extension?!

That would push the hearing into late January. Concerning an election in early March.

If Jablonski doesn't object to it then I guess it may be granted; then again, maybe the court itself will balk. But Orly's been at this for three YEARS. Why on earth does she need 30 extra days to summarize her case?

There is no reason to object. Orly's case will not get better with time. It will get significantly worse. There is no prejudice to Obama. There is great risk for Orly's client.

jtmunkus · **Joined:** Mon May 23, 2011 7:33 pm **Posts:** 3491

Farrar wanted to be counseled by Lady Liberty herself. She obviously has a groundbreaking strategy, with earth-shattering new evidence, likely culled just yesterday from the law library in Honolulu.

He needs to sit back, and let her represent.

raicha · **Posted:** Thu Dec 01, 2011 5:43 pm

Yup, the dude invited her speshully to come to Georgia and commit malpractice. That's gonna bite him in the ass when he tries to sue her for her incompetence.

kimba · **Joined:** Tue Sep 08, 2009 3:24 pm **Posts:** 6626

Edit: I'm sorta thinking the response to Orly's amended complaint with all the zibits will be she's got nuthin. But maybe they've brought in Jablonski to put an end to all of it for the rest of the primary season and he files a fresh, 2011-certified copy of the short form BC.

raicha · **Posted:** Thu Dec 01, 2011 5:59 pm

Quote:

616-1-2-.34 Appearance by Attorneys; Signing of Pleadings. Amended.
(1) Except as authorized in paragraph (2) of this Rule or where authorized by law, no person
shall represent any party in a proceeding before an Administrative Law Judge unless the person
is an active member in good standing of the State Bar of Georgia and has filed an entry of
appearance in the case in the attorney’s individual name. An entry of appearance shall not be
required if a pleading, motion or other paper has previously been filed on the case by the attorney
of record pursuant to paragraph (3) of this Rule.
(2) Nonresident attorneys who are not active members of the State Bar of Georgia may be
permitted to appear before an Administrative Law Judge in isolated cases upon motion to and in
the discretion of the Administrative Law Judge. A motion to appear in a particular case shall
state the jurisdiction in which the movant regularly practices and state that the movant agrees to
behave in accordance with the Georgia standards of professional conduct and the duties imposed
upon attorneys by O.C.G.A. § 15-19-4.
(3) Every pleading, motion, or other paper of a party represented by an attorney shall be signed
by at least one attorney of record in the attorney’s individual name, whose address shall be
stated. A party who is not represented by an attorney shall sign the party’s pleadings and state the
party’s address. The signature of an attorney constitutes a certificate by the attorney that the attorney has read the pleading and that it is not interposed for any improper purpose, including,
but not limited to, delay or harassment. If a pleading, motion, or other paper is signed in
violation of this Rule, the Administrative Law Judge, upon motion of any party or upon the
Administrative Law Judge’s own motion, shall impose upon the person who signed it, a
represented party, or both, an appropriate sanction, including, but not limited to, dismissal.

No mention of a fee to be admitted PHV.

A Legal Lohengrin · **Joined:** Tue Oct 26, 2010 9:56 pm **Posts:** 9326

raicha wrote:

Loren wrote:

A 30-day extension?!

That would push the hearing into late January. Concerning an election in early March.

If Jablonski doesn't object to it then I guess it may be granted; then again, maybe the court itself will balk. But Orly's been at this for three YEARS. Why on earth does she need 30 extra days to summarize her case?

There is no reason to object. Orly's case will not get better with time. It will get significantly worse. There is no prejudice to Obama. There is great risk for Orly's client.

Yep. And when she, out of time, screeches that it's an emergency, all the defendants need do is point out that she has only her own incompetence to blame for that. Jablonski doing absolutely nothing in response to Orly's absolutely suicidal motion is perfection. He didn't even have to dig a hole and cover it with grass and twigs and lure her into it. She dug it herself, filled it with manure and then jumped in headfirst, while he whistled Dixie.

I already like this guy.

realist · **Joined:** Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm **Posts:** 23526

raicha wrote:

Orly has posted the order. She has until the 9th to amend and she has an "if necessary" hearing date.

kimba · **Joined:** Tue Sep 08, 2009 3:24 pm **Posts:** 6626

Look up - 2 posts.

raicha · **Posted:** Thu Dec 01, 2011 6:07 pm

A Legal Lohengrin wrote:

She dug it herself, filled it with manure and then jumped in headfirst, while he whistled Dixie.

I already like this guy.

This is known in California as "The Hildreth Maneuver".

Loren · **Joined:** Wed Jan 28, 2009 4:20 pm **Posts:** 3891

kimba wrote:

But maybe they've brought in Jablonski to put an end to all of it for the rest of the primary season and he files a fresh, 2011-certified copy of the short form BC.

I'm almost willing to bet that that's exactly what will happen.

Whatever4 · **Posted:** Thu Dec 01, 2011 7:14 pm

Loren wrote:

kimba wrote:

But maybe they've brought in Jablonski to put an end to all of it for the rest of the primary season and he files a fresh, 2011-certified copy of the short form BC.

I'm almost willing to bet that that's exactly what will happen.

In a sealed envelope from the DoH, to be opened in court.

Butterfly Bilderberg · **Posted:** Thu Dec 01, 2011 7:16 pm

I've marked my calendar to set aside the tentative hearing dates. However, if Loren has this one covered I may attend the hearing (if any) in Montgomery. Do we have Fogbowsers in 'Bama? If not, I've got it covered, along with any contested hearings in Baton Rouge and Jackson.

fava · **Joined:** Mon Oct 05, 2009 12:51 pm **Posts:** 151

kimba wrote:

But maybe they've brought in Jablonski to put an end to all of it for the rest of the primary season and he files a fresh, 2011-certified copy of the short form BC.

And Orly will take it to Hawaii and demand verification, which must consist of her and her "experts" "inspecting" the original vault copy. If Hawaii refuses she will claim that the state has refused to verify the certificate, therefore it must be a fake.

The court will have no option but to order the arrest of Obama for usurpering.

At least that is how Orly thinks it will happen. =))

lyssandri · **Posted:** Thu Dec 01, 2011 10:33 pm

jtmunkus wrote:

Orly thinks she got skoooled in Hawai'i? Meet Mr. Jablonski, and let the games begin:

Quote:

Michael Jablonski to Kim, me, David, kwainscott, orly

show details 12:16 PM (5 minutes ago)
We have no opposition.posting.php?mode=reply&f=46&t=6845

I suggest that an order granting a continuance to file an amended complaint include a requirement that the standard pretrial order be filed concurrently with the complaint?

If answering this openly would help Orly too much, please send me a PM - what is the "standard pretrial order" that he is suggesting be filed concurrently?

Loren · **Joined:** Wed Jan 28, 2009 4:20 pm **Posts:** 3891

thorswitch wrote:

If answering this openly would help Orly too much, please send me a PM - what is the "standard pretrial order" that he is suggesting be filed concurrently?

ORYR: David Farrar v. Barack Obama: First Georgia Ballot Access Challenge Filing Released

GreatGrey · **Posted:** Thu Dec 01, 2011 11:01 pm

Uhhh, can someone tell me how Haynes v Wells, a case about a state election, applies to a Federal position? What are they gonna say, Obama hasn't been a Georgia resident for 2 years?

Falsehoods unchallenged only fester and grow.

Georgia Ballot Challenge

Who is online