BARNETT|KEYES v. OBAMA - II - DISCUSSION (9th Cir.)

AnitaMaria · **Joined:** Tue Mar 29, 2011 5:41 pm **Posts:** 2113

Can somebody explain what happens now to her first mandemus. She seems to think it is erased from the record but I'm guessing she is incorrect about that since she is wrong about most things.

bob · **Posted:** Tue Nov 08, 2011 10:19 pm

AnitaMaria wrote:

Can somebody explain what happens now to her first mandemus. She seems to think it is erased from the record but I'm guessing she is incorrect about that since she is wrong about most things.

The clerk's rejection letter said the first mandemus could not be "processed." It was bounced. The court may lodge (but not file) it in the court record, but it won't be considered on the merits.

raicha · **Posted:** Tue Nov 08, 2011 10:19 pm

Yeah, just like when Judge Lamberth called her out on the fraudulently obtained documents. She just files a new POS and leaves out the part that was "misunderstood".

So this new argument is: the President released the document just days before you, this court, were to hear my case. That creates a a danger that you were unfairly influenced by a document that had nothing to do with the issue in the appeal: standing. Therefore, you must allow me to inspect the document and keep Obama off the ballot even though you have not issued an opinion that indicates what influence anyone at all had upon this court.

Makes perfect sense.

DeeLite · **Posted:** Tue Nov 08, 2011 11:10 pm

this woman is nothing but a train-wreck.

wish we could just deport her for treason.

Mr. Gneiss · **Joined:** Sat Jan 01, 2011 1:37 am **Posts:** 566

Quote:

My computer was wiped up,

Can anyone help me out? What is a "wiped up" computer? Thankfully for us, it didn't wipe up before she sent the 9th her 151 pages of zibits.

Sterngard Friegen · **Posted:** Wed Nov 09, 2011 12:06 am

Mr. Gneiss wrote:

Quote:

My computer was wiped up,

Can anyone help me out? What is a "wiped up" computer? Thankfully for us, it didn't wipe up before she sent the 9th her 151 pages of zibits.

What's on the 9th page of the Human Virus's zibits?

Somerset · **Posted:** Wed Nov 09, 2011 12:45 am

jtmunkus wrote:

Taitz wrote:

Today was a tough day. I had to stay up all night to submit this petition and 151 pages of exhibits....

Now I am in my office working with my patients...

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=27372

Pity the poor Orbot sitting in that chair (even more than usual!!)!!

:((

Amen to that!

What I really like about this latest poopie is how much time she wasted generating it, and how quickly and efficiently the US Attorneys were able respond to it. It's nice to see O'rly's grand magnum opus answered with a three paragraph response that basically says, "read what we submitted yesterday." :-bd

nycpeter · **Joined:** Mon Aug 08, 2011 3:50 pm **Posts:** 306

GreatGrey · **Posted:** Wed Nov 09, 2011 1:17 am

nycpeter wrote:

Yoo Hoo, Orly... look familiar? :lol:

Puppy has an itchy Yahoo?

Plutodog · **Posted:** Wed Nov 09, 2011 2:14 am

realist wrote:

New Docket Entry...

Quote:

11/08/2011 55 Filed (ECF) Appellees Joseph R. Biden, Hillary Rodham Clinton, Robert M. Gates, Barack Hussein Obama and Michelle L.R. Obama in 09-56827, 10-55084 response opposing motion (,motion for miscellaneous relief (to be used only if no other relief applies)). Date of service: 11/08/2011. [7959100] [09-56827, 10-55084] (REW)

Shouldn't Jack have water-marked this? :-k

GreatGrey · **Posted:** Wed Nov 09, 2011 2:15 am

Plutodog wrote:

realist wrote:

New Docket Entry...

Quote:

11/08/2011 55 Filed (ECF) Appellees Joseph R. Biden, Hillary Rodham Clinton, Robert M. Gates, Barack Hussein Obama and Michelle L.R. Obama in 09-56827, 10-55084 response opposing motion (,motion for miscellaneous relief (to be used only if no other relief applies)). Date of service: 11/08/2011. [7959100] [09-56827, 10-55084] (REW)

Shouldn't Jack have water-marked this? :-k

Not a transcript, it's on Pacer.

A Legal Lohengrin · **Joined:** Tue Oct 26, 2010 9:56 pm **Posts:** 9364

Somerset wrote:

jtmunkus wrote:

Taitz wrote:

Today was a tough day. I had to stay up all night to submit this petition and 151 pages of exhibits....

Now I am in my office working with my patients...

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=27372

Isn't this admission of malpractice, should any of her so-called patients sue her for whatever dental incompetence she no doubt committed? "I was so busy being a complete nutcase the night previously that I jerked out the wrong teeth and did a dental cleaning with a Roto-Rooter."

jtmunkus · **Joined:** Mon May 23, 2011 7:33 pm **Posts:** 3497

A Legal Lohengrin wrote:

Isn't this admission of malpractice, should any of her so-called patients sue her for whatever dental incompetence she no doubt committed? "I was so busy being a complete nutcase the night previously that I jerked out the wrong teeth and did a dental cleaning with a Roto-Rooter."

I suspect her "practice" consists of the other two dentists visiting once a week to handle the "patients," who likely consist of a very small representative handful of idiot birther supporters - or the other dentists' own clients.

Plutodog · **Posted:** Wed Nov 09, 2011 2:58 am

Offtopic :

I had a tooth ground down and fitted with temp crown. Numb is just about gone now. The outer side at the base seems to be sticking out a bit (can barely reach and feel the sharp edge with my tongue when i travel it over the teeth and onto the outside). Also, I feel the pressure on top a little, something like it felt before the tooth originally sheared off. Izzat all normal/not to be worried about for the 10 days until the permanent crown is ready?

jtmunkus · **Joined:** Mon May 23, 2011 7:33 pm **Posts:** 3497

Plutodog wrote:

Offtopic :

I had a tooth ground down and fitted with temp crown. Numb is just about gone now. The outer side at the base seems to be sticking out a bit (can barely reach and feel the sharp edge with my tongue when i travel it over the teeth and onto the outside). Also, I feel the pressure on top a little, something like it felt before the tooth originally sheared off. Izzat all normal/not to be worried about for the 10 days until the permanent crown is ready?

Yeah, and the temp feels unnecessarily rough and tastes funny, right? I hate that.

Plutodog · **Posted:** Wed Nov 09, 2011 3:13 am

jtmunkus wrote:

Plutodog wrote:

Offtopic :

I had a tooth ground down and fitted with temp crown. Numb is just about gone now. The outer side at the base seems to be sticking out a bit (can barely reach and feel the sharp edge with my tongue when i travel it over the teeth and onto the outside). Also, I feel the pressure on top a little, something like it felt before the tooth originally sheared off. Izzat all normal/not to be worried about for the 10 days until the permanent crown is ready?

Yeah, and the temp feels unnecessarily rough and tastes funny, right? I hate that.

Actually it's pretty much smooth on most of its surfaces, and without cutting edges like real teeth. Making the ones on each side seem sharper, rougher than before. :-k

raicha · **Posted:** Wed Nov 09, 2011 4:46 am

Offtopic :

It's temporary, so it is going to have rough edges and weirdness. No one tried to make it perfect. When you get ther permanent crown, that will feel weird too for a while but you will get used to it. Don't worry, be happy.

Sterngard Friegen · **Posted:** Wed Nov 09, 2011 8:58 am

Offtopic :

'dog - Call (949) 766-7687 for an appointment and get a second opinion.

Somerset · **Posted:** Wed Nov 09, 2011 9:19 am

Sterngard Friegen wrote:

Offtopic :

'dog - Call (949) 766-7687 for an appointment and get a second opinion.

Plutodog · **Posted:** Wed Nov 09, 2011 4:23 pm

Sterngard Friegen wrote:

Offtopic :

'dog - Call (949) 766-7687 for an appointment and get a second opinion.

Now I KNOW you didn't steer me at the Chaleria Chair of Lurve, Stern?
[-X

realist · **Joined:** Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm **Posts:** 23557

Amendment to a previous Docket Entry...

Quote:

11/03/2011
51
COURT DELETED ENTRY PER REQUEST FROM COUNSEL. Original Text: Submitted (ECF) Letter brief for review. Submitted by Appellants Capt. Pamela Barnett, Richard Norton Bauerbach, Capt. Robin D. Biron, Col. John D. Blair, Mr. David L. Bosley, Ms. Loretta G. Bosley, Capt. Harry G. Butler, Rep. Glenn Casada, Jennifer Leah Clark, Timothy Comerford, Charles Crusemire, Thomas S. Davidson, Rep. Cynthia Davis, Matthew Michael Edwards, Lt. Jason Freese, Mr. Kurt C. Fuqua, Officer Clint Grimes, Julliett Ireland, D. Andrew Johnson, Israel D. Jones, Timothy Jones, Alan Keyes, Ph. D., David Fullmer LaRoque, Gail Lightfoot, Lita M. Lott, Major David Grant Mosby, Steven Kay Neuenschwander, Frank Niceley, Robert Lee Perry, Col. Harry Riley, Sgt. Jeffrey Wayne Rosner, Capt. David Smithey, John Bruce Steidel, Douglas Earl Stoeppelwerth, Rep. Eric Swafford, Capt. Neil B. Turner, Richard E. Venable, Jeff Graham Winthrope and Mark Wriggle in 10-55084. Date of service: 11/03/2011. [7953875] [10-55084, 09-56827] (OT)

Document 51 was, of course, her original "Petition" with all her lies to the Court which the DOJ so clearly pointed out.

Mr. Gneiss · **Joined:** Sat Jan 01, 2011 1:37 am **Posts:** 566

Did Orly just say "OOPS" too?

Sorry folks. I'll stop at two.

Clairez · **Posted:** Tue Nov 15, 2011 1:15 am

I think there may be a dissertation that could be written on Mrs. Yoshi Tatiz's use of commas and spaces in her legal filings.

Someone who is working on a Psychology doctorate should look into this. :idea:

raicha · **Posted:** Sun Dec 18, 2011 4:36 pm

Butterfly Bilderberg wrote:

kate520 wrote:

Is the 9thCircuit ever going to release their decision? It's been 6 months.

The average time for the Ninth Circuit is 12 - 18 months. Personally, I'm gunning for 18 months. Sometime around November 2012 would suit me fine.

I think it would be nice if it were sooner.

I had predicted that the 9th would eventually release an opinion that would find against the appellants but leave the door open for a proper candidate-challenger to bring a claim under a state election law. However, now I am convinced that the court will also come down strongly and rule that this is a political question, left to the Electoral College and Congress.

If that decision were to be released now, it would be appealed to SCOTUS and might be dealt with expeditiously.

But whether it happens now or later, the decision will not help the birthers in the 2012 election cycle.

realist · **Joined:** Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm **Posts:** 23557

Orly posted a letter she penned to the Chief Justice of the 9th Circuit (it is not docketed) but may be viewed here

For whatever reason, Kreep responded (it is on the docket).

Quote:

12/20/2011 56 Filed (ECF) Appellants Wiley S. Drake and Markham Robinson in 09-56827 Correspondence: Opposition To Notice of a Related CAse. Date of service: 12/20/2011 [8007630] [09-56827, 10-55084] (GGK)

Falsehoods unchallenged only fester and grow.

BARNETT|KEYES v. OBAMA - II - DISCUSSION (9th Cir.)

Who is online