FIFH. Did this guy say he was a journalist?

In another vein, I do kinda get a kick out of his overall approach. Innovative (for a birther). He wants all these documents - birth certificates, passport records, immigration records, family ties, etc., etc. - each of which (if it exists) is held under the jurisdiction of any of a number of official agencies. So why do battle with all of those, when you can go to someone (the FBI) who (the hallucinating birther presumes) has gathered it all together in one place for you?


THE AGGREGATOR!

Of course, one of the MANY problems with this approach (and by no means the most fundamental, I'm guessing -- such as whether FBI dossiers are even subject to FOIA) is that Obama in most cases would have had to give each of those agencies permission to share any background records with the FBI.

Honestly, it's like these people don't even live on the planet.

Not according to Rikker.

Ah, but did he then write about Gingrich's ethics hearing, censure, $300,000 fine and loss of speakership? (Which, by the way, involved the very same thing he brought Jim Wright down for?) Or Trent Lott's ties to racists and supremacists?

Local news coverage by the Clarke Daily News:

Quote:

I’m not a ‘birther,’" Archibald said after filing his lawsuit.

BB-- we has a thread already.

GREENIE! Delete please.

Thanks, GG. Now I have to go see a psychiatrist.

There's a 12 Step program you could try instead.

Well, maybe if I take enough Rohypnol I can just forget this and get the horrible visions out of my mind.

An old Clarke Daily News article: Winchester FBI Office Refuses FOIA Request on Obama Records

Archibald writes about this as if he was a disinterested reporter, but omits that he is reporting about his own FOIA request.

From comments section, it is implied that Archibald is not the CDN's staff, but it agrees with him politically and therefore gave him this soapbox.

anudder nutter.

One of his big stories while at TWT


http://www.wanttoknow.info/890629washin ... esfranklin

Seems he quit the Washington Times and bashed them. According to them, he later begged for his job back. They didn't rehire him.

http://www.mediabistro.com/fishbowldc/b ... -twt_b3404

I wonder why they'd be so upset?


http://www.consortiumnews.com/2006/122706.html

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/george-archibald

I think the address he's using for his lawsuit is that for subsidized low-income elderly. I think it's part of this: http://communityhousingpartners.org/about/ He's only in his early-mid sixties. Maybe he's a manager guy or something.

age was from his bio: http://www.worldji.com/people/view/43



Freakin' commie socialist bastid.

So basically, this is a disgruntled nut angry that he was fired by the Moonie cult for being too insane even for them.

t-witch wrote:

Yes, I remember it well. The young man in question was one of a group who blew the lid off of Boy's Town and the horrible scandal linked to sexual child abuse there. There were large numbers of male prostitutes involved in the larger scandal that reached into the heart of the Pentagon and Congress. There was one well-known and well-connected figure that committed suicide in a related connection as an organizer for the orgies. I was in Washington at the time and became acquainted with a couple of the providers of services at these events. I had no reason to doubt the stories they told and who their customers were. Most of the scandal got swept under the rug pretty fast and those that did report on it were marginalized.

As for the Boy's Town side of the story, a book was written about it by one of the children's lawyers, IIRC. They were sent to prison for perjury for testifying against the local political bosses. It's a very ugly, sickening story. There was also a documentary made about it.

Do you think we should send a copy of this lawsuit to Orly? And maybe highlight the parts about the FBI running backround checks on presidential candidates? You think she might be interested since she stated during the NH hearing that ever a janitor at the White House gets a backround check while Obama had none?

Thread to discuss child sexual abuse:

viewtopic.php?f=63&t=6839

In the Mississippi thread service and proper service were recently topics of discussion.

Just FYI -

Docket Update...

2012-05-23 - 2 Order

So the Order posted above received attention.

Docket Update...

Docket Update...

Hmmm -- how does Ms Ruemmler have a position as a defendant when she was not served (apart being WH staff not responsive to FOIA requests?
How does Robert Bauer have a position in a FOIA request when he is not part of the government anymore (apart of having had a WH position not responsive to a FOIA REQUEST).

I bet we will see Taitz vs Ruemmler quoted in dissmissal order

They seem to be their own worst enemy...

Poor, stoopit George. He's quibbling over the Answer? Wrong move when a Motion to Dismiss was filed. Is this supposed to pass as his opposition to the MTD? If not he has effectively conceded that dismissal is proper.

And if it is, dismissal is still in order. He failed to rebut the arguments raised by the motion. They cannot be (successfully) rebutted because FOIA simply has no application here.

Just saw this, and in reading the first link I see he asks for information regarding the FBI's 'background check' of President Obama.

Federal elected officials do not undergo a background check, nor do they receive 'security clearance'.

Yep, the authority for administrating security clearances is held by the president and then delegated to others. A security check on the president makes absolutely no sense.